:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:人間之魅--漢唐之間「精魅」故事析論
書刊名:中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊
作者:林富士 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Fu-shih
出版日期:2007
卷期:78:1
頁次:頁107-182
主題關鍵詞:鬼神宗教妖怪故事SpiritsJingmeiFairiesMeiMonsterTales
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:97
中國傳統社會所認知或建構的「鬼神世界」(或是所謂的「超自然世界」)中,除了有大家所習知的「天神」、「地祇」、「人鬼」之外,其實還有所謂的「魅」。而透過相關「語詞」的分析,我們發現,中國傳統社會對於「魅」的種種認知和觀念,基本上在先秦時期便已萌芽,到了兩漢時期,則更形成熟。三組最基本的概念和詞彙,亦即「魑魅」、「鬼魅」和「精魅」(老魅、物魅),也在這個時期出現,其意涵也大致確立。 基本上,「魅」是指某種「物怪」(非人類);是罕見、神祕、怪異之「物」,而且是會帶來禍害、迷惑、疾病、災難、煩擾的「妖物」、「凶物」。不過,這三組概念,相互之間,也有一些明顯的差異,其中,最主要的有二點: 第一是關於魅的出沒之地。「魑魅」最早是在「異域」、「遠方」,後來則進入「中國」的山林川澤之地。「鬼魅」似乎也在荒遠、偏僻之處活動。但「精魅」則遍及各地,山林、原野、都市、鄉村、家室都有其形蹤。 第二是關於魅的形體。「魑魅」是有特定形體的「生物」,其形大都是動物(獸形)或人獸合體。「鬼魅」則是「無形」或能「隱形」之物,無特定形體可言。至於「精魅」則千變萬化,萬「物」(包括人)都能變成精魅,早期的觀念是以物化為「人形」為主,但後來則認為萬物之間都有可能互相轉化其形,而且能隱能見。這種差異,不僅僅是語詞之間在語義上的分殊,尚且牽涉到時代觀念的變遷。換句話說,大約到了東漢中晚期(西元第二世紀)以後,「精魅」的概念逐漸成為中國傳統社會對於魅的主流看法。 至於精魅是在什麼樣的情境下現形或變化,精魅如何侵擾或危害人類,什麼樣的「物」才會成為精魅這一類的問題,中國傳統文獻似乎從東漢末年開始才逐漸有比較具體的論述。因此,本文便以漢唐之際的「精魅」「故事」為主要根據,探討當時人如何建構「魅」的新形象。 透過四十一則「精魅」故事的分析,我們發現,當時人認為,無論男女老少、貧富貴賤、士農工商,任何人隨時隨地都可能和精魅有所遭逢。精魅的原形則包括野生的獸類(狐、狸、鹿等)、蛇類、昆蟲(蚱蜢、蠍子)、水域的動物(鼉、龜、黿、鼈、獺、鯉魚等)、植物(大樹)、家中的牲畜(豬、雞、犬等)和日常用品(枕、屐等),幾乎任何有生命或無生命的「物」都可能因年代久遠或特質的稟賦、情境而變化成「魅」。甚至連「死人」也能化為「魅」。不過,仍以野生的動物佔絕大多數。 絕大多數精魅都可以變化成人形,甚至假冒某人所熟悉的親屬、配偶,但也有一些只能隱形而具有人的語言、飲食能力,或是具有人形但欠缺完整的人類的器官。而無論精魅的原形與變形是什麼,和精魅遭逢之人,有一些毫髮未傷;有一些只受到輕微的驚嚇、迷惑或干擾;有一些會被截斷頭髮;有一些會受到魅惑而和精魅交歡,男性有時會因此「失精」而亡,女性則大多會因此生病,一般稱之為「病邪」、「魅病」。不過,也有一些男子和精魅產生「一夜情」,或是和它們寢處數月、數年之久,甚至讓精魅懷孕產子,本身卻不會受到任何損傷。事實上,在當時人的觀念中,人和仙、神、鬼也都可以有異性、異類之間的婚戀、性愛關係。 同時,他們也相信,即使精魅隨時隨地都可能現身害人,但是,一般人都可以使用一些尋常之「物」(如鏡子、火、犬、刀劍),令精魅現出原形或加以捕殺、逐離。此外,也可以向巫覡、術士、道士、僧人尋求救助,他們可以使用更複雜的法術(如卜筮、厭勝、符咒等)診察魅的原形並加以誅除。若被魅所害而生病,也可以尋求醫者的療治。 因此,純粹就精魅觀念來看,當時人對於「人外」(extra-human) 的世界顯得比前人更加恐懼,對於自己的感官經驗及其所及的世界也更欠缺自信。他們害怕一切陌生的、遙遠的異域、異物和異類,也懷疑所有熟悉的、周遭的人和物。換句話說,在他們的心靈中,任何生物和無生物都可能變成精魅,任何人都可能是精魅的化身。精魅與物怪所帶來的傷害不再只存在於荒野的山林和陌生的水域,危險的時刻也不再只限於昏暗和黑夜的場合。這種變化,或許可以稱之為精魅或凶惡的「人間化」或日常生活化。 不過,當時人面對這樣的精魅世界,也建構出一套防衛和對抗機制。他們相信,人的力量還是大於精魅,只需一些尋常的器物和方法就可以應付精魅,而且,各個宗教也提供了一些除魅之道,可以救助逢魅之人。因此,有些精魅不僅不曾對人造成任何傷害,反遭人類殺害。換句話說,精魅的世界也許變得比以前更恐怖,但人的武裝也比以前更精進,足以應付新的挑戰,可以馴服生活中的精魅。
Traditional Chinese society constructed a “spiritual” or “supernatural” world made up of “Heavenly Gods,” “Spirits of the Earth,” and “Human Ghosts.” In addition to these beings were also the so-called mei 魅, which are somewhat similar to the fairies or monsters in Western civilization. This philological study of terms associated with mei reveals that the notion of mei can be traced to pre-Qin 秦 China (pre-221 BC). Three basic terms referring to these beings emerged during the Han Dynasty (202 BC-AD 220), namely chimei 魑魅 (monster), guimei 鬼魅 (ghostly monster) and jingmei 精魅 (fairy), and it was during the Han Dynasty that the meanings of these terms reached maturity and became more firmly established. Basically, mei refers to a type of non-human monstrous creature; Regarded as “goblins” or “demons” that brought about accidents, confusion, illness, disasters, and disruption, these “beings” were seen as rare, mysterious, and strange. Yet the three concepts of chimei, guimei, and jingmei clearly differ. Among these distinctions, two stand out as the most significant: first, the places in which the mei appeared, and second, the physical form that the mei adopted. Chimei were originally thought to have existed in “foreign lands” or “remote places,” and it was only later that they entered the mountains and rivers of “China” proper. Guimei seemed to linger in wild and remote places. Jingmei, however, were scattered about everywhere and could be found in forests, fields, cities, villages, and houses. These three types of mei also took on different physical forms. Chimei were “creatures” with particular forms, mostly those of animals or creatures that were half-human and half-beast. Guimei were “invisible” beings or beings capable of remaining “invisible” without adopting a particular physical shape. Jingmei could assume all kinds of forms. Every “being” (including humans) could be transformed into jingmei. In early China it was believed that non-human beings could take on human form, but later it was thought that every “being” could assume any other form and could be visible or invisible. This difference is not merely semantic but relates to the evolution of the very concept of mei. In China after the second century, the term mei gradually came to be used primarily to mean jingmei. Only after the second century do traditional Chinese documents present more concrete descriptions of the circumstances under which jingmei revealed their original form or changed their form, of how they attacked or endangered humans, and of the types of “beings” that could become jingmei. This article intends to explore how people in early medieval China constructed this new image of mei based principally on the tales of jingmei. Through an analysis of 41 jingmei tales, we discovered that in the Six Dynasties (3rd-6th centuries), people believed that anyone could encounter jingmei anywhere and at any time, regardless of gender, age, social class, and occupation. Gingmei’s original physical forms included wild beasts (foxes, wild cats and deer etc.), snakes, insects (grasshoppers, scorpions), aquatic creatures (water lizards, turtles, otters, carp etc.), plants (large trees), domestic animals (pigs, chicken and dogs etc.) and commonly used objects (pillows and wooden shoes). Any living or lifeless “being” could be transformed into jingmei under certain circumstances because of their age-old existence or natural talents. Even the dead could transform themselves into jingmei. The majority of jingmei, however, took the form of wild animals. Most jingmei could transform into humans, and even assume the identity of a relative or partner. Some remained invisible, or could only speak a human language and eat like humans; others had human form but lacked certain body parts. Some people who encountered jingmei were left entirely unharmed. Others were only frightened, confused or harassed. Some victims, however, had their hair chopped off, and others were lured into having sex with jingmei. In some cases men died because of “the loss of sperm.” Most women fell ill with what was generally called a “demonic illness” or a “fairy illness.” However, some men had “one-night stands” with jingmei, or slept with them for several months or years, and jingmei even became pregnant and had babies. According to the stories, they seemed to have been left unharmed. It is worth noting that in the Six Dynasties, people believed that humans could have loving or sexual relationships with jingmei, gods, or ghosts who were members of the opposite sex or of a different species. At the same time, however, jingmei also induced much fear, since people believed that jingmei could appear anywhere and at any time to harm humans. Luckily, ordinary people could use some commonly found objects─such as mirrors, fire, dogs, knives and swords─to force the spirits reveal their original forms, and exorcise and kill them. In addition, people could also seek the help of spiritual sources such as occult art practitioners, Taoist priests, or Buddhist monks. These spiritual experts could then employ more complicated occult arts─such as divination and incantations─to determine the original forms of the jingmei and kill them. If people were harmed by jingmei and became sick, they could go to see doctors for therapy. An examination of the conception of jingmei in early medieval China reveals broader cultural and historical significance. People in early medieval China seemed to have a greater fear of the “extra-human” world when compared with their predecessors. They lacked confidence in their sensory experience and the world they encountered. They feared all strange and remote places, different beings, and different species. They also lived in doubt of their acquaintances and the objects around them: They believed that any living creature or lifeless being could transform into jingmei in human form. Unpredictability in everyday life increased since the threat of encountering jingmei could no longer be clearly delineated: Jingmei no longer only lurked in wild forests and strange waters, and moments of danger were no longer limited to darkness, dusk, and dawn. This change may perhaps be termed the “humanization” or “normalization” of the concept of jingmei. Facing the world of jingmei, people in the Six Dynasties nevertheless constructed mechanisms to defend against and resist the interference of jingmei. They believed that the power which humans wielded was greater than that of the jingmei, and that by implementing commonly used objects and methods, jingmei could be driven away, exorcised, or eliminated. Moreover, jingmei could also be eliminated by religious means. Consequently, some jingmei which had never harmed people were killed by humans. Literary sources from early medieval China indicate that people believed that the unpredictability of encountering jingmei had rendered the world more ominous than in the past. However, equipped with more advanced weapons, they remained optimistic that they could meet these new challenges and keep jingmei at bay.
期刊論文
1.謝明勳(20040500)。近五十年來臺灣地區六朝志怪小說研究論著目錄。東華漢學,2,293-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林富士(20000300)。頭髮、疾病與醫療--以中國漢唐之間的醫學文獻為主的初步探討。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,71(1),67-127+229-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李豐楙(19800600)。六朝鏡劍傳說與道教法術思想。中國古典小說研究專集,2,1-28。  延伸查詢new window
4.李豐楙(19810600)。六朝精怪傳說與道教法術思想。中國古典小說研究專集,3,1-36。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉宗迪(1998)。狐魅淵源考:兼論戲劇與小說的源流關係。攀枝花大學學報,15(1),37-41。  延伸查詢new window
6.康笑菲(1999)。The Fox [hu 狐] and the Barbarian [hu 胡]: Unraveling Representations of the Other in Late Tang Tales。Journal of Chinese Religions,27,35-67。  new window
7.林富士(20031100)。中國早期道士的「醫者」形象:以《神仙傳》為主的初步探討。世界宗教學刊,2,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.關野雄(1985)。華表考。東洋學報,66,397-421。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊軍(2004)。魏晉六朝志怪中人鬼婚戀故事的文化解讀。西北農林科技大學學報,4(3),132-135。  延伸查詢new window
10.Cahill, Suzanne Elizabeth(1985)。Sex and the Supernatural in Medieval China: Cantos on the Transcendent Who Presides over the River。Journal of the American Oriental Society,105(2),197-220。  new window
11.李豐楙(19810900)。山經靈異動物之研究。中華學苑,24/25,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.杜正勝(20020100)。古代物怪之研究--一種心態史和文化史的探索。大陸雜誌,104(1),1-14。  延伸查詢new window
13.杜正勝(20020200)。古代物怪之研究--一種心態史和文化史的探索。大陸雜誌,104(2),1-15。  延伸查詢new window
14.杜正勝(20020300)。古代物怪之研究--一種心態史和文化史的探索。大陸雜誌,104(3),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
15.林富士(19990300)。中國六朝時期的巫覡與醫療。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,70(1),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.劉苑如(19960300)。雜傳體志怪與史傳的關係--從文類觀念所作的考察。中國文哲研究集刊,8,365-400。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.周華斌(1992)。方相、饕餮考。戲劇藝術,1992(3)=59,44-56。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉樂賢(1993)。睡虎地秦簡日書《詰咎篇》研究。考古學報,1993(4),435-454。  延伸查詢new window
19.小山滿(1988)。「抱朴子」と神獸鏡。創大アジア研究,9,73-106。  延伸查詢new window
20.張智華(2000)。中國文學中精靈形象的演變與發展。中國社會科學,4,144-154。  延伸查詢new window
21.道端良秀(1962)。中國佛教の鬼神。印度學佛教學研究,10(2),82-86。  延伸查詢new window
22.蔡群(2001)。六朝志怪與唐傳奇中的人與神仙鬼怪戀愛作品比論。湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),4,83-86。  延伸查詢new window
23.普慧(2002)。佛教對六朝志怪小說的影響。复旦学报(社会科学版),2,126-132。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉仲宇(1997)。物魅、人鬼與神祇:中國原始崇拜體系形成的歷史鉤沈。宗教哲學,3(3),16-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.劉宗迪(1998)。狐魅渊源考-兼论戏剧与小说的源流关系。攀枝花大学学报,1,37-41。  延伸查詢new window
26.石昌渝(2003)。論魏晉志怪的鬼魅意象。文学遗产,2,15-24。  延伸查詢new window
27.山田勝美(1952)。螭魅罔兩考。日本中国学会報,3,53-63。  延伸查詢new window
28.(2005)。誠品好讀月報。誠品好讀月報,57,38-76。  延伸查詢new window
29.蔡群(2001)。六朝志怪與唐傳奇中的人與神仙鬼怪戀愛作品比論。湖北師範學院學報(哲學社會科學版),4,83-86。  延伸查詢new window
30.小山滿(1988)。「抱朴子」と神獸鏡。創大アジア研究,9,73-106。  延伸查詢new window
31.山田勝美(1952)。螭魅罔兩考。日本中国学会報,3,53-63。  延伸查詢new window
32.Kang, Xiao-Fei(1999)。The Fox [hu 狐] and the Barbarian [hu 胡]: Unraveling Representations of the Other in Late Tang Tale。Journal of Chinese Religions,10,76-80。  new window
33.道端良秀(1962)。中國佛教の鬼神。印度学仏教学研究,10(20,82-86。  延伸查詢new window
34.石昌渝(2003)。論魏晉志怪的鬼魅意象。文學遺產,2,15-24。  延伸查詢new window
35.張智華(2000)。中國文學中精靈形象的演變與發展。中國社會科學,4,144-154。  延伸查詢new window
36.普慧(2004)。佛教對六朝志怪小說的影響。復旦學報:社會科學版,4(3),132-135。  延伸查詢new window
37.誠品好讀編輯部(2005)。誠品好讀。誠品好讀,57,38-76。  延伸查詢new window
38.劉宗迪(1998)。物魅、人鬼與神祗:中國原始崇拜體系形成的歷史鉤沈。宗教哲學,1,37-41。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉苑如(1998)。鑑照幽明 : 六朝志怪的揭露模式--兼論六朝志怪的評價標準。臺北:文史哲。1-42。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.全寅初(1978)。魏晉南北朝志怪小說研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳秀芬(2003)。Medicine, society, and the making of madness in imperial China(博士論文),London。  new window
3.Chen, Hsiu-fen(2003)。Medicine, society and the making of madness in imperial China(博士論文)。University of London,London。  new window
4.謝明勳(198806)。六朝志怪小說變化題材研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張美卿(1993)。中國古代神話中之靈異動物研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.Didier, John Calvin(1998)。Way Transformation: Universal Unity in Warring States through Sung China - The Book of Transformation (Hua shu化書) and the Renewal of Metaphysics in the Tenth Century,0。  new window
7.Didier, John Calvin(1998)。Way Transformation: Universal Unity in Warring States through Sung China-The Book of Transformation (Hua shu化書) and the Renewal of Metaphysics in the Tenth Century。  new window
8.張美卿(1993)。中國古代神話之靈異動物研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.磯部彰(1995)。「西遊記」受容史の研究。「西遊記」受容史の研究。日本,東京都:多賀出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉淑芬(2005)。中古僧人的「伐魔文書」。鬼魅神魔:中國通俗文化側寫。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kao, Karl S. Y.(1985)。Classical Chinese Tales of the Supernatural and the Fantastic: Selections from the Third to the Tenth Century。Classical Chinese Tales of the Supernatural and the Fantastic: Selections from the Third to the Tenth Century。Bloomington。  new window
4.李昉(1975)。太平御覽。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1924)。大正新脩大藏經。大正新脩大藏經。日本,東京都:大正一切經刊行会。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1924)。咒魅經。東京:大正一切經刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
7.馬樞(1963)。道學傳。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.見素子、嚴一萍(1991)。洞仙傳。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.孫思邈(1987)。備急千金要方。臺北:宏業書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬樞(1963)。道學傳。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.陶弘景(1977)。登真隱訣。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.葛洪(1992)。神仙傳。臺北:捷幼出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.福永光司(1987)。道教思想史研究。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
14.伊藤清司(1986)。中國の神獸.惡鬼--山海經の世界。東京:東方書店。  延伸查詢new window
15.小松和彥(1994)。妖怪學新考:妖怪からる日本人の心。東京。  延伸查詢new window
16.竹田晃(1980)。中国の幽霊。東京:東京大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
17.江紹原(1966)。中國古代旅行之研究。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.(1988)。簡明大英百科全書。臺北市:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.柳田國男(1977)。妖怪談義。講談社。  延伸查詢new window
20.Briggs, K. M.(1967)。The Fairies in Tradition and Literature。London, UK:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
21.張光直、郭淨、陳星(1993)。美術.神話與祭祀。台北板橋:稻鄉出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.中野美代子、何彬(1989)。中國的妖怪。黃河文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.葛洪、王明(1985)。抱朴子內篇。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.嚴可均(199910)。全晉文。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
25.李百藥、唐長孺(1972)。北齊書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.釋僧佑(1924)。弘明集。東京:大正一切經刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
27.王國良(1984)。魏晉南北朝志怪小説研究。台北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.太田辰夫(1984)。西遊記の研究。東京:研文。  延伸查詢new window
29.林辰(199210)。神怪小說史話。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.王充、黃暉(1938)。論衡校釋。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
31.張靜二(1984)。《西遊記》人物研究。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
32.潘重規(1984)。敦煌變文集新書。臺北:中國文化大學中文研究所敦煌學研究會。  延伸查詢new window
33.劉仲宇(1997)。中國精怪文化。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
34.嚴可均(198106)。全晉文。京都:中文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.Adams, Charles J.、Eliade, Mircea(1987)。The Encyclopedia of Religion。New York, N.Y.:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
36.江紹源(1935)。中國古代旅行之研究。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
37.應邵、王利器(1982)。風俗通義校注。台北市:明文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
38.山民(199410)。狐狸信仰之謎。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
39.楊明照(1991)。抱朴子外篇校箋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
40.李劍國(1984)。唐前志怪小說史。天津:南開大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
41.裴啓(1999)。裴子語林。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
42.顧炎武(1971)。原抄本日知錄。臺北:明倫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
43.李昉(1975)。太平御覽。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
44.王國良(1988)。六朝志怪小說考論。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
45.謝明勳(1999)。六朝志怪小說故事考論。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
46.薛惠琪(1995)。六朝佛教志怪小說研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
47.陳國符(1963)。道藏源流考。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
48.魏收(1974)。魏書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
49.李昉(1987)。太平廣記。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
50.傅惜華(1987)。白蛇傳集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
51.李豐楙(1986)。六朝隋唐仙道類小說研究。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
52.周次吉(1990)。六朝志怪小說研究。台北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
53.王曉平(1990)。佛典.志怪.物語。江西南昌市:江西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
54.顏慧琪(1994)。六朝志怪小說異類姻緣故事研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
55.Campany, Robert Ford(1996)。Strange Writing: Anomaly Accounts in Early Medieval China。State University of New York Press。  new window
56.魯迅(1967)。古小說鉤沈。新藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
57.郭茂倩(1980)。樂府詩集。里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
58.干寶、汪紹楹(1979)。搜神記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
59.潘重規(1994)。敦煌變文集新書。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
60.張鷟、趙守儼(1979)。朝野僉載。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
61.von Glahn, Richard(2004)。The Sinister Way: The Divine and the Demonic in Chinese Religious Culture。University of California Press。  new window
62.(1987)。白蛇傳集。白蛇傳集。上海市。  延伸查詢new window
63.井上圓了(1897)。妖怪學講義。妖怪學講義。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
64.江馬務(1923)。日本妖怪變化史。日本妖怪變化史。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
65.Ling, T. O.(1962)。Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil: A Study in Theravàda Buddhism。Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil: A Study in Theravàda Buddhism。London, UK。  new window
66.平田篤胤(1969)。古今妖魅考。古今妖魅考。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
67.北園孝吉(1969)。浮世繪妖怪ものがたり。浮世繪妖怪ものがたり。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
68.北園孝吉(1969)。浮世繪怪異ものがたり。浮世繪怪異ものがたり。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
69.Duffy, Maureen(1972)。The Erotic World of Faery。The Erotic World of Faery。London, UK。  new window
70.嚴一萍(1973)。道教研究資料。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
71.井上圓了(1975)。妖怪學講義。妖怪學講義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
72.Briggs, Katharine Mary(1976)。A Dictionary of Fairies: Hobgoblins, Brownies, Bogies, and Other Supernatural Creatures。A Dictionary of Fairies: Hobgoblins, Brownies, Bogies, and Other Supernatural Creatures。London, UK。  new window
73.山室靜(1977)。北歐の神タと妖精たち。北歐の神タと妖精たち。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
74.澤田瑞穗(1978)。中國動物譚。中國動物譚。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
75.竹田晃(1980)。中國の幽靈。中國の幽靈。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
76.吉野裕子(1980)。狐:陰陽五行と稻荷信仰。狐:陰陽五行と稻荷信仰。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
77.李厚基、韓海明(1982)。人鬼妖狐的藝術世界:《聊齋誌異》散論。人鬼妖狐的藝術世界:《聊齋誌異》散論。天津市。  延伸查詢new window
78.太田辰夫(1984)。西遊記の研究。西遊記の研究。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
79.水木しげる(1984)。妖精100物語。妖精100物語。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
80.Kao, Karl S. Y.(1985)。Introduction to Classical Chinese Tales of the Supernatural and the Fantastic: Selections from the Third to the Tenth Century。Introduction to Classical Chinese Tales of the Supernatural and the Fantastic: Selections from the Third to the Tenth Century。Bloomington, IN。  new window
81.伊藤清司(1986)。中國の神獸.惡鬼たち-山海經の世界。中國の神獸.惡鬼たち-山海經の世界。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
82.(1990)。圖說日本妖怪。圖說日本妖怪。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
83.(1991)。神話中的女神與妖精。神話中的女神與妖精。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
84.Stewart, Charles(1991)。Demons and the Devil。Demons and the Devil。Princeton, NJ。  new window
85.近藤春雄(1992)。中國の怪奇と美女-志怪.傳奇の世界一。中國の怪奇と美女-志怪.傳奇の世界一。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
86.(1992)。中國鬼神精怪。中國鬼神精怪。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
87.(1994)。中國靈怪大觀。中國靈怪大觀。北京市。  延伸查詢new window
88.小松和彥(1994)。妖怪學新考:妖怪からみる日本人の心。妖怪學新考:妖怪からみる日本人の心。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
89.小松和彥(1994)。憑靈信仰論:妖怪研への試み。憑靈信仰論:妖怪研への試み。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
90.Cherry, John(1995)。Mythical Beasts。Mythical Beasts。London, UK。  new window
91.クロード.カブレール(1997)。中世の妖怪、惡魔、奇跡。中世の妖怪、惡魔、奇跡。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
92.(1997)。幻想の國に棲動物たち。幻想の國に棲動物たち。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
93.(1997)。動物と人間の文化誌。動物と人間の文化誌。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
94.江馬務(1998)。妖怪變化號。妖怪變化號。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
95.岡田建文(1998)。動物界靈異誌。動物界靈異誌。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
96.Silver, Carole G.(1999)。Strange and Secret Peoples: Fairies and Victorian Consciousness。Strange and Secret Peoples: Fairies and Victorian Consciousness。Oxford, UK。  new window
97.井上圓了(2001)。井上圓了.妖怪學全集。井上圓了.妖怪學全集。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
98.(2001)。地方發明治妖怪ニュース。地方發明治妖怪ニュース。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
99.田中聰(2002)。妖怪と怨靈の日本史。妖怪と怨靈の日本史。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
100.(2005)。2005陰陽師千年特集。2005陰陽師千年特集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
101.佚名。古今妖怪大觀。古今妖怪大觀。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
102.木山英雄(1967)。靈怪.神魔という世界-小說と俗信。中國文化叢書6:宗教。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
103.Long, J. Bruce(1987)。Demons: An Overview。The Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol. 4。0。  new window
104.Newall, Venetia(1987)。Fairies。The Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol. 5。0。  new window
105.Gaster, Theodor, H.(1987)。Monsters。The Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol. 10。0。  new window
106.神塚淑子(1992)。魔の觀念と消魔の思想。中國古道教史研究。日本,京都市。  延伸查詢new window
107.Roberts, Gareth(2000)。The Bodies of Demons。The Body in Late Medieval and Early Modern Culture。Aldershot, UK。  new window
108.嚴一萍(1973)。道教研究資料(1)。道教研究資料(1)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
109.Kappler, Claude(1997)。中世の妖怪、惡魔、奇跡。中世の妖怪、惡魔、奇跡。東京。  延伸查詢new window
110.小松和彥(1994)。憑靈信仰論:妖怪研究への試み。憑靈信仰論:妖怪研究への試み。東京。  延伸查詢new window
111.山室靜(1977)。北歐の神々と妖精たち。北歐の神々と妖精たち。東京。  延伸查詢new window
112.井上圓了(1897)。妖怪學講義。妖怪學講義。東京。  延伸查詢new window
113.井上圓了(1999)。井上圓了.妖怪學全集。井上圓了.妖怪學全集。東京。  延伸查詢new window
114.木山英雄(1967)。靈怪.神魔という世界─小說と俗信─。中國文化叢書(6):宗教。東京。  延伸查詢new window
115.岡田建文(1998)。動物界靈異誌。動物界靈異誌。東京。  延伸查詢new window
116.Cherry, John(1997)。幻想の國に棲動物たち。幻想の國に棲動物たち。東京。  延伸查詢new window
117.江馬務(1998)。妖怪變化號。妖怪變化號。東京。  延伸查詢new window
118.江馬務(1923)。日本妖怪變化史。日本妖怪變化史。京都。  延伸查詢new window
119.吉野裕子(1980)。狐:陰陽五行と稻荷信仰。狐:陰陽五行と稻荷信仰。東京。  延伸查詢new window
120.田中聰(2002)。妖怪と怨靈の日本史。妖怪と怨靈の日本史。東京。  延伸查詢new window
121.平田篤胤(1969)。古今妖魅考。古今妖魅考。東京。  延伸查詢new window
122.北園孝吉(1969)。浮世繪怪異ものがたり。浮世繪怪異ものがたり。東京。  延伸查詢new window
123.北園孝吉(1969)。浮世繪妖怪ものがたり。浮世繪妖怪ものがたり。東京。  延伸查詢new window
124.水木しげる(1984)。妖精100物語。妖精100物語。東京。  延伸查詢new window
125.Stewart, Charles C.(1991)。Demons and the Devil。Demons and the Devil。Princeton。  new window
126.Duffy, Maureen(1972)。The Erotic World of Fairy。The Erotic World of Fairy。London。  new window
127.Eliade, Mircea(1972)。The Encyclopedia of Religion。The Encyclopedia of Religion。New York。  new window
128.Ling, T. O.(1962)。Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil: A Study in Theravāda Buddhism。Buddhism and the Mythology of Evil: A Study in Theravāda Buddhism。London。  new window
129.Roberts, Gareth(2000)。The Bodies of Demons。The Body in Ltae Medieval and Early Modern Culture。Aldershot。  new window
130.Silver, Carole G.(1999)。Strange and Secret Peoples: Fairies and Victorian Conciousness。Strange and Secret Peoples: Fairies and Victorian Conciousness。Oxford。  new window
131.Briggs, Katharine Mary(1976)。A Dictionary of Fairies: Hobgoblins, Brownies, Bogies, and Other Supernatural Creatures。A Dictionary of Fairies: Hobgoblins, Brownies, Bogies, and Other Supernatural Creatures。London。  new window
132.Cherry, John(1995)。Mythical Beasts。Mythical Beasts。London。  new window
133.湯本豪一(2001)。地方發明治妖怪ニュース。地方發明治妖怪ニュース。東京。  延伸查詢new window
134.國立歴史民俗博物館(1997)。動物の人間の文化誌。動物の人間の文化誌。東京。  延伸查詢new window
135.近藤雅樹(1990)。圖說日本の妖怪。圖說日本の妖怪。東京。  延伸查詢new window
136.近藤春雄(1992)。中國の怪奇と美女─志怪.傳奇の世界。中國の怪奇と美女─志怪.傳奇の世界。東京。  延伸查詢new window
137.何懷碩(1991)。神話中的女神與妖精。神話中的女神與妖精。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
138.古今妖怪大觀。古今妖怪大觀。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
139.吳康(1992)。中國鬼神精怪。中國鬼神精怪。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
140.李厚基、韓海明(1982)。人鬼妖狐的藝術世界:《聊齋誌異》散論。人鬼妖狐的藝術世界:《聊齋誌異》散論。天津。  延伸查詢new window
141.徐慶雯、賴淑玲(2005)。2005陰陽師千年特集。2005陰陽師千年特集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
142.麻國鈞(1994)。中國靈怪大觀。中國靈怪大觀。北京。  延伸查詢new window
143.神塚淑子(1991)。魔の觀念と消魔の思想。中國古道教史研究。京都。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.USEPA(2009)。Environmental risk: Your guide to analyzing and reducing risk,http://www.epa.gov/region5/publications/risk.pdf, 20090703。  new window
2.陶淵明。搜神後記,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.(南朝宋)劉義慶(1999)。幽明錄,上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.(晉)陶潛(1981)。搜神後記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.陶弘景。登真隱訣,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)顧炎武。日知錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.(梁)釋僧佑(1924)。弘明集,東京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(北魏)楊衒之(1978)。洛陽伽藍記,上海。  延伸查詢new window
9.釋慧琳。一切經音義(大.2128),0。  延伸查詢new window
10.殷芸。小說,0。  延伸查詢new window
11.孔約。孔氏志怪,0。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭璞。玄中記,0。  延伸查詢new window
13.洪邁(1937)。夷監志.夷監丙志,上海市。  延伸查詢new window
14.見素子(1973)。洞仙傳,0。  延伸查詢new window
15.曹丕。列異傳,0。  延伸查詢new window
16.葛洪。抱朴子內篇,0。  延伸查詢new window
17.葛洪。抱朴子外篇,0。  延伸查詢new window
18.釋道世。法苑珠林(大.2122),0。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳田夫。南嶽總勝集(大.2097),0。  延伸查詢new window
20.楊衒之。洛陽伽藍記,0。  延伸查詢new window
21.葛洪。神仙傳,0。  延伸查詢new window
22.郭季產。集異記,0。  延伸查詢new window
23.干寶。搜神記,0。  延伸查詢new window
24.戴祚。甄異傳,0。  延伸查詢new window
25.王充。論衡,0。  延伸查詢new window
26.翻譯名義集(大.2131),0。  延伸查詢new window
27.佚名。雜鬼神志怪,0。  延伸查詢new window
28.佚名。續異記,0。  延伸查詢new window
29.孔約(1967)。孔氏志怪,香港。  延伸查詢new window
30.(1967)。雜鬼神志怪,香港。  延伸查詢new window
31.(1967)。續異記,香港。  延伸查詢new window
32.(宋)法雲(1924)。翻譯名義集,東京。  延伸查詢new window
33.(南宋)洪邁(1937)。夷堅志,上海。  延伸查詢new window
34.(南朝梁)殷芸(1967)。小說,香港。  延伸查詢new window
35.郭季產(1967)。集異記,香港。  延伸查詢new window
36.(魏)曹丕(1967)。列異傳,香港。  延伸查詢new window
37.(晉)郭璞(1967)。玄中記,香港。  延伸查詢new window
38.陳田夫(1924)。南嶽總勝集,東京。  延伸查詢new window
39.(晉)裴啟(1967)。裴子語林,香港。  延伸查詢new window
40.(南朝宋)劉義慶(1967)。幽明錄,香港。  延伸查詢new window
41.戴祚(1967)。甄異傳,香港。  延伸查詢new window
42.(唐)道世(1924)。法苑珠林,東京。  延伸查詢new window
43.(唐)釋慧琳(1924)。一切經音義,東京。  延伸查詢new window
44.井上圓了(1905)。妖怪學講義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李豐楙(1986)。洞仙傳研究。六朝隋唐仙道類小說研究。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.DeWoskin, Kenneth J.(1977)。The Six Dynasties Chih-kuai and the Birth of Fiction。Chinese Narrative: Critical and Theoretical Essays。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
3.林富士(20050000)。釋「魅」:以先秦至東漢時期的文獻資料為主的考察。鬼魅神魔 : 中國通俗文化側冩。臺北:麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林富士(2002)。試論六朝時期的道巫之別。國史浮海開新錄:余英時教授榮退論文集。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE