:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:馬來西亞麻坡中化中學專業學習社群建構微觀觀課與宏觀觀學運作作為之行動研究
作者:彭進財
作者(外文):Pang, Chin-Choy
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:林國楨
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:專業學習社群微觀觀課宏觀觀學行動研究professional learning communitymicro-observationmacro-observationaction research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
本研究旨在透過協同行動研究,成立個案學校馬來西亞麻坡中化中學教師專業學習社群,以建構校本微觀觀課與宏觀觀學之運作作為。本研究根據文獻探討、觀察、訪談、焦點團體訪談省思與文件分析等,獲致以下之重要結論,主要包括:
一、 專業學習社群運作能夠有效促進教師同儕之間互相激勵學習,分享知識與創新,提升教師的專業成長。
二、 微觀觀課的核心理念在於進班觀察學生學習的真實現況,以改善教學實務,提升學生的學習成效為最終目標。
三、 微觀觀課激發教師在教學觀念上起著改變,將觀察的重點移到學生學習的具體事實表現。
四、 微觀觀課形成教室裏面的第三隻眼睛,班級教學更達致理想。
五、 宏觀觀課的核心理念在於走動巡視校園,感受學校的學習氛圍,並蒐集校園教學的資訊,持續改進,進而提升教師教學模式,達成學生學習成就的最終目標。
六、 宏觀觀學促使教師跳脫教室的框架,開拓更廣闊的視野。
七、 學校成立專業學習社群推動微觀觀課與宏觀觀學運作作爲均會對面困境需要加以克服,並可發展相關因應策略,同時採取可行的方案,以利模式的推動與實施。
本研究根據文獻探討、研究結果與結論,針對馬來西亞教育行政機關、華文獨立中學、教師及未來研究等方面,提出以下建議供參考:
一、 建議馬來西亞教育行政機關成立研發小組以規劃成立教師專業學習社群,推動微觀觀課與宏觀觀學之運作,並為獨中教師成長提供諮詢與服務,共享資源,減少各獨中摸索的時間。
二、建議華文獨立中學善用微觀觀課與宏觀觀學方案與實踐策略,提升教學與學習成效;組成推動小組,依學校狀況,發展適切校本微觀觀課與宏觀觀學運作方式;利用微觀觀課與宏觀觀學的實施,增進學校人員的互動與信任,型塑省思合作的學校專業文化;培訓種子教師,落實並持續微觀觀課與宏觀觀學之推展;積極宣導微觀觀課與宏觀觀學理念,化解學校教師的懷疑和抗拒;建立配套措施以協助教師專業成長。
三、建議獨中教師運用團隊分享、合作的力量,互相激勵求專業成長,教師之間的專業對話與合作變成一種常態;鼓勵教師進行宏觀觀學,從小圈圈走入大 圈圈,開拓更廣闊的視野。
四、 建議未來研究對微觀觀課與宏觀觀學這個主題做更多、更深入的
探討;研究方法可以更多元;研究對象有待擴大範疇。
The purpose of this study was to establish a case study of professional learning community in Chung HwA High School Muar in Malaysia through collaborative action research to construct a school-based micro-observation and macro-observation operation. Based on literature discussion, observation, interview, focus group interview , self reflection and document analysis, the study has reached the following important conclusions, including:
1. The professional learning community operation can effectively promote mutual encouragement between teachers and peers, share knowledge and innovation, and enhance teachers' professional growth.
2. The core concept of mico-observation is to observe the true realization of student learning in order to improve teaching practice and improve students' learning outcome as the ultimate goal.
3. The micro-observation class inspires teachers to change their teaching concepts, and shifts the focus of observation to the specific factual performance of students' learning.
4. The micro-observation forms the third eye in the classroom, and the class teaching is more ideal.
5. The core concept of macro-observation is to walk around the campus, feel the learning atmosphere of the school, collect information on campus teaching, and continuously improve, so as to enhance the teaching mode of teachers and achieve the ultimate goal of students' learning achievement.
6. Macro-observations encourage teachers to break away from the classroom framework and open up a broader perspective.
7. The establishment of a professional learning community to promote micro-observation and macro-observation of the operation as a meeting dilemma needs to be overcome, and can develop relevant response strategies, while adopting feasible solutions to facilitate the promotion and implementation of the model.
Based on literature research, research results and conclusions, this study proposes the following recommendations for Malaysia educational administrations, Chinese independent schools, teachers and future research:
1. It is recommended that the Malaysia Education Administration set up a research and development team to plan and establish a professional learning community for teachers, promote the operation of micro- observation and macro-observation, and provide consultation and services for the growth of independent school teachers, share resources and reduce the groping of each individual time.
2. It is recommended that chinese independent schools make good use of micro-observation and macro-observation programs and practical strategies to promote teaching and learning effectiveness; form a promotion team to develop appropriate school-based schools according to school conditions
micro-observation and macro-observation mode of operation; using micro-observation and macro-observation to enhance the interaction and trust of school personnel, and to shape the professional culture of the school;Training seed teachers, implementing and continuing the micro- observation and macro-observation; guide micro- observation and macro-observation concepts, resolve the doubts observation and resistance of school teachers; establish supporting measures to help teachers grow professionally.
3.It is recommended that the chinese independent school teachers use the power of team sharing and cooperation to encourage each other to grow professionally, make professional dialogue and cooperation between teachers becomes a norm; encourage teachers to make macro views, learn to walk into a large circle from a small circle and open up a broader perspective.
4. It is suggested that future research should do more and more in-depth discussion on the subject of micro-observation and macro-observation; the research method can be multivariate approach; the research object needs to be expanded.
壹、中文部分
丁文祺(2007)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
王文科(2001)。教育研究法(第六版)。臺北:五南。
王文科、王智弘譯(1999)。焦點訪談法。臺北:五南。
王世英計畫主持(2000)。教學觀察與會談:認知教練取向。臺北:國立教育資料館。
王淑慧(2015)。馬來西亞華文獨立中學教師在職進修 之教育專業文憑課程。臺灣教育評論月刊,2015,4(3), 67-73。
李玲惠 (2016) 。馬來西亞華文中學教師專業社群之引進與發展-以吉隆坡一所華文獨立中學為例。2016東亞地區校長學學術研討會「學校改進議題與趨勢」,241-257。
李真文、羅寶鳳(2013)。學習共同體為基的差異化教學探究。教育研究月刊,233,21-35。
余肇傑(2014)。淺談佐藤學「學習共同體」。 臺灣教育評論月刊,3(5),122-125。
沈秀香、黃哲彬(2009)。淺談社會資本及其對教育政策與教育實踐之啟示。教育趨勢導報,32,133-136。
呂木琳(2002)。教學視導-理論與實務。臺北:五南。
呂木琳、張德銳(譯)(2002)。B. M. Harris, & J. Hill著。教師發展評鑑系統(Development Teacher Evalution Kit)。新竹:國立新竹師範學院。
吳明清(2002)。促進教師專業發展的策略。理論與策略,16(1),99-113。
吴建成(2019)。支援小型獨中芻議。馬來西亞東方日報 。取自
http://www.orientaldaily.com.my/s/274790
吳清基(1990)。精緻教育的理念。臺北:師大書苑。
吳俊憲(2010)。教師專業學習社群:意涵、理論與推動策略。靜宜大學師資培育中心實習輔導通訊,11,3-7。
吳清山(2017)。未來教育發展。臺北:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北:高等教育。
佐藤學( 2011)。學校再生的哲學—學習共同體與活動系統。全球教育展望,40(3),3-10。
林天祐(2005)。教育研究倫理準則。教育研究月刊,132,70-86。
林劭仁(2006)。專業學習社群運用於師資培育自我評鑑之探究。中正教育研究,5(2),79-111。
林素卿(2012)。教師行動研究導論。高雄:麗文文化。
林國楨(2011)。高中優質化輔助方案SAP:學校完全自主管理與範例。100學年度高中優質化校際交流研習,臺南市德光高中,臺南市。
林國楨(2012)。高中優質化輔助方案學校增能支持系統:校際交流與自主管理。台灣教育評論月刊,1(10),24-28。
林清江(1999)。與教師一起進行教育改革。中等教育,50(1),10-11。
周啟葶(2006)。以「學習社群」促進教師專業發展之分析。中等教育,57(5),94-113。
徐世貴(2003)。課程改革與校長工作對策。遼寧教育,4,1-7。
郭進隆(譯)(2003)。彼得.聖吉著。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務。臺北:天下遠見。
高松景(2012。臺北市:「學習共同體」下校長「學習領導」的新議題。親子天下。取自http://topic.parenting.com.tw/issue/learning3/taiwan/article05-1.aspx
陳佩英、簡菲莉(主編)(2015)。高中優質化的藍海航程紀實。臺北:教育部國民及學前教育署。
陳麗華(2013)。學習共同體-臺灣初體驗。臺北:親子天下,40-46。
秦夢群 (1999)。營造學習型組織學校:教育行政人員應有的體認與策略。教育資料與研究,27,9-12。
教育部(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊(2版)。臺北:教育部。
張夏平(2008)。學校組織變革與教師專業發展關係之研究-以台南市國民中小學為例。國立臺南大學博士論文,未出版,臺南市。
張新仁(2003)。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北:心理。
張喜崇(2014)。教師即研究者:獨中教師專業成長的運行模式。2014年馬來西亞華文教育研討會文集「挑戰與革新」,96-97。
張德銳(2008)。以教學觀察與回饋促進教師專業發展。97年度教師專業發展評鑑教學影片委託製作計畫,教學觀察與回饋。
張德銳(2017)。教學觀察與回饋三部曲:備課、觀課、議課。師友月刊, 597(3), 40-44。
張德銳、王淑珍(2010)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報,41(1),61-90。
張孝慈、賴素卿、林淑惠(2014)。有效教學一點訣:開放課堂行思學藉由共同備課、公開授課、觀課議課與組成教師專業團隊等策略,提高英語教學效能之教學分享。國教新知,61(2) ,63-74。
黃旭鈞(2009):「教室走察」的理念及其在提昇學校教育品質之應用。 教育研究月刊,188,100-111。
黃旭鈞(2014)。教室走察,教師專業發展的新思維。臺北:高等教育。
黃奇汪(1968)。革新教育必須改進教學方法--從國校舉辦教學觀摩會談起。師友月刊,12,19-19。
黃郁倫(譯)(2017)。佐藤學著。邁向專家之路-教師教育改革的藍圖。臺北市:高教出版社。
黃郁倫、鍾啟泉(譯)( 2012)。佐藤學著。學習的革命:從教室出發的改革。臺北:天下。
黃禎玉(2009)。獨中教育從復興到教改。馬來西亞華校校友會聯合會總會編,董總50年特刊,加影:董總,14-22。
黃禎玉(2013)。馬來西亞華文獨立中學 「校本教師專業發展」 之現況。馬來西亞教育資料集刊「2013 各國中等教育」,58,加影:董總,25-42。
黃禎玉(2018)。教室裏的第三隻眼:教學視察與觀課對獨中教師專業發展的意義。馬來西亞教育評論,加影:董總。
黃瑞琴(2001)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
董總(2017)。馬來西亞華文獨中教育藍圖(諮詢稿)。吉隆坡:馬來西亞華文獨中教育藍圖專案小組。
董總(2018a)。馬來西亞華文獨中教育藍圖。吉隆坡:馬來西亞華文獨中教育藍圖專案小組。
董總(2018b)。馬來西亞教育評論。吉隆坡:馬來西亞華校董事聯合會總會。
鄧日才(2005)。校長經 (再版)。馬來西亞:鄧日才。
廖世芸(2014)。桃園縣國中綜合活動學習領域教學觀察評鑑指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。取自 http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/75616616504814426586
潘慧玲(2013)。學習共同體-臺灣初體驗。臺北:親子天下,78-87。
潘慧玲(編)(2018)。啟動高中課程變革:十二年國教課綱的轉化實踐。台北:國家教育研究院。
簡妙娟(2003)。合作學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁(主編),學習與教學新趨勢(403-463頁)。臺北:心理出版社。
蔡進雄(2005)。社會資本的意涵及其對學校經營領導的啟示。研習資訊,22(2) ,74-81。
歐用生(2004)。 提升教師行動研究能力。取自http://content.edu.tw/primary/society/ks_ck/nine/n4.htm
鄭良樹(1998)。馬來西亞華文教育發展史(第一~四冊)。吉隆玻:馬來西亞華校教師會總會。
鄭良樹(2005)。馬來西亞華文教育發展簡史。新山:南方學院。
鄭昭賢(2012)。中化歷史長河百年特刊。麻坡:中化中學
蔣宗堯( 2001)。評課藝術。北京:中國林業
劉世雄(2017)。臺灣國中教師對共同備課、公開觀課與 集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及專業成長知覺之研究。當代教育研究季刊 ,23(1),43-76。
賴協志(2014)。活化教學的動能:教師專業學習社群觀點。教育人力與專業發展,31(3),83-90。
賴協志(2018)。國民中小學教師正向領導量表之建構與運用:學習領域召集人觀點。教育政策論壇,21(2),131-164。
駱淑慧、林彩雲(2005a)。馬來西亞教育發展概況。吉隆玻:馬來西亞華校教師會總會。
駱淑慧、林彩雲(2005b)。馬來西亞華文教育現況與未來發展。吉隆玻:馬來西亞華校教師會總會。
謝文全(2007)。教育行政學(第三版)。臺北:高等教育。
藍偉瑩 (2017)。教學現場三部曲——共備、觀課與授課。親子天下
取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/3146

貳、西文部分
Andy, H., & Michael, F. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Place of Publication.
Barber, M.,& Mourshed, B.(2007).How the best performing schools come out on top. London:McKinsey Group.
Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. London:DfES.
Buckner, T. M.(2008).Is managing by wandering around still relevant? Exchange, 86-88.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. MA: Harvard University Press.
Corcoran, T. (1995). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Developing professional development schools: early lessons, challenge, and promise”. Darling-Hammond, L. (ed.) Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession.New York: Teachers College Press.
David,L. & Juan, M. S.(2011). Classroom observation: desirable conditions established by teachers. European journal of teacher education, 34(4), 449–463.
Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., English, F. W., Frase, L. E., & Poston, W. K. (2004). The three-minute classroom walkthrough: Changing school supervisory practice one teacher at a time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
DuFour, R.(2004).What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6– 11.
Earl, L. M., & Katz, S.(2010). Creating a culture of inquiry: Harnessing data for professional learning. In A. M. Blankstein, P. D. Houston, & R. W. Cple (Eds.), Data enhanced leadership (pp.9-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Feldman, J., & Tung, R.(2001). Whole school reform: How school use the data-based inquiry and decision making process. Paper presented at the 82nd annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, April 2001, Seattle.
Frase, L., & Hetzel, R.(2003). School management by wandering around (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: R&L Education.
Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewski, R. J.(1993). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers(3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovvich College Publishers.
Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. LTSN Generic centre Higher Education Academy: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk
Graves, T. (1991). The controversy over group rewards in cooperative classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48 (7), 77-79.
Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. as cited in Kemmis, S. & McTaggert, R. (eds) (1988). The action research reader (3ed). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H.(2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement:
Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95-110.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and teacher education, 10 (4),423-438.
Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable professional learning communities. In Stoll, L. and Seashore Louis, K. (Eds), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hopkins, G.(2009). Walk-throughs are on the move. Education World. Retrieved from http://www.education-world.com/a_admin/admin/admin405.shtml
Hord, S. D. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, T.X.: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Huffman, J.B., & Hipp, K.K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
James, S. Coleman. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Place of Publication: University of Chicago.
Joana, S. N.(2018). The role of classroom observation in pre-service english teachers’ understanding of the teaching profession. Porta linguarum 30 , 193-206
Johnson, B. (1993). Teacher-as-researcher. ERIC Digest. Retrieved on August 25th, 2004 at http://www.ericfacility.net/ericdigests/ed355205.html
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Learning together and alone (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Kachur, D. S., Stout, J. A., & Edwards, C. L.(2010). Classroom walkthroughs to improve teaching and learning. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Leana, C.R., & Pil, F.K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance.Organization Science, 17(3), 353–366.
Louis, K.S., Marks, H.M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in Restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757–798.
Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M.(2008). Data-driven school improvement:Linking data and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Masoumeh, Z.(2012). An investigation into the effect of classroom observation on teaching methodology. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences 70 ( 2013 ) , 605 – 614
Mbatia, J. W.(2016). Teachers’ perception on classroom observation and checking of pupils’ exercise books by head teachers on performance of duty in primary schools in nakuru north district, kenya. Journal of education & social policy, 3(3), 80-87
Means, B., Padilla, C., & Gallagher, L.(2010). Use of education data at the local level:From accountability to instructional improvement. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from :http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opend/ppss/reports.html#edtech
Mooney N., & Mausbach, A. (2008). Align the design: A blueprint for school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Nash, R. (1973) . Classrooms observed. London: Routledge.
Noddings, N. (1989). Theoretical and practical concerns about small groups in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 89 (5), 606-623.
Pavan, B. N.(1985). Hunters clinical supervision and instruction models: Research in schools utilizing comparative measures. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 273606)
Peter, T. J., & Austin, N. (1985). A passion for excellence:The leadership difference. New York, NY: Warner Book.
Pitler, H., & Goodwin, B.(2008). Classroom walkthroughs: Learning to see the trees and the forests. Changing Schools, 58/Summer, 9-11.
Powney, J., & Watts, M. (1987). Interviewing in educational research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Protheroe, N. (2009). Using classroom walkthroughs to improve instruction. Principal 3, 30 – 34.
Reese, S.(2009). Management by Walking Around. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 83(9), 10-11.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989).Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman
Schmuck, R. A. (2006). Practical action research for change, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
Senge, Peter M. (1990). The fifth discipline : The art and practice of the learning organization. New York : Doubleday/Currency.
Serrat, O.(2009). Managing by walking around. Knowledge Solution, 37, 1-3.
Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stenhouse, L.(1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Stoll, L., & Louis, K.S. (Eds.). (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence,
depth, and dilemmas. Glasgow: The McGraw-Hill companies.
Sompong, P. E., & Sudharm, D.(2015).The development of professional learning community in primary schools. Academic Journals. 10 (21) , 2789-2796.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE