:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:權力下放與教師的專業自主--港臺兩地教育改革的經驗與思考
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:黎萬紅盧乃桂
作者(外文):Lai, Man-hongLo, Leslie N. K.
出版日期:2002
卷期:48:4
頁次:頁53-74
主題關鍵詞:分權教育改革教師專業化DecentralizationEducational reformTeacher professionalization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:234
  • 點閱點閱:42
     面對全球化的衝擊,港臺兩地均積極進行教育改革。權力下放以及提高教師的專 業自主性,成為了兩地教育改革共通的主要政策方向。在權力下放政策下,兩地中央政府的 角色獲得了重新的定位,地方教育部門的角色日形重要,校本管理更成為重要的改革措施。 綜觀兩地的經驗,教育分權充其量是介乎分散與委派管理的狀態。在多重機構權力重新定位 的情境下,在學校層面,增加了各特分者的參與機會,然而,香港教師的參與代表性非常低 ,臺灣學校引入了較多的家長及教師的參與,學校微觀政治卻日趨複雜。面對日趨複雜的工 作環境,兩地教師的脆弱性日增。要真正釋放教師的專業空間,相信需要政策及學校層面的 改革配合。教師的增權,仍是兩地一條漫長的追尋道路。
     Hong Kong and Taiwan have initiated reform efforts in their educational system in an attempt to cope with the challenges of globalization. Decentralization and teacher professionalization have been among the major policy changes in educational policy. Under the new policies, the roles of the state and local educational departments have indeed changed, and their responsibilities in education have been altered. School-based management has been used as a major strategy for facilitating educational reform. In the course of decentralizing power and shifting responsibilities to the schools, the state of affairs in both educatonal systems can be characterized as progressing from deconcentration to delegation. At the school level, the participation of various stakeholders has been enhanced; however, unlike that in Taiwan, the participation of Hong Kong teachers is considered low. In Taiwan, parents and teachers have stronger involvement in school affairs, but micro-politics have also given rise to complications with regard to operations. Having to face the challenges of micro-politics in school, the vulnerability of the teachers in these two societies has become more apparent. There is a need for further reform at both the policy and school levels for authentic professional autonomy to be actualized. The empowerment of teachears remains an arduous process in the pursuit of teachers' professionalism.
期刊論文
1.Hanson, E. Mark(1998)。Strategies of educational decentralization: Key questions and core issues。Journal of Educational Administration,36(2),111-128。  new window
2.沈姍姍(19960100)。專業主義、教師權力與教育行政體制關係:教師權力消長的動態研究。新竹師院學報,9,103-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊振昇(19980800)。邁向二十一世紀我國教育視導制度之反省與展望。教育政策論壇,1(2),81-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳彬(1996)。教育地方化:成就、問題與前瞻。教育與經濟,1,42-45。  延伸查詢new window
5.Brandt, R.(1989)。On teacher empowerment: A conversation with Ann Lieberman。Educational Leadership,46(8),23-26。  new window
6.Hawkins, J. N.(2000)。Centralization, decentralization, recentralization: Educational reform in China。Journal of Educational Administration,38(5),442-455。  new window
7.Lauglo, J.(1990)。Factors behind decentralization in education systems: A comparative perspective with special reference to Norway。Compare,20(1),21-39。  new window
8.Maclure, R.(1994)。Misplaced assumptions of decentralization and participation in rural communities: Primary school reform in Burkina Faso。Comparative Education,30(3),239-254。  new window
9.Weiler, Hans N.(1989)。Education and power: the politics of educational decentralization in comparative perspective。Education Policy,3(1),31-43。  new window
10.Wunsch, J. S.(1991)。Sustaining third world infrastructure investments: Decentralization and alternative strategies。Public Administration and Development,11,5-23。  new window
會議論文
1.張明輝(1998)。我國中小學學校行政人員任用之現況及其變革趨勢。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧乃桂(2000)。教育改革潮中的教師和教師教育。南京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.香港教育統籌局(2000)。香港教育制度改革建議。香港:香港印務署。  延伸查詢new window
2.Maeroff, G.(1988)。The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence。The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Helsby, G.(1999)。Changing teachers' work: The reform of secondary schooling。Open University。  new window
4.Levin, H. M.(1998)。Education and the ability to deal with change。Hong Kong:The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research。  new window
5.Murphy, Joseph、Beck, Lynn G.(1995)。School-based management as school reform: Taking stock。Corwin Press。  new window
6.張明輝(19990000)。學校教育與行政革新研究。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari Knopp(1998)。Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
8.Bereday, George Z. F.(1964)。Comparative Method in Education。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
9.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1998)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部(2000)。二十一世紀教育願景-全人教育溫馨校園終身學習。二十一世紀教育願景-全人教育溫馨校園終身學習。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育署(1999)。校本管理諮詢文件。校本管理諮詢文件。香港。  延伸查詢new window
12.教育署(1999)。教育署改革。教育署改革。香港。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳麗珠(1997)。臺灣地區國民教育資源分配的現況與展望。臺灣地區國民教育資源分配的現況與展望。香港。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.課程發展議會(2000)。課程發展議會諮詢文件-學會學習。課程發展議會諮詢文件-學會學習。香港。  延伸查詢new window
15.黎萬紅(2000)。中港兩地職業教育面臨的困惑與挑戰。新世紀的教育挑戰與各國因應策略。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Benson, C.(1978)。The economics of public education。The economics of public education。Boston, MA。  new window
17.Brown, Phillip、Halsey, A. H.、Lauder, Hugh、Wells, Amy Stuart(1997)。The Transformation of Education and Society: An Introduction。Education: Culture, Economy, and Society。Oxford, NY。  new window
18.Chieuw, J.、Mandolang, N. H.(1992)。Literature reviews on decentralization: Strengthening local educational capacity。Literature reviews on decentralization: Strengthening local educational capacity。Tallahassee, FL。  new window
19.Johnson, S. M.(1994)。Teachers and policy: Implications for management。The International Encyclopedia of Education。Oxford。  new window
20.Kandel, I. L.(1933)。Comparative education。Comparative education。Boston, MA。  new window
21.Kemmerer, F.(1994)。Decentralization of schooling in developing nations。The International encyclopedia of education。Oxford。  new window
22.(1985)。The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization-decentralization debate。The control of education: International perspectives on the centralization-decentralization debate。London, UK。  new window
23.盧乃桂(1993)。The changing education system: Dilemma of disparity。China Review 1993。Hong Kong。  new window
24.MaGinn, N. F.(1992)。Reforming educational governance: Centralization/ decentralization。Emergent issues in education: comparative perspectives。New York, NY。  new window
25.Murphy, J.(1992)。Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena。Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena。New York, NY。  new window
26.Pescador, J. A.(1985)。Decentralization and education。The international encyclopedia of education。沒有紀錄。  new window
27.World Conference on Basic Education for All(1990)。Framework for action to meet basic learning needs。Framework for action to meet basic learning needs。New York, NY。  new window
28.Young, P. V.(1960)。Scientific social surveys and research: An introduction to the background, content, methods, principles, and analysis of social studies。Scientific social surveys and research: An introduction to the background, content, methods, principles, and analysis of social studies。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
單篇論文
1.Short, P. M.(1992)。Dimensions of teacher empowerment,http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED368701,(ED368701)。  new window
其他
1.Cummings, W.(1992)。The Indonesian school principal: Broadening responsibility,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sabatier, Paul A.、Mazmanian, Daniel A.(1983)。Policy Implementation。In Encyclopedia of Policy Studies。New York:Marcel Dekker。  new window
2.Bray, M.(1999)。Control of education: issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization。Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local。Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE