臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科展績優教師創意思考教學模式之建構--以國小自然科「太陽的運行」為例
書刊名：教育學刊
作者：鄭英耀 引用關係／劉昆夏
作者(外文)：Cheng, Ying-yao／Liu, Kun-shia
出版日期：2007
卷期：28
頁次：頁137-168
主題關鍵詞：創意思考教學；教材開發；知識分享；自然科；創造性問題解決；Creative thinking instruction；Teaching material development；Knowledge sharing；Science subject；Creative problem solving
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:129
  • 點閱點閱:52
本研究旨在邀集具備豐富教學經驗的科展績優教師，建構一套適合推廣的創意思考教學模式及教材。教材開發成員包括七位國小自然科教師，平均教學年資20年，其中有五位教師曾榮獲五次以上之高雄市國中小科展第一名，而且七位教師之中有三位是國小教科書的撰述委員，兼具專業的教材開發能力。教材之開發歷程，首先由團隊成員透過定期的聚會討論與專業分享，建構適用於國小自然科的創意思考教學模式。其次，再依據所建構之模式，以「太陽的運行」為單元主題，設計一套適用於九年一貫課程的教案，提供國小教師教學上的參考。結果發現：科展績優教師團隊經過17次的討論與共識建立，依據創造性問題解決(creative problem solving)模式、科學探究(scientific inquiry)教學以及STS(Science/Technology/Society)教學的理念，將創意思考教學模式(Creative Thinking Instruction Model, CTIM)劃分為「教師的創意」與「學生的創意」兩大部分，包含「設計情境」、「發現問題」、「提出假設」、「設計驗證」、「解釋結果」以及「推廣應用」六個步驟。以「太陽的運行」為單元主題所設計的教案，不僅符合九年一貫自然與生活科技學習領域的能力指標，亦與坊間各版本教科書的主題相呼應，有利於教育現場實務教學之運用。
The main purpose of this study was to develop creative thinking instruction model and teaching material of science. Seven science fair awarded teachers with average 20 years of working experience were recruited as a team. Among them, five were awarded science fair champions more than five times in Kaohsiung city, and three were writing committee members of science textbooks. The study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, an appropriate Creative Thinking Instruction Model (CTIM) was constructed through panel discussion and shared teaching expertise. In the second stage, the teaching material of "The Motion of the Sun" was developed on the basis of the constructed CTIM. The results indicate that: 1) a general consensus is reached by the team members through 17 panel discussions, and the essentials of creative problem solving model, scientific inquiry approach and STS (Science/Technology/Society) approach are combined on the basis of CTIM, which then is classified into "creativity of the teachers" and "creativity of the pupils", which are further differentiated into a six-step instruction loop: situation designing, problem finding, hypothesis proposing, testing designing, results explaining, and application promoting/2) The teaching material of "The Motion of the Sun" not only meets the competence indicators of science and life technology learning area in the Grade 1-9 Curriculum, but also is in accordance with the subjects of most commercial science textbooks. It can be applied to current science teaching and to promoting creativity education.
期刊論文
1.Rose, L. H.、Lin, H. T.(1984)。A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs。Journal of Creative Behavior，18(1)，11-22。  new window
2.吳坤璋、吳裕益、黃台珠(20051200)。科學探究能力測驗的編製與信、效度考驗。測驗學刊，52(2)，119-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Coll, R. K.(2005)。The Role of Models and Analogies in Science Education: Implications from Research。International Journal of Science Education，27(2)，183-198。  new window
4.Bibens, R. F.(2001)。Using inquiry effectively。Theory into Practice，19(2)，87-92。  new window
5.黃萬居(20021200)。由教學原理論述STS教學活動之應用。科學教育研究與發展季刊，2002專刊，59-85。  延伸查詢new window
6.Sternberg, R. J.(2003)。Creative thinking in the classroom。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research，47(3)，325-338。  new window
7.Peterson, R. E.(2002)。Establishing the Creative Environment in Technology Education。The Technology Teacher，61(4)，7-10。  new window
8.Scott, G. M.、Leritz, L. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2004)。The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review。Creativity Research Journal，16(4)，361-388。  new window
9.徐蓓蓓(19831200)。教師個人特質、師生口語互動與學生對教師行為的知覺、學生學業成就之關係研究。教育心理學報，16，99-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Christie, K.、Kaminski, K.(2002)。Creative problem solving at the united way。Communique，13，8-11。  new window
11.Johnson, D.(2002)。Everyday practice in problem-solving。Library Talk，15(1)。  new window
12.鄭英耀、王文中(20020900)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究，15，163-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.洪振方(20031200)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15(3)，641-662。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Hendriks, P.(1999)。Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing。Knowledge and process management，6(2)，91-100。  new window
15.Isaksen, S. G.、Treffinger, D. J.(2004)。Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving。Journal of Creative Behavior，38(2)，75-101。  new window
16.孫仲山(1996)。師生互動的教學理論。高市文教，57，38-41。  延伸查詢new window
17.Harris, D. G.、Blank, S. S.(1983)。A Comparative Study: Two Approaches to Enhance Creative Problem-solving in Grade Five Students。B. C. Journal of Special Education，7(2)，129-152。  new window
18.Isaksen, S. G.、Dorval, K. B.(1993)。Changing Views of CPS: Over 40 Years of Continuous Improvement。International Creativity Network，3，1-5。  new window
19.Anderson, D. R.(2002)。Creative Teachers: Risk, Responsibility, and Love。Journal of Education，183(1)，33-48。  new window
20.James, P. T. F.(2000)。Fostering Creativity Education。Education，120(1)，744-757。  new window
21.Richetti, C.、Sheerin, J.(1999)。Helping Student Ask the Right Questions。Educational Leadership，57(3)，58-62。  new window
22.Sternberg, R. J.(2000)。Identifying and Developing Creativity Giftedness。Roeper Review，23(2)，60-64。  new window
23.Howe, R.(1996)。Instruction and Experience for Abilities Related to Creative Proccesses and Products。Journal of Creative Behavior，30，156-178。  new window
24.Freeman, T.、Wolfe, P.、Littlejohn, B.、Mayfield, N.(2001)。Measuring Success: Survey Shows CPS Impacts Indiana。Communique，12，1-6。  new window
25.Hoover, S. M.(1994)。Scientific Problem Finding in Gifted Fifth-grade Students。Roeper Review，16(3)，156-159。  new window
26.Palincsar, A. S.、Magnusson, S. J.、Vincent, M.(2002)。Supporting Guided-inquiry Instruction。Teaching Exceptional Children，34(3)，88-91。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭英耀、李育嘉(2003)。國小自然科教學行為之差異分析：科展績優教師與一般教師之比較。2003創造力實踐歷程研討會，政治大學創新與創造力研究中心舉辦 (會議日期: Mar. 21-22)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪文東(2001)。國小自然科學創造思考教學模組設計與評估。臺中市。961-991。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇育任(2001)。運用STS理念設計九年一貫自然與生活科技統整課程之研究。臺中市。931-960。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭英耀、張川木、王文中(2002)。科學創意教學實驗與教材發展－以國小自然科為例。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭英耀、王文中(2003)。科學創意教學實驗與教材發展－以國小自然科為例（II）。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.夏侯欣鵬(2000)。信任與權力對組織內知識分享意願影響之研究--以銀行放款部門主管為例(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.施乃華(2002)。創造思考教學成效之後設分析(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂素雯(2002)。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小六年級學童問題解決能力、態度及學習成就之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.張振松(2001)。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力及問題解決能力之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Yager, R. E.(1996)。Science/ Technology/ Society as Reform in Science Education。New York, NY：Albany：State University of New York：State University of New York。  new window
2.Joyce, B.、Weil, M.(1980)。Models of teaching。Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Brooking, Annie(1999)。Corporate Memory: Strategies for Knowledge Management。International Thomson Business Press。  new window
4.教育部(2004)。2005-2008教育施政主軸。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Maker, C. J.(1982)。Curriculum development for the gifted。Austin, Texas：PRO-ED, Inc.。  new window
6.教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Isaksen, S. G.、Treffinger, D. J.(1985)。Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course。Buffalo, NY：Bearly Limited。  new window
8.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
9.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
10.Isaksen, S. G.、Dorval, K. B.、Treffinger, D. J.(2000)。Creative approaches to problem solving。Dubuque, Iowa：Kendal/Hunt。  new window
11.Nonaka, Ikujiro、Takeuchi, Hirotaka(1995)。The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.(1991)。Developing Minds: A Resourse Book for Teaching Thinking, Vol. 1。Developing Minds: A Resourse Book for Teaching Thinking, Vol. 1。Alexandria, VA。  new window
13.吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀(2002)。教育部創造力教育政策白皮書子計畫（六）國際創造力教育發展趨勢專案。教育部創造力教育政策白皮書子計畫（六）國際創造力教育發展趨勢專案。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.Koulopoulos, T. M.、Frappaolo(2001)。知識管理。知識管理。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.Barell, J.(2003)。Developing More Curious Minds。Developing More Curious Minds。Alexandria, VA。  new window
16.教育部(2004)。科學教育白皮書。科學教育白皮書。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
17.Houtz, J. C.(1990)。Environments That Support Creative Thinking。Cognition, Curriculum and Literacy。Norwood, NJ。  new window
18.Hartman, H. J.(2001)。Developing Students' Metacognitive Knowledge and Skill。Metacognition in Learning and Instruction。Dordrecht, Netherlands。  new window
19.Hartman, H. J.(2001)。Metacognition in Science Teaching and Learning。Metacognition in Learning and Instruction。Dordrecht, Netherlands。  new window
圖書論文
1.Torrance, E. P.(1986)。Teaching creative and gifted learners。Handbook of Research on Teaching。New York：Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
2.Barell, J.(1991)。Reflective teaching for thoughtfulness。Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1031（臺灣：1022，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67811927
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上