:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小一般智能資賦優異學生創造力課程實施之研究
作者:胡宗光
作者(外文):Hu Tsung Kuang
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
指導教授:盧台華教授
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:國小資優生創造力教材能力指標創造力課程行動研究準實驗設計elementary gifted studentscreativity teaching materialscompetence indicatorscreativity curriculumaction researchquasi-experimental design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
本研究之主要目的在根據特殊需求領域課程大綱之創造力課程第一階段分段能力指標,配合九年一貫各學習領域與重大議題分段能力指標,設計適合國小中年級資優生創造力教材。本研究除探討其編製過程、實施情形與試行成效外,並進一步推廣應用於其他資優資源班。整個研究分為二部份,第一部份為行動研究,以海天國小9位資優生與2位教師為研究對象,透過創造力測驗、觀察、訪談、研究日誌、能力指標檢核與文件蒐集進行教材編製與探討實施過程。第二部份為教學實驗準實驗設計,針對實驗組資優生29名實施16週之自編創造力教材,而30名對照組學生則在原校接受創造力教學,除以創造力測驗前後測探討學習成效,並採檢核能力指標、觀察與訪談等方式探討三與四年級資優生之學習差異。本研究之主要發現如下。
壹、創造力教材編製與實施方面
一、創造力教材應符合資優生需求與4P原則,需先選擇特殊需求領域之創
造力課程能力指標,並與主題有關之九年一貫學習領域與重大議題之能
力指標結合。能力指標可經過替換、拆解、組合與聚焦等方式轉化為具
體之單元目標,且各單元流程需依認識任務、確定任務、產生及選擇創
意、修改創意提高品質、實踐與分享和完成任務等歷程加以規劃。
二、各單元教材應具有系統性,以前幾單元學過之能力指標為教材基礎,再
加入新的指標,使指標在練習與複習中逐漸被強化。
三、資優生執行計畫之執行力需由教師從旁給予大量協助與督促。在教材實
施過程中應提供創造實例與生活化的任務。
四、資優生於各單元之創造力學習行為如學習興趣、投入創造活動、蒐集資
料、參與討論、分工合作完成任務、運用先前或學過知識能力解決問題、
依據教師或同儕建議選擇與修正、學會某能力、製作作品、學到新創造
思考技能與對作品滿意度等表現大致均佳,各單元設計大致合宜。
五、本教材在第一部分之行動研究過程後,從活動內容、教具、前導組織活
動、教師介入程度、活動順序安排等加以調整或修正各單元,且將每單
元皆改以八節課規劃實施,並在教材設計加欄位顯示能力指標來源與轉
化結果。
六、跟參與研究前比較,協同研究者更具信心轉化能力指標與從事創造力教
材之設計與實施,能掌握教材設計與個別輔導計畫之聯結性,且願意營
造創造性環境;而研究者則更能發揮能力彈性調整或延伸教材,且更有
能量從事課程領導工作,亦更能理解中年級資優生之學習特質。
七、資優生除在創造思考能力之流暢力、獨創力、變通力與精密力等向度,
與創造性傾向之想像力學習效果皆有進步外,在各能力指標表現亦大致
良好,且對具動手操作之單元滿意度較高。
貳、創造力教材推廣應用成效方面
一、實驗組資優生接受研究者編製之創造力教材後,在語文及圖形為管
道表現出的流暢力、獨創力、變通力與精密力等創造思考能力均顯著高
於對照組資優生;而在創造性傾向中的想像力和挑戰心得分均顯著高於
對照組,唯在冒險心與好奇心之得分則未有明顯差異。
二、實驗組資優生能力指標達成情形良好且穩定,惟文字創作能力則可能需
更多時間方能逐步養成;至於三與四年級資優生在與好奇心與流暢力相
關之能力指標表現均達優異之程度,且三年級表現優異能力指標較四年
級資優生多,顯示從三年級實施創造力教學確有其必要。
三、三年級資優生之壓力擔負與處遇能力有所提升,除更有意願投入任務,
且能分工合作與主動以不同方式表現創意;同時在回饋他人時,不僅有
批評亦有正向意見與建議,且表達具有條理。
四、四年級資優生能專注於每一次任務,接受任務挑戰之意願有所提升,
思維更多元,且能運用上課所學思考技能於其他教學活動。
參、建置創造力課程與教學架構
從行動研究與教學實驗研究結果顯示創造力課程需依據資優生的個別輔導計畫設計,其架構需先聯結所選用之能力指標,做為主題擬定之依據,並轉化為單元目標。另需納入教學流程及活動、資源與時間、班級經營與評量方式等配套。
本研究並根據上述發現,針對未來資優或創造力教育之發展與研究提出建議。
The main purposes of these two stage studies were (1) to design creativity teaching materials for the 3rd and 4th grade gifted students according to the first learning stage competence indicators of the newly edited creativity curriculum guidelines for the students with special needs and the first and second stages competence indicators related to the seven learning areas and the important issues of the grade 1 to 9 regular education curriculum; and (2) to experiment the above edited creativity teaching materials to gifted students from other resource room programs. Action research was used in the first stage study and participants were 9 gifted students studying from Hi-Tian elementary school. Data were collected through creativity assessment instruments, observation checklists, interviews, daily research records, curriculum competence indicators checklists and written documents. The second stage study was a quasi-experimental design study. The experimental group with 29 gifted students received creativity teaching materials developed from the first stage study for 16 weeks, whereas the control group of 30 gifted students was still received the original creativity curriculum teachings in their own schools. The pretest-posttest of creativity assessment instruments, competence indicators checklists, observation checklists and interviews were conducted to explore the effects of the curriculum teaching materials. The main findings of the whole research were as the following.
1. Creativity teaching materials should be edited based on the needs of gifted students and the 4P creativity principles. The editing process should be firstly selecting the competence indicators from creativity curriculum guidelines for the students with special needs. And then combining the competence indicators with interesting topic units and integrated with the competence indicators from related learning areas or important issues of the grade 1-9 regular education curriculum. After that, the researcher transformed the above competence indicators into unit objectives by means of " substitution", "decomposition", "combination" and "focusing". Each unit included " knowing the task"," confirming the task", "developing and selecting innovative ideas", "modifying the ideas", "putting the ideas into practice" and "executing the task" sequentially.
2. The usage of the competence indicators should be based on the indicators students had learned and then added in new indicators systematically. The competence indicators could be be strengthened by means of practices and reviews.
3. The gifted students should be provided with creative examples and daily lives
tasks , and their executive ability needed to be developed through teachers'
assistance and urge.
4.The gifted students showed desirable creative behaviors such as interesting in learning, engaging the creative activities, collecting information, discussing with others, cooperating with others, using previous knowledge, modifying the work according to the suggestions from the teachers and classmates, learning certain knowledge, knowing how to do work, and thinking more deeply.
5.The creativity teaching materials were modifyed and adapted in teaching
contents, aids, advanced organizers, the level of teacher's intervention and
sequences of activities. Moreover, each unit added to 8 lessons and some
columns to present the competence indicators and the results of transformation.
6. Through action research, the co-workers had more confidence not only in
transforming the competence indicators but also in designing and implementing
the creativity teaching materials. They could connect teaching materials with student’s individualized guidance plan and were willing to establish creative environment as well. The researcher was more capable and had more energy to adapt and edit creative teaching materials flexibly.
7.The gifted students in the action research improved significantly in fluency, flexibility , originality, elaboration and imagination of creative thinking and achieved competence indicators well. They were more highly satisfied with the hands-on units.
8.The experiment group 's fluency, originality, flexibility and elaboration of creative thinking both in verbal and figural versions, and the imagination and complexity of divergent thinking were higher than the control group. However, there were no significant differences found between the two group in risk-taking and curiosity of divergent thinking.
9.The experiment group achieved the competence indicators well and stably. However, creative writing needed more time to improve step by step. The 3rd and 4th grade gifted students both showed excellent performances in competence indicators related to curiosity and fluency, and the 3rd graders achieved more competence indicators than the 4th graders.
10.The 3rd grade gifted students' abilities to bear and deal with pressure
increased. They were more willing to commit themselves to the tasks,
cooperate with others, and actively perform in various ways. When giving
comments to others, they not only criticized others, but also tried to give
positive suggestions with clear expression.
11.The 4th grade gifted students were able to engage in each task. Moreover, their will to face challenges was enhanced and their thought became more diverse. Furthermore, they could apply the creative thinking skills learned to other teaching activities.
12.The results of both action and quasi-experimental research indicated that creativity curriculum should be designed according to gifted student's individulized guidance plan. The framework should firstly choose related competence indicators for deciding the topics and transforming the unit objectives. Then, teaching activities and procedures, resources and time, classroom management and assessment methods should all be infused into the units.
According to the above findings, the researcher made some suggestions
for the development and implementation of creativity curriculum and instructions in the future.
于曉平(2007):高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展之關聯及角色楷模課程實驗之影響研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文 (未出版)。new window
勾孝倫(2007):英語資優班與普通班課程實踐之對照研究:一位高中英語教師之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學英語學系碩士論文(未出版)。
毛連塭(1995):資優教育課程與教學。台北:五南。
王文君(2009):未來學課程對國小資優生創造思考能力及問題解決能力影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學資賦優異研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
王郁雯(2006):藝術與人文學習領域概念統整課程建構能力指標轉化之理論與實務研究-以第三學習階段為例。國立台南大學音樂教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
王詩婷(2005):自然與生活科技領域能力指標詮釋、轉化與驗證之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
台北市政府(2010):台北市資賦優異教育白皮書。台北:市政府。
台北市國民教育階段資賦優異資源班運作原則(2011):中華民國 100 年07 月25 日北市教特字第10040291000 號函修正發布。
白瑩潔(2008):學生的課程詮釋--以建中人文社會科學資優班學生為例。國立臺灣師範
大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
江沖文(2012):融入式創造思考教學對國民中學學生生活科技學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
何雅婷(2010):CSCH情意課程對促進國小資優學生利社會行為之質性研究。臺北市立
教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳佳穎(2007):高中英語資優班課程評估之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學英語學系碩士
論文(未出版)。
吳侎燕(2006):以後設認知取向之創造思考教學促進國小學童科學創造力之行動研究。
國立花蓮教育大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳怜嬌(2011):國小資優資源班教師數學課程發展與實施之個案研究。國立屏東教育大
學數理教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
吳武典(1996):我國資優教育行政與體制的檢討與改進芻議。資優教育季刊,59,1-10。
吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一與黃秀玉(2008):高職學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報:教育類,53(3),67-93。new window
吳玟潔(2010):國中資優班教師在職進修現況及課程需求之調查研究。國立彰化師範大
學特殊教育學系所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳怡瑄(2002):主題統整教學,教室氣氛,年級及父母社經地位與國小學童科技創造力之new window
關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳俊明(2010):資訊科技融入創造性問題解決教學對國小學童科學創造力之影響。國立東華大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳雅萍(2009):創造性問題解決教學對學生學習成效影響之後設分析。國立新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳靖國(2004):有效教學來自於視域交融—「靠」與「看」作為生命教育的基本要素。載於國立台灣海洋大學師資培育中心(主編),有效教學與課程領導(頁51-78)。
吳靖國(2013):教材設計原則。發表於課程與教學研習手冊(2-6頁)。基隆:尚仁國小。
吳嘉琪(2011):國中數理資優教育教師課程設計需求之研究。國立彰化師範大學資賦優
異研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
吳錦勲(2012):創意數學活動對國中資優生的創造力與問題解決能力之影響。台北市立
教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
吳靜吉(2002):華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。new window
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、林玉樺(1999):新編創造思考測驗研究。
學生輔導,62,132-147。
吳耀宗(2011):國小資優資源班課程設計與教學實施之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教
育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
呂金燮(2003):創造力教學的本質與陷阱。資優教育季刊,86,1-9。
呂金燮(2004):給資優生一個展現實力的舞台-問題本位學習。資優教育季刊,92,1-11 。
李乙明(2006):陶倫斯創造思考測驗。台北:心理。
李仁盛(2006):國民小學普通班與資優班實施自然與生活科技領域統整課程之比較研
究。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育與輔助科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李佩庭(2008):當ADHD資優生與資優班教師相遇時─獨立研究課程之行動研究。國立
臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
李坤崇(2002a):多元化教學評量。發表於國中小教師基礎研習手冊(120-162頁)。台北:
教育部。
李坤崇(2002b):綜合活動學習領域能力指標概念分析。教育研究月刊,98,111-122。new window
李坤崇(2002c):綜合活動學習領域能力指標與評量。載於教育部主編:綜合活動學習領
域基礎研習手冊(120-162頁)。台北:教育部。
李芬容(2006):國小資優班與普通班生命教育課程與教學實施現況之比較研究。國立台
中教育大學特殊教育輔助科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李俊榮(2010):運用不同教學模式於電腦樂高課程對資優學生問題解決能力與學習動機
之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李冠瑩(2009):國小資優班與普通班教師性別角色態度與性別平等教育課程之需求。國
立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
李倍締(2011): 創造與批判思考融入教學對國中生之教學效果。國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李梅齡(2004):年齡、氣質、情緒調節、創作性戲劇教學與幼兒創造力之關係。國立中
山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李雅怡(2003):年級、城鄉別、出生序、建設性思考、情緒能力與國小高年級學童科技
創造力之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
汪菁瑤(2007):高雄市國小資優資源班教師對資優課程設計與調整之個案研究。國立屏
東教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準(2002):中華民國91年5月9日教育部臺參字第
9106344號令訂定發布。
身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法(2012):中華民國101年9月28日教育部臺參字第
1010173092C 號令修正發布。
林天祐(2005):教育研究倫理準則。教育研究月刊,132,70-86。new window
林作逸(2006):國小資優班媒體素養批判思考課程設計與實施之行動研究。國立臺北教
育大學教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林宜慧(2012):創意數學活動對國中資優生的創造力與問題解決能力之影響。國立彰化
師大資優教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林幸台、王木榮修訂(1994):威廉斯創造力測驗。台北:心理。
林昱伶(2013):國小資優資源班教師課程設計與教學能力之研究。國立屏東教育大學特
殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
林敏琦(2005):藝術與人文學習領域學校本位課程實施能力指標轉化音樂教師角色覺
知與實踐之研究。國立台南大學音樂教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
林傳能(2006):問題本位學習課程對國小資優生問題解決歷程與表現之影響。台北市立
教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林嘉琦(2009):國小音樂資優班團體課程能力指標建構之研究。國立花蓮教育大學身心
障礙與輔助科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
武秀韻(2011):我與亞斯伯格資優生共舞─自然科學課程中師生互動歷程之敘事探究。
國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
邱雅莉(2004):生活課程能力指標轉化課程設計之行動研究。國立台北師院課程與教學
研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
施乃華(2002):創造思考教學成效之後設分析。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
施惠靜(2006):國小資優班統整課程實施現況研究。國立台中教育大學特殊教育與輔助
科技研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
洪淑娥(2009):生涯輔導課程對資優學童生涯成熟態度之研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育
學系碩士論文(未出版)。
洪靖凱(2012):數學充實課程在高中數理資優班之實踐。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學
系碩士論文(未出版)。
特殊教育法(1984):中華民國73 年 12 月 17 日華總(一)義字第 6692 號令公布。
特殊教育法(1997):中華民國86 年 5 月 14 日華總(一)義字第 8600112820 號令修正公布。
特殊教育法(2009):中華民國 98 年 11 月 18 日華總一義字第09800289381號令修正公布。
特殊教育法(2013):中華民國 102年1月23日華總一義字第10200012441號令修正公布。
特殊教育通報網(2014):102學年度各縣市設置資優班級概況。各類統計查詢,2014年5月1日,取自http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp
特殊教育課程教材及教法實施辦法(1986):中華民國75 年12月24日教育部台(75)參字第 58772 號令訂定發布。
特殊教育課程教材教法及評量實施辦法(1986):中華民國99年12月31日教育部臺參字第0990218743C號令修正發布。
秦嗣輝(2003):九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域能力指標轉化之個案研究。國立台北師院課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
馬信行(2004):創造力訓練效果之後設分析。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫 成果報告。NSC92-2413-H-004-004。
高級中等以下學校特殊教育班班級及專責單位設置與人員進用辦法(2012):中華民國101
年9月14日 臺參字第1010164063C號令公布。
高新建(2002):能力指標轉化模式(一):能力指標之分析及其教學轉化。載於黃炳煌主編:
社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略(51-93頁)。台北:師大書苑。
張秉翰(2012):國小四年級資優生學習LOGO程式設計課程之可行性研究─以「LOGO打
字機」教材為例。國立屏東教育大學數理教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
張芝萱(2011):資優教育教師專業認定類型及其相關因素之探討。國立台灣師範大學特new window
殊教育學系博士論文(未出版)。
張淑玲(2005):情緒教育課程對提昇國小資優生情緒智力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特
殊教育學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張瑜真(2006):高中人文社會資優班課程實施歷程及其相關影響因素分析。國立台灣師
範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
張鈿富(2001):教育指標理念簡介。載於簡茂發、李琪明主編:當代教育指標:國際比
較觀點(1-25頁)。台北:學富。
教育部(2003a):創造力教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
教育部(2003b):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。new window
教育部(2008):資優教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
教育部(2010):第八次全國教育會議。教育部網站。2012年12月31日,取自
http://www.edu.tw/content.aspx?site_content_sn=21831。
教育部(2012):十二年國民基本教育。教育部網站。2013年2月28日,取自
http://12basic.edu.tw/。
教育部(2013a):高級中等以下學校特殊教育課程發展共同原則及課程大綱。教育部優質特教發展網路系統暨教學支援平台。2013年3月1日,取自http://sencir.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/site /c_principle_001/index/process_t_key/212/mode_t_key/-1/data_t_key/-1/code/001/kind_code/001
教育部(2013b):特殊需求領域課程大綱。教育部優質特教發展網路系統暨教學支援平台。2013年3月1日,取自http://sencir.spc.ntnu.edu.tw/site/c_principle_003/index/
process_t_key/212/mode_t_key/-1/data_t_key/-1/code/005/kind_code/001。
郭富添(2011):圖形組織工具對國二數理資優學生科學課程學習成效之研究。國立彰化
師範大學資賦優異研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
陳文典(2002):國民中小學九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域教學與其教材。發表
於國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要能力指標研討會自然與生活科技學習領域會議手冊
(24-31頁)。台北:國立編譯館。
陳佳萍(2013):國小資優資源班數學課程實施之個案研究。國立屏東教育大學數理教育new window
學系碩士論文(未出版)。
陳明仁(2013):國小一般智能資優資源班自然科學相關課程教師專業能力之研究。國立
臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
陳長益(1995):國民小學資優教育輔導手冊。台北:台北市立師範學院特殊教育中心。
陳長益、陳美芳、張芝萱、呂金燮(2006):課程與方案設計。載於國立臺灣師範大學(編印),全國資優教育發展研討會手冊(頁21-39)。台北:國立臺灣師範大學。new window
陳長益、陳美芳、陳偉仁主編(2011):分散式資優資源班經營實務手冊。臺北:教育部。
陳勇祥(2005):充實三合模式融入資優班戶外教學課程設計之研究。國立高雄
師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
陳建成(2011):樂高動力機械課程對於資優生創造力影響之研究。國立屏東教育大學數
位學習教學碩士學位學程碩士論文(未出版)。
陳建利(2005):社會學習領域能力指標轉化教學目標之研究∼以第一、二、三學習階段「人
與空間」主題軸為例。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
陳昭儀(1991):二十位傑出發明家的生涯路。臺北:心理。
陳昭儀(2012):資優教育教師之專業能力與專業成長歷程探析。資優教育季刊,122,1-8
陳美芳(2001):綜觀思考能力訓練。發表於台灣師大特殊教育中心主辦思考能力訓練研討會手冊。台北:台灣師大。
陳偉仁、黃楷茹、陳美芳、陳長益(2013):臺灣國民中小學資優資源班運作基本模式之new window
探究。特殊教育研究學刊,38(1),55-78。
陳新轉(2000):課程統整之理論性研究及其對九年一貫社會領域課程綱要之啟示。國立
政治大學教育學系博士論文(未出版)。
陳新轉(2002):能力指標轉化模式(一)能力指標之分析及其教學轉化。載於黃炳煌主編:
社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略(51-93頁)。台北:師大書苑。
陳淑芳(2009):國中數理資優生的科學本質觀及數理資優課程對其影響之研究。
國立臺南大學材料科學系碩士論文(未出版)。
陳雅芸(2005):藝術與人文學習領域能力指標解析與轉化之研究—以第三冊教科書音樂
課程內涵為探討主軸。國立台南大學音樂教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
陳雅慧(2012):12年國教來了,9成5國中老師想變,不到2成有行動。親子天下,38,24-26。
陳學志、洪素蘋、詹志禹、關秉林、邱皓政(2009):擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會─有限解答之擴散性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗。教育科學研究期刊,54(4)29-62。new window
陳龍安(1995):創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。new window
陳霞鄢、王振德(2004):國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
彭康益(2010):運用線上組織圖提昇國小學生問題解決能力之研究─以臺北市國小六年
級資優班濕地專題研究課程為例。臺北市立教育大學數學資訊教育教學碩士學位班碩
士論文(未出版)。
彭連煒(2010):創造性問題解決模式介入游泳教學對軍校生創造思考及批判思考能力之研究。台北巿立體育學院運動教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
曾柏維(2013):Intel K-12圖像式思考輔助工具融入教學方案對國小資優生推理能力new window
及創造力。台北市立教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
曾玲珠(2004):國民小學生活課程教科書能力指標轉化--藝術與人文部分。國立新竹教
育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
曾琦芬(2008):台灣高級中學英語文資優班課程規劃原則建立與其轉化成課程評鑑規準new window
之研究。國立臺灣師範大學英語學系博士論文(未出版)。
曾藝美(2011):國中視覺藝術創造思考教學對創造力影響之研究。國立臺中教育大學美術學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
游盈楨(2011):國小資優班教師服務學習課程教學之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學國民
教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
黃秀治(2009):國小資優班實施生涯發展課程之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教
學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃政傑(2005):課程改革新論:現場教學虛實探究。台北:冠學文化。
黃玲玉(2012):國民中學資優班教師執行個別輔導計畫之現況研究。國立彰化師範大學
特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃郁玲(2011):創造思考教學運用在生活課程促進創造力之行動研究-以二年級為例。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃倩瓊(2012):以創造性問題解決融入「力與運動」相關之科學遊戲的教學成效研究。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃德發(2010):高職模具科「模具製作實習」課程實施創造思考教學對學生創造力影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
楊志鴻(2011):區分性科學讀寫課程對八年級資優學生科學認識關與後設認知成效之研
究。國立彰化師範大學資賦優異研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
楊孟禎(2011):高職烘焙教學視覺傳達設計課程影響學生創造力成效之研究。南台科技大學餐旅管理教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
葉玉珠(2002):國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關
係。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC90-2511-S-110-006)。
葉連祺(2002):九年一貫課程與基本能力轉化。教育研究月刊,96,49-63。new window
葉惠芳(2008):國小資優學生領導才能課程教學成效之研究。國立臺北教育大學特殊教
育教學碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
詹秀美(2005):國小資優班創造思考教學實施現況研究。台中師院學報,19(1),47-72。new window
廖丹敏(2005):國小資優班領導才能課程實施成效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學
特殊教育在職進修碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
廖榮啟(2007):國小資優班科學充實課程實施成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育new window
學系博士論文(未出版)。
甄曉蘭(2001):從課程組織的觀點檢查統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊,4(1),1-20。new window
甄曉蘭、鍾靜(2002):學校本位課程發展相關問題及其相應措施之研究。師大學報,47(1),1-16。new window
劉士豪(1998):年齡、性別、成就目標、目標導向與創意生活經驗、創造力之關係。國
立政治大學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
劉志宏(2011):樂高FLL自然與生活科技課程對提高國小資優生科技創造力之研究。臺
北市立教育大學自然科學系碩士論文(未出版)。
潘寶秀(2010):國民小學自然與生活科技領域能力指標教學轉化之研究。國立新竹教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔡清田(2000):教育行動研究。台北:五南。
蔡碩穎(2010):DISCOVER課程對提升國小資優生問題解決能力與創造力之成效。國立
臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
鄧雅文(2008):國中小藝術才能音樂資優班團體課程設計與實施狀況之研究。國立花蓮
教育大學國民教育研究所特殊教育教學碩士班碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭綺雯(2011):運用創造思考教學於綜合活動領域教學之行動研究:以「孩子行動,世界大不同」教學方案為例。國立臺北教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
駐洛杉磯臺北經濟文化辦事處文化組(2011):美國忽視培育資優學生計畫。教育部電子報,488。2013年3月12日,取自ttp://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=8861
駐紐約臺北經濟文化辦事處文化組(2011):美各州削減資優教育經費。教育部電子報,454。2013年3月12日,取自http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=7328。
盧台華主編(2004):九年一貫在特殊教育之應用手冊。台北:教育部。
盧台華(2011):高級中等以下學校特殊教育課程大綱輔導與運作模式建立與推廣工作計畫第一年期末報告。台北:國立台灣師範大學。
盧台華、張靖卿(2003):個別化教育計畫評鑑檢核表之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊,24,15-38。new window
蕭玉芬(2004):生活課程能力指標轉化課程設計之行動研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
賴霖歆(2004):國小資優班教師對九年一貫課程態度之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教
育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
謝佩芬(2010):視覺藝術創造思考教學活動對國中學生創造力影響之研究。國立臺中教育大學美術學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
鍾青青(2009):國小低年級綜合活動領域教科書層級能力指標轉化之研究。國立新竹教
育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
鍾瑋純(2102):運用創造思考教學於表演藝術舞蹈課程學生創造力表現之行動研究。國立臺灣藝術大學舞蹈學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
藍毓豪(2006):國小英語科能力指標轉化至教科書之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
羅芝芸(1999):兒童認知風格、情緒智力與問題解決能力之相關研究。國立高雄
師範大學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
顏淑卿(2005):高雄市國小資優教育課程與教學實施現況之調查研究─以一般能力資優
教育資源班為例。國立屏東教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
饒見維(2005):創造思考訓練︰創思的心理策略與技巧。台北︰五南。
Aboukinane ,C. (2007). A qualitative study ofcreative thinking using experiential learning in
an agricultural and life sciences course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Texas A&M
University.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Colorado: Westview Press.
Amsler, M. (1987). Creativity and the Imagination. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
Bain, S. K., Bourgeois, S. J., & Pappas, D. N. (2003).Linking theoretical models to
actual practices: A survey of teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 4, 166-172.
Beane, J.A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New
York: Teachers CollegePress.
Bertrand, J.R.(2005). Can individual creativity be enhanced by training? A meta-analysis.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of Southern California.
Beyer, B. (2001). What research says about teaching skills. In A. L. Costa (Ed.). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd Ed., pp. 275-282). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bleakley, A. (2004). ‘Your creativity or mine?: a typology of creativities in higher education
and the value of a pluralistic approach. Teaching in Higher Education,9(4), 463-475.
Bocconi,S., Kampylis,P.,& Punie,Y.(2012).Creative Classrooms: A Systemic Approach
forMainstreaming ICT-enabled Innovation for Learning in Europe. European
Commission1, DG JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS),Seville, Spain.
Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., & Burns, D. (2006).
Documenting “possibility thinking”: A journey of collaborative enquiry.International Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 243–262.
Byron, K. (2007). Defining boundaries for creativity. Keynote presentation at the Creativity or conformity?Building cultures of creativity in higher education conference, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff,8-10 January.
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative Learning and Innovative
Teaching:Final Report on the Study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in EU
Member States.Seville: European Commission - Joint Research Center -Institute for
Prospective Technological Studies. EUR 24675 EN. Retrieved 1 May 2014 from
http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=3900
Cameron,P.A.(2010). Preschool Environments, Relationships and Creative Skills: A Case Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Walden University .
Campbell, D.M. & Harris, L.S. (2001).Collaborative theme building: How teachers write integrated curriculum. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Çetinkaya, Ç .(2010). An Examination of Creative Thinking Skills of Gifted and Talented
Preschool Children in Terms of Various Variables. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH. 1(1), 48-61.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better
predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521-531.
Cheung,R,H,P.(2012).Teaching for creativity:Examining the beliefs of early childhood teachers and their influence on teaching practices.Australasian Journal of Early Childhood,37(3),43-51.
Chowcat, J. (2002). Education for a high-knowledge era. Education Review, 15(2), 41-46.
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in Schools: tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge
Cropley, A. (1994). More ways than one: Fosteringcreativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cropley, A. (2001).Creativity in Education and Learning, Kogan Page Ltd, UK.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and
invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Cumming,C.S.(2011).Enhancing Professional Learning through Aspects of Creativity.
School of Education, University of Glasgow, Scotland. .Retrieved 2,3,2013, from
http://www.icsei.net/icsei2011/Full%20Papers/0001.pdf.
Cunningham, S. (2006). What Price a Creative Economy? Strawberry Hills, NSW:
Currency Press.
Cuttance, P. (1990). Performance indicators and the management of quality in Education.
( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED333575).
Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.).
Boston, MA: Pearson.
Delamare Le Deist, F.,& Winterton, J. (2005). 'What is Competence?' Human Resource
Development International, 8(1), 27–46.
Desailly.J. (2012).Creativity in the Primary Classroom. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dineen, R., Samuel, E. ,& Livesey, K. (2005). The promotion of creativity in learners:
theory and practice. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 4(3),
155-172.
Doppelt ,Y.(2009).Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning International Journal
of Technology and Design Education, 19,(1) 55-65.
Drake, S.M.(2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: aligning curriculum, content, assessment, and instruction(2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Dudek, S. Z., Strobel, M. G., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Cumulative and proximal
influences on the social environment and children’s creative potential. The Journal
of Genetic Psychology, 154 (4), 487-499.
Duncan, A. (2010). The well-rounded curriculum: Secretary Arne Duncan’s remarks at the Arts Education Partnership National Forum. U.S. Department of Education .Retrieved 1,31,2013, from https://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2010/04/04092010.html.
Eberle, R. F.(1971). Scamper: games for imagination development. New york: D. O. K.
Publisher.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1991). Identification of gifted and talented youth. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 7-22). NY: Pergamon.
Feldhusen, J.F. (2003). Precocity and acceleration. Gifted Education International, 17(1),
55-58.
Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. J. Stern-berg (Ed.), Handbook of
creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and Creativity in Education and
Training in the EU Member States: Fostering Creative Learning and Supporting
Innovative Teaching -Literature review on Innovation and Creativity in E&T in the EU
Member States (ICEAC).Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities. Retrieved 1 May 2014 from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2700.
Fleith,D.S.(2000).Creativity in the classroom: teacher and student perceptions of creativity in
the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3),148-153.
Florida, R. (2004) .“America’s Looming Creativity Crisis.” Harvard Business Review,82(10),
122-124, 126, 128.
Fogarty, R., & Stoehr, J. (2007). Integrating curricula with multiple intelligences: Teams,
themes, & threads. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Forgaty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(1), 61-65.
Freeman, J. (2006). First insights: Fostering creativity in university performance. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(1) 91–103.
Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: the change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand
Oaks,Calif.: Corwin.
Gallagher,J.J.(1985).Teaching the gifted child.(3rd ed.).Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Gallagher, J. J. & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child(4th Ed).Boston,
MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Gentry, M., & Ferriss, S. (1999). StATS: A model of collaboration to develop science talent among rural students. Roeper Review, 21, 316-320.
Glaser, R. (1993). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. In: R. McCormick,
P. Murphy, &M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology (pp. 91–111).
Wokingham, England:Addison-Wesley in association with The Open University.
Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher,5, 3-8.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Foshay, A. W. (1991). Integrated curriculum. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hockett, J. A. (2009). Curriculum for highly able learners that conforms to general education
and gifted education quality indicators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(3),
394-342.
Hoffmann,T. (1999) ."The meanings of competency". Journal of European Industrial Training,
23( 6), 275 - 286.
Homestead, E.R., & McGinnis, K.L. (1997). Making integrated curriculum work. New York:
Teacher College.
Howe, R. (1997). Creative problem solving approaches process for teaching and doing
creativity activity.發表於創造思考教學研討會研習手冊。台北:台灣師大科學教育研究所。
Isaksen.,S.G.,& Parnes,S.J.(1985).Curriculum Planning for Creative Thinking and Problem
Solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior,19(1),1-29.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria,
VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jackson, N.(2003). Creativity in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.Retrieved
5,31,2013, from http:www.palantine.ac.uk/files/1015.pdf.
Jeffrey, B. (2005). Final Report of the Creative Learning and Students Perspectives Research
Project (CLASP). Retrieved 12,31,2012, from http://clasp.open.ac.uk.
Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: towards a common discourse and practice.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), pp. 399–414.
Jeffrey, B.,& Craft, A.(2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1),77–87.
Johnson, D,T.(1994).Mathematics curriculum for the gifted. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (2nd ed) (pp. 231-261). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Resource review: Creativity. Change, 39, 55-58.
Kelly, F. S., McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (2009). Digital generation: No more cookie-cutter high schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kelly, K., & Kneipp, L. (2009). You do what you are: The relationship between the Scale of
Creative Attributes and Behavior and vocational interests. Journal of Instructional
Psychology, 36(1), 79-83.
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1998). Designing Effective Instruction. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Lasky,D.(2012). EXAMINING SMALL MULTIPLE CASE *C CREATIVITY IN THE
SCIENCE CLASSROOM: STUDIES OF FIVE HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS .Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Law, N., Yuen, A., & Fox, R. (2011). Educational innovations beyond technology - Nurturing
leadership and establishing learning organizations. New York: Springer.
Ledoux, M. W., & McHenry, N. (2006). Electronic portfolio adoption for teacher education
candidates. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 103–116.
Lipman,M., Sharp,A.M.,& Oscanyan,F.F.(1980).Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia:
Temple University Press.
Liu,X.Y.(2011). Research on Developing Vocational College Students’ Creativity Based on
Task-based Teaching Method. Asian Social Science, 7(1),201-206.
Luckett, K.,& Sutherland, L. (2000). Assessment Practices that improve Teaching and
Learning. In: Makoni, S. (ed.). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Handbook
for Southern Africa. Witwatersrand University Press and The Higher Education Research
and Development of Australian Society. Johannesburg, South Africa.
Maker,C.J.(1995).Lessons learned from the children.Understanding Our Gifted,8(1),1,8-13.
Maker, C.J. & Nielson, A.B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
McNiff, J.,Lomax, P.,& Whitehead, J.(1996).You and your action research project.
London:Hyde.
McWilliam,E.,& Dawson,S.(2008).Teaching for creativity:Towards sustainable and replicable
pedagogical practice.Higher Education,56(6),633-643.
Meier, S. L., Hovde, R. L. & Meier, R. L. (1996). Problem solving: teachers perceptions,
content area models and interdisciplinary connections. School Science and Mathematics,
96(5), 230-237.
Memmert,D.(2006).Developing creative thinking in a gifted sport enrichment program and the
crucial role of attention process.High AbilityStudies,17(1),101-115.
Missett,T.C., Callahan, C.M.,& Hertberg-Davis, H.(2012). Destination ImagiNation program
evaluation report. Destination Imagination. Retrieved 5,31,2013, from
http://downloads.destinationimagination.org/research/2011di_program evaluation_report.pdf.
Moore, D. W., Bhadelia, R. A., Billings, R. L., Fulwiler, C., Heilman, K. M., Rood, K.M. J., &
Gansler, D. A. (2009). Brain and cognition. Journal of Elsevier, 70, 267–272.
Morris ,W. (2006) .Creativity its place in education, Retrieved 1,30,2014, from
http://www.jpb.com/creative/Creativity_in_Education.pdf
Montogomery, D., Bull, K. S., & Baloche, L. (1992). College level creativity course
content. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(4), 228-234.
Necka, E. (2003).Creative interaction: A conceptual schema for the process of producing ideas
and judging he outcomes. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp.115-127).
New Jersey: Hampton press.
OECD (2011). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: Author. Retrieved 1,30,2013,
from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/48631582.pdf.
Osborn,A.F.(1963).Applied imagination. New York:Charles Scribner's Sons.
Parry, S. B. (1998). Just what is a competency? And should you care? Training, 6, 58-64.
Pahl,K.(2007). Creativity in events and practices: a lens for understanding children's
multimodal texts. Literacy,41(2),86-92.
Parker,J.S.(2008). The Impact of Visual Art Instruction On Student Creativity.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation ,Walden University College of education.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved
10. 29,2013, from http://www.p21.org/documents /P21_Framework _Definitions.pdf
Passow, A.H. (1982). Differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented. In Curricula for the gifted: Selected proceedings for the First National Conference on Curricula for the Gifted/Talented (pp. 4-20). Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training
Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
Pelfrey,R.(2011). CLASSROOM BEHAVIORS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
TEACHERS IDENTIFIED AS FOSTERING CREATIVITY. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation , Northern Kentucky University.
Reis,S.M.,Burns,D.E., & Renzulli, J. S.(1992). Curriculum compacting:The complete guide to
modifying the regular curriculum for high ability student.Mansfield, CT︰Creative Learning
Press.
Rejskind,G.(2000).TAG teacher: Only the creative need apply. Roeper Review, 22, 153-157.
Renzulli,J,S.(1977). The Enrichment Trial Model︰A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J.S. (1978). What Makes Giftedness? Reexamining a Definition. Phi Delta Kappan,
60(3), 180-184, 261.
Renzulli, J. S. (1979). What makes giftedness: A reexamination of the definition of the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: Ventura CountySuperintendent of Schools Office.
Renzulli, J. S. (1997). The multiple menu modle:A successful marriage for integrating content and process.NaSSP Bulletin,81(587),51-58.
Renzulli,J.S, & Thompson.,A.(2009). Light Up Your Child's Mind: Finding a Unique Pathway to Happiness and Success.NY:Little, Brown, and Company.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Robinson, K. (2001).Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford: Capstone.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3). 317-324.
Runco, M.,& Pritzker, S.(1999).Encyclopedia of Creativity, Academic Press: San Diego.
Runco, M.A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In (J. Kaufman &
R.Sternberg, Eds.)Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. (pp. 413-446).Cambridge UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Sarsani, M. R. (2008). Do high and low creative children differ in their cognition and motivation? Creativity Research Journal, 20, 155–170.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1 (1), 41-48.
Scope, E.E.(1998). A meta-analysis of research on creativity: The effects of
instructional variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Fordham University.
Skiba, T., Tan, M., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Roads not taken, new roads to
take: Looking for creativity in the classroom. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C.Kaufman (Eds.),
Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom.(pp252-269). Cambridge:Cambridge University
Press.
Smith, J. L., & Johnson, H. (1993)Bringing it together: Literature in an integrative curriculum.
Middle School Journal, 25(1), 3-7.
Simon, H., & Hicks,J.(2006). Opening doors: Using the creative arts in learning and teaching. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education ,5(1), 77-90.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, persona, developmental and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior
performance. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Starko, A. J. (2000).Creativity in the Classroom: School in the Curious Delight. N.J.: LEA.
Sternberg, R.J(1999a). Cognitive Psychology(2nd ed.).Orlando:Harcourt College Publishers.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999b). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. (2003). Creative Thinking in the Classroom. Scandinavian Journal of
Educational Research, 47( 3),325-338.
Sternberg, R. (2007). Making creativity the centrepiece of higher education. Paper
presented at the Creativity or conformity? Building cultures of creativity in higher
education, 8-10. January, Cardiff.
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity,American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Strip, C., & Hirsch, G..(2000). Helping Gifted Children Soar: a Practical Guide for Parents and Teachers. Scottsdale: Gifted Psychology Press.
The Five Colleges of Ohio( 2007). Creative and critical thinking: Assessing the foundations of a liberal arts education. The College of Wooster. Retrieved 1,30,2013, from http://www.wooster.edu/teagle.
Treffinger, B., & Isaksen, S. G. (2001). Teaching for creative learning and problem solving. In A. L. Costa (Ed.). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed., pp. 442- 445). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms-teaching manual, Princeton. New York: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1993). Understanding and recognizing creativity. In S. G. Isakeson, M.C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, and D. J. Treffinger (Eds). The emergence of a discipline. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Toth,L.S.,& Baker,S.R.(1990).The Relationship of Creativity and Instructional Style
Preferences to Overachievement and Under-achievement In A Sample Of Public
School Children. The Journal of Creative Behavior,24(3),190-198.
Ugur,S. (2004). About Creativity, Giftedness, and Teaching the Creatively Gifted in
the Classroom. Roeper Review, 26( 4),216-222.
VanTassel-Baska ,J. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 164–169.
VanTassel- Baska, J. (1997). Comprehensivecurriculum for gifted learners. NeedhamHeights
,MA: Allyn and Bacon. In N.Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (pp.126-135). Needham Heights,MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Van Tassel-Baska, J.(2002).Planning Effective Curriculum Experiences for Gifted
Learners. Understanding Our Gifted . Open Space Communications ,15(1).
Retrieved 3,12,2013, from http://www.davidsongifted.org/db/Articles_id_10278.aspx
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum Planning and Instructional Design for Gifted Learners. Denver: Love.
VanTassel-Baska,J.(2004).Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students.Corwin press.
Woods, P. (2002). Teaching and learning in the new millenium, in: C. Day & C. Sugrue (Eds) Developing teaching and teachers: international research perspectives (London, Falmer), 73–91.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T.(2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen,S. K. (2011,November). The revised NAGC P-12 gifted programming standards: The Foundationfor quality gifted education services. Paper presented 58th Annual Convention ofthe National Association
for Gifted Children,New Orleans, LA.
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York : Harcourt, Brace Jovanvich.
Ward, T. B., Smith, R. A., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg
(Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, A., Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in
primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,
16, 221-235.
Wolfinger, D,M., & Stockard, J.W.(1997). Elementary methods: An integrated curriculum.
New York: Longman.
Yousie,K.,& Harjee,N(2013). Learning Creativity Innovation Synergistic Value.Creating
the critical linkage. Retrieved 10,30,2013, from http://www.banffcentre.ca/departments
/leadership /library/pdf/creating_value.pdf.
Zohar, A., & Tamir, P. (1993). Incorporating critical thinking within a regular high school
biology curriculum. School Science and Mathmatics, 93(3), 136–140.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE