:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構大學經營績效指標動態模式之個案研究
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:林聖薇 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Sheng-wei
出版日期:2012
卷期:15:3=43
頁次:頁101-132
主題關鍵詞:系統動態學高等教育評鑑績效評估Higher education evaluationPerformance evaluationSystem dynamics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:215
  • 點閱點閱:89
近年來,大學院校間之競爭激烈,如何維持競爭優勢,以達永續經營,已然成為現今大學績效衡量的重要議題。由於傳統靜態績效衡量之管理系統,較無法解決動態複雜之問題,也不具即時回饋性,致使其推動效益不如預期,因此,本研究旨在引用評鑑之指標,以系統動態學為方法論,建構大學績效評估之模式,並以個案大學的過去和現在之政策進行模型的測試與效度之分析,驗證動態性模式在大學績效評核之適用性。研究結果顯示,建構之動態模式能有效評估大學營運績效,其中模式之績效指標在連續時間之變動情形,可反映歷史與現況資料,亦可適時做為調整政策的途徑與機制;模式的效度分析則顯示模式之精確性極佳。最後,本研究再試驗未來實施不同政策時,其績效指標變動情形及效果,並提出結論及建議做為未來績效管理的參考。
In recent years, because of the intense competition between universities, sustaining the predominance in competition for the business continuity has become a significant issue for performance evaluation of universities. However, the traditional static performance evaluation is unable to solve the complicated problem about dynamics and does not have the characteristic of immediate feedback; as a result, the impetus benefit does not come to what people would expect. The purpose of the study is to cite the evaluation of indicators and use the methodology of System Dynamics, and then to construct a system dynamics model for evaluating operational performance of universities. Analysis of tests and validity with past and present policies of a university was used to take stock of applicability with dynamics on performance appraisal of universities. According to the result, the constructed system dynamics model is very effective in appraising operational performance of universities. The variation of the model performance index in a successive time is able to reflect the historical and present data and to adjust avenue and mechanism of policies at the right moment; therefore, validity analysis of the model shows its perfect accuracy. Finally, the model was tested again with the implementation of different policies to see its performance indicators of changes in circumstances and its effects. Based on the findings, the study made some suggestions for the application of the model by universities and for future research.
期刊論文
1.楊瑩(20050400)。高等教育的品質保證。臺灣教育,632,13-20。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, J. H.、Jan, T. S.(2005)。A system dynamics model of the semiconductor industry development in Taiwan。Journal of the Operational Research Society,56(10),1141-1150。  new window
3.楊國賜(20050400)。我國大學自我評鑑機制與運作之探討。臺灣教育,632,2-12。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jan, T. S.、Hsiao, C. T.(2004)。A four-role model of the automotive industry development in developing countries: A case in Taiwan。Journal of Operational Research Society,55(11),1145-1155。  new window
5.Chiu, H.-L.、Tsai, H.-H.(2007)。人口結構變遷槪況。主計月刊 \=Monthly of Budget Accounting and Statistic,617,6-13。  new window
6.Fontana, M.(2006)。Simulation in economics: Evidence on diffusion and communication。Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,9(2),1-15。  new window
7.Jan, T. S.、Jan, C. G.(2000)。Designing simulation software to facilitate learning of quantitative system dynamics skills: A case in Taiwan。Journal of the Operational Research Society,51(12),1409-1419。  new window
8.Qureshi, M. A.(2007)。System dynamics modeling of firm value。Journal of Modelling in Management,2(1),24-39。  new window
會議論文
1.Yeh, C.-C.(1994)。使管理學習者成為系統思考者的一種教學法:以系統動態學為教學法的探討。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Wu, T.-F.(2002)。應用動態資料增強系統動力學模型模擬技術之探討。國立中山大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳清基(2003)。精緻教育的理念。臺北:文師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Forrester, J. W.(1968)。Principles of System。Cambridge, MA:Pegasus Communications。  new window
3.韓釗(2002)。系統動力學--探討動態複雜之鑰。台北:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lewis, C. D.(1982)。Industrial and Business Forecasting Methods: a practical guide to exponential smoothing and curve fitting。Southampton:London:The Camelot Press Ltd:Butterworth Scientific。  new window
5.楊國賜(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Sterman, John D.(2000)。Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World。Irwin McGraw-Hill。  new window
7.湯堯(20010000)。學校經營管理策略:大學經費分配、募款與行銷。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.曹翠英(2006)。策略聯盟--強化大學競爭優勢。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇錦麗(19970000)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實際。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Forrester, Jay Wright(1961)。Industrial dynamics。M.I.T. Press。  new window
11.Wang, B.-J.(1997)。大學評鑑模式 ( 二 ):品質保證制度。大學評鑑 \\ 陳漢強 (主編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lee, T.-M.(1997)。大學評鑑之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.Tao, Z.-P.(2003)。系統動態學:直擊「第五項修練」奧秘。台北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Kellaghan, T.、Stufflebeam, D. L.(2002)。International handbook of educational evaluation。Dordrecht, OR。  new window
15.Kells, H. R.(1984)。Self-study process。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior(2010)。歷年出生統計資料。  延伸查詢new window
2.Taiwan Assessment and Evaluation Association(2004)。大學校務評鑑規劃與實施計畫評鑑手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2012)。專科以上學校總量發展規模與資源條件標準。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ministry of Education(2010)。重要教育統計資訊:大專校院校數統計。  延伸查詢new window
5.Ministry of Education, Department of Higher Education(2005)。高等教育評鑑中心規劃草案。  延伸查詢new window
6.Ministry of Education, Department of Statistics(2007)。大學教育階段學生人數預測分析報告 (96至112學年度)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊思偉、陳盛賢(2011)。我國高等教育發展特色與趨勢分析。我國百年教育回顧與展望。新北:國家教育研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE