:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用CVIPP模型建構我國樂齡學習中心學習運作關鍵指標之研究
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:施宇澤 引用關係胡夢鯨 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih, Yu-zeHu, Meng-ching
出版日期:2017
卷期:20:4=64
頁次:頁107-144
主題關鍵詞:樂齡學習中心學習運作CVIPPActive aging learning centerLearning process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:296
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究運用CVIPP內部流程管理面向指標區別出不同管理類型的樂齡學習中心,再經由系統性的分析,歸結不同管理類型樂齡學習中心在學習運作模式的關鍵指標,並提出具體建議。應用「我國樂齡學習中心CVIPP指標」問卷,實地調查樂齡中心實務工作者與學員,進行學習運作模式評估,總計發出單位版1,455份,回收後有效問卷863份,有效率59.31%,發出學員版5,948份,回收後有效問卷3,936份,有效率66.17%。運用CVIPP模型組織運作過程、制度規劃落實、資源活化運用三構面,可以有效區隔出高/中/低三種管理程度類型的樂齡學習中心;在學習運作模式中須共同重視的關鍵指標為規劃活躍老化課程、課程多元、提升效率。此外,高管理程度中心另有深化系列課程、課前評估、教師教學熱忱、多元行銷、品牌形象受肯定等五項關鍵指標,一般中心另有深化系列課程、課前評估、互動氣氛、多元行銷、服務品質等五項關鍵指標,低管理程度中心則另有教師教學熱忱、舉辦展示活動、服務品質等三項關鍵指標。
This study investigates different management types of Active Aging Learning Centers (AALC) with the internal processes of the CVIPP model. Through systematic analysis, this study concludes key indicators of learning process model of the centers and provides concrete suggestions. The questionnaire of “The CVIPP indicators of Active Aging Learning Centers in Taiwan” was used to evaluate the learning process models of the AALC’s. 1,455 questionnaires were sent to the staff of the AALC’s and 863 completed questionnaires were returned (completion rate: 59.31%); 5,948 surveys were sent to the elderly of the AALC’s and 3,936 completed questionnaires were returned (completion rate: 66.17%). With learning process of organizations, application of rules and utilization of resources of the CVIPP model, the study is able to effectively distinguish the centers with high-level management, medium-level management, and low-level management. In the learning process model, the key indicators that are shared by centers of all of the three levels include planning active aging courses, diversity of courses, and increasing efficiency. The centers with high-level management have five extra key indicators: in-depth courses, pre-course evaluations, teaching passions of teachers, diverse marketing, and reliable brand images. The centers with medium-level management have five extra key indicators: in-depth courses, pre-course evaluations, interactive atmosphere, diverse marketing, and service quality. The centers with lowlevel management have three extra key indicators: teaching passions of teachers, showcases, and service quality.
期刊論文
1.李志宏(20060700)。從組織治理談非政府組織的責信度。非政府組織學刊,1,103-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Joewono, T. B.、Kubota, H.(2007)。User satisfaction with paratransit in competition with motorization in Indonesia: Anticipation of future implications。Transportation,34(3),337-354。  new window
3.胡夢鯨、嚴嘉明、詹浚煌(20150600)。臺灣地區成人教育組織績效評估CVIPP模型與指標之建構。成人及終身教育學刊,24,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Muthén, B.、Kaplan, D.(1992)。A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model。British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,45,19-30。  new window
5.彭錦鵬、江瑞祥、許耿銘(20110900)。非營利組織績效評量指標之建構。政治科學論叢,49,125-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Wheeler, J. C.(2000)。Capital investment strategies in health care systems。Journal of Health Care Finance,26(4),31-52。  new window
7.Raines-Eudy, Ruth(2000)。Using Structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration。Structural Equation Modeling,7(1),124-141。  new window
8.胡夢鯨、嚴嘉明、施宇澤(20160600)。成人教育組織經營績效之調查研究:CVIPP模型與指標的應用。當代教育研究季刊,24(2),39-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.胡夢鯨、嚴嘉明、施宇澤(20170200)。以高齡者為對象的高齡型成人教育組織績效評估之研究。教育政策論壇,20(1)=61,139-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Abdullah, N.、Wahab, N. A.、Noh, N. M.、Abdullah, E. M.、Ahmad, A.(2016)。The evaluation and effectiveness of school based assessment among science teachers in Malaysia using CIPP Model。International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences,3(11),1-7。  new window
11.Ahmady, S.、Lakeh, M. A.、Esmaeilpoor, S.、Arab, M.、Yaghmaei, M.(2014)。Educational program evaluation model, from the perspective of the new theories。Research and Development in Medical Education,3(1),5-8。  new window
12.Chinta, R.、Kebritchi, M.、Elias, J.(2016)。A conceptual framework for evaluating higher education institutions。International Journal of Educational Management,30(6),989-1002。  new window
13.Comm, C. L.、Dennis, F. X. M.(2000)。Assessing employee satisfaction in service firms: An example in high education。Journal of Business and Economic Studies,6(1),43-53。  new window
14.Hope-Hailey, V.、Farndale, E.、Truss, C.(2005)。The HR department's role in organizational performance。Human Resource Management Journal,15(3),49-66。  new window
15.Patil, Y.、Kalekar, S.(2015)。CIPP model for school evaluation。Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language,2(10),2615-2619。  new window
16.Powell, B.、Conrad, E.(2015)。Utilizing the CIPP model as a means to develop an integrated service-learning component in a university health course。Journal of Health Education Teaching,6(1),21-32。  new window
17.李允傑(20110300)。政策管理與執行力:跨域治理觀點。T&D飛訊,17,45-53。  延伸查詢new window
18.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423。  new window
19.Defourny, Jacques、Nyssens, Marthe(2010)。Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences。Journal of Social Entrepreneurship,1(1),32-53。  new window
20.魏惠娟、胡夢鯨、陳冠良(20101200)。臺灣樂齡學習中心課程之分析:McClusky需求幅度理論的應用。成人及終身教育學刊,15,115-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2013)。全國樂齡學習中心服務品質效益分析計畫:子計畫三、高齡學習者參與樂齡學習中心滿意度分析計畫。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2008)。教育部補助設置鄉鎮市區樂齡銀髮學習中心計畫。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡夢鯨、魏惠娟、黃錦山(2011)。抽訪中部、南部樂齡學習中心及樂齡講師培訓計畫:樂齡中心訪視結果報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃富順、林麗惠(2012)。抽訪北部、東部及離島地區樂齡學習中心及自主學習培訓計畫結案報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.施宇澤(2016)。CVIPP模型在我國樂齡學習中心績效評估應用之研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳於志(2016)。運用商業模式及績效評估之觀點分析臺灣社會企業發展模式(博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fitzpatrick, J. L.、Sanders, J. R.、Worthen, B. R.(2004)。Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Cohen, J.、Cohen, P.(1983)。Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Collins, J. C.、Porras, J. I.(2004)。Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies。New York, NY:Harperaudio。  new window
4.Ferrell, O. C.、Hartline, M. D.、Lucas, G. H.、Luck, D. J.(1999)。Marketing Strategy。Fort Worth, Texas:Dryden Press。  new window
5.Knowles, M. S.(1980)。The modern practice of adult education: From andragogy to pedagogy。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall Regents。  new window
6.江明修(20000000)。第三部門:經營策略與社會參與。臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.魏惠娟(2001)。成人教育方案發展:理論與實際。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.林水波、李長晏(20050000)。跨域治理。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hill, Michael、Hupe, Peter L.(2002)。Implementing Public Policy。Sage。  new window
10.Stepney, Paul、Popple, Keith(2008)。Social work and the community: A critical context for practice。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
11.Stufflebeam, D. L.、Madaus, G. F.、Kellaghan, T.(2000)。Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
12.Brown, L. David(2003)。A framework for strengthening NGO accountability。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations APPC。  new window
13.魏惠娟(2015)。樂齡生涯學習。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.魏惠娟、胡夢鯨、李藹慈(2012)。臺灣樂齡學習。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.胡夢鯨(19970000)。終生教育典範的發展與實踐。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1989)。LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Meadowcroft, J.(1999)。Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics?。Planning sustainability。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE