臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：建構數學的困境與新境：批判與重建建構主義的教學實踐
書刊名：國民教育研究集刊
作者：蔡明哲
作者(外文)：Tsai, Ming-che
出版日期：2003
卷期：11
頁次：頁149-165+167
主題關鍵詞：建構數學；建構主義；知識論；Constructive mathematics；Constructivism；Epistemology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:232
  • 點閱點閱:33
「建構數學」課程近來出現許多批判與反省的聲音，這波熱潮對建構主義的實踐者深具意義。本文試圖反思建構主義的知識論重建建構主義的教學實踐。 首先解析建構數學背後單一學派意識型態的運作，使實際的教學運作只有「解構」而沒有「重構」。其次批判反思建構主義知識論中知識真理、相互主觀性、主動建構等議題。第三從教學實際層面，詮釋建構所指的心理運思是有層次和續局的，應致力提昇兒童的建構層次，提供最大的學習機會。 最後以教室場域重建建構主義的教學實踐。建構主義課程必須由教師自行建構，同時在知識文化的社群中，精鍊各種差異主張的敏感性。兼顧主體在自我反省與社群調節中創塑意義。
The constructive mathematics curriculum implemented in elementary schools from 1995 is nowadays under pressure of critic and reflection. This rush wave is indeed meaningful for the constructivist. This paper tries to reflect the theory of epistemology and methodology of constructivism, to offer suggestion toward the holistic approach of mathematical education and reconstruct the pedagogy practice of onstructivism. First, toexplore the operation of single paradigm ideology. Secondly, to discourse these controversial thesis such as: knowledge truth, subjectivity and intersubjectivity and the implication of active construction. Thirdly, to interpret the psychological operation indicated by constructivist is gradualand continuous. Teachers should try to promote children's constructive grade and offer them the maximal learning opportunities. Finally, to recite that professional teaching depends on the context of classroom and peculiarity of students to surmount predication. The constructive teaching is that teachers have to construct by themselves, to cultivate sensitivity about different statements, to pursuit the intersubjective meaning of integration and complement.
期刊論文
1.甯自強(1987)。根本建構主義--認知研究的另一種架構。師友月刊，246，30-32。  延伸查詢new window
2.Applefield, J. M.、Huber, R.、Moallem, M.(2001)。Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding。High School Journal，84(2)，35-53。  new window
3.朱則剛(1994)。建構主義知識論對情境認知與教育科技的意義。視聽教育雙月刊，35(4)，1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Clements, D. H.(1997)。(Mis)Constructing constructivism。Teaching Children Mathematics，4(2)，198-200。  new window
5.Colliver, J. A.(2001)。Constructivism: The view of knowledge that ended philosophy or a theory of learning and instruction?。Teaching and Learning in Medicine，14(1)，49-51。  new window
6.Green, S. K.(2002)。A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice。School Psychology Review，31(1)，53-70。  new window
7.Noddings, N.(1990)。Constructivism in mathematics educatio. In NCTM, Constructivist views on the teaching and learning mathematicsn。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph，4，7-18。  new window
8.Richards, J.、von Glasersfeld, E.(1979)。The control of perception and the construction of reality。Dialectica，33，37-58。  new window
9.Sewell, A.(2002)。Constructivism and student misconceptions: why every teacher needs to know about them。Australian Science Teachers' Journal，48(2)，24-28。  new window
10.楊龍立(20011100)。建構主義的批判。臺北市立師範學院學報，32，67-80。  延伸查詢new window
11.溫明麗(19940600)。知識論之批判:是需要辯證性認知的時候。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，35，101-126。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡敏玲(19980700)。「內」「外」之間與之外的模糊地帶：再思建構論之爭議。課程與教學，1(3)，81-95+138-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蘇育任(1997)。建構主義式教育的迷思與省思。國民教育研究集刊，5，121-137+139。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.甄曉蘭(19990500)。知識論之辯證對課程發展的影響。教育資料文摘，43(5)=256，12-18。  延伸查詢new window
15.李真文、甯自強(19960600)。淺談建構教學的幾個概念--專訪嘉義師範學院甯自強教授。教育研究，49，4-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Phillips, D. C.(1995)。The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism。Educational researcher，24(7)，5-12。  new window
17.Solomon, J.(1994)。The rise and fall of constructivism。Studies in Science Education，23，1-20。  new window
18.Gergen, Kenneth J.(1985)。The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology。American Psychologist，40(3)，266-275。  new window
19.郭重吉(19960600)。建構論：科學哲學的省思。教育研究月刊，49，16-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.詹志禹(19960600)。認識與知識：建構論VS.接受觀。教育研究月刊，49，25-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Popper, Karl R.(1979)。Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Berger, P. L.、Luckmann, T.(1989)。The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge。N.Y.,Garden：Doubleday。  new window
3.Steffe, L.、Gale, J.(1995)。Alternative epistemologies in education。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
4.張華、鍾啟泉(2001)。經驗課程論。上海：上海教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kant, I.、Smith, N. K.(1965)。Critique of pure reason。New York：St Martin's Press。  new window
6.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
7.劉錫麒(1993)。數學思考教學研究。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1996)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.教育部(1993)。國民小學課程標準。台北市：台捷。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊深坑(20020000)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Johnson, D. K.(1988)。Toward a social constructivist epistemology: Introductory Remarks on the social philosophic implications of constructivism(SE050344)。  new window
其他
1.中央日報(2002)。建構數學補破網教部兩週內提對策，http://tw.news.yahoo.com/2002/ll/12/leisure/cdn/3643500.html， 2002/11/12。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央社(2002)。建構數學讓計算能力變差北縣研擬補救教學，http://tw.news.yahoo.eom/2002/l1/14/society/cna/3649399.html， 2002/11/14。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣日報(2002)。沒有變通的權柄--建構數學的敗筆，http://tw.news.yahoo.eom/2002/11/09/polity/twdaily/3638480.html， 2002/11/09。  延伸查詢new window
4.民視新聞(2002)。建構數學難解，數學檢測擠進三萬人，http://tw.news.yahoo.eom/2002/ll/10/leisure/ftv/3640825.html， 2002/11/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ernest, P.(1995)。The one and the many。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, N. J.：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.江世真(1995)。親師交流道：給家長的信。親師手冊國小低年級數學新課程。臺北：國立臺北師範學院附設實驗小學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bruner, J.(1990)。The transactional self。Making sense: The child’s construction of the world。London：Methuen。  new window
4.Clandinin, D. J.、Connelly, F. M.(1992)。Teachers as curriculum maker。Handbook of research on curriculum: a project of the American Educational Research Association。NY：Macmilian。  new window
5.Richards, J.(1991)。Mathematics discussions。Radical constructivism in mathematics education。Netherland：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
6.Shaw, K. L.、Etchberger, M. L.(1993)。Transitioning into constructivism: A vignette of a fifth grade teacher。The Practice of constructivism in science education。Hillsdale, N.J：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press。  new window
7.von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。Piaget's constructivist theory of knowing。Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning。PA：Taylor & Francis Ins。  new window
8.Schwab, Joseph J.(1978)。The practical: A language for curriculum。Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education: Selected Essays。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1990)。An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical。Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics。Reston, VA：NCTM。  new window
10.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1993)。Questions and answers about radical constructivism。The Practice of constructivism in science education。Hillsdale, N.J.：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press。  new window
11.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1989)。Constructivism in education。The International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies。Oxford。  new window
12.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1984)。An introduction to radical constructivism。The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
13.Gergen, K. J.(1995)。Social construction and the educational process。Constructivism in education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
14.Eisner, E. W.(1992)。Curriculum ideologies。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York, NY：Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：751（臺灣：711，外國：40） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67557027
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上