:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Development of Chinese Leadership Model: An Empirically-based Theory
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:康自立張菽萱 引用關係楊禮仁黃舒楷
作者(外文):Kang, Tze-liChang, Shu-hsuanYang, Li-jenHuang, Shu-kai
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁115-142
主題關鍵詞:文化認知領導行為領導效能Culture cognitionLeadership behaviorLeadership effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:312
  • 點閱點閱:45
伴隨企業全球化趨勢的發展,不同文化下的有效領導議題日趨受到重視。本研究的基本假設乃是:在中國傳統文化之影響下,華人對於領導的認知將有其獨特的內涵,且領導者的領導行為亦將反映出中國文化的某些特質。本研究旨在從文化的觀點採以下程序發展以實證為基礎之領導理論:一、透過文件分析,發展「中國式領導模式」;二、建構「中國式領導行為量表」:為一份用以調查部屬對領導行為期望與感受之量化量表;三、採用本研究編成之領導行為量表在不同領域進行一系列的實地測試,包括:在台灣的學校、服務業和製造業,並且與中國的研究進行比較。研究結果顯示:中國式領導行為量表在不同領域的實地測試得到良好的結果。此外,中國式領導量表也被應用於探討領導行為感受、領導行為期望、情境變數和領導效能之間的關係。
Increasing globalization of organizations has made it more important to study effective leadership in different cultures. The basic assumption of this paper is that under the influence of Chinese culture, Chinese people have their unique conception of leadership; moreover, the leadership behavior reflects some characteristics of Chinese culture. Grounded on a cultural perspective, this paper aims to develop an empiricallybased theory of leadership by the following process: first, to develop a “Chinese Leadership Model” (CLM) by documentary analysis; second, to construct a “Chinese Leadership Behavior Inventory” (CLBI), which is a quantitative instrument for evaluating the leadership behavior by subordinates; and third, to verify CLM by conducting a series of field-testing, including schools, service industry and manufacturing industry in Taiwan, and making a comparative study between Taiwan and China. Our CLM and CLBI showed very satisfactory results in the filed tests. Furthermore, CLBI was applied to exploring the relationship between leadership behavior perception, leadership behavior expectation, situational variables and leadership effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.Villa, J. R.、Howell, J. P.、Dorfman, P. W.、Daniel, D. L.(2003)。Problems with Detecting Moderators in Leadership Research Using Moderated Multiple Regression。The Leadership Quarterly,14(1),3-23。  new window
2.Bolman, L. G.、Deal, T. E.(1991)。Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frames, multi-sector analysis。Human Resource Management,30(4),509-534。  new window
3.Dorfman, Peter W.、Howell, J. P.、Hibino, S.、Lee, J. K.、Tate, U.、Bautista, A.(1997)。Leadership in Western and Asian Countries: Commonalities and Differences in Effective Leadership Processes across Cultures。The Leadership Quarterly,8(3),233-274。  new window
4.Fu, P. P.、Yukl, G.(2000)。Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the United States and China。Leadership Quarterly,11(2),251-266。  new window
5.Den Hartog, D. N.、House, R. J.、Hanges, P. J.、Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A.、Dorfman, P. W.、Abdalla, I. A.、Akande, B. E.(1999)。Culture Specific and Cross-culturally Generalizable Implicit Leadership Theories: Are Attributes of Charismatic/Transformational Leadership Universally Endorsed?。The Leadership Quarterly,10(2),219-256。  new window
6.Hofetede, Greet(1993)。Cultural constraints in management theories。Academy of Management Executive,7(1),81-94。  new window
7.Bolman, L. G.、Deal, T. E.(1991)。Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frame, multi-sector analysis。Human Resource Management,30(4),509-534。  new window
8.Bass, Bernard M.(1990)。From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision。Organizational Dynamics,18(3),19-31。  new window
9.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
10.Dickson, Marcus W.、Den Hartog, Deanne N.、Mitchelson, Jacqueline K.(2003)。Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions。The Leadership Quarterly,14(6),719-768。  new window
11.Bennett, M.(1977)。Testing management theories cross-culturally。Journal of Applied Psychology,62(5),578-581。  new window
12.Kang, T. L.,、Chang, S. H.(2001)。Development ala three-dimensional leadership model in technological and vocational education in Taiwan。Global Journal of Engineering Education,5(2),139-146。  new window
13.Meade, R. D.(1970)。Leadership studies of Chinese and Chinese-Americans。Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology,1(4),325-332。  new window
14.Scandura, T.,、Dorfman, P.(2004)。Leadership research in an international and cross-cultural context。Leadership Quarterly,15(2),277-307。  new window
15.Smith, P. B., Wang, Z. M.,、Leung, K.(1997)。Leadership, decision-making and cultural context: Event management within Chinese joint ventures。Leadership Quarterly,8(4),413-431。  new window
16.Van de Vliert, E.,、Smith, P. B.(2004)。Leader reliance on subordinates across nations that differ in development and climate。Leadership Quarterly,15(3),381-403。  new window
17.Bennett, M.(1977)。Testing management theories cross-culturally。Journal of Applied Psychology,62,578-581。  new window
18.Kang, T. L.、Chang, S. H.(2001)。Development ala three-dimensional leadership model in technological and vocational education in Taiwan。Global Journal of Engineering Education,5(2),139-146。  new window
19.Meade, R. D.(1970)。Leadership studies of Chinese and Chinese-Americans。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,1(4),325-332。  new window
20.Scandura, T.、Dorfman, P.(2004)。Leadership research in an international and cross-cultural context。Leadership Quarterly,15(2),277-307。  new window
21.Smith, P. B.、Wang, Z. M.、Leung, K.(1997)。Leadership, decision-making and cultural context: Event management within Chinese joint ventures。Leadership Quarterly,8(4),413-431。  new window
22.Van de Vliert, E.、Smith, P. B.(2004)。Leader reliance on subordinates across nations that differ in development and climate。Leadership Quarterly,15(3),381-403。  new window
會議論文
1.蘇國禎與黃昱瞳(2001)。大學院校主管領導行為量表之發展:華人社會觀點。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇國禎、黃昱瞳(2001)。大學院校主管領導行為量表之發展:華人社會觀點。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.康自立、張菽萱(1997)。中國式領導模式之建構及在技職教育之應用研究(I):中國式領導理論之建構 (計畫編號:NSC-86-2516-S-018-002-TG)。台北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.康自立與張菽萱(1998)。中國式領導模式之建構及在技職教育之應用研究(II):中國式領導量表之建立。台北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.康自立與張菽萱(1999)。中國式領導模式之建構及在技職教育之應用研究(III):中國式領導量表在技職教育之應用研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.康自立與張菽萱(2000)。中國式領導量表之建立及其在製造業之應用研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.康自立、張菽萱(1999)。中國式領導模式之建構及在技職教育之應用研究(III):中國式領導量表在技職教育之應用研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.康自立、張菽萱(2000)。中國式領導量表之建立及其在製造業之應用研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張其高(2004)。海峽兩岸製造業主管領導風格、部屬成熟度、工作特性、與領導效能之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許世卿(2000)。中國式領導行為模式在我國製造業之應用研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇國禎(2000)。我國服務業領導模式之發展及其應用之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.江玫君(2001)。中國式領導模式之比較研究:以中國大陸浙江省與台灣地區普通中學為例,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.江玫君(2001)。中國式領導摸式之比較研究:以中國大陸浙江省與台灣地區普通中學為例。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Adler, N.(1991)。International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior。International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior。沒有紀錄:PWS-KENT Publishing Company。  new window
2.Lords R. G.、Maher, K. J.(1991)。Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance。Boston, MA:Unwin Hyman。  new window
3.Mosley, D. C., Pietri, P. H.,、Megginson, L. C.(1996)。Management, leadership in action。New York, NY:Harper Collins College。  new window
4.Quinn, R. E.(1992)。Personal reflective instruments for successful management: Competing values developmental tool。San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass。  new window
5.Lipman-Blueman, Jean、席玉蘋(1997)。整合優勢:群雄並起世界中的領先之道。臺北市:智庫文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊中芳(1996)。如何研究中國人。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kouzes, J. M.、Posner, B. Z.(1995)。The leadership challenge。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Lévi-Strauss, Claude、Jacobson, Claire(1963)。Structural Anthropology。New York:Basic Books。  new window
9.Yukl, G. A.(2001)。Leadership in organizations。New York。  new window
10.Nahavandi, A.(2000)。The art and science of leadership。Upper Sader River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
11.Adler, N. J.(1997)。International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior。Concinnati:South-western College Publishing。  new window
12.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
14.Yukl, Gary A.(2002)。Leadership in organizations。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
15.Joreskog, K. G.、Sorbom, D.(1993)。LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide。Chicago:Scientific Software。  new window
16.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research。Aldine。  new window
17.楊忠試、V. D. Rust(1999)。邁向台灣的教育政策:國際化與本土化。教育科學的國際化與本土化。台北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Nahavandi, A.(1997)。The art and science of leadership。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
19.Piaget, J.(1979)。Le structuralisme。Paris:Presses Universitaires de France。  new window
20.楊忠城、Rust, V. D.(1999)。邁向台灣的教育政策:國際化與本土化。教育科學的國際化與本土化 \\ 國立台灣師範大學教育學系教育部國家講座 (主編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Getzels, J. W.(1963)。Conflict and role behavior in the educational setting。Readings in the social psychology of education \\ W. W. Charters ; N. L. Gage (Eds.)。Boston, MA。  new window
22.Piaget, J.(1979)。Le structuralisme。Paris, France。  new window
圖書論文
1.House, R. J.、Aditya, R. N.、Wright, N. S.(1997)。Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory。New perspectives on international/organizational psychology。San Francisco, CA:New Lexington。  new window
2.Getzels, J. W.(1963)。Conflict and role behavior in the educational setting。Readings in the social psychology of education。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacan.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE