:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會學取向的教科書政策分析
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:王麗雲 引用關係甄曉蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Li-yunChen, Hsiao-lan
出版日期:2009
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:教科書政策政策分析社會學分析Textbook policyPolicy analysisSociological analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:50
長久以來,教科書政策爭議不斷。鑑於教科書的重要性與教科書 政策的關鍵影響,教科書研究日益受到重視,研究數量也不斷成長, 但大部分的研究無論在主題或方法取向上,多以教科書的內容分析為 主,少有對教科書政策進行分析者,而以社會學取向對教科書政策進 行分析研究者更少。教科書所呈現的合法知識,往往是文化、社會、 政治、經濟及教育勢力的角力結果,教科書議題極適合透過社會學的 觀點來獲得進一步的理解,因此,本文特別探討社會學分析應用於教 科書政策研究的可能途徑與潛在價值。文中首先介紹社會學取向分析 的意義與功能,進而解析政策研究的功能與旨趣,並探討教科書政策 研究的可能議題,最後,舉例說明教科書政策社會學分析的議題焦點 與應用潛力。
Textbook policy has been subjected to fierce controversy over the last decade. Due to the importance of textbooks and the immense impact of textbook policy, more and more research attention has been given to textbook controversy. However, most of the existing textbook related studies focus more on content analysis of textbooks. Only a few focus on textbook policy analysis. We rarely find studies on textbook policy analysis from a sociological perspective. Since the legitimized knowledge in textbooks is quite often the result of power struggles among cultural, social, political, economic, and educational forces, it is critical to gain better understanding of textbook controversies through a sociological lens. Therefore, this article attempts to explore possible approaches and embedded values of sociology-oriented textbook policy analysis. In this article the authors will first introduce the meanings and functions of sociological analysis. The authors will then explore the potential themes for textbook policy analysis. Finally, examples of sociology-oriented textbook policy analysis are given to illustrate possible issues for analysis as well as the implications for further studies.
期刊論文
1.Mitchell, D.(1989)。Education politics for the new century: Past issues and future directions。Journal of Education Policy,4(5),153-167。  new window
2.Su, Y. C.(2007)。Ideological representations of Taiwan's history: An analysis of elementary social studies textbook, 1978-1995。Curriculum Inquiry,37(3),205-237。  new window
3.Bowles, S.、Gintis, H.(1973)。IQ in the U.S. class structure。Social Policy,3,65-96。  new window
4.Mazza, K. A.(1982)。Reconceptual inquiry as an alternative model of curriculum theory and practice。Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,4,5-89。  new window
5.Issitt, J.(2004)。Reflections on the study of textbooks。History of Education,33(6),683-696。  new window
6.Temple, J. R.(2005)。‘People who are different from you’: Heterosexism in Quebec high school textbooks。Canadian Journal of Education,28(3),271-294。  new window
7.周珮儀、鄭明長(20060600)。一個我國教科書研究資料庫的建置與分析。教育學刊,26,109-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.周淑卿(20031200)。今是昨非,抑或昨是今非?--教科書一綱多本爭議之分析。國立編譯館館刊,31,12-21。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chen, J. J.(2002)。Reforming textbooks, reshaping school knowledge: Taiwan's textbook deregulation in the 1990s。Pedagogy, Culture, and Society,10(1),39-72。  new window
10.Anyon, Jean(1979)。Ideology and United States history textbooks。Harvard Educational Review,49(3),361-386。  new window
11.Nicholls, J.(2003)。Methods in school textbook research, international journal of historical learning。Teaching and Research,3(2),1-17。  new window
12.歐用生(19970200)。教科書事件平議。國民教育,37(3),3-10。  延伸查詢new window
13.Parsons, T.(1959)。The school class as a social system: Some of its functions in American society。Harvard Educational Review,29(4),297-313。  new window
14.Collins, Randall(1971)。Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification。American Sociological Review,36(6),1002-1019。  new window
15.甄曉蘭(19961100)。從典範轉移的再思論質的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師院學報,10,119-146。  延伸查詢new window
16.歐用生(20060600)。臺灣教科書政策的批判論述分析。當代教育研究季刊,14(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Davis, Kingsley、Moore, Wilbert E.(1945)。Some principles of stratification。American Sociological Review,10(2),242-249。  new window
學位論文
1.詹美華(2004)。九年一貫課程改革教科書開放主要議題之論述分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.王麗雲(1990)。艾波教育思想研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.方佳惠、譚光鼎、王麗雲(2006)。教育社會學:人物與思想。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Turner, J. H.、馬康莊(1985)。社會學理論的結構。臺北縣:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.Feynman, R.、吳程遠(2007)。別鬧了,費曼先生。臺北市:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳奎憙(1998)。教育社會學的發展與主要理論。現代教育社會學。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.Blackledge, D.、Hunt, B.(1985)。Sociological interpretations of education。Routledge。  new window
6.Bulmer, M.(1996)。The sociological contribution to social policy research。James S. Coleman。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
7.Chambers, D. E.(2000)。Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst。New York:Macmillan。  new window
8.Elliott, D. L.(1990)。Textbooks and the curriculum in the postwar era, 1950-1980。Textbooks and schooling in the United States。Chicago:NSSE。  new window
9.Mulkay, M.(1992)。Science and sociology of knowledge。London:Gregg Revivals。  new window
10.Pingel, F.(1999)。UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision。Hanover:Hahnsche Buchhandlung。  new window
11.Wallance, R. A.、Wolf, A.(1991)。Contemporary sociological theory: Continuing the classical tradition。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
12.Willis, Paul E.(1981)。Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs。Columbia University Press。  new window
13.Giroux, Henry A.(1983)。Theory and Resistance in Education--A Pedagogy for the Oppressed。Massachusetts:Bergin and Garvey。  new window
14.Whitty, G.(1985)。Sociology and School Knowledge: Curriculum Theory, Research and Politics。London:Methuen。  new window
15.王麗雲(20060000)。教育研究應用:教育研究、政策與實務的銜接。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Collins, R.(1979)。The credential society: A historical sociology of education and stratification。New York:Academic Press。  new window
17.Apple, M. W.、Christian-Smith, L. K.(1991)。The politics of the textbook。Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.。  new window
18.Bowles, S.、Gintis, H.(1977)。Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reforms and the contradictions of economic life。New York:Basic Books。  new window
19.Apple, Michael W.、Weis, Lois(1983)。Ideology and practice in schooling。Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
20.Apple, M. W.(1986)。Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
21.Craib, Ian、廖立文(1986)。當代社會理論:從派深思到哈伯瑪斯。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard、Bottomore, Tom(1977)。Reproduction in education, society and culture。Sage。  new window
23.Apple, M. W.(1993)。Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age。New York, NY:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
24.Apple, Michael W.(1982)。Education and power。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
25.Apple, Michael W.(1979)。Ideology and Curriculum。New York:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
26.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
27.Gutmann, Amy(1987)。Democratic Education。Princeton University Press。  new window
28.Apple, Michael W.、王麗雲(2002)。意識型態與課程。桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Apple, M. W.(1991)。Regulating the text: The socio-historical roots of state control。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy, and pedagogy。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.Apple, M. W.(1991)。The culture and commerce of the textbook。The politics of the textbook。New York, NY。  new window
3.王麗雲(2006)。M. W. Apple : 批判教育社會學先驅。教育社會學 : 人物與思想。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.Stout, R. T.、Tallerico, M.、Scribner, K. P.(1994)。Values: The ‘what’ of the politics of education。The study of educational politics。Washington, DC。  new window
5.王麗雲(2005)。艾波的課程思想。課程思想。臺北:冠學文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Tanner, D.(1999)。The textbook controversies。Issues in curriculum: A selection of chapters from past National Society for the Study of Education yearbooks。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press:The National Society for the Study of Education。  new window
7.Keith, Sherry(1991)。The determinants of textbook content。Textbooks in American Society: Politics, Policy, and Pedagogy。Albany, New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
8.Venezky, R. L.(1992)。Textbooks in school and society。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York, NY:Maxwell Macmillan。  new window
9.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE