In evaluation of the nine-year curriculum, multiple methods of evaluation have been used. This is especially true in arts and humanities field, as it is here that overall learning outcomes are emphasized. The educational connoisseurship and criticism proposed by Eisner subsumes the following four steps: connoisseurship, description, interpretation, and evaluation. Such an evaluation process broadens evaluators' vision. Using Eisner's evaluation connoisseurship and criticism, the present researcher proposes a model for evaluation of the arts and humanities curriculum. By way of this study, the researcher hopes for those involved in the work of arts and humanities curriculum can value such salient characteristics of arts and humanities curriculum based on various people and situations. Finally, the present research advances a call for attention: Curriculum evaluation is a continual and cyclical process. It requires constant dialog and continual action research to serve as a feedback.