臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：專題導向學習對大學生創造力之研究
書刊名：北體學報
作者：謝依婷／周建智 引用關係／黃美瑤 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsieh, Yi-ting／Chou, Chien-chih／Huang, Mei-yao
出版日期：2009
卷期：17
頁次：頁84-95
主題關鍵詞：大學生；創造力；專題導向學習；College students；Creativity；Project-based learning
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:267
  • 點閱點閱:81
二十一世紀是一個以腦力決定勝負的年代，僵化的思維已經跟不上社會的變化，提升國內學子的創造力發展實屬刻不容緩且具有舉足輕重的重要性。因此，本研究主要目的在於探討專題導向學習對大學生創造力之研究，以北部地區某國立大學選修運動指導法課之54 位二年級學生，其中包括33 位男學生及21 位女學生為本實驗之研究對象，本教學實驗為每週一節課，每次100 分鐘，共安排五週的教學實驗介入。並在教學實驗實施之前後施以「新編創造思考測驗」包含語文創造思考測驗與圖形創造思考測驗，並根據前後測所得資料以描述性統計、相依樣本t 檢定進行分析，且將本研究之顯著水準定為α＝ .05。本研究結果如下：一、專題導向學習能有效提升大學生在語文創造思考測驗之流暢力、變通力、獨創力等創造思考能力表現且達到顯著水準。二、專題導向學習能有效提升大學生在圖形創造思考測驗之流暢力、變通力、獨創力等創造思考能力表現且達到顯著水準，但在精進力表現上，前測成績表現顯著優於後測成績。 由上述的結果得知，在五週短期研究中，專題導向學習介入有助於增進大學生的創造力。
The 21th century is an age decided by the well-mental ability, and the rigid thoughts couldn’t follow up the fast change of society. It was urgent to promote the creativity development of students and played a decisive role now. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the short term effectiveness of implement of project-based learning (PBL) on college student’s creativity abilities. More closely, the study intended to: a) understand how the student’s verbal creativity on fluency, flexibility, and originality after apply the PBL; b). understand how the student’s figure creativity on, fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration after apply the PBL. Fifty-four ( n=54 ) sophomore college students and their instructor were participated in this study. The PBL was explored in the course for 5 weeks. Each class met for 100 minutes a week. All the students were administered the “The New Tests of Creative Thinking” from pre-test and post-test. The descriptive and paired samples t-test statistics were utilized to analyze the acquired data. The significant or rejection level was set at the .05 level. The results were as follows: a). The PBL was significantly improve in the verbal creativity on the factors of fluency, flexibility, and originality in college students. b). The PBL was significantly improve in the figure creativity on the factors of fluency, flexibility, and originality in college students, but in the figure creativity on the factors of elaboration was significantly in pre-test better than post-test. In conclusion, the PBL was effective in improving the student’s verbal and figure’s creativity abilities.
期刊論文
1.Moshe, B.、Yaron, D.(1999)。Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) Programme for creative thinking into a project-based technology curriculum。Research in Science & Technological Education，17(2)，139-151。  new window
2.Shepherd, A.、Cosgrif, B.(1998)。Problem based learning: Abridge between planning education and planning practice。Journal of Planning Education and Research，17，348-357。  new window
3.江美惠(20051200)。創造性問題解決教學方案對資優學生創造力及問題解決能力影響之研究。資優教育研究，5(2)，83-106。  延伸查詢new window
4.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1989)。Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching。Synthese，80(1)，121-140。  new window
5.吳靜吉(20020900)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，17-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Davidson, N.、O'Leary, P. W.(1990)。How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching。Educational Leadership，47(5)，30-40。  new window
7.Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.、Soloway, Elliot、Marx, Ronald W.、Krajcik, Joseph S.、Guzdial, Mark、Palincsar, Annemarie(1991)。Motivating Project-based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning。Educational Psychologist，26(3/4)，369-398。  new window
會議論文
1.詹志禹(2002)。台灣地區中小學創造力教育的現況條件與政策推廣。創造能力課程開發國際學術研討會。臺北市：國立臺北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsiao, H.-C.(1997)。The improvement of creativity and productivity of technical workers through partnership between university and industry。The International Conference on Creativity Development in Technical Education and Training。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗。台北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王睿千(2006)。創造思考教學模組對體育師資生創造力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂意仁(2008)。專題本位學習對國小學生科學態度和創造力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李崇城(2004)。高職商標設計課程之創意教學研究(碩士論文)。大同大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.莊子賢(2008)。創造思考教學融入探索教育體驗學習活動之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李登隆(2004)。資訊融入專題導向學習對國小學生自然科學習態度與問題解決能力之影響(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.曾雄豪(2005)。創造性思考教學對國小五年級學童動作技能與創造力之影響(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.簡尚姿(2006)。大學生修習創造力課程對於創造力與學習狀況影響之研究(碩士論文)。慈濟大學，花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
8.康琳琬(2006)。「數理世界的批判思考與創造」通識課程對大學生創造力的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.魏炎順(2004)。解決問題取向創意思考教學對師院勞作課學生創造力之影響研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.王淑娟(2003)。兒童圖畫書創造思考教學提升學童創造力之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳延旻(2003)。專題製作課程對大學生創造力之影響研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學，彰化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Vickers, J. N.(1990)。Instructional design for teaching physical activities: A knowledge structures approach。Champaign, IL：Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Boaler, J.(1997)。Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex, and settings。Buckingham：Open University Press。  new window
3.Gary, W. A.、David, L. K.(1996)。Case study workbook for physical education teacher preparation。Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company。  new window
4.Polman, J. L.(1998)。Activity structures for project based teaching and learning: Design and adaptation of cultural tools。San Diego, CA：Annual Meeting of AERA。  new window
5.Treffinger, D. J.(1980)。Encouraging creative learning for the gifted and talented。Ventura, CA：Ventura County School/LTI。  new window
6.葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學：過去、現在與未來。臺北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Rink, J. E.(1998)。Teaching physical education for learning。McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(20000000)。創造力研究。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張世忠(20000000)。建構教學：理論與應用。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Thomas, J. W.(2000)。A review of research of project-based learning，http://www.autodesk.com/foundation， 2006/11/16。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nijhot, W.、Kommers, P.(1985)。An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy。Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1455（臺灣：1438，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68294279
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上