:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小弱勢學生數學教科書轉化及教學介入之研究--以成就目標導向與學習成就之改變為例
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:黃儒傑 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Ju-chieh
出版日期:2012
卷期:5:3
頁次:頁59-98
主題關鍵詞:教科書轉化弱勢學生成就目標導向學習成就Textbook transformationDisadvantaged studentsAchievement goal orientationsMathematics achievement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:733
  • 點閱點閱:82
本研究針對弱勢學生進行教科書轉化與教學介入,以提升弱勢學生的成就目標導向與數學學習成就。其中,教科書轉化係融入自我調整學習策略,並依據因應弱勢學生學習的教材設計原則,進行設計,並由研究者針對8名弱勢學生進行教學介入。研究設計係採前後測設計,在教學介入前後均實施成就目標導向問卷及數學學習成就測驗,並以該校五年級學生161人的分數做為參照比較標準。問卷資料經採因素分析、多變量變異數分析、多變量相依樣本平均數考驗及共變數分析後,發現一些重要結論。首先,教學介入學生在教學介入前之數學成就測驗分數,顯著低於未教學介入學生,惟其成就目標導向不具有顯著差異。其次,教科書轉化的教學介入,能夠顯著提升教學介入學生之趨向表現層面的成就目標導向。最後,教科書轉化的教學介入,亦能顯著提升教學介入學生之數學成就。
This study was designed to determine changes in the mathematics achievements and goal orientations among disadvantaged students after instructional intervention in textbook transformation and instructional intervention for disadvantaged students. There were eight disadvantaged students in this instructional intervention. Factor analysis, MANOVA, and covariance analysis were used in data analysis. Several important findings were discovered. First, prior to instructional intervention, the achievement goal orientations of disadvantaged students were no different from those of other students, but their mathematics achievements were lower than those of others. Second, after instructional intervention, the achievement goal orientation of disadvantaged students became higher. Finally, after instructional intervention, the mathematics achievements of disadvantaged students became higher, too.
期刊論文
1.胡永崇(20030100)。國小學童數學解題的性質及補救教學教材設計。國民教育研究,7,74-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾柏瑜(20080600)。低成就學童的有效補救教學原則。臺東特教,27,25-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hattie, J.、Biggs, J.、Purdie, N.(1996)。Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meat-analysis。Review of Educational Research,66,99-136。  new window
4.程炳林(2003)。四向度個人目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。  延伸查詢new window
5.施香如(19940400)。「概念圖元法」--幫助學生增加閱讀效果的學習策略。諮商與輔導,100,40-43。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭芬蘭、林清山(19970900)。目標導向因果模式之驗證。教育心理學報,29,215-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡秉燁(2004)。從有意義的學習談教材設計。教育研究,118,98-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.高博銓(20001000)。教師應重視學習策略的指導。中等教育,51(5),54-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Wolters, C. A.(1998)。Self-regulated Learning and College Students' Regulation of Motivation。Journal of Educational Psychology,90(2),224-235。  new window
10.Battin-Pearson, Sara、Abbott, Robert D.、Hill, Karl G.、Catalano, Richard F.、Hawkins, J. David、Newcomb, Michael D.(2000)。Predictors of Early High School Dropout: A Test of Five Theories。Journal of Educational Psychology,92(3),568-582。  new window
11.許家驊(20110900)。歷程導向設計及學習策略中介教導對個體不同層次數學解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報,43(1),127-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.譚光鼎(20071200)。批判種族理論及其對臺灣弱勢族群教育之啟示。教育資料集刊,36,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林建平(19920900)。學習策略的訓練及其成效。初等教育學刊,1,133-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳李綢(19950500)。有效學習策略的研究與應用。學生輔導,38,40-47。  延伸查詢new window
15.Zimmerman, Barry J.、Martinez-Pons, M.(1988)。Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning。Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),284-290。  new window
16.張新仁(20060600)。學習策略的知識管理。教育研究與發展期刊,2(2),19-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.楊雲龍、徐慶宏(20071200)。社會學習領域教師轉化教科書之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,24(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.程炳林(20020400)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報,33(2),79-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Elliot, A. J.、McGregor, H. A.(2001)。A 2×2 achievement goal framework。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(3),501-519。  new window
20.Barron, K. E.、Harackiewicz, J. M.(2001)。Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(5),706-722。  new window
21.Boekaerts, M.(1997)。Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students。Learning and Instruction,7(2),161-186。  new window
22.Zimmerman, B. J.、Martinez-Pons, M.(1986)。Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self regulated learning strategies。American Educational Research Journal,23(4),614-628。  new window
23.陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(20061000)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳萩卿、張景媛(20070900)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證。教育心理學報,39(1),23-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Pintrich, Paul R.(1999)。The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning。International journal of educational research,31(6),459-470。  new window
26.陳淑麗(20080600)。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃怡瑛(2009)。家長背景與居住地對國小學生數學學習成效影響之研究(碩士論文)。亞洲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王明傑(2003)。國小學生自我調整學習模式之驗證暨應用性向與事件評量融入社會領域之自我調整閱讀理解教學效果之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林桑瑜(2002)。高中生自我調整學習策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.侯玫如(2002)。多重目標導向對國中生認知、動機、情感與學習行為之影響(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
5.魏麗敏(1996)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃俊傑(2008)。國小高年級學生的自我調整學習因素及其學習策略教學效果之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張春興(1997)。現代心理學:現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺灣東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。  new window
3.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mayer, Richard E.、林清山(1997)。教育心理學--認知取向。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Schraw, G.,Brooks, D.(2001)。Improving college teaching using an interactive, compensatory model of learning,http://www.cci.unl.edu/Chau/CompMod.html。  new window
2.吳孟真(2007)。運用圖畫書幫助弱勢學生語文能力的提升--以一位國小四年級原住民學童為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂玉琴(1988)。加減法文字題的解題層次及其數學的表徵。  延伸查詢new window
4.李咏吟(1994)。學習策略的診斷與輔導。  延伸查詢new window
5.邵秋桃(2004)。臺灣南部五縣市國小學生學習策略與學業成就關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡月寶(2011)。語文領域教科書使用與教學轉化之理論研究與啟示--以新加坡之研究為例。  延伸查詢new window
7.涂金堂(1999)。國小學生數學解題歷程之分析研究。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張新仁(2005)。國科會教育學門--學習策略主題研究成果之綜合分析。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(2010)。教育部補助國民中小學及幼稚園弱勢學生實施要點。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭瑞芬(2006)。都會區弱勢學生之學習處境。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃儒傑(2000)。數學科同質解題層次小組教學模式之理論探究。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃儒傑(2010)。因應弱勢學生學習需要的教材設計初探。  延伸查詢new window
13.廖郁馨、林吟霞(2011)。提升低成就學生學習態度之行動研究-運用英文童謠進行「攜手計畫課後扶助班」學童補救教學。  延伸查詢new window
14.譚宇權(2004)。弱勢團體,怎麼辦?一種學習輔導的研討。  延伸查詢new window
15.Baranik, L. E., Barron, K. E., & Finney, S. J.(2007)。Measuring goal orientation in a work domain: Construct validity evidence for the 2 × 2 framework。  new window
16.Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C.(1995)。The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students。  new window
17.Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., & Bordeleau, L.(1998)。A development study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning。  new window
18.Constantinos, P.(2000)。Internal and external factors affecting achievement in mathematics: Some findings from TIMSS。  new window
19.Corno, L.(2001)。Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning。  new window
20.Fuson, K. C.(1992)。Research of whole number addition and subtraction。  new window
21.Gaddis, M. D., & Elliott, T.(1997)。An alternative pedagogical approach to teaching at-risk and underachieving upper-level accounting students。  new window
22.Kuhl, J.(2000)。A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions。  new window
23.Pintrich, P. R.(2000)。An achievement goal theory perspective on issues on motivation terminology, theory, and research。  new window
24.Riveiro, J. M., Cabanach, R. G., & Arias, A. V.(2001)。Multiple - goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies。  new window
25.Sood, S., & Jitendra, A. K.(2007)。A comparative analysis of number sense instruction in reform-based and traditional mathematics textbook。  new window
圖書論文
1.Pintrich, P. R.(2000)。The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning。Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE