:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:存有論(Ontology)在教育研究方法論的意涵--以海德格與布爾迪厄為中心的初步討論
書刊名:國民教育研究學報
作者:李文富
作者(外文):Lee, Wen-fu
出版日期:2003
卷期:11
頁次:頁169-188
主題關鍵詞:存有論存有教育研究方法論此有生存心態OntologyBeingDaseinHabitusMethodology of educational research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:441
  • 點閱點閱:67
本文指出教育是一門關於人的學科,但教育研究對於人的存有問題並沒有給予應有的重視。相反的,卻因為過於強調研究方法的〝技巧〞與〝應用〞,而對研究對象的理解與掌握上出了問題,使得教育研究與實踐有了落差。要克服這種表象的描述研究對象,就必須嚴肅地從存有論的基礎上對研究對象進行哲學思考。準此,本文試圖透過梳理海德格與布爾迪厄的存有論概念,操作一個以存在的-存有論為基礎的教育研究方法論,並指出其聯繫教育研究與教育實務的可能貢獻。
This essay indicates that education is a subject concerning humans. Nevertheless, many educational researches do not pay adequate attention to the problem of Being. Instead, due to the over-emphasis on the "skills" and "application" of methods, gap between the educational research and practice is thus created, that is to say, there is something wrong with comprehension and command of the object of their researches. In order to overcome the difficulty of describing the object of researches in surface, serious philosophic thought should be launched toward the object of researches on the basis of ontology. Based on this, this essay, by analyzing the ontology of Heidegger and Bourdieu, intends to manipulate the methodology of education on the basis of existential-ontology and to point out the possible contribution in connecting educational research and practice.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(19960300)。社會學科的性質和意義。通識教育,3(1),91-98。  延伸查詢new window
2.高宣揚(19911200)。再論布爾迪厄的「生存心態」概念。思與言,29(4),295-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡錦昌(1995)。活在知識中的人:知識分子新論(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Brezinka, W.、胡勁松(2001)。教育科學的基本概念:分析、批判和建議。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.高宣揚(1990)。哲學人類學。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Heidegger, Martin、Hofstadter, A.(1982)。The basic problems of phenomenology。Indiana University Press。  new window
4.Ricoeur, P.、Thompson, J. B.(1989)。Hermeneutics and Human Sciences。Cambridge:Cambridge University。  new window
5.Harker, R.(1990)。An Introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
6.Dreyfus, Hubert L.(1992)。Being-in-the-world: a commentary on Heidegger's Being and time, division I。Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press。  new window
7.Bauman, Z.(1992)。Hermeneutics and social science: Approaches to understanding。Gregg Revivals。  new window
8.Heidegger, M.、陳嘉映、王慶節(1994)。存在與時間。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊深坑(1988)。理論‧證釋與實踐--教育學方法論論文集。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.袁貴仁(1994)。對人的哲學理解。河南:河南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.馮朝霖(2000)。教育哲學專論--主體、情性與創化。台北:元照:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard(1990)。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。Sage Publications。  new window
13.高宣揚(1998)。當代社會學理論。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bourdieu, P.(2000)。Pascalian meditations。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
15.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1977)。Outline of a Theory of Practice。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Bourdieu, Pierre、包亞明(1997)。文化資本與社會煉金術:布爾迪厄訪談錄。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Bourdieu, Pierre、Adamson, Matthew(1990)。In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology。Stanford University Press。  new window
18.陳嘉映(1995)。海德格爾哲學概念。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
19.葉啟政(20010000)。社會學和本土化。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊深坑(20020000)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bourdieu, Pierre、Wacquant, Loïc J. D.(1992)。An invitation to reflexive sociology。Polity Press。  new window
22.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1990)。The Logic of Practice。Stanford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dreyfus, H.、Rabinow, R.(1999)。Can there be a science of existential structure and social meaning?。Bourdieu: A critical reader。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
2.Althusser, L.(1986)。意識型態與意識型態國家機器。造反哲學家:路易阿圖塞。台北:文化社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE