:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生選擇多元入學管道因素之探討:以四技為例
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:林大森 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Da-sen
出版日期:2010
卷期:55:3
頁次:頁89-122
主題關鍵詞:大學多元入學方案四技技職教育高等教育Multiple college entrance programFour-year institutes of technologyTechnological and vocational educationHigher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:624
  • 點閱點閱:144
摘要: 關於「大學多元入學方案」的相關討論,為近年來相當重要的研究議題。雖然累積了很多成果,但關注於技職體系的學術研究則相當罕見。本文以高等技職教育體系(四技)為研究對象,採用「臺灣高等教育資料庫」九十四學年度四技新生資料,分析家庭背景、高中職經歷如何影響個人選擇推薦甄選、登記分發、申請入學三大入學管道。研究發現:一、父母教育程度較高者,經由申請入學機會較大;二、相較於登記分發,推薦甄選以及申請入學者,較重視師長與親友之建議;三、人文學門中,推薦甄選途徑者較大機會錄取公立技職院校,而申請入學者則是在自然學門較容易考上公立技職院校。
Abstract: One of the most widely investigated research topics in recent years concerns student participation in the Multiple College Entrance Program. Although many researchers have examined this topic, few studies have examined how this issue relates to students studying in the technological and vocational education system. The present study examined students studying in four-year institutes of technology. Utilizing a survey of freshmen conducted in 2005 as part of the Taiwan Higher Education Database, the present study analyzed how family background and high school experiences affected students’ choices for the three major channels of admission: recommendation and screening, registration and placement, and application. The main findings were: (1) Students whose parents have a higher than average level of education have more opportunities to apply for university by application. (2) Students who take advantage of the recommendation and screening or application admission channels are likely to rely on teachers’ and friends’ suggestions or opinions. (3) For departments in the fields of arts and humanities at public institutes of technology, more students entered via the recommendation and screening channel. At the same time, applicants are easily allowed for applications to public Institute of Technology in departments of Sciences.
期刊論文
1.Davies, Scott、Guppy, Neil(1997)。Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education。Social Forces,75(4),1417-1438。  new window
2.Elliot, K. M.、Healy, M. A.(2001)。Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention。Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,10(4),1-11。  new window
3.田弘華、田芳華(20081200)。大學多元入學制度下不同入學管道之大一新生特性比較。人文及社會科學集刊,20(4),481-511。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Charles, Maria、Bradley, Karen(2002)。Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education。American Sociological Review,67(4),573-599。  new window
5.田芳華、傅祖壇(20090300)。大學多元入學制度:學生家庭社經背景與學業成就之比較。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),209-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林大森(20060100)。技術學院與科技大學新生主修科系轉換之分析。教育與社會研究,10,93-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Carbonaro, W.(2005)。Tracking, students' effort, and academic achievement。Sociology of Education,78(1),27-49。  new window
8.England, Paula、Li, Su(2006)。Desegregation stalled: The changing gender composition of college majors, 1971-2002。Gender and Society,20(5),657-677。  new window
9.Theodore, L.、Cheng, S.-Y.(2006)。Tracking, expectations, and the transformation of vocational education。American Journal of Education,113(1),67-101。  new window
10.黃毅志(20090900)。國際新職業量表在臺灣教育研究中的適用性:本土化與國際化的考量。教育科學研究期刊,54(3),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳怡靖、陳密桃、黃毅志(20060900)。臺灣地區高中多元入學與教育機會的關聯性之實徵研究。教育與心理研究,29(3),433-459。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張新堂(20020700)。大學多元入學方案的挑戰及因應途徑。教育資料與研究,47,126-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.丁慕玉(20061200)。科技大學多元入學之學生對於不同校院系學業成就的探討--以虎尾科技大學為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報,25(4),71-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.董銘惠、黃燕飛(20020300)。臺北科技大學四技多元入學學生學業成就之比較研究。臺北科技大學學報,35(1),351-362。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.魏璽倫、侯勝茂、楊銘欽(20050900)。多元入學醫學生之學習表現。醫學教育,9(3),262-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陶宏麟、林瓊華、陳昌媛(20021200)。大學推薦甄選制度下的高中參與行為分析。教育研究資訊,10(6),63-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.李奉儒、詹家惠(20020900)。檢視高中多元入學方案--批判教學論觀點。教育研究月刊,101,60-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Jencks, C.、Crouse, J.、Mueser, P.(1983)。The Wisconsin model of status attainment: A national replication with improved measures of ability and aspiration。Sociology of Education,56(1),3-19。  new window
19.Pratt, P.、Evans, D.(2002)。Assessment of the utility of parents as sources of information about the college decisions of their children。College and University,77(4),9-12。  new window
20.張鈿富、葉連祺、張奕華(20050800)。大學多元入學方案對入學機會之影響。教育政策論壇,8(2),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Broekemier, G. M.(2002)。A comparison of two-year and four-year adult students: motivations to attend college and the importance of choice criteria。Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,12(1),31-48。  new window
22.Gamoran, A.(1992)。The variable effects of high school tracking。American Sociological Review,57(6),812-828。  new window
23.楊瑞明(20041000)。四技二專多元入學問題之探討。技術及職業教育,83,47-54。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉正、陳建州(20071200)。臺灣高等教育學習領域之性別區隔與變遷:1972-2003。教育與心理研究,30(4),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.曹亮吉(19940300)。大學多元入學方案之建立。教育研究資訊,2(2),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Useem, E. L.(1992)。Middle schools and math groups: parents' involvement in children's placement。Sociology of Education,65(4),263-279。  new window
27.陳建州、劉正(20041200)。論多元入學方案之教育機會均等性。教育研究集刊,50(4),115-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.楊瑩(19940500)。臺灣地區不同家庭背景子女受教機會差異之研究。教育研究資訊,2(3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃毅志、陳俊瑋(20080300)。學科補習、成績表現與升學結果--以學測成績與上公立大學為例。教育研究集刊,54(1),117-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.李文益(20040600)。文化資本、多元入學管道與學生學習表現--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.林大森(19990300)。臺灣地區家庭背景對中等教育分流的影響:「高中/高職」與「公立/私立」差異的探討。東吳社會學報,8,35-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Lucas, Samuel R.(2001)。Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects。American Journal of Sociology,106(6),1642-1690。  new window
33.秦夢群(20040800)。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇,7(2),59-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.林生傳(20041200)。臺灣近期教育改革的透視與省思。教育學刊,23,1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.林大森(20020400)。高中/高職的公立/私立分流對地位取得之影響。教育與心理研究,25(上),35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳武典(20050300)。臺灣教育改革的經驗與分析--以九年一貫課程和多元入學方案為例。當代教育研究季刊,13(1),35-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.蔡淑鈴(20040600)。高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。臺灣社會學,7,47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.黃毅志(20080600)。如何精確測量職業地位?--「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),151-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.周文賢、江文雄、鄭增財、江義平、陳瑞榮、陳淑均(2003)。技專校院考招分離制度實施之成效追蹤研究。中國技術學院學報,25,1-17。  延伸查詢new window
40.林大森(2007)。職校學生晉升四技二專之主修流動:流動表之應用。師大學報:教育類,52(1),111-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.林騰蛟(1996)。技(藝)能優良保甄制度之現況與檢討。技術及職業教育雙月刊,32,7-12。  延伸查詢new window
42.柯嚴賀(2003)。「高中及高職多元入學方案」評析。教育研究,11,137-148。  延伸查詢new window
43.馬信行(2002)。教育改革研究成果之綜合分析。教育政策論壇,5(2),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.孫建行、鄭增財(2004)。技專校院考招分離入學制度現況調查研究。中華技術學院學報,31,39-50。  延伸查詢new window
45.許聰鑫(2005)。專科學校採行推薦甄選制對學生來源與學習成效的影響-以南開技術學院為例。師大學報:教育類,50(1),139-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.陶宏麟、陳昌媛、林瓊華(2001)。大學院校參與大學推薦甄選分析。教育研究資訊,9(5),175-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.黃燕飛(2001)。技專校院考招分離制度改進方向。技術及職業教育雙月刊,65,24-27。  延伸查詢new window
48.楊朝祥(2000)。高職五專多元入學方案之規劃與實施。立法院院聞,28(2),15-21。  延伸查詢new window
49.楊朝祥(2001)。高中/職多元入學變革六面向總檢討。國家政策論壇,1(7),147-152。  延伸查詢new window
50.廖年淼(1999)。大學與二技推薦甄選入學方式之比較。技術及職業教育雙月刊,50,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
51.廖年淼(2000)。二技推薦甄選入學方式之研究。教育研究資訊,8(1),55-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.鄭宇辰、李孟智、李鴻森、林隆堯、藍琴臺、曹昌堯等(2006)。中山醫學大學醫學系推薦甄試生與分發入學學生的回溯性比較研究。醫學教育,10(4),301-312。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.Barbara, F. T., Charles, L. O.,、Patricia, M. M.(2005)。The role of HBCUs in the college choice process of African Americans in California。The Journal of Negro Education,74(1),63-75。  new window
54.Bers, T.,、Galowich, P.(2003)。Parents and the college choice process for community college students。Journal of Applied Research in the Community College,10(1),24-40。  new window
55.Broekemier, G.,、Seshadri, S.(1999)。Differences in college choice criteria between deciding students and their parents。Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,9(3),1-13。  new window
56.Callahan, R. M.(2005)。Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn。American Educational Research Journal,42(2),305-328。  new window
57.Gerber, T. P.,、Schaefer, D. R.(2004)。Horizontal stratification of higher education in Russia: Trends, gender differences, and labor market outcomes。Sociology of Education,77,32-59。  new window
58.Ono, H.(2001)。Who goes to college? Features of institutional tracking in Japanese higher education。American Journal of Education,109(2),161-195。  new window
59.Venkatakrishnan, H.、Wiliam, D.(2003)。Tracking and mixed-ability grouping in secondary school mathematics classrooms: A case study。British Educational Research Journal,29(2),189-204。  new window
60.Wayne, S.(2002)。The returns to school quality: College choice and earnings。Journal of Labor Economics,20(3),475-503。  new window
61.Hallinan, M. T.(1992)。The organization of students for instruction in the middle school.。Sociology of Education,,65,,114-127.。  new window
圖書
1.劉清田、黃世欽、林舜天(1999)。甄試入學技優生、學優生與高中生之學習輔導、追蹤與改進方案研究。沒有紀錄:國立台灣科技大學技職教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Crowson, R. L.、Boyd, W. L.、Mawhinney, H. B.(1996)。The Politics of Education and the New Institutionalism: Reinventing the American school。New York, NY:Routledge Falmer。  new window
3.Green, K. C.(1992)。After the Boom: Management Majors in the 1990s。After the Boom: Management Majors in the 1990s。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Goldthorpe, John H.(2000)。On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Oakes, J.(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Birmingham, NY:New Haven:Vail-Ballou Press:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Lucas, Samual R.(1999)。Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
7.薛承泰(2003)。十年教改為誰築夢。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.周祝瑛(20030000)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改?。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部技職司(2000)。二十一世紀技職教育政策白皮書。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育部技職司(2010)。99 學年度四技二專多元入學進路指南。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝小芩、陳佩英、林大森(2009)。科系性別區隔—綜合大學與技職校院學生的比較。台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.Borum, F.,、Westenholz, A.(1995)。The incorporation of multiple institutional models: Organizational field multiplicity and the role of actors。The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
14.Meyer, H. D.,、Rowan, B. Eds..(2007)。The new institutionalism in education。New York。  new window
其他
1.徐明珠(2003)。聯考與多元入學問題探討,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/092/EC-B-092-001.htm, 2006/11/29。  new window
2.技專校院招生策進總會(2009)。九十八學年度四技二專各聯合招生委員會錄取率一覽表。  延伸查詢new window
3.技專院校招生策進總會(2009)。98 學年度四技申請入學聯合招生簡章,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2009)。中華民國教育統計(九十八學年度版),臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部統計處(2009)。大學聯招(指考)錄取率。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Brint, Steven、Karabel, Jerome(1991)。Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.謝小芩(1993)。教育活動與學校組織。社會組織。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王秀槐(2009)。多元入學管道下大學生科系選擇的確定度與滿意度。台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE