:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:誰是臺大學生﹖--性別、省籍與城鄉差異
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:駱明慶 引用關係
作者(外文):Luoh, Ming-ching
出版日期:2002
卷期:30:1
頁次:頁113-147
主題關鍵詞:臺灣大學性別省籍城鄉差異National Taiwan UniversityGenderEthnicityUrban/rural discrepancy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(96) 博士論文(13) 專書(2) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:94
  • 共同引用共同引用:237
  • 點閱點閱:224
     本文使用1954-2000年臺大學生的學籍資料,描述臺大學生的性別、省籍和城鄉差異,並探討大學聯考的篩選效果。首先,臺大學生的女性比例在1960年代末期就已經和男性相當接近,此與一般大學生由男女大幅差異而逐漸接近的趨勢不同。在省籍分布方面,1954-1991年間,約36%的臺大學生為外省籍。臺大學生為外省籍的比例雖逐漸下降,但省籍間的差異仍然顯著存在。外省人在成為臺大學生的優勢上,又比成為大學生的優勢為大。在城鄉差異方面,1997-2000年間,相較於全國平均的0.89%,3.06%的臺北市人口和6.10%的大安區人口會成為臺大學生,臺東縣的比例則只有0.19%。各縣市成為臺大學生機率的差異程度,也明顯大於各縣市成為大學生機率的差異程度。另一方面,82%的臺大學生來自前20所明星高中,受大學教育機會的篩選過程,在高中階段就已開始。此外,迴歸分析顯示,各縣市的家庭背景和教育支出等變數,僅能解釋不到五分之一的縣市差異。而臺大法學院學生的背景資料顯示,42%的父親和27%的母親為大學畢業生,父親或母親為公教人員的比例高達42%,均遠高於大學生和一般人口的比例。綜合言之,考上大學與省籍、父母教育程度和居住在臺北市或其他城市正相關,而考上臺大與這些變數的相關程度又更大。對照低學費政策下學費成本與聯考分數大致程負相關的現象,我國現行分配大學教育機會的方式,至少在學費負擔的公平性上是值得懷疑的。
     Using student records between 1954 and 2000, this paper investigates the gender, ethnic and urban/rural composition of NTU students, and discusses the selection effect of the University Entrance Examination. First, the proportion of female students has been fairly close to that of male students since the late 1960s. This differs from the gender composition of college students generally for which female students consist of a smaller but increasing proportion of the student population. Second, 36% of NTU students are Mainlanders. Although the gap between Mainlanders and Taiwanese has decreased, it is still significant. Being a mainlander increase one's prospects of becoming an NTU student more than it increases the prospect of simply becoming a college student. For the years 1997-2000, compared to a national average of 0.89%, the probability of becoming a NTU student for an 18-year-old in Taipei city is 3.06%, while the probability for Ta-An district is 6.10% and only 0.19% for Taitung county. The variation of the likelihood of entering NTU among counties is greater than that of entering colleges. In fact, the competition begins at an earlier stage where 82% of NTU students are from the top 20 senior high schools. In addition, regression results show that aggregate county level data can explain less than one-fifth of the variation. Moreover, data for the current students show that, compared to other college students and the 18-to-22-year-old population, parents of NTU students are much better educated and are much more likely to be government employees. In contrast to the fact that college tuition is negatively associated with the examination scores, the probability of entering NTU is positively associated with family background. This casts doubts on the equity of college education in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Betts, J. R.(1995)。Does school quality matter? Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth。The Review of Economics and Statistics,77(2),231-50。  new window
2.于若蓉、朱敬一(19980300)。臺大「惠我良多」?--論各大學畢業生初出校門的表現。經濟論文叢刊,26(1),65-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Tsai, Shu-Ling、Gates, Hill、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1994)。Schooling Taiwan's Women: Educational Attainment in the Mid-20th Century。Sociology of Education,67,243-263。  new window
4.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊,29(2),117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡淑鈴、瞿海源(19930700)。Educational Attainment in Taiwan: Comparisons of Ethnic Groups。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,3(2),188-202。  延伸查詢new window
6.薛承泰(19961000)。影響國初中後教育分流的實證分析:性別、省籍、與家庭背景的差異。臺灣社會學刊,20,49-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳乃德(19971200)。檳榔和拖鞋,西裝及皮鞋:臺灣階級流動的族群差異及原因。臺灣社會學研究,1,137-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Card, D.、Krueger, A. B.(1992)。Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States。Journal of Political Economy,100(1),1-40。  new window
9.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
10.張清溪(1992)。臺灣教育機會均等的歷史趨勢。經濟論文叢刊,20(1),23-50。  延伸查詢new window
11.Krueger, A. B.、Card, D.(1992)。School quality and black-white relative earnings: a direct assessment。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,107(1),151-200。  new window
12.楊瑩(1982)。從大專學生家庭背景論照顧低收入家庭子女就學之途徑。社會建設,46,41-53。  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡裕敏(1982)。臺灣大專學生家庭背景分析。臺灣銀行季刊,33(4),234-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Card, D.、Krueger, A. B.(1996)。School resources and student outcomes: an overview of the literature and new evidence from North and South Carolina。The Journal of Economic Perspectives,10(4),31-50。  new window
15.Hanushek, E. A.(1986)。The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools。Journal of Economic Literature,24(3),1141-1177。  new window
16.Rozada, M. G.、Menendez, A.(2001)。Public university in Argentina: subsidizing the rich?。Economics of Education Review。  new window
研究報告
1.陳聽安(1981)。大專院校學費之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林荔華(1982)。教育與經濟公平:教育機會、家庭背景與個人所得之分析,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stiglitz, Joseph(1988)。Economics of the Public Sector。New York:Norton & Company, Inc。  new window
2.大學教育改革促進會(1993)。台灣高等教育白皮書。臺北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.成嘉玲(1991)。公私立大學畢業生所得與就業之比較研究--兼論政府對公私立大學教育投資的效率。臺北:行政院青輔會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Coleman, James S.、Campbell, Ernest Q.、Hobson, Carol J.、McPartland, James、Mood, Alexander M.、Weinfeld, Frederic D.、York, Robert L.(1966)。Equality of educational opportunity。U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
5.張清溪(1995)。九十年來的臺灣學校教育。臺灣經濟發展論文集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.大學入學考試試務委員會(1978)。大學入學考試試務委員會工作報告。大學入學考試試務委員會工作報告。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.國立臺灣大學教務處(1954)。國立臺灣大學學生名冊。國立臺灣大學學生名冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.臺灣省政府教育廳(1968)。臺灣省教育統計,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林忠正、林鶴玲(1993)。臺灣地區各族群的經濟差異。族群關係與國家認同。台北:業強出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡淑鈴(1988)。社會地位取得:山地、閩客及外省之比較。變遷中的台灣社會:第一次社會變遷基本調查資料的分析。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧政春(1995)。利益團體與社會福利資源分配,透視我國軍公教福利。台灣的社會福利:民間觀點 \\ 中華民國現代社會福利協會(編輯)。台北:五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE