中文部分
Baggini, J. (2006). 自願被吃的豬：100個讓人想破頭的哲學問題（黃煜文譯）。台北：麥田。（原著出版於2005年）
Bauman, Z. (2004). 全球化浪潮的政治定位（李培元譯）。台北：韋伯文化國際。（原著出版於1999年）
Beck, U. (2000). 全球化危機（孫治本譯）。台北：台灣商務印書館。（原著出版於1998年）
Berdahl, R. O., & McConnell, T. R. (2003). 自主與績效責任：誰控制學界（蘇錦麗譯）。載於P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport（編），21世紀美國高等教育：社會、政治、經濟的挑戰（頁83-100）。台北：高等教育。（原著出版於1999年）
Lane, J.-E., & Ersson, S. (2003). 新制度主義政治學（何景榮譯）。台北：韋伯文化國際。（原著出版於2000年）
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2007). 政治學方法論與途徑（陳義彥、陳景堯、林妤虹、吳宜璇、何景榮與任雲楠譯）。台北：韋伯文化國際。（原著出版於2002年）
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2005). 質性研究資料分析（張芬芬譯）。台北：雙葉書廊。（原著出版於1994年）
Nash, K. (2007). 解讀當代政治社會學（林庭瑤譯）。台北：韋伯文化國際。（原著出版於2000年）
Orwell, J. (2006). 1984（王憶琳編譯）。台北：華文網。（原著出版於1949年）
Torres, C. A., & Rhoads, R. A. (2005). 世界體系中的全球化與高等教育：理論與政治構念（鄭勝耀譯）。載於淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心（主編），21世紀高等教育的挑戰與回應：趨勢、課程、治理（頁3-28）。台北：淡江大學出版中心。
王文科（2002）。教育研究法（第七版）。台北：五南。王仕圖與吳慧敏（2005）。深度訪談與案例演練。載於齊力與林本炫（編），質性研究方法與資料分析（第二版，頁97-115）。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。
立法院（1989）。立法院公報委員會記錄。立法院公報，78（95），2-22。
立法院（1991）。立法院公報院會記錄。立法院公報，80（27），273-274。
立法院（1992）。立法院公報院會記錄。立法院公報，82（46），93-163。
立法院（1997）。立法院公報院會記錄。立法院公報，86（41），88-89。
立法院（1999）。立法院公報院會記錄。立法院公報，88（21），406-407。
立法院（2000）。立法院公報院會記錄。立法院公報，89（9），465-466。
立法院（2008）。立法院公報委員會記錄。立法院公報，97（35），399-478。
吳明清（1991）。教育研究：基本觀念與方法之分析。台北：五南。
吳柏林（2005）。模糊統計導論：方法與應用。台北：五南。
吳清山、黃美芳與徐緯平（2002）。教育績效責任研究。台北：高等教育。呂亞力（2008）。政治學：從權力角度之政治剖析。台北：台灣東華。
李曉康（2002）。管理主義、市場化與大學評鑑：香港的經驗。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪與謝安邦（編），高等教育市場化（頁156-181）。台北：高等教育。
阮新邦（1993）。批判詮釋論的理論基礎。載於阮新邦（編），批判詮釋論與社會研究（頁9-53）。River Edge, NJ: Global.
周志宏（2002）。學術自由與高等教育法制。台北：高等教育。翁福元（1993）。教育研究中意義理解問題之析論。載於賈馥茗與楊深坑（主編），教育學方法論（頁181-207）。台北：五南。
翁福元（2002）。國家、市場與高等教育：台灣的挑戰。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪與謝安邦（編），高等教育市場化（頁90-119）。台北：高等教育。
翁福元（2007）。教育政策社會學：教育政策與當代社會思潮之對話。台北：五南。
翁福元（2009）。評鑑政治學概述：從政治學觀點看評鑑工作的挑戰。評鑑，20，56-62。
馬信行（1998）。教育科學研究法。台北：五南。
高強華（1997）。當前大學自主的危機與轉機。載於黃政傑（主編），大學的自主與責任（頁17-36）。台北：漢文。
教育部（2009）。教育大事年表。 2009年5月1日，擷取自http://history.moe.gov.tw/milestone.asp
教育部高教司（1993）。大學校院教育評鑑。台北：教育部。
教育部統計處（2008a）。大專校院概況表（87～97學年度）。2008年6月28日，擷取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0013/u.xls
教育部統計處（2008b）。大學聯招（指考）錄取率。2008年6月28日，擷取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0013/overview09.xls
莫家豪（2002）。中、港、台高等教育市場化：源起與理解。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪與謝安邦（編），高等教育市場化（頁42-69）。台北：高等教育。
郭昭佑（2007）。教育評鑑研究：原罪與解放。台北：五南。陳玉琨（2004）。教育評鑑學。台北：五南。
陳伯璋（2005）。台灣高等教育的發展與改革。載於陳伯璋與蓋浙生（主編），新世紀高等教育政策與行政（頁3-37）。台北：高等教育。
陳曼玲（2006）。翻開大學評鑑發展史。評鑑，1，22-23。
陳曼玲（2008a）。退場機制市場化，評鑑結果應脫鈎：專訪教育部高教司長何卓飛。評鑑，16，1-3。
陳曼玲（2008b）。學者疾呼：評鑑「大學評鑑與退場結合」政策。評鑑，14，44-45。
單文經（2005）。後現代主義的挑戰與評鑑學者的回應。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育評鑑的回顧與展望（頁37-66）。台北：心理。
曾志朗（2007）。擘畫高教藍圖，化補強為頂尖。載於李冰榮（編審），面對公與義：全球化下的發展與分配（頁369-373）。台北：財團法人時報文教基金會。
湯堯（2005）。大學學問大：改善高等教育的27計。台北：天下遠見。
湯堯（2007）。台灣高等教育評鑑制度的實務探討。教育政策論壇，10（4），1-17。黃政傑（2003）。大學評鑑的爭論話題。師友，438，1-3。
黃榮村（2007）。面對全球化的教育資源與人才培育。載於李冰榮（編審），面對公與義：全球化下的發展與分配（頁348-361）。台北：財團法人時報文教基金會。
楊國賜（主編）（2001）。大學教育政策白皮書。台北：教育部。
溫明麗（2004）。詮釋典範與教育研究。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育研究方法論：觀點與方法（頁155-186）。台北：心理。
葉昱岑（2006）。我國大學評鑑政策之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系，南投。
劉維琪（2008）。管制干預或市場機制：從認可評鑑談大學招生政策。評鑑，14，4-5。
劉嶽雲（2001）。政治理論與方法論。台北：五南。
潘慧玲（2005）。邁向下一代的教育評鑑：回顧與前瞻。載於潘慧玲（主編），教育評鑑的回顧與展望（頁3-36）。台北：心理。
戴曉霞（2000）。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。台北：揚智。蘇錦麗（1997）。高等教育評鑑：理論與實務。台北：五南。
英文部分
Abma, T. A. (2000). Stakeholder conflict: A case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 199-210.
Abma, T., & Schwandt, T. A. (2005). The practice and politics of sponsored evaluations. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 105-112). London: Sage.
Adelman, C. (Ed.) (1984). The politics and ethics of evaluation. London: Croom Helm.
Alkin, M. C. (1991). Evaluation theory development (II). In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips, Evaluation and education: At quarter century (pp. 91-112). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Ayers, T. D. (1987). Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 263-271.
Ayres, C. E. (1962). Evaluation in higher education. [Review of the book]. The Journal of Higher Education, 33(7), 404-405.
Bamberger, M. (1991). The politics of evaluation in developing countries. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14, 325-339.
Barrow, P. D. M., & Mayhew, P. J. (2000). Investigating principles of stakeholder evaluation in a modern IS development approach. The Journal of Systems and Software, 52, 95-103.
Bay, C. (1965). Politics and pseudopolitics: A critical evaluation of some behavioral literature. The American Political Science Review, 59(1), 39-51.
Beaumont, H. (1939). The evaluation of academic counseling. The Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 79-82, 116.
Benveniste, L. (2002). The political structuration of assessment: Negotiating state power and legitimacy. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 89-118.
Bovens, M., Hart, P. T., & Kuipers, S. (2005). The politics of policy evaluation. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. F. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 317-333). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brandon, P. R. (1998). Stakeholder participation for the purpose of helping ensure evaluation validity: Bridging the gap between collaborative and non-collaborative evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 325-337.
Brandon, P. R. (1999). Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators’ recommendations for program revisions. Evaluation and Planning, 22, 363-372.
Bridges, E. M., & Groves, B. R. (1999). The macro- and micropolitics of personnel evaluation: A framework. Journal fo Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 321-337.
Charles, C. M., & Mertler, C. A. (2002). Introduction to educational research (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Charron, D. C. (2007). Stockholders and stakeholders: The battle for control of the corporation. Cato Journal, 27(1), 1-22.
Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation? Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(3), 199-213.
Chelimsky, E. (1997a). The coming transformations in evaluation. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 1-26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chelimsky, E. (1997b). The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 53-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
Cohen, D. K. (1970). Politics and research: Evaluation of social action programs in education. Review of Educational Research, 40(2), 213-238.
Colin, R. (2000). Small-scale evaluation principles and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cook, T. D. (1997). Lessons learned in evaluation over the past 25 years. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 30-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397-418.
Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C. Phillips, D. C., et al. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
David, M., & Sutton, C. (2004). Social research: The basics. London: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gilliam, A., Davis, D., Barrington, T., Lacson, R., Uhl, G., & Phoenix, U. (2002). The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 5-17.
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Gold, N. (1983). Stakeholder and program evaluation: Characterizations and reflections. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (no. 17, pp. 63-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gossett, C. W. (1999). Politics and practices of intergovernmental evaluation [Review of the book]. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 137-139.
Greene, J. C. (1987). Stakeholder participation in evaluation design: Is it worth the effort? Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 379-394.
Greene, J. C. (1988). Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 12(2), 91-116.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hansen, B. (1949). An evaluation of the Montana study. The Journal of Higher Education, 20(1), 18-27.
Hansen, H. F. (2005). Choosing evaluation models: A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447-462.
Harlen, W. (1985). The politics and ethics of evaluation [Review of the book]. British Journal of Education Studies, 33(1), 103-105.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage.
Hedrick, T. E. (1988). The interaction of politics and evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 9, 5-14.
Henry, G. T., Dickey, K. C., & Areson, J. C. (1991). Stakeholder participation in educational performance monitoring systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 177-188.
House, E. R. (1974). The politics of evaluation in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 45(8), 618-627.
House, E. R. (1999). Evaluation and people of color: A response to professor stanfield. American Jorunal of Evaluation, 20(3), 433-435.
House, E. R. (2001). Unfinished Business: Causes and values. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 309-315.
House, E. R. (2003). Stakeholder bias. In C. A. Christie (ed.), Practice-theory relationship in evaluation: New directions for evaluation (no. 97, pp. 53-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
House, E. R. (2007). Regression to the mean: A novel of evaluation politics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1998). The issue of advocacy in evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(2), 233-236.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (2000). Deliberative democratic evaluation in practice. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 409-421). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (1999). Exploring corporate strategy. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
Joint Committee on Standard for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jose Orlando, T. (1975, June). The politics of evaluation and accountability on the school scene. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Library Association, Sac Francisco.
Karlsson Vestman, O., & Conner, R. F. (2006). The relationship between evaluation and politics. In M. M. Mrak, J. C. Greene, & I. F. Shaw (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation (pp. 225-242). London: Sage.
Kimmel, A. J. (1988). Ethics and values in applied social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Leathwood, C., & Phillips, D. (2000). Developing curriculum evaluation research in higher education: Process, politics and practicalities. Higher Education, 40, 313-330.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Tracks toward a postmodern politics of evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 15(3), 299-309.
Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). From the discourse of “the other” to the other discourse: Stakeholder-based models of evaluation and the human side of social welfare. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 7, 114-117.
Mabry, L. (2002). Postmodern evaluation-or not? American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 141-157.
Madaus, G. F., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Program evaluation: A historical overview. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 3-18). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Madison, A. (1988). The politics of program evaluation [Review of the book]. American Journal of Evaluation, 9, 54-57.
Mathie, A., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity? Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(3), 279-285.
Mcaulay, L., Doherty, N., & Keval, N. (2002). The stakeholder dimension in information systems evaluation. Journal of Information Technology, 17, 241-255.
Melkers, J., & Roessner, D. (1997). Politics and the political setting as an influence on evaluation activities: National research and technology policy programs in the United States and Canada. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(1), 57-75.
Mercier, C. (1997). Participation in stakeholder-based evaluation: A case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(4), 467-475.
Mertens, D. M. (2008). Stakeholder representation in culturally complex communities. In N. L. Smith & P. R. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 41-60). New York: The Guilford Press.
Mertler, C. A. (1999). Teacher perceptions of students as stakeholders in teacher evaluation. American Secondary Education, 27(3), 17-30.
Michalski, G. V., & Cousins, J. B. (2000). Differences in stakeholder perceptions about training evaluation: A concept mapping/pattern matching investigation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 211-230.
Michalski, G. V., & Cousins, J. B. (2001). Multiple perspectives on training evaluation: Probing stakeholder perceptions in a global network development firm. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 37-53.
Mills, H. C. (1935). An evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 77-82.
Mitchell, R. K., Bradley, R. A., & Donna, J. W. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Nguyen, H. T., & Wu, B. (2006). Fundamentals of statistics with fuzzy data. New York: Springer.
Norris, N. (2005). The politics of evaluation and the methodological imagination. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(4), 584-586.
O’Sullivan, R. G., & O’Sullivan, J. M. (1998). Evaluation voices: Promoting evaluation form within programs through collaboration. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 21-29.
Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 321-328.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Education trends in perspective: Analysis of the world education indicators. Paris: Author.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Education at a glance. Paris: Author.
Pace, C. R. (1969). An evaluation of higher education: Plans and perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 40(9), 673-681.
Palumbo, D. J. (Ed.) (1987). The politics of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Papineau, D., & Kiely, M. C. (1996). Participatory evaluation in a community organization: Fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(1), 79-93.
Parent, E. R., Vaughan, C. E., & Wharton, K. (1971). A new approach to course evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 42(2), 133-138.
Patton, M. Q. (1988). Politics and evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 9, 89-94.
Reineke, R. A. (1991). Stakeholder involvement in evaluation: Suggestions for practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 12(1), 39-44.
Reynolds, P. D. (1986). The politics and ethics of evaluation [Review of the book]. Contemporary Sociology, 15(1), 63.
Rieper, O., & Toulemonde, J. (Eds.) (1997). Politics and practices of intergovernmental evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Robertson, R. (1999). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
Rod, M. R. M., & Paliwoda, S. J. (2003). Multi-sector collaboration: A stakeholder perspective on a government, industry and university collaborative venture. Science and Public Policy, 30(4), 273-284.
Scheirer, M. A. (2008). Mainstreaming process evaluation: Ethical issues in reporting interim results. In M. Morris (Ed.), Evaluation ethics for best practice: Cases and commentaries (pp. 144-154). New York: Guilford Press.
Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2007). Accreditation in the framework of evaluation activities: A comparative study in the European higher education area. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area (pp. 1-41). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Scriven, M. (2000). Evaluation ideologies. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 249-278). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Scriven, M. (2001). Evaluation: Future tense. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 301-307.
Šebková, H. (2007). Czech quality assurance: The tasks and responsibilities of accreditation and evaluation. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Segerholm, C. (2003). Researching evaluation in national (state) politics and administration: A critical approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 353-372.
Shadish, W. R. (1998). Evaluation theory is who we are. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 1-19.
Simmons, J., & Eades, E. (2004). Challenging aporia in the performance appraisal of consultants: A stakeholder systems response. Clinician in Management, 12, 153-163.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19-25.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1999). Using professional standards to legally and ethically release evaluation findings. Studies in Educational Evaluatoin, 25, 325-334.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000a). Foundational models for 21st century program evaluatoin. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 33-83). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000b). Lessons in contracting for evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), 293-414.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Taylor, D., & Balloch, S. (Eds.). (2005). The politics of evaluation: Participation and policy implementation. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Turnbull, B. (1999). The mediation effect of participation efficacy on evaluation use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 131-140.
Unruh, D. (2005). Using primary and secondary stakeholders to define facility-to-community transition needs for adjudicated youth with disabilities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 413-422.
Van Vlaenderen, H. (2001). Evaluating development programs: Building joint activity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 343-352.
Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (1995). Improvement and accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London: Routledge.
Weiss, C. H. (1983a). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (no. 17, pp. 3-15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weiss, C. H. (1983b). Toward the future of stakeholder approaches in evaluation. In A. S. Bryk (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (no. 17, pp. 83-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weiss, C. H. (1984). Increasing the likelihood of influencing decisions. In L. Rutman (Ed.), Evaluation research methods: A basic guide (2nd ed., pp. 159-190). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Weiss, C. H. (1993a). Politics and evaluation: A reprise with mellower overtones. American Journal of Evaluation, 14(1), 107-109.
Weiss, C. H. (1993b). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93-106. (Reprinted from Evaluation, 1, pp. 37-45, by C. H. Weiss, 1973, Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation.)
Wergin, J. F. (1976). The evaluation of organizational policy making: A political model. Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 75-115.
Williams, W., & Evans, J. W. (1969, July). The politics of evaluation: The case of head start. Prepared for Annals of American Academy of Political Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED045690)
Worthingtoin, F,. & Hodgson, J. (2005). Academic labour and the politics of quality in higher education: A critical evaluation of the conditions of possibility of resistance. Critical Quarterly, 47(1-2), 96-110.