臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：華人領導行為之內隱結構初探
書刊名：本土心理學研究
作者：劉兆明 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Chaoming
出版日期：2002
卷期：18
頁次：頁229-265
主題關鍵詞：內隱領導論；道德評價；對立思考；認知分類歷程；領導行為；Categorization process；Dual-categorization；Implicit leadership theory；Leader behavior；Moral evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:417
  • 點閱點閱:50
Leader behavior studies have provided consistent results in the past decades. It seems that onsideration and initiating structure are two major dimensions of leader behaviors. Implicit leadership theories, however, argued that the two leader behavior dimensions are just a reflection of subordinates' implicit categorization, not the real behaviors presented by leaders. In both Mainland China and Taiwan, moral and character factors always emerged from leader behavior studies. Using a bottom-up inquiry approach, the present study developed a leader behavior inventory based on critical incident data collected in earlier studies. The inventory was administered to 750 employees. Results indicated that two factors, positive and negative leader behaviors, consistently emerged in different factor analysis procedures. Cluster analysis revealed that subjects could be properly divided into two clusters based on their responses in the leader behavior inventory. One cluster of subjects intended to evaluate their leaders positively, another one was just the opposite. The author tries to explain the results with cultural perspectives. In Chinese culture, dual­categorization (like yin/yang, good/evil) is often used in any situations. The most popular character sketch is Chun-tzu (i.e., real gentleman) and Hsiao-jen (i.e, mean person) presented in the Confucian Analects. Based on the implicit leadership theory, it is possible that subjects' responses on the leader behavior inventory just reflect their implicit categorization leader behaviors. Taking earlier related findings as evidence, the author proposes that moral evaluation is a key component in Chinese leader behavior. The cultural context is really important in indigenous leader behavior research.
期刊論文
1.潘小慧(19980600)。倫理自我主義述評--自我、自我主義及倫理自我主義。哲學論集，31，271-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Schriesheim, C. A.、Stogdill, R. M.(1975)。Differences in factor structure across three versions of the Ohio State leadership scales。Personnel Psychology，28，189-206。  new window
3.Fleishman, E. A.(1953)。The description of supervisory behavior。Personnel Psychology，37，1-6。  new window
4.Eden, D.、Leviatan, U.(1975)。Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales。Journal of Applied Psychology，60(6)，736-741。  new window
5.Yang, Kuo-Shu、Bond, Michael H.(1990)。Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，58(6)，1087-1095。  new window
6.Kenney, R. A.、Schwartz-Kenney, B. M.、Blascovich, J.(1996)。Implicit Leadership Theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，22(11)，1128-1143。  new window
7.Flanagan, John C.(1954)。The Critical Incident Technique。Psychological Bulletin，51(4)，327-358。  new window
8.Kerr, Steven、Jermier, John M.(1978)。Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement。Organizational behavior and human performance，22(3)，375-403。  new window
9.劉兆明(19930600)。發展工作動機理論的初步實徵研究。應用心理學報，2，1-24。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭伯壎(19951200)。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個臺灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉兆明、黃子玲、陳千玉(19951200)。企業文化的解讀與分析--以三個大型民營企業為例。中華心理學刊，37(2)，123-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭伯壎、莊仲仁(19811200)。基層軍事幹部有效領導行為之因素分析:領導績效、領導角色與領導行為的關係。中華心理學刊，23(2)，97-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.凌文輇、陳龍、王登(1987)。CPM领导行为评价量表的建构。心理学报，20(2)，89-97。  延伸查詢new window
14.Komaki, J. L.、Zlotnick, S.、Jensen, M.(1986)。Development of an operant-based taxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior。Journal of Applied Psychology，71，260-269。  new window
15.Komaki, J. L.(1986)。Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work。Journal of Applied Psychology，71，270-279。  new window
16.Lorr, M.、Shea, T.(1977)。Are mood states bipolar?。Journal of Personality Assessment，43，468-472。  new window
17.Meindl, J. R.(1990)。On Leadership: An Alternative to the Conventional Wisdom。Research in Organizational Behavior，12，159-203。  new window
18.Rush, M. C.、Thomas, J. C.、Lord, R. G.(1977)。Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，20，93-110。  new window
19.Russell, James A.(1979)。Affective space is bipolar。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，37，345-356。  new window
20.Goods, O. S.、Stogdill, R. M.、Day, D. R.(1962)。New leader behavior description subscales。Journal of Psychology，54，259-269。  new window
會議論文
1.楊中芳(1996)。對過分依賴西方評定量表的反省之二：「好惡度」在人物觀感研究中所起的作用。臺北。235-255。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.劉兆明(1996)。領導行為與工作動機。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭伯壎(1985)。工作取向領導行為與部屬工作績效：補足模式及其驗證(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.潘小慧(1990)。論人類道德實踐的基本結構--析論先秦儒家與多瑪斯哲學(博士論文)。輔仁大學，新莊市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.洪英正(1987)。工作團隊中工作者的A型人格、主管領導型態與工作壓力、工作滿足及工作投入的關係研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧鴻志(1990)。個人特質、向心力、領導型態、組織結構對參與品管圈活動效果之影響(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭得臣(1985)。領導型態、角色壓力、核心生活興趣與組織承諾的關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃開義(1984)。個人特質、工作特性、領導型態與工作滿足、組織承諾對離職意願之影響(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭伯壎(1977)。領導方式、情境因素與人格屬性對工人工作滿足感的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄧添祿(1989)。領導型態與工作士氣之研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
9.高蓉光(1989)。歐、美、日公司主管之領導型態、組織氣候與工作滿足感之差異比較，0。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱春林(1987)。督導行為與義務「張老師」工作滿足及工作績效的關係－因徑目標論之應用，0。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳文明(1986)。領導方式、成就動機與推銷員工作滿足、離職傾向關係研究－以百科全書推銷員為例，0。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳逢明(1989)。領導型態、組織系統知覺與部屬工作績效之關係，0。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳順發(1987)。個人特質、領導型態、績效回饋與工作反應的相關研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
14.李秀嬌(1986)。中、美、日三國公司主管在工作特性、組織結構、領導型態、個人特質、工作態度的比較研究，0。  延伸查詢new window
15.戴杏芳(1988)。領導型態對員工達成預算態度的影響，0。  延伸查詢new window
16.邱麗孟(1985)。企業主管的價值觀、成就動機與其領導行為關係之研究－臺灣電子業中、美、日商公司比較釋例，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳千玉(1992)。組織文化與領導。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光國(1991)。王者之道。臺北市：臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭伯壎(1990)。領導與情境--互動心理學研究途徑。臺北市：大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yukl, G. A.(1981)。Leadership in Organizations。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.楊伯峻(1987)。論語譯注。臺中：藍燈文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐復觀(1985)。學術與政治之間。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.勞思光(1980)。新編中國哲學史。友聯。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘小慧(1997)。君子。哲學大辭書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.England, G.(1975)。The manager and his values。The manager and his values。New York, NY。  new window
10.Misumi, J.(1985)。The behavioral science of leadership。The behavioral science of leadership。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
圖書論文
1.凌文輇(1991)。中國人的領導與行為。中國人、中國心--人格與社會篇。臺北市：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fleishman, E. A.(1973)。Twenty years of consideration and structure。Current developments in the study of leadership。Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
3.Smith, P. B.、Wang, Z. M.(1996)。Chinese leadership and organizational structures。The handbook of Chinese psychology。NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Bownas, D. A.、Bernardin, H. J.(1988)。Critical incident technique。The job analysis handbook for business, Industry and government。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
5.林義正(1990)。先秦法家人性論之研究。中國人性論。臺北：東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理--理念與方法篇。台北：桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：722（臺灣：703，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1408417 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67209491
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上