臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科學創造力課程成效之縱貫性分析
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：蕭佳純 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsiao, Chia-chun
出版日期：2017
卷期：25:1
頁次：頁47-73
主題關鍵詞：正向情緒；科學創造力；創造力傾向；創意自我效能；縱貫性分析；Positive emotion；Scientific creativity；Creative tendency；Creative self-efficacy；Longitudinal analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:239
  • 點閱點閱:18
本研究以自編的科學創造力課程融入國小自然與生活科技學科，選取實驗組學生157位、對照組學生211位，進行實驗課程教學，以瞭解課程成效及縱貫性發展。除了分析科學創造力的成長趨勢之外，更瞭解學生參加實驗與否、領域知識對於科學創造力成長趨勢是否有所影響。本研究一共進行四次實驗課程、四次調查，藉由階層線性模式發現，實驗組學生的科學創造力是呈現先下後上的趨勢，而對照組學生則是線性向下的發展趨勢。本研究除分析學生科學創造力受到時間變項的影響之外，也討論科學創造力是否為受到隨時間變動的共變項而影響其科學創造力，討論的變項包含了正向情緒、創意自我效能以及創造力傾向。其中，實驗組學生的創造力會受到創意成品、好奇性、挑戰性的正向影響，而對照組學生則是受到創意思考、創意成品、抗衡負面、冒險性的正向影響，可知，影響實驗組與對照組的科學創造力共變因素略為不同。另外，在實驗組學生部分，若領域知識越好，或是沒有補習，則成長曲率越快；但是在對照組來說，有補習的學生他們的科學創造力下降速率也將較快。整體而言，本研究所設計的融入式課程可有效提升學生的科學創造力。
A self-edited scientific creativity course was integrated into Science and Technology for elementary schools in this study to conduct the experimental course teaching with 157 students in the experimental group and 211 students in the control group in order to understand the course effectiveness and the longitudinal development. In addition to analyzing the growing trend of scientific creativity, it was expected to understand the effects of student participation in the experiment and the domain knowledge on the growing trend of scientific creativity. The experimental course was proceeded four times for 4 surveys. By using hierarchical linear modeling, it was found, from the conditional growth model, that the students in the experimental group presented downward and then upward trend on scientific creativity, while the students in the control group appeared linear downward development trend. This study explored the effect of time on students' scientific creativity and also discussed the effect of covariance with time, including positive emotion, creative self-efficacy, and creative tendency, on scientific creativity. Creative product, curiosity, and challenge showed positive effects on the creativity of students in the experimental group, while creative thinking, creative product, negative contention, and adventure revealed positive effects on the control group. Apparently, the covariance for the scientific creativity was different in the experimental group and the control group. Furthermore, the students in the experimental group with better domain knowledge or not going to cram schools showed faster growing curve, while the scientific creativity of students in the control group who go to cram schools reduced more rapidly. Overall speaking, the integrated course designed in this study could effectively promote students' scientific creativity.
期刊論文
1.Schwarz, N.(2000)。Emotion, Cognition and Decision Making。Cognition and Emotion，14(4)，433-440。  new window
2.Besançon, M.、Lubart, T.(2008)。Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments。Learning and Individual Differences，18(4)，381-389。  new window
3.Birdi, K. S.(2005)。No Idea? Evaluating the effectiveness of creativity training。Journal of European Industrial Training，29(2)，102-111。  new window
4.Mayer, R. E.(2008)。Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction。American Psychologist，63(8)，760-769。  new window
5.Benedek, M.、Fink, A.、Neubauer, A. C.(2006)。Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training。Creativity Research Journal，18(3)，317-328。  new window
6.Cramond, B.、Matthews-Morgan, J.、Bandalos, D.、Zuo, L.(2005)。A report on the 40-Year follow-up of the Torrance test of creative thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium。Gifted Child Quarterly，49(4)，283-291。  new window
7.Daniel, M.(2007)。Can creativity be improved by an attention-broadening training program? An exploratory study focusing on team sports。Creativity Research Journal，19(2/3)，281-291。  new window
8.蔡笑岳、朱雨潔(2007)。中小學生創造性傾向、智力及學業成績的相關研究。心理發展與教育，2，36-41。  延伸查詢new window
9.Osburn, H. K.、Mumford, M. D.(2006)。Creativity and Planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills。Creativity Research Journal，18(2)，173-190。  new window
10.Gruber, H. E.、Wallace, Doris B.(2001)。Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin。American Psychologist，56(4)，346-349。  new window
11.Chen, Gilad、Gully, Stanley M.、Eden, Dov(2001)。Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale。Organizational Research Methods，4(1)，62-83。  new window
12.Scott, G. M.、Leritz, L. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2004)。The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review。Creativity Research Journal，16(4)，361-388。  new window
13.Jaussi, K. S.、Randel, A. E.、Dionne, S. D.(2007)。I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work。Creativity Research Journal，19(2/3)，247-258。  new window
14.李偉清(20120300)。「國小資優生創造傾向量表」之編製研究。特殊教育研究學刊，37(1)，79-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.汪美香、黃炳憲(20121200)。專業技能與創造力的關聯：創意自我效能中介角色。南台學報，37(4)，1-14。  延伸查詢new window
16.林幸台(20020900)。青少年的創造力發展。應用心理研究，15，63-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.洪榮昭、康鳳梅、林展立(20031000)。傑出科技創作學童創造特質分析--以機器人競賽為例。師大學報：科學教育類，48(2)，239-253。  延伸查詢new window
18.葉玉珠、葉玉環、李梅齡、彭月茵(20061000)。以創作性戲劇教學啟發幼兒創造力之行動研究。師大學報：教育類，51(2S)，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.蕭佳純(20141200)。國小學童參與科展的歷程、內在動機與科技創造力成長的縱貫性分析。教育實踐與研究，27(2)，33-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.蕭佳純(20150300)。國小學童科學創造力成長歷程之縱貫性分析。科學教育學刊，23(1)，23-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.蕭佳純(20160300)。教師創意教學發展之縱貫性研究。特殊教育研究學刊，41(1)，63-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Fredrickson, B. L.、Branigan, C.(2005)。Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and through-action repertoires。Cognition and Emotion，19(3)，313-332。  new window
23.Hartley, K. A.、Plucker, J. A.、Long, H.(2016)。Creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of student creativity in Chinese elementary classrooms。Thinking Skills and Creativity，22，142-151。  new window
24.Huang, L.、Krasikova, D. V.、Liu, D.(2016)。I can do it, so can you: The role of leader creative self-efficacy in facilitating follower creativity。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，132，49-62。  new window
25.Kaufman, J. C.、Bear, J.、Gentile, C. A.(2004)。Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks。The Journal of Creative Behavior，38(1)，56-69。  new window
26.Kim, T. Y.、Hon, A. H. Y.、Crant, J. M.(2009)。Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study。Journal of Business and Psychology，24(1)，93-103。  new window
27.Mellon, E.(1996)。The two-conditions view of creativity。The Journal of Creativity Behavior，30(2)，126-143。  new window
28.Min, K. R.、Ugaddan, R. G.、Park, S. M.(2016)。Is the creative tendency affected by organizational leadership and employee empowerment? An empirical analysis of U.S. federal employees。Public Performance & Management Review，40(2)，382-408。  new window
29.Puccio, G. J.、Wheeler, R. A.、Cassandro, V. J.(2004)。Reactions to creative problem solving training: Does cognitive style make a different?。The Journal of Creative Behavior，38(3)，192-216。  new window
30.Wang, C.-W.、Chen, M.、Homg, R.-W.、Huang, C.-Y.、Li, H.-P.(2004)。Case studies of implementation of web-based group decision support system and creativity training in organizations。Taiwan Academy of Management Journal，4(3)，357-378。  new window
31.Wai, J.、Lubinski, D.、Benbow, C. P.(2005)。Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to 33 longitudinal study。Journal of Educational Psychology，97(3)，484-492。  new window
32.Wang, C.-W.、Homg, R.-W.(2002)。The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance。R&D Management，32(1)，35-45。  new window
33.邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲(20080600)。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊，50(2)，125-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.方紫薇、陳學志、佘曉清、蘇嘉鈴(20111200)。正向情緒及幽默有助於國中生之科學問題解決嗎？。教育科學研究期刊，56(4)，43-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.王精文、洪瑞雲、范凱棠、陸佳瑩(20061200)。創造力訓練及群體決策支援系統對問題解決能力的影響。交大管理學報，26(2)，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.吳秀娟、潘裕豐(20071200)。主題統整教學對國小學童創造力、問題解決能力及學業成就的影響之研究。資優教育研究，7(2)，71-103。  延伸查詢new window
37.李秀姿、陳昭儀(20071200)。創造性戲劇教學對國小資優生創造力與人際溝通影響之研究。資優教育研究，7(2)，19-46。  延伸查詢new window
38.李明昆、洪振方(20120600)。提升科學創造力的探究教學策略之實驗研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，65，49-73。  延伸查詢new window
39.洪文東(20031200)。創造性問題解決化學單元教學活動設計與評估。科學教育學刊，11(4)，407-430。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.胡夢蕾(20060600)。我國創造力與人格特質研究之回顧與探析。教育學刊，26，215-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.常雅珍、毛國楠(20061000)。以正向心理學建構情意教育之行動研究。師大學報. 教育類，51(2)，121-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.陳玉樹(20081000)。創造力訓練課程成效分析：準Solomon四組設計。課程與教學，11(4)，187-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.陳玉樹、周志偉(20090400)。目標導向對創造力訓練效果之影響：HLM成長模式分析。課程與教學，12(2)，19-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳亮光(20080400)。建置對外華語文師資培育創意教學課程增進教師創造力之研究。中原華語文學報，1，143-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.葉玉珠、彭月茵、林志哲、蔡維欣、鍾素香(20080400)。「情境式科學創造力測驗」之發展暨科學創造力之性別與年級差異分析。測驗學刊，55(1)，33-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.鄭英耀、李育嘉、劉昆夏(20080300)。科展績優教師教學行為與學童創造力、問題解決能力之關係。教育與心理研究，31(1)，1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.錢昭君、張世彗(20101200)。心智圖法寫作教學方案對國小學生創造力及寫作表現之影響。特殊教育學報，32，79-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Batey, Mark、Furnham, Adrian、Safiullina, Xeniya(2010)。Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity。Learning and Individual Differences，20(5)，532-535。  new window
49.Fredrickson, B. L.、Levenson, R. W.(1998)。Positive Emotion Speed Recovery from the Cardiovascular Sequelae of Negative Emotions。Cognition and Emotion，12(2)，191-220。  new window
50.Garaigordobil, M.(2006)。Intervention in creativity with children aged 10 and 11 years: Impact of a play program on verbal and graphic-figural creativity。Creativity Research Journal，18(3)，329-345。  new window
51.Grawitch, Matthew J.、Munz, David C.、Kramer, Thomas J.(2003)。Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice，7(1)，41-54。  new window
52.Hunsaker, S. L.(2005)。Outcomes of creativity training programs。The Gifted Child Quarterly，49(4)，292-299。  new window
53.Kaufmann, G.、Vosburg, S. K.(2002)。The effects of mood on early and late idea production。Creativity Research Journal，14(3/4)，317-330。  new window
54.Ma, H.-H.(2006)。A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs。Creativity Research Journal，18(4)，435-446。  new window
55.Zhao, J. J.、Zhao, S. Y.(2010)。The impact of IQ+EQ+CQ integration on student productivity in web design and development。Journal of Information Systems Education，21(1)，43-53。  new window
56.蕭佳純(20121200)。國小學童科學學習動機、父母創意教養與科技創造力關聯之研究。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，103-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
57.Tierney, P.、Farmer, S. M.(2011)。Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time。Journal of Applied Psychology，96(2)，277-293。  new window
58.洪文東(20000300)。從問題解決的過程培養學生的科學創造力。屏師科學教育，11，52-62。  延伸查詢new window
59.Seligman, Martin E. P.、Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(2000)。Positive psychology: An introduction。American Psychologist，55(1)，5-14。  new window
60.王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀(20140900)。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61(3)，337-360。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.Kaufman, J. C.、Baer, J.(2008)。Gender differences in creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior，42(2)，75-105。  new window
62.Gong, Yaping、Huang, Jia-Chi、Farh, Jiing-Lih(2009)。Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy。Academy of Management Journal，52(4)，765-778。  new window
63.Tierney, Pamela、Farmer, Steven M.(2002)。Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance。Academy of Management Journal，45(6)，1137-1148。  new window
64.Tierney, P.、Farmer, S. M.(2004)。The Pygmalion process and employee creativity。Journal of Management，30(3)，413-432。  new window
65.Amabile, Teresa M.(1988)。A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations。Research in Organizational Behavior，10(1)，123-167。  new window
66.林碧芳、邱皓政(20080300)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編制與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
67.葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(20001000)。影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表編製。師大學報.科學教育類，45(2)，39-63。  延伸查詢new window
68.陳玉樹、郭銘茜(20130900)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響：創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，85-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
69.陳學志、徐芝君(20061000)。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報. 教育類，創造力特刊，71-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
70.Cheung, C.、Roskams, T.、Fisher, D.(2006)。Enhancement of Creativity through a One-semester Course in University。Journal of Creative Behavior，40(1)，1-25。  new window
71.Gasper, K.(2004)。Permission to freely? The effect of happy and sad moods on generating old and new ideas。Creativity Research Journal，16(2/3)，215-229。  new window
會議論文
1.Magoun, D.、Eaton, V.、Owens, C.(2002)。IT and the attitudes of middle school girls: A follow-up study。The National Educational Computing Conference。San Antonio, TX。  new window
2.Shapiro, P. J.、Weisbcrg, R. W.、Alloy, L. B.(2000)。Creativity and bipolarity: Affective patterns predict trait creativity。The Convention of the American Psychological Society。  new window
學位論文
1.施乃華(2002)。創造思考教學成效之後設分析(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Puccio, G. J.、Murdock, M. C.、Mance, M.(2007)。Creative leadership: Skill that drive change。London：Sage。  new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.(1996)。Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life。New York：Basic Books。  new window
3.Williams, F. E.(1980)。Creativity assessment packet (CAP) manual。Buffalo, NY：D.O.K.。  new window
4.陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.林幸台、王木榮(1999)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市：心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.Amabile, T. M.(1996)。Creativity in the context: Update to the social psychology of creativity。Oxford：Westview Press。  new window
7.Florida, Richard L.(2002)。The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life。Basic Books。  new window
8.葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學：過去、現在與未來。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
10.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods。Sage。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要--自然與生活科技學習領域，http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_php。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Isen, A. M.(2000)。Positive affect and decision making。Handbook of emotion。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
2.Kaufman, J. C.、Bear, J.(2005)。The amusement park theory of creativity。Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Runco, M. A.、Sakamoto, S. O.(1999)。Experimental studies of creativities。Handbook of creativity。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Mayer, R. E.(1999)。Fifty Years of Creativity Research。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1999)。The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 英文故事閱讀與繪畫之教學策略對高職學生英語文學習興趣及學習成效影響之研究
2. 實驗教育學校教學信念、創造力自我效能、學習環境、學習滿意度關係之研究
3. 創造性探究教學模組對高中社團學生科學探究能力、科學創造力與科學學習動機之影響
4. 大學生品味、創意自我效能、廚藝創造力關係之研究
5. 國民中學校長正向領導、教師教學效能、與學生學習成效關係之研究
6. 國小兒童行為困擾第二階驗證性因素分析暨社會與情緒學習課程方案效果之研究
7. 職場個人學習、創新效能感、工作動機、創造力及工作績效間之關係—以組織創新氛圍為跨層次調節效果
8. 幼兒數學自主學習創新教學模式之行動研究
9. 發展與實施「自然科學探究與實作」課程之研究
10. 國小教師參與專業學習社群態度、心理資本、主觀幸福感與教學效能關係之研究
11. 大學生生命意義感、正向情緒、生活適應與心理幸福感關聯之研究
12. 學習共同體與講述教學對國小高年級學童社會學習領域學習成效之比較研究
13. 國民小學校長領導行為、教師專業發展與創新教學效能關係之研究－以臺灣北部四市為例
14. 國小教師對學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、自我效能與教學行為調整之關係研究
15. 教師自我調節能力、自我效能、社會支持 對教師專業發展之影響
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1012（臺灣：1006，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67701583
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上