臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示
書刊名：師大學報. 教育類
作者：吳清山 引用關係／蔡菁芝
作者(外文)：Wu, Ching-shan／Tsai, Ching-chin
出版日期：2006
卷期：51:1
頁次：頁1-21
主題關鍵詞：績效責任；教育績效責任；學校績效責任；Accountability；Educational accountability；School accountability；Achievement tests；Mechanism for sanactions
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(15) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:113
  • 點閱點閱:112
教育績效責任是提升教育效能和實現教育目標的重要手段之一。1990年代以來，美、英兩國在教育上大力推動教育績效責任，希望達到上述目的；因此，本文旨在探究美、英兩國的教育績效責任的起源、現況和做法，並予以比較分析，提出對我國未來教育發展有用的啟示如下： 1.重視學生有效學習的教育改革，讓每位孩子都有成功機會； 2.辦理全國國中、小主要年級學力成就測驗，了解學生學習能力； 3.鼓勵各校公佈學校績效報告卡，讓社會大眾了解學校辦學績效； 4.建立辦理不力學校處理和輔導機制，以確保學生受教育品質。
Beginning in the 1990s, the UK and USA have promoted accountability as a means of improving educational performance and fulfilling educational objectives. This article aims at probing into the origins of educational accountability and the ways in which it is currently practiced in these two countries, and then makes a comparative analysis. From this analysis there have emerged some useful guidelines for the further development of education in Taiwan. Namely, we must: 1.Focus on reforms which enhance effective learning, so that every child may have a change to succeed. 2.Give practice student achievement tests in both elementary and secondary school. 3.Encourage every school to publish its achievement "report card" so that it will be accountable to the public. 4.Establish a mechanism for "sanactions" of "failing" schools in order better to ensure the quality of our students' education.
期刊論文
1.劉慶仁(20020500)。教育績效責任--從美國德州的經驗談起。教育研究，97，63-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張鈿富(20040800)。美國績效責任與學校教育改造的發展。教育研究，124，22-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Schultz, Theodore W.(1961)。Investment in Human Capital。American Economic Review，51(1)，1-17。  new window
4.孫仲山、鄭義融(1999)。從國際經驗之啟示談人力培育改革構想。技術及職業教育，53，49-56。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉慶仁(2002)。從「別讓孩子落後法」看美國中小學教育改革。教師天地，121，76-80。  延伸查詢new window
6.Darling-Hammond, L.(1989)。Accountability for Professional Practice。Teachers College Record，91(1)，59-80。  new window
7.Olson, L.(2004)。The United Kingdom: An Educator's Guide。Education Weekly，23(34)，22-22。  new window
會議論文
1.劉慶仁(2002)。績效責任：美國教育改革的趨勢。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院。154-165。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gipps, C. V.(2003)。Educational Accountability in England: The Role of Assessment。0。  new window
學位論文
1.黃美芳(2002)。美國學校教育績效責任制及其在我國實施可行性之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Office for Standards in Education(2004)。The Future of Inspection: A Consultation Paper。London：Office for Standards in Education。  new window
2.吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Finch, Janet(1984)。Education as social policy。London：Longman。  new window
4.Finn, C. E., Jr.、Petrilli, M. J.(2000)。The state of state standards 2000。Washington, DC：Thomas B. Fordham Foundation。  new window
5.(1977)。Accountability in Education。Accountability in Education。0。  new window
6.Becher, T.、Eraut, M.、Knight, J.(1981)。Policies for Educational Accountability。Policies for Educational Accountability。London, UK。  new window
7.Bell, D.(2003)。Introduction by Her Majesty' s Chief Inspector of Schools in England。Strategic plan 2004-2007。London, UK。  new window
8.Boyd, W. L.(2001)。Balancing the State, Markets, and Civil Society in Education Rreform: Trends and Issues in England and the United States。Education between State, Markets, and Civil Society: Comparative Perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
9.Chitty, C.(1994)。Consensus to Conflict: The Structure of Educational Decision-making Transformed。Accountability and Control in Educational Settings。London, UK。  new window
10.Department for Education and Science(1988)。Education Reform Act 1988。Education Reform Act 1988。London, UK。  new window
11.Elliott, J.、Bridges, D.、Ebbutt, D.、Gibson, R.、Nias, J.(1981)。School Accountability: The SSRC Cambridge Accountability Project。School Accountability: The SSRC Cambridge Accountability Project。London, UK。  new window
12.Gipps, C. V(1990)。National Assessment: A comparison of English and American Trends。Changing Educational Assessment: International Perspectives and Trends。London, UK。  new window
13.Jennings, J. F.(1998)。Why National Standards and Tests? Politics and the Quest for Better Schools。Why National Standards and Tests? Politics and the Quest for Better Schools。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
14.Kellaghan, T.、Madaus, G. F.(2000)。Outcome Evaluation。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation。Norwell, MA。  new window
15.Kirst, M. W.(2000)。Accountability: Implications for State and Local Policymakers。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation。Norwell, MA。  new window
16.Kogan, M.(1988)。Education Accountability: An Analytic Overview。Education Accountability: An Analytic Overview。London, UK。  new window
17.Lashway, L.(2001)。The New Standards and Accountability: Will Rewards and Sanctions Motivate America's Schools to Peak Performance?。The New Standards and Accountability: Will Rewards and Sanctions Motivate America's Schools to Peak Performance?。Eugene, OR。  new window
18.Lello, J.(1993)。Accountability in Practice。Accountability in Practice。London, UK。  new window
19.Madaus, G. F.、Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。Program Evaluation: A Historical Overview。Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation。Norwell, MA。  new window
20.Ouston, J.、Fidler, B.、Earley, P.(1998)。The Educational Accountability of Schools in England and Wales。The Politics of Accountability。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
21.Scott, D.(1994)。Making Schools Accountable: Assessment Policy and the Education Reform Act。Accountability and Control in Educational Settings。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.張明輝(2003)。英國教育與就業部組織再造，0。  延伸查詢new window
2.Department of Education and Employee(1996)。Parent's Charter，0。  new window
3.Department of Education and Skills(2003)。Assessment of Pupils，0。  new window
4.Department of Education and Skills(2004)。Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Government Strategy for SEN，0。  new window
5.Department of Education and Skills(2004)。Clarke Welcomes LEAs' Decisions on School Funding，0。  new window
6.Department of Education and Skills(2004)。Monitoring and Accountability，0。  new window
7.National Education Association(2002)。Accountability and Testing，0。  new window
8.National Education Association(2002)。NEA on the Issues: No Child Left Behind Act，0。  new window
9.Office of Elementary and Secondary Education(2004)。Standards and Assessments: Peer Reviewer Guidance - Information and Examples for Meeting Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001，0。  new window
10.Office for Standards in Education(2004)。How We Work: Our Role，0。  new window
11.Simon, R.(2004)。Letter to Chief State School Officers: Regarding of the Process for Amending Accountability Plans，0。  new window
12.U. S. Department of Education(2000)。Strategic Plan 2001-2005，0。  new window
13.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Strategic Plan 2002-2007，0。  new window
14.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Promoting Educational Excellence for All Americans，0。  new window
15.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Lead & Manage My School: Key Policy Letters Signed By the Education Secretary or Deputy Secretary，0。  new window
16.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Lead & Manage My School: Standards, Assessments and Accountability，0。  new window
17.U. S. Department of Education(2002)。Negotiated Rulemaking: Information for Title I Public Comment Meetings，0。  new window
18.U. S. Department of Education(2004)。Funds for State Formula-allocated and Selected Student Aid Programs, By Program: Grand Total，0。  new window
19.U. S. Department of Education(2005)。The National's Report Card: Overview，0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：793（臺灣：779，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67484595
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上