臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：建構教學理念的興起與應用
書刊名：國民教育研究學報
作者：甄曉蘭／曾志華
作者(外文)：Chen, Sharon Hsiao-lan／Tzeng, Jyh-hwa
出版日期：1997
卷期：3
頁次：頁179-208
主題關鍵詞：建構教學
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(19) 博士論文(30) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:164
  • 點閱點閱:34
　　　　　在新興建構教學典範影響之下，課程與教學的理論與實務有了極大的革新，主張 課程與教學應建立在開放、共創的基礎上，透過學生主動參與知識的建構，在對話、運思、 辯証的社會互動過程中產生學習。基於建構教學理念和傳統的教學理念有極大的差異，使得 對教師的教學實踐產生極大的挑戰。因此，探究建構理念在當代教學典範中興起意義及其在 教學實踐上應用的情形，便成為落實建構教學理念、擴展建構教學研究層面，所不可忽視的 重要課題。本文特從評析當代重要教學典範出發，進而探索建構教學理念興起的意義，以及 其源自於哲學心理學和社會學的理論基礎，然後，藉著介紹建構教學理念的內涵及其應用推 廣的情形，試圖探討建構教學理念的發展對我國教學研究與師資培育的啟示。畢竟，建構教 學理念的紮根與落實，有賴於多方面的努力，並非只是理念的推銷而己。
　　　　　Because of the influences of the emerging constructivist paradigm, there has been a lot of attention given to its implication for educational praxis. It has not only brought a great deal of challenges to pedagogical practices but also has raised many important issues for further exploration in curriculum development, instructional design, and teacher education. Facing the current trend in implementing and disseminating constructivist approach to teaching practices, it is important to investigate the meaning behind the emergence of constructivist paradigm and the implication of constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Based on literature review, this paper first discusses the major paradigms of teaching, then examines the making of constructivist paradigm and its theoretical foundation. With an attempt to investigate the possibilities of implementing constructivist approaches to educational praxis, this paper also goes in-depth to examine the perspectives on teaching and learning of constructivist paradigm, as well as its implications in different educational fields.
期刊論文
1.甄曉蘭(1994)。教學實踐的再思--指望更嘉教學境界。嘉師學報，8，209-229。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anderson, R. C.(1984)。Some reflections on the acqusition of knowledge。Educational Researcher，13(9)，5-10。  new window
3.Condon, M. W. F.、Clyde, J. A.、Kyle, D. W.、Hovda, R. A.(1993)。A Constructivist basis for teaching and teacher education: a framework for program development and research on graduates。Journal of Teacher Education，44(4)，273-278。  new window
4.Glasson, G. E.、Lalik, R. V.(1993)。Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: a qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，30(2)，187-207。  new window
5.Cobb, P.(1988)。The Tension between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education。Educational Psychologist，23(2)，87-103。  new window
6.朱湘吉(19920400)。新觀念、新挑戰--建構主義的教學系統。教學科技與媒體，2，15-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.朱則剛(19960400)。建構主義對教學設計的意義。教學科技與媒體，26，3-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李真文、甯自強(19960600)。淺談建構教學的幾個概念--專訪嘉義師範學院甯自強教授。教育研究，49，4-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Black, A.、Ammon, P.(1992)。A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education，43(5)，323-335。  new window
10.Brooks, J. G.(1990)。Teachers and students: constructivist forging new connection。Educational Leadership，47(5)，68-71。  new window
11.Bruffee, K. A.(1986)。Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay。College English，48(8)，773-790。  new window
12.Cobb, P.、Steffe, L. P.(1983)。The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，14(2)，83-94。  new window
13.Etchberger, M. L.、Shaw, K. L.(1992)。Teacher change as a progression of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher。School Science and Mathematics，92(8)，411-417。  new window
14.Garrison, J.(1995)。Deweyan pragmatism and the epistemology of contemporary social constructivism。American Educational Research Journal，32(4)，716-740。  new window
15.Pirie, S.、Kieren, T.(1992)。Creativing constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics。Educational Studies in Mathematics，23，505-528。  new window
16.Reigeluth, C. M.(1992)。Educational technology at the crossroads: New mindsets and new direction。Educational technology Research and Development，37(1)，67-80。  new window
17.Wheatley, G. H.(1991)。Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning。Science Education，75(1)，9-21。  new window
18.Driver, R.、Oldham, V.(1986)。A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science。Studies in Science Education，13(1)，105-122。  new window
19.吳振賢、馮朝霖(19960600)。建構主義之哲學觀點與啟示--專訪政大教育系馮朝霖教授。教育研究，49，7-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Bodner, George M.(1986)。Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge。Journal of Chemical Education，63(10)，873-878。  new window
21.Simon, M. A.(1995)。Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，26(2)，114-145。  new window
22.李暉、郭重吉、段曉林(19940500)。國中理化教師試行建構主義教學之個案研究。科學教育，5，27-51。  延伸查詢new window
23.Gergen, Kenneth J.(1985)。The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology。American Psychologist，40(3)，266-275。  new window
24.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher，18(1)，32-42。  new window
25.甄曉蘭(19951100)。合作行動研究--進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。  延伸查詢new window
26.詹志禹(19960600)。認識與知識：建構論VS.接受觀。教育研究月刊，49，25-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊，20(5)，548-570。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳淑敏(19940600)。Vygotsky的心理發展理論和教育。屏東師院學報，7，119-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.甄曉蘭(1994)。實踐新數學課程理念的必要性、妥適性與可行性。八十二學年度數學教育研討會。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。327-331。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾靜、朱建正(1994)。小學數學課程改革下之教師成長研究。1993國際科學教育詮釋性研究研討會。臺北：師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄔瑞香(1993)。我的數學教學模式--探索、反省與成果。八十二學年度數學教育研討會。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。295-325。  延伸查詢new window
4.梁淑坤(1996)。教師如何配合數學新課程實施下的新需求。八十四學年度數學教育研討會，(會議日期: 1996/04/11-04/12)。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。371-375。  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾靜(1996)。數學教室文化的新貌。八十四學年度數學教育研討會，國立嘉義師範學院 (會議日期: 1996/04/11-04/12)。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。324-340。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐照麗(1996)。以建構主義為基礎的教學設計。「建構主義的教學」研討會，國立台中師院初等教育系 。國立台中師範學院初等教育系。6-17。  延伸查詢new window
7.張蘭畹(1996)。建構主義的教學評量。「建構主義的教學」研討會，國立台中師院學院初等教育系 18-27。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.郭重吉、江武雄(1992)。從協助學生建構意義的觀點探討國中理化教學的改進。彰化市：彰化師大。  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉嵐(1996)。應用建構教學理念於教育專業發展之課程研究。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Chen, H. L. S.(1993)。Knowledge, reflection, and dialogue: An educative exploration of cooperative inquiry as practical art in two professional education sites(博士論文)。The Ohio State University。  new window
2.李暉(1993)。國中理化教師試行建構主義教學之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉錫麒(1991)。合作反省思考的數學解題教學模式及其實徵研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dewey, J.(1960)。The quest for certainty。New York：Capricorn。  new window
2.Giroux, H. A.、McLaren, P.(1989)。Critical pedogogy, the state and cultural struggle。NY：SUNY Press。  new window
3.Wood, Terry、Cobb, Paul、Yackel, Erna、Dillion, Deborah(1993)。Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues。National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
4.Van Manen, Max(1991)。The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness。State University of New York Press。  new window
5.幸曼玲(1996)。皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話。臺北：臺北市立師範學院兒童發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.Fosnot, C. T.(1996)。Constructivism : Theory, perspectives, and practice。New York：Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
7.Clandinin, D. J.(1986)。Classroom Practice: Teacher Images in Actions。London：The Falmer Press。  new window
8.李其維(1995)。皮亞傑心理邏輯學。臺北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Duffy, T. M.、Jonassen, D. H.(1992)。Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
10.Gagné, R. M.(1985)。The condition of learning and theory of instruction。New York, NY：Holt, Rinehert & Winston。  new window
11.Good, T. L.、Brophy, J. E.(1987)。Looking in classroom。New York：Harper & Row。  new window
12.Holmes Group(1986)。Tomorrow teachers: A report of The Holmes Group。MI：The Holmes Group。  new window
13.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991)。Professional standards for teaching mathematics。Reston, Virginia：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
14.Steffe, L. P.、Gale, J.(1995)。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
15.Piaget, Jean、Duckworth, Eleanor(1970)。Genetic Epistemology。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
16.陳奎憙(1992)。教育社會學研究。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
17.Davis, R. B.、Maher, C. A.、Noddings, N.(1990)。Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics。Reston, VA：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
18.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
19.Rorty, Richard(1979)。Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature。Princeton University Press。  new window
20.Wertsch, James V.(1985)。Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
21.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.Giroux, Henry A.、Freire, Paulo、McLaren, Peter(1988)。Teachers as intellectuals: toward a critical pedagogy of learning。London：Bergin & Garvey。  new window
23.Berger, Peter L.、Luckmann, Thomas(1966)。The social construction of reality。Doubleday。  new window
圖書論文
1.Konold, C.、Johnson, D. K.(1991)。Philosophical and psychological aspects of constructivism。Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience。New York：Springer-Verlag。  new window
2.詹棟樑(1989)。批判結構的教學法。有效教學研究。臺北：臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.Confrey, J.(1995)。How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches, and social constructivism?。Constructivism in Education。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associsates。  new window
4.陳伯璋(1990)。課程、教學與意識型態。教學研究專集。台北：南宏。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kilpatrick, J.(1987)。What constructivism might be in mathematics education。Proceeding of the psychology of mathematics education。Montreal。  new window
6.朱則剛(19940000)。建構主義知識論的起源與近代哲學知識論的趨勢。教育工學的發展與派典演化。臺北：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Confrey, J.(1991)。Learning to listening: A student’s understanding of powers of ten。Radical constructivism in mathematics education。Dordrecht：Kluwer。  new window
8.Gergen, K. J.(1985)。The Social Constructionist Inquiry: Context and Implication。The Social Construction of the Person。New York：Springer-Verlag。  new window
9.Richards, J.(1991)。Mathematical discussions。Radical constructivism in mathematics education。Dordrecht：Kluwer。  new window
10.von Glasersfeld, E.(1987)。Learning as a constructive activity。Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
11.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。A constructivist approach to teaching。Constructivism in Education。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
12.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1989)。Constructivism in education。The International Encyclopedia of Education: Research and Studies。Oxford。  new window
13.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1984)。An introduction to radical constructivism。The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? Contributions to constructivism。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
14.Gergen, K. J.(1995)。Social construction and the educational process。Constructivism in education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
15.Clark, C. M.、Peterson, P. L.(1986)。Teachers' thought processes。Handbook of research on teaching。New York：Macmillan。  new window
16.Confrey, J.(1990)。What constructivism implies for teaching。Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics。Reston, VA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1084（臺灣：984，外國：100） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1385896 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67186656
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上