臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：誰怕評鑑？我國學校評鑑問題剖析
書刊名：教育研究月刊
作者：王麗雲／葉珍玲
作者(外文)：Wang, Li-yun／Yeh, Chen-lin
出版日期：2019
卷期：299
頁次：頁75-93
主題關鍵詞：抗拒；教育績效責任；評鑑問題；學校評鑑；Resistance；Educational accountability；Evaluation problems；School evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:167
  • 點閱點閱:13
學校評鑑是機構評鑑，透過系統性的資料蒐集與價值判斷，做為學校辦學品質保證與改進的依據。但近年國內卻興起反評鑑浪潮，許多縣市紛紛停辦學校評鑑，相較國外則重視教育績效責任，透過學校評鑑確保辦學品質，反差頗大。本文選取四個個案縣市進行訪談，以了解國內對評鑑反感的成因。結果發現學校評鑑定位不清、評鑑結果應用性差、校長與教師對學校評鑑持防衛心態、評鑑指標適用性不佳、學校處於弱勢無法符應評鑑理想、評鑑結果無法挑戰社會認知、評鑑過程產生目標偏移問題，都是受訪者無法接納學校評鑑的主因。本文提出具體建議，據以改進我國學校評鑑作法。
School evaluation is considered as an institutional evaluation that is done via systematic data collection and value judgment to serve as the base for school quality assurance and improvement. However, school evaluation faced huge challenges in recent years. Many cities decided to cancel school evaluation, which was quite ironic compared to international trend in emphasizing educational accountability through school evaluation. This research selected four cities in Taiwan to investigate the reasons for the resistance to school evaluation. It was found that school evaluation has unclear purposes, poor utilization, and inappropriate indicators. Principals and teachers do not trust school evaluation. Schools felt a lot of pressure because they could not meet the expectation of school evaluation. School evaluation was conducted inappropriately and it seldom challenged social cognition. Finally, the problems of goal displacement were observed during the evaluation process. Suggestions are provided for improving school evaluation.
期刊論文
1.王麗雲(20111000)。學校課責。教師天地，174，30-34。  延伸查詢new window
2.王麗雲(20130700)。大學自辦外部評鑑的作法與展望。評鑑雙月刊，44，30-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.湯志民(20020400)。臺北市國民中學校務評鑑之評析。初等教育學刊，11，25-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李安明、溫儀詩(20160100)。教育改革的困境與挑戰：實施中小學校務評鑑之問題與對策。學校行政，101，1-14。  延伸查詢new window
5.Taut, S.、Brauns, D.(2003)。Resistance to evaluation: A psychological perspective。Evaluation，9(3)，247-264。  new window
6.Schafer, W. D.、Lissitz, R. W.、Zhu, X.、Zhang, Y.、Hou, X.、Li, Y.(2012)。Evaluating teachers and schools using student growth models。Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation，17(17)，1-21。  new window
7.Rey, O.(2013)。Décentralisation et politiques éducatives。Dossier d'actualité Veille et Analyses IFÉ，83，1-26。  new window
8.Monsen, L.(2002)。School-based evaluation in Norway: Why is it so difficult to convince teachers of its usefulness?。School-Based Evaluation: An International Perspective，8，73-88。  new window
9.王麗雲、翁福元、楊坤祥、羅明都、黃政傑(2018)。中小學校務評鑑。臺灣教育，712，1-20。  延伸查詢new window
10.李安明(20161200)。從教育領域的質性研究談研究倫理議題。教育研究月刊，272，30-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王文科、王智弘(20100600)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Faubert, V.(2009)。School Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review。OECD Publishing。  new window
2.王麗雲(2017)。學校評鑑探究--臺灣與國際比較 (計畫編號：NSC 104-2410-H-3-9-SS2)。臺北市：臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nevo, D.(1995)。School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement。New York：Pergamon。  new window
2.卡洛．魏斯、王麗雲(2014)。政策與方案評鑑。臺北：學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hopkins, David(1989)。Evaluation for school development。Open University Press。  new window
4.Dupriez, V.(2015)。Peut-on réformer l'école. Approches organisationnelle et institutionnelle du changement pédagogique。Bruxelles：De Boeck。  new window
5.Whitby, K.(2010)。School inspection: Recent experiences in high performing education systems。Berkshire：CfBT Education Trust。  new window
6.Wilcox, B.(2000)。Making school inspection visits more effective: The English experience。Paris：International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO。  new window
7.Fitzpatrick, K. A.(1997)。Indicators of schools of quality。Schaumburg, IL：National Study of School Evaluation。  new window
8.Braun, H. l.(2005)。Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。  new window
9.Organization for Economic and Co-operation Development(2013)。Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment, OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education。Paris：Organization for Economic and Co-operation Development。  new window
10.郭昭佑(20000000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.謝文全(2002)。學校行政。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.鍾邦友(2016)。評鑑喊停，最棒的教師節禮物，http://www.akau.tw/?p=66085。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鐘山(20151121)。中小學校務評鑑 市長：目標明年取消，http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/934080。  延伸查詢new window
3.侯永琪，林劭仁，池俊吉(2017)。教育部停辦系所評鑑與各大學因應之道，http://cpaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2017/05/01/6747.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
4.莊福泰(2015)。通往地獄的路都是善意鋪設而成的／104年高中職全國super教師獎得獎感言，https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/1562。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ryan, K. E.、Feller, I.(2009)。Evaluation, accountability, and performance: Measurement in national education systems。The Sage international handbook of educational evaluation。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Dahler-Larsen, P.(2009)。Learning-oriented educational evaluation in contemporary society。The Sage international handbook of educational evaluation。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Niessen, T. J. H.、Abma, T. A.、Widdershoven, G. A. M.、Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.(2009)。Learning-in (inter)action: A dialogical turn to evaluation and learning。The Sage international handbook of educational evaluation。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1087（臺灣：1077，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67298200
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上