:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師是專業或是觀念簡單性的忠誠執行者?文化再製理論的檢證
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:姜添輝
作者(外文):Chiang, Tien-hui
出版日期:2003
卷期:49:4
頁次:頁93-126
主題關鍵詞:文化再製工具理性反智主義Cultural reproductionInstrumental rationalityAnti-intellectualism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(22) 博士論文(9) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:19
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:59
文化再製理論揭示社會階級再製根源於學校課程內容,其運作環節是藉由知識結構與屬性的階級排他性,以達到社會控制的目的。此種控制機制的運作往往依賴於教師,應對於此種關聯性,本研究對7位國語科種子教師進行24次深度訪談。研究發現顯示受訪者並未脫離「工具理性」的束縛,甚至扮演「忠誠的執行者」,此種現象根源於欠缺文化批判的視野,因而以「歸因論」來合理化教育結果的不公平,致使他們以「心理學導向思維」處理低成就學生的問題,「適性發展」導引出的「一技之長」不但未能解決此種問題,甚至強化「文化再製」的可能性。
Some sociologists have recently argued that social reproduction is determined more by cul­tural than by economic factors. From their viewpoint, social mobility is generally condi­tioned by schools through the unique structure of curricular knowledge, and such a social control mechanism is largely reliant upon teachers due to their key role in the process of delivering teaching practices. This study attempted to examine the characteristics of teachers’ values and behavior by means of qualitative data collected from 7 primary teach­ers in 24 interviews. Research evidence showed that instead of asking “why,” our infor­mants were generally more concerned with “how” in their quest to achieve pre-determined educational goals. Under the constraints of such an instrumental rationality, they can be characterized as loyal implementers with conceptual simplicity. This phenomenon results from the lack of a critical-cultural vision. This simplistic and anti-intellectual mind-set made our informants neglect the problem of the educational system itself, and instead blame factors outside the system like parents’ values or efforts and pupils’ intellectual capaci­ties. Furthermore, their behavior was generally constrained within the limits of a psycho­logical orientation, as seen in their ways of managing under-achieving students. How­ever, such an approach was not only unable to help these students; it was also likely to increase the possibility of cultural reproduction.
期刊論文
1.Goldthorpe, J. H.、Breen, R.(1999)。Class Inequality and Meritocracy: A Critique Of Saunders and an Alternative Analysis。British Journal of Sociology,50(1),1-27。  new window
2.薛承泰(19961000)。影響國初中後教育分流的實證分析:性別、省籍、與家庭背景的差異。臺灣社會學刊,20,49-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.姜添輝(20020600)。九年一貫課程政策影響教師專業自主權之研究。教育研究集刊,48(2),157-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李奉儒(2002)。批判教育學論理論基礎與主要教育議題。廣州。  延伸查詢new window
2.林彩岫(2001)。師範教育的課程與教學之社會學分析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.姜添輝(1998)。從臺灣小學課程改革分析師資課程的社會控制。北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.張建成(1999)。課程規劃與社會正義。高雄。363-388。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bourdieu, P.(1993)。The Field of Cultural。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
2.Gramsci, A.、Quintin Hoare、Geoggrey Nowell Smith(1976)。Selections from the Prison Notebooks。New York, NY:International Publishers。  new window
3.Connell, R. W.(1985)。Teachers' work。Sydney:George Allen & Unwin。  new window
4.Bernstein, B.(1990)。The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse, Volume IV: Class, codes and control。Routledge。  new window
5.Nice, R.、Bourdieu, P.(2000)。Pascalian Meditations。Stanford, California:Polity Press; Stanford University Press。  new window
6.Manion, L.、Cohen, L.(1980)。Research Methods in Education。New York, NY:Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.。  new window
7.Giroux, Henry A.(1997)。Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
8.Althusser, Louis(2001)。Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays。Monthly Review Press。  new window
9.Poulantzas, N.(1979)。Classes in Contemporary Capitalism。London:NLB。  new window
10.Giroux, Henry A.(1983)。Theory and Resistance in Education--A Pedagogy for the Oppressed。Massachusetts:Bergin and Garvey。  new window
11.Durkheim, Émile、Simpson, George(1933)。The Division of Labor in Society。Free Press。  new window
12.Goldthorpe, J. H.、Llewellyn, Catriona、Payne, Clive(1987)。Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain。Oxford:Clarendon press。  new window
13.de Tocqueville, Alexis、Reeve, Henry(1945)。Democracy in America。New York:Vintage。  new window
14.Weber, Max、Parsons, Talcott、Henderson, A. M.(1964)。The Theory of Social and Economic Organization。New York:The Free Press。  new window
15.Harris, Kevin、唐宗清(1994)。教師與階級:馬克斯主義分析。臺北:桂冠書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.Jackson, P. W.(1968)。Life in classrooms。New York:Teachers College Press:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
17.Apple, M. W.(1985)。Education and Power。Boston, MA:Routledge and Kegan Paul:Ark Paperbacks。  new window
18.姜添輝(2002)。資本社會中的社會流動與學校體系:批判教育社會學的分析。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
19.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, R.(1998)。Practical reason: on the theory of action。Polity Press。  new window
20.Willis, Paul E.(1977)。Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
21.楊瑩(1995)。教育機會均等--教育社會學的探究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
22.Borg, W. R.、Gall, M. D.(1989)。Educational research: An introduction。White Plains, NY。  new window
23.Parsons, Talcott(1951)。Social System。New York:Glencoe, Ill:Free Press。  new window
24.Bernstein, B.(1996)。Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity。London:Routledge。  new window
25.Bernstein, B.(1977)。Class, Codes and Control。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
26.Padgett, Deborah K.、王金永、張英陣(2000)。質化研究與社會工作。臺北:洪葉文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.Oppenheim, An N.(1966)。Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement。New York, NY:Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
28.Kumar, Ranjit、胡龍騰、黃瑋瑩、潘中道(2000)。研究方法:步驟化學習指南。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.Dahrendorf, Ralf(1959)。Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society。Stanford University Press。  new window
30.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
31.Apple, M. W.(1988)。Work, Class and Teaching。Schoolwork: Approaches to the Labour Process of Teaching。Milton Keynes, UK。  new window
32.Hoyle, E.(1980)。Professionalization and deprofessionalization in education。World yearbook of education 1980。London, UK。  new window
33.Gibson, Rex(1995)。結構主義與教育。結構主義與教育。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
34.戴曉霞(1997)。文化研究與教育研究。新世紀的教育發展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
35.Freire, P.(1976)。A Few Notions about the Word "Concientization"。Schooling and Capitalism: A Sociological Reader。London, UK。  new window
36.Glass, D. V.、Hall, J. R.(1975)。Social mobility in great Britain: A study of intergeneration changes in status。Social mobility。Harmondsworth, UK。  new window
37.Havighurst, R. J.(1961)。Education and social mobility in four societies。Education, Economy, and Society: A Reader in the Sociology of Education。London, UK。  new window
38.Wolfle, D.(1961)。Educational opportunity, measured intelligence, and social background。Education, Economy, and Society: A Reader in the Sociology of Education。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.Davies, B.(2003)。Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, J. C.(1973)。Cultural reproduction and social reproduction。Knowledge, education, and cultural change: Papers in the sociology of education。London, England:Tavistock。  new window
2.Fielding, T.(1995)。Migration and middle-class formation in England and Wales, 1981-1991。Social Change and Middle Classes。London:UCL。  new window
3.Williams, R.(1976)。Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory。Schooling and Capitalism。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Davis, Kingsley、Moore, Wilbert E.(1966)。Some principles of stratification。Class, status and power: Social stratification in comparative perspective。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
5.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Weber, M.(1966)。The development of caste。Class, status, and power。London, UK:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE