:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:隱喻與情理--孟學論辯放到當代西方哲學時
書刊名:清華學報
作者:鄧育仁 引用關係
作者(外文):Teng, Norman Y.
出版日期:2008
卷期:38:3
頁次:頁485-504
主題關鍵詞:隱喻感情重新框架孟子羅爾斯MetaphorFeelingReframingMenciusJohn Rawls
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(6) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:589
  • 點閱點閱:80
本文由隱喻的角度,分析孟子的論辯。孟子善於由重新框架議題之所以成立的預設,調節人對議題的看法和感覺;本文稱此論辯手法為「重設法則」。對孟子而言,論辯的要點不會只在結論成不成立,而重新框架也不會只限於論辯的場合。善用隱喻而重新調節感覺,特別是道德與政治場域中合不合乎情理的感覺,尤為重要。孟子的重設法則,放到現代的民主生活,特別是羅爾斯稱為「合理多元的事實」所成立的脈絡裡,依然適用。本文由重設法則的講理方式,比較羅爾斯的正義論與孟子的政治思想。
This study offers a metaphorical analysis of Mencius' arguments. A prominent tactic that Mencius uses in his arguments is reframing. He does not merely argue for or against a conclusion; instead he also reframes the presuppositions and changes the metaphors surrounding a particular issue and, in doing so, alters people's views on that issue. The Mencian tactic of reframing is applied not only to argumentation; it is also used to readjust people's feelings and perceptions of what is reasonable in moral and political domains. The fact of reasonable pluralism in our time, as characterized by John Rawls (1993/2005), makes this reframing tactic even more apt. A comparison of Rawls' theory of justice and Mencius' political thought is made with reference to the reframing perspective.
期刊論文
1.Mio, Jeffery Scott(1997)。Metaphor and politics。Metaphor and Symbol,12,113-133。  new window
2.Rawls, John(1985)。Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical。Philosophy and Public Affairs,14(3),223-251。  new window
3.鄧育仁(20050300)。生活處境中的隱喻。歐美研究,35(1),97-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧育仁(20060100)。意志的品質:選擇的困局及其解決之道。國立政治大學哲學學報,15,135-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(1998)。Conceptual Integration Network。Cognitive Science,22(2),133-187。  new window
6.Freeman, Samuel(2006)。Frontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach vs. Contractarianism。Texas Law Review,85,385-430。  new window
7.Gallie, Walter Bryce(1956)。Essentially Contested Concepts。Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,56,167-198。  new window
8.Lau, D. C.(1963)。On Mencius's use of the Method of Analogy in Argument。Asia Major,10,173-194。  new window
9.Slingerland, Edward(2005)。Conceptual Blending, Somatic Marking, and Normativity: A Case Example from Ancient Chinese。Cognitive Linguistics,16,557-584。  new window
10.鄧育仁(2006)。Metaphor and Coupling: An Embodied, Action-oriented Perspective。Metaphor and Symbol,21,67-85。  new window
圖書
1.Damasio, Antonio R.(1999)。The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness。The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness。New York。  new window
2.Damasio, Antonio R.(2003)。Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain。New York。  new window
3.Nussbaum, Martha Craven(2006)。Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Damasio, A. R.(1994)。Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain。New York:Grosset。  new window
5.Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(2002)。The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
6.Turner, M.(1996)。The literary mind: The origins of thought and language。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Searle, John R.(1995)。The Construction of Social Reality。New York:Division of Simon & Schuster Inc。  new window
8.孟軻、沈文倬、焦循(1988)。孟子正義。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.張岱年(1995)。戴震全書。合肥:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Slingerland, Edward Gilman(2003)。Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.陳大齊(1968)。孟子的名理思想及其辯說實況。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.Allan, Sarah(1997)。The Way of Water and Sprouts of Virtue。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
13.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1999)。Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought。Basic Books。  new window
14.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Hansen, Chad(1992)。A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Johnson, Mark(2007)。The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.楊儒賓(19960000)。儒家身體觀。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李明輝(20050000)。儒家視野下的政治思想。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Rawls, John(1999)。The Law of Peoples: With "the Idea of Public Reason Revisited"。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
20.甘懷真(20040000)。皇權、禮儀與經典詮釋:中國古代政治史研究。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
23.滾石(2001)。媽媽的怕怕線。媽媽的怕怕線。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.鄧育仁。隱喻與意向性。現象學與當代哲學。  延伸查詢new window
25.莊錦章(2007)。Early Confucian Ethics。Early Confucian Ethics。Chicago。  new window
26.Feldman, Jerome(2006)。From Molecule to Metaphor。From Molecule to Metaphor。Cambridge, MA。  new window
27.Freeman, Samuel(2007)。Rawls。Rawls。New York。  new window
28.Lakoff, George(2006)。Whose Freedom? The Battle over America%s Most Important Idea。Whose Freedom? The Battle over America%s Most Important Idea。New York。  new window
29.Popper, Karl R.(1968)。Prediction and Prophecy in the Social Sciences。Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge。New York/Evanston。  new window
其他
1.李依瀅(2006)。沒有道再見,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Larmore, Charles(2003)。Public Reason。The Cambridge Companion to Rawls。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE