:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:滾石不生苔?臺灣勞力市場中的工作經歷對薪資的影響
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:蔡瑞明 引用關係林大森 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsay, Ruey-mingLin, Da-sen
出版日期:2002
卷期:29
頁次:頁57-95
主題關鍵詞:工作經歷勞力市場薪資先前經驗職業經驗公司年資現職年資Work experienceLabor marketWagePrevious experienceOccupational experienceFirm tenurePositional tenure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:112
本文的主要目的在於探究勞力市場中勞動者的「工作經歷」(經驗和年資) 對其職業成就 (薪資) 的影響。過去的研究在分析薪資取得的過程時,通常把焦點放在個人與結構的特質,因而忽略了勞動者在公司或行業中所累積的工作經歷的作用。本文試圖透過對工作經歷的精細定義來探討這個議題。本文提出四個指標來測量「工作經歷」:先前經驗、職業經驗、公司年資、現職年資,以便解析這些工作經歷對勞動者薪資的影響狀況。本文分析的結果發現勞工在職業上的經驗比在同一公司工作的時間對於薪資來得有影響力,同一個職業的年資可以有持續的效果。這一點顯示出台灣勞工在公司內的年資的累積效果並不佳,但是持續在同一個職業場域的轉業對於薪資有正面的作用。整體而言,大多數受雇於中小企業的台灣勞工的處境是,在一個公司待得久,對其薪資的提升並沒有很大的助益,並且轉業所付出的代價並不是很高。
The main purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of work experience of Taiwan's workers on their earning. In analyzing the determination of job wage, previous literature often focuses on the effects of individual and structural attributes. Thus researchers of labor markets tend to ignore the effects of work experience, including such as the tenure either in a firm or in an industry. We take up this issue by elaborating the detailed definition of work experience. We classify the characteristics of work experience into four indicators: Previous Experience, Occupational Experience, Firm Tenure, and Positional Tenure, and analyze their effects on wage. The results show that occupational experience, measured by the tenure of one's current occupation, has the strongest influence in the process of wage determination. This result indicates that the accumulated tenure in the same firm does not always pay off. In addition, the price of inter-firm mobility is not as high as one has expected.
期刊論文
1.蔡明璋(19940600)。地區家庭收入的決定因素 : 區域階層化的初步分析。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),231-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Reskin, Barbara(1993)。Sex Segregation in the Workplace。Annual Review of Sociology,19(1),241-270。  new window
3.黃毅志(20010600)。臺灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討:流動表分析。臺灣社會學刊,25,157-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Baron, James N.、Bielby, William T.(1980)。Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work。American Sociological Review,45(5),737-765。  new window
5.張苙雲(19890800)。行政組織內的個人事業生涯發展。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,66,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
6.Tam, Tony(1997)。Sex Segregation and Occupational Gender Inequality in The United States: Devaluation or Specialized Training?。American Journal of Sociology,102(6),1652-1692。  new window
7.Wright, E. O.、Perrone, L.(1977)。Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality。American Sociological Review,42(1),32-55。  new window
8.熊瑞梅、黃毅志(19921200)。社會資源與小資本階級。中國社會學刊,16,107-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Barnett, William P.、Baron, James N.、Stuart, Toby E.(2000)。Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California civil service。American Journal of Sociology,106(1),88-144。  new window
10.莊奕琦、許碧峰(19990600)。臺灣不同規模廠商工資差異之實證分析。經濟論文叢刊,27(2),241-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.謝國雄(19890600)。黑手變頭家--臺灣製造業中的階級流動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(2),11-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.譚令蒂、于若蓉(19960600)。雙元勞動市場模型的應用--兼論臺灣婦女就業結構的改變。經濟論文叢刊,24(2),275-311。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.謝國雄(19931100)。事頭、頭家與立業基之活化:臺灣小型製造單位創立及存活過程之研究。臺灣社會研究季刊,15,93-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Konda, S. L.、Stewman, S.(1983)。Careers and Organizational Labor Markets: Demographic Models of Organizational Behavior。American Journal of Sociology,88,637-685。  new window
15.Neal, D.(1995)。Industry-Specific Human Capital: Evidence from Displaced Workers。Journal of Labor Economic,13(4),653-677。  new window
16.蔡瑞明(1999)。臺灣、美國與日本社會流動的結構分析。臺灣社會學刊,22,83-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Costello, C.、Wright, E. O.、Hachen, D.、Sprague, J.(1982)。The American Class Structure。American Sociological Review,47(6),709-726。  new window
18.Van Buren, M. E.、Kalleberg, A. L.(1996)。Is Bigger Better? Explaining the Relationship between Organization Size and Job Rewards。American Sociological Review,61(1),47-66。  new window
19.Neal, D.(1999)。The Complexity of Job Mobility Among Young Men。Journal of Labor Economics,17(2),237-261。  new window
20.王德睦、蔡勇美、王篤強、呂朝賢(1999)。薪資所得公平分配判斷原則及其相關因素。臺灣社會學刊,22,47-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Stolzenberg, R. M.(1978)。Bringing the Boss Back In: Employer Size, Employee Schooling, and Socioeconomic Achievement。American Sociological Review,43(6),813-828。  new window
22.Neal, D.(1998)。The Link Between Ability and Specialization: An Explanation for Observed Correlations Between Wages and Mobility Rates。The Journal of Human Resources,33(1),173-200。  new window
23.Lazear, E. P.(1995)。A Jobs-based Analysis of Labor Markets。The American Economic Review,85,260-265。  new window
會議論文
1.蘇國賢(2000)。轉入及轉出自雇從業身份的生涯路徑分析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉正、Sakamoto, Arthur、楊文山(1996)。教育年數與企業規模對薪資產生的邊際效果:以臺灣地區為例的模型分析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.瞿海源(1998)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃:第三期第三次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC-86-2418-H-001-001-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lazear, E. P.(1995)。Personnel Economics。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Wright, Erik Olin(1985)。Classes。New York, NY:New Left Books。  new window
3.DiPrete, Thomas A.(1989)。The Bureaucratic Labor Market: The Case of the Federal Civil Service。Plenum Press。  new window
4.Rosenbaum, J. E.(1984)。Career Mobility in a Corporate Hierarchy。New York, NY:Orlando, FL:Academic Press:Academic Press。  new window
5.Goldthorpe, John H.(2000)。On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.Sewell, William H.、Hauser, Robert M.(1975)。Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
8.Becker, Gary Stanley(1993)。Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Breiger, R. L.(1990)。Social mobility and social structure。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
11.許嘉猶(1994)。階級結構的分類,定位與估計:臺灣與美國實證研究之比較。階級結構與階級意識比較研究論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.Tan, Wenfang、Parish, W. L.(2000)。Taiwan and China Compared。Chinese Urban Life Under Reform: The Changing Social Control。Cambridge。  new window
13.Jencks, C.(1979)。Who Get Ahead?。Who Get Ahead?。NY。  new window
14.(1981)。Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets。Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets。NY。  new window
15.隅谷三喜男(1995)。勞動-低工資結構的祕密。臺灣之經濟:典型NIES之成就與問題。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Topel, R. H.(1986)。Job Mobility, Search, and Earnings Growth: A Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions。Research in Labor Economics。London, UK。  new window
17.Lazear, E. P.(1992)。The Job as a Concept。Performance Measurement, Evaluation, and Incentives。Boston, MA。  new window
18.小池洋一(1992)。技術基礎的形成。臺灣的工業化:國際加工基地的形成。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.嚴祥鸞(1995)。美國高學歷科技人才的就業型態與薪資報酬:性別差異之分析。美國與台灣社會結構研究。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭新煌(1994)。新中產階級與資本主義:台灣、美國與瑞典的初步比較。階級結構與階級意識比較研究論文集。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫清山、黃毅志(1995)。教育、收入與社會資源和階級取得過程之關連。台灣社會研究的回顧與前瞻。台中:東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡瑞明、林大森(2000)。教育與勞力市場的連結:以臺灣的教育分流為例。市場、階級與政治:變遷中的華人社會。香港:中文大學香港亞太研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡瑞明(1997)。台灣階級結構變遷與社會流動。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝雨生、鄭宜仲(1995)。多元迴歸分析的假定與實例檢討:多元線性重合現象的診斷與處理。社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.林忠正(1989)。臺灣階層結構、政府角色與所得分配之關係:一個初步的探討。臺灣社會現象的分析:家庭、人口、政策與階層。臺北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE