:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:1999至2003年臺灣地區管理學門學術期刊發表成果分析
書刊名:管理與系統
作者:陳禹辰 引用關係簡志宏陳彥良
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-chenChien, Chi-hongChen, Yan-lian
出版日期:2005
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁99-127
主題關鍵詞:期刊分級大學評鑑學門評鑑管理學門SCISSCIJournal classificationEvaluation of universityEvaluation of disciplineManagement discipline
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:142
  • 點閱點閱:61
學術期刊發表的質與量的評鑑,是學術界相當重視之議題,也是各大學研究品質績效的重要基礎。有鑑於此,梁定澎等學者於2003年針對管理學門不同領域的國際期刊完成一份期刊評鑑報告。本研究以其成果為基礎,以1999至2003五年間臺灣地區管理學門發表之文獻,分析臺灣管理領域的學術表現。結果發現,(1)臺灣文獻總數量的成長率高於全球成長率,而成長率的增長主要來自於資管及一般管理領域的貢獻;(2)就全球而言,生管、資管及一般管理三個領域的論文較為豐富,且呈現微幅上升的趨勢;但臺灣比較偏重在生管及資管;(3)臺灣文獻數量佔全球的比例雖逐年微幅上升,但比例仍偏低,生管是表現最好的領域,資管則成長最為快速,成為管理學域中最具競爭力的兩個領域;(4)就個別大學而言,私立學校及科技大學一般都只能在單一領域有較好的表現,而國立大學則較能普遍涉入多個領域。生管領域由交大及成大遙遙領先;資管領域若不計入電機資訊學院的發表,以中山、中央表現最佳;財會領域由政大與臺大掄元。在將行銷及一般管理合併為企管領域之後,政大名列第一,有趣的是交大與清華兩所傳統理工學校亦名列前茅。此外,我們亦發現臺大在A級論文的發表數量遙遙領先其他大學。
The quality and quantity of papers published in academic journals is an important base for evaluating universities’ research performance. In a recent research, Liang et al. (2003) proposed academic journal ranking lists for the major fields in management discipline. According to these ranking lists, this study surveys the publishing status of Taiwan’s Management discipline in the duration from 1999 to 2003, as well as assesses the research performance of each area. The results reveal many interesting phenomena, including: (1) the annual growth rate of papers published by Taiwan’s researchers is higher than that of the globe; this increasing mainly came from the areas of information and general management; (2) the areas of production management (PM), information management (IM), and general management (GM) contributed the largest percentage of total papers published in the globe, but papers published by Taiwan’s scholars mainly came from areas of PM and IM; (3) the percentage of articles published by Taiwan’s scholars to that of the globe, though increased slightly, was still small. The PM area constitutes the largest percentage of total published papers, but the IM area has the highest annual growth rate. Hence, these two fields were the most competitive area in the management discipline of Taiwan; (4) As to the performance of each respective university, this study found that national universities were always better performed in areas more than private and technological universities were. National Chiao-Tung and Cheng-Kung Universities did the best in the PM field. National Sun Yat-Sen and Central Universities performed very well in the IM field. National Cheng-Chi University achieves the top performance in the business administration field, it is also interesting to note that National Chiao-Tung and Tsing-Hwa university, traditionally better performed in science and engineering field, were also performed very well in this area. National Cheng-Chi and Taiwan universities were the top performers in the finance-&-accounting field. Finally, we found that National Taiwan University has the most number of top ranked journal papers.
期刊論文
1.黃旭男、洪廣朋(20030400)。我國博碩士論文在電子商務上之研究現況與趨勢。管理與系統,10(2),149-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Boffo, S.、Chave, D.、Kaukonen, E.、Opdal, L. R.(1999)。The Evaluation of Research in European Universities。European Journal of Education,34,325-334。  new window
3.Nord, Jeretta Horn、Nord, G. Daryl(1995)。MIS Research: Journal Status Assessment and Analysis。Information & Management,29(1),29-42。  new window
4.陳禹辰、皮世明、范錚強(19960700)。我國資訊管理研究方向及方法--碩士論文之分析。資訊管理研究. 中央大學,1(1),1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Kokko, Hanna、Sutherland, William J.(1999)。What Do Impact Factors Tell Us?。Trends in Ecology & Evolution,14(10),382-384。  new window
6.王保進(2003)。大學教育研究品質評鑑標準與機制之探討。臺灣大學嚴慶齡工業研究中心簡訊。  延伸查詢new window
7.許和鈞、吳壽山、楊馥如、葉立仁(2002)。我國管理領域學術研究成果統計報告(下):論文發表量及各校領域別的發展量效率分析。人文與社會科學簡訊,4(3),21-43。  延伸查詢new window
8.Frazer, M.(1997)。Report on the Modalities of External Evaluation of Higher Education in Europe: 1995-1997。Higher Education in Europe,22,349-401。  new window
研究報告
1.黃政傑、李隆盛(1998)。大學校務綜合評鑑指標建構之研究。0:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁定澎(2003)。管理一及管理二學門國際學術期刊分級及排序專案計畫。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉京玫(2001)。影響係數、被引用次數與期刊重要性和作者影響力關係之探討--以數學學科為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊玉惠(2003)。大學學門評鑑制度規劃之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張玉成、徐超聖、孫志麟(2002)。大學學門評鑑制度規劃與實施作業之研擬。臺北市:教育部高等教育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1997)。The Evaluation of Scientific Research: Selected Experiences。Paris, France:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
3.蘇錦麗(19970000)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實際。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Moore, W. J.、Newman, R. J.、Turnbull, G. K.(2001)。Academic Pay and Productivity: A Tale of Two Countries。Academic Pay and Productivity: A Tale of Two Countries。0。  new window
其他
1.Harzing, A.(2003)。Journal Quality List,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊孝濚(1993)。內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE