:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣中小學教師職業流動表分析
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:黃毅志 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Yih-jyh
出版日期:2014
卷期:60:4
頁次:頁33-61
主題關鍵詞:中小學教師職業流動階級意識Elementary and junior high school teachersOccupational mobilityClass consciousness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:349
  • 點閱點閱:187
中小學教師職業流動愈是封閉,愈有助於階級意識發展。本研究分析臺灣中小學教師流動的封閉性與可能的階級意識發展,以對數線性與對數相乘分析,結果顯示,從父職到初職、初職到現職與父職到現職的流動過程,都只用一個主要代表職業間社經地位差距愈大,相對流動機會愈小的齊一關聯參數,以及流動表對角線上六個代表不流動封閉性的參數,就使流動表適合資料。以下說明各參數所顯示的中小學教師流動封閉性:一、從初職到現職流動的封閉性,以中小學教師最高。二、從父職到初職、父職到現職的流動封閉性,中小學教師排名第二。而在以上三個流動過程中,各職業與中小學教師社經地位差距愈大,相對流動機會都愈小。
The more closed occupational mobility the elementary and junior high school teachers in Taiwan are, more helpful to develop class consciousness it is. This study explores the closed pattern of teachers’ mobility and the possible development of class consciousness. According to loglinear and multiplicative analysis, in the mobility process from father’s occupation to the first occupation, and then to the current occupation, and from father’s occupation to the current occupation, the uniform association parameter mainly presenting the larger the gap of socioeconomic status between occupations is, the smaller the opportunity of relative mobility is, and the six parameters on the diagonal mobility tables presenting the immobile closed pattern, make the mobility tables fitted the data. The findings indicate that the teachers’ closed mobility in the process from the first occupation to the current occupation is the highest. The teachers’ closed motilities in the process from father’s occupation to the first occupation and to the current occupation are the second high. Finally, above three mobility tables, the larger the gap of socioeconomic status between teachers and other occupations is, the smaller the opportunity of relative mobility is.
期刊論文
1.Emily, B.(2009)。Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: Why mothers matter。American Sociological Review,74,507-528。  new window
2.Florencia, T.(2005)。Unequal but fluid: Social mobility in child in comparative perspective。American Sociological Review,70,422-450。  new window
3.Hiroshi, I.、Walter, M.、John, M. R.(1995)。Class origin, class destination, and education: A cross-national study of ten industrial nations。American Journal of Sociology,101(1),145-193。  new window
4.Jan, O. J.、David, B. G.、Matthew, D. C.、Reinhard, P.、Mary, C. B.(2009)。Microclass mobility: Social reproduction in four countries。American Journal of Sociology,114(4),977-1036。  new window
5.Kim, A. W.、David, B. G.(2012)。The three worlds of inequality。American Journal of Sociology,117(6),1723-1785。  new window
6.Michael, E. S.、Mark, P. B.、Susan, M. M.(1998)。Origins, destinations, & association in occupational mobility。American Journal of Sociology,104(3),687-721。  new window
7.Raftery, A. E.(1986)。Choosing modeling for cross-classifications。American Sociological Review,51,145-146。  new window
8.Chan, Tak W.、Boliver, Vikki(2013)。The grandparents effect in social mobility: Evidence from British birth cohort studies。American Sociological Review,78(4),662-678。  new window
9.黃毅志(20010600)。臺灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討:流動表分析。臺灣社會學刊,25,157-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hout, Michael(1988)。More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s。American Journal of Sociology,93(6),1358-1400。  new window
11.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1994)。Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status。American Journal of Sociology,100(2),442-452。  new window
12.王振寰(19890900)。工人階級形成的分析:E. P. Thompson與新馬克斯主義。臺灣社會研究,2(3/4),147-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃毅志、章英華(20051200)。臺灣地區族群交友界限之變遷:1970年與1997年的比較。臺灣社會學刊,35,127-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Duncan, O. D.(1979)。How destination depends on origin in the occupational mobility table。American Journal of Sociology,84(4),793-803。  new window
15.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。  new window
16.Marsden, P. V.(1988)。Homogeneity in confiding relations。Social Networks,10,57-76。  new window
17.許嘉猷、黃毅志、陸先恆(20020600)。跨越階級界限?:兼論「黑手變頭家」的實證研究結果及與歐美社會之一些比較。臺灣社會學刊,27,1-59+61-71+73-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.蘇船利、黃毅志(20121200)。教師之抗爭意識以及專業自主意識與其參加組織意願的關連:以臺東為範圍。教育實踐與研究,25(2),195-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃毅志(20051200)。教育研究中的「職業調查封閉式問卷」之信效度分析。教育研究集刊,51(4),43-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林益慶(20000700)。中小學教師的社會流動與職業取得。教育研究資訊,8(4),114-140+a8。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.郭丁熒(19970400)。師院學生的社會流動之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,7(2),181-197。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃毅志(19961000)。社會流動、社會網絡與工人意識。臺灣社會學刊,20,頁85-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃毅志(19980400)。臺灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究:方法與應用,5,5-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Bearman, P. S.、Deane, G.(1992)。The Structure of Opportunity: Middle-Class Mobility in England, 1548-1689。American Journal of Sociology,98(1),30-66。  new window
26.Guest, A. M.、Landale, N. S.、McCann, J. C.(1989)。Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in the Late 19th Century United States。Social Forces,68(2),351-378。  new window
27.Western, Mark、Wright, Erik Olin(1994)。The Permeability of Class Boundaries to Intergenerational Mobility among Men in the United States, Canada, Norway and Sweden。American Sociological Review,59(4),606-629。  new window
28.Hout, Michael(1984)。Status, Autonomy, and Training in Occupational Mobility。American Journal of Sociology,89(6),1379-1409。  new window
學位論文
1.蘇船利(2011)。臺東縣教師階級意識之研究(博士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Goldthorpe, John H.、Llewellyn, Catriona、Payne, Clive(1980)。Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Hout, Michael(1983)。Mobility Tables。Beverly Hills, CA:Madison, WI:Sage Publications:Sage University Press。  new window
3.Lenski, Gerhard E.(1966)。Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Elster, J.(1986)。Karl Marx: A Reader。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Giddens, Anthony(1973)。The class structure of the advanced societies。London, UK:New York, NY:Hutchinson:Harper & Row。  new window
6.Blau, Peter M.、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupation Structure。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
7.Parkin, Frank(1979)。Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
8.Goodman, Leo A.(1984)。The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Blau, Peter M.(1977)。Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure。Free Press。  new window
10.黃毅志(2011)。臺灣的教育分流、勞力市場階層結構與地位取得。臺北市:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Dahrendorf, Ralf(1959)。Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society。Stanford University Press。  new window
12.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.孫清山、黃毅志(1997)。台灣階級結構:流動表與網絡表的分析。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE