臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：學生認知歷程對學生評鑑教師教學的影響：階層線性模式分析
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：曾明基／邱于真／張德勝 引用關係／羅寶鳳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tseng, Ming-chi／Qiu, Yu-zhen／Chang, Te-sheng／Lo, Pao-feng
出版日期：2011
卷期：14:3
頁次：頁157-179
主題關鍵詞：認知歷程；學生評鑑教師教學；階層線性模式分析；Cognitive process；Student ratings of instruction；Hierarchical linear modeling analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:154
  • 點閱點閱:115
本研究主要從學生認知歷程的觀點出發，探討學生背景變項、學生層次及班級層次的認知歷程對學生評鑑教師教學的影響。研究對象為東部某大學大學部180班學生，班級人數介於11和92人之間，總樣本數為6292人。研究結果顯示，在學生層次上學生的性別、年級、科目性質、認知歷程及學習興趣對於學生評鑑教師教學有顯著的影響，而班級層次的認知歷程對於學生評鑑教師教學影響顯著，但無調節效果。針對上述結果，本研究對學生評鑑教師教學提出相關的建議。
The hierarchical linear modeling analysis was used to examine the effects of students' and classes' cognitive process on student ratings of instruction. Data were gathered from 6292 students enrolled in 180 undergraduate courses at a university in Taiwan. The results indicate that, within the student individual level, students' gender, year in the school, cognitive process, interest in learning, and the attribute of the subjects have a significant impact on student ratings. The cognitive process, within the class level, also has a significant impact on student ratings. However, it does not show the moderating effect. The implications of these findings for student ratings policies as they affect university faculty and students are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Beran, T.、Violato, C.(2005)。Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter?。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，30(6)，593-601。  new window
2.Cohen, E. H.(2005)。Student evaluations of course and teacher: Factor analysis and SSA approaches。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，30(2)，123-136。  new window
3.Spooren, P.、Mortelmans, D.(2006)。Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: Will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings?。Educational Studies，32(2)，201-214。  new window
4.Vincent, F. F.、Kennon, M. S.(2008)。Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: Testing a sequential path model。Educational Psychology，28(6)，711-724。  new window
5.Koushki, P. A.、Kuhn, H. A. J.(1982)。How reliable are student evaluations of teachers?。Engineering Education，72，362-367。  new window
6.Feldman, K. A.(1993)。College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II--Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers。Research in Higher Education，34，151-211。  new window
7.Mathieu, J. E.、Taylor, S. R.(2007)。A framework for testing mesomediational relationships in organizational behavior。Journal of Organization Behavior，28，141-172。  new window
8.Marsh, H. W.(1987)。Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research。International Journal of Educational Research，11(3)，253-388。  new window
9.張德勝(2003)。「學生評鑑教師教學」之結果：教師態度有關嗎？。教育心理學報，35 (2)，183-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張德勝(2003)。不同評鑑結果之教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之比較。教育與心理研究，26 (3)，385-405。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bachen, C. M.、McLaughlin, M. M.、Garcia, S. S.(1999)。Assessing the role of gender in college students, evaluations of faculty。Communication Education，48(3)，193-210。  new window
12.Chang, T.(2001)。Student ratings: What teachers college students telling us about them?。Journal of Jinan University，5(2)，169-192。  new window
13.Cheung, M. W. L.、Au, K.(2005)。Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross-national research。Structural Equation Modeling，12(4)，598-619。  new window
14.De Boeck, P.、Wilson, M.、Acton, G. S.(2005)。A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimension。Psychological Review，112，129-158。  new window
15.張德勝(2009)。第一印象與學生評鑑教師教學之相關硏究。測驗學刊，56(3)，321-341。  延伸查詢new window
16.Muthen, B. O.(1989)。Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous population。Psychometrika，54，557-585。  new window
17.Nancy, N.、Ruth, Z.(2008)。Using Bloom's taxonomy to teach critical thinking skills to business students。College & Undergraduate Libraries，15(1/2)，159-172。  new window
18.Wendell, H.(2007)。The new Bloom's taxonomy: Implications for music education。Arts Education Policy Review，108(4)，7-16。  new window
19.Farmer, G. L.(2000)。Use of multilevel covariance structure analysis to evaluate the multilevel nature of theoretical constructs。Social Work Research，24(3)，180-189。  new window
20.張德勝(2002)。學生對「學生評鑑教師教學」的觀點：學校政策是否會影響呢？。花蓮師院學報，14，43-65。  延伸查詢new window
21.Scherr, F. C.、Scherr, S. S.(1990)。Bias in student evaluations of teacher effectiveness。Journal of Education for Business，65，365-368。  new window
22.曹嘉秀、魏孟雪(20030600)。影響學生評鑑教學之背景因素探討。測驗學刊，50(1)，143-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Fuhrmanna, B. G.、Geyera, A.(2003)。Students' evaluation of teachers and instructional quality-analysis of relevant factors based on empirical evaluation research。Assessment &. Evaluation in Higher Education，28(3)，229-238。  new window
24.Dyer, N. G.、Hanges, P. J.、Hall, R. J.(2005)。Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership。The Leadership Quarterly，16(1)，149-167。  new window
25.張德勝(20051000)。臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報. 教育類，50(2)，203-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Vincent, F. F.、Kennon, M. S.(2003)。Student psychological need satisfaction and college teacher-course evaluations。Educational Psychology，23(3)，235-247。  new window
27.Marsh, H. W.(1982)。Validity of student's evaluation of college teachings: A multitrait-multimethod analysis。Journal of Educational Psychology，74，264-279。  new window
28.Centra, J. A.、Gaubatz, N. B.(2000)。Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?。The Journal of Higher Education，71(1)，17-33。  new window
29.Muthén, B. O.(1994)。Multilevel covariance structure analysis。Sociological Methods & Research，22(3)，376-398。  new window
30.黃毅志、巫有鎰(20030600)。影響教學評鑑得分因素之探討--以臺東師院為例。臺東師院學報，14(上)，347-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.張德勝、羅鮑柏(20061200)。The Influence of Instructor, Student, and Course Characteristics on Student Ratings: What do Faculty and Students Believe?。花蓮教育大學學報，23，1-27。new window  new window
32.曾明基、張德勝(20101100)。超額教師在學校新環境適應困擾的影響因素：階層線性模式分析。臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類，41(2)，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.黃瓊蓉(20041200)。Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: A Bierarchical Linear Model。測驗學刊，51(2)，163-184。new window  new window
34.鄭蕙如、林世華(20041200)。Bloom認知領域教育目標分類修訂版理論與實務之探討--以九年一貫課程數學領域分段能力指標為例。臺東大學教育學報，15(2)，247-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.林珊如(19991200)。大學生評鑑教學量表：編製及效度考驗。教育與心理研究，22(下)，295-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.葉連祺、林淑萍(20030100)。布魯姆認知領域教育目標分類修訂版之探討。教育研究月刊，105，94-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Nylund, Karen L.、Asparouhov, Tihomir、Muthén, Bengt O.(2007)。Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，14(4)，535-569。  new window
圖書
1.Muthén, L. K.、Muthén, B. O.(2006)。Mplus user's guide。Los Angeles, CA：Muthén & Muthén。  new window
2.張德勝(2002)。學生評鑑教師教學：理論、實務與態度。臺北：揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bloom, B. S.、Englhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1. Cognitive domain。New York：McKay。  new window
4.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
6.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
7.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Nasser, F.，Glassman, D.(1997)。Student evaluation of university teaching: structure and relationship with student characteristics(ED407390)。  new window
其他
1.Schlenker, D. E.，Mckinnon, N. C.(1994)。Assessing faculty performance using the student evaluation of instruction，New Brunswich, Canada：Atlantic Baptic College。(ED371-667)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Marsh, H. W.(2007)。Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and usefulness。The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective。Springer。  new window
2.Bandalos, D. L.、Finney, S. J.(2001)。Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling。New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling。Lawrence Erlbanm Association。  new window
3.Kozlowski, Steve W. J.、Klein, Katherine J.(2000)。A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes。Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions。Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：853（臺灣：844，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67573774
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上