:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:誰是資優生? 國小資優生家庭背景之探析
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:黃隆興王采薇 引用關係張德勝 引用關係
出版日期:2010
卷期:21
頁次:頁145-170
主題關鍵詞:資優生家庭背景Gifted studentsFamily backgrounds
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:592
  • 點閱點閱:47
本研究旨在比較國小資優生與普通生的家庭背景。研究者採自編問卷進行資料蒐集,調查期間為西元2005年10月至西元2006年2月,共得資優生問卷676份,普通生753份。研究發現:一、資優生父母教育程度以「專科」、「大學」及「研究所」居多,職業類別以「助理專業員」與「專業員」為主。普通生父母教育程度以「國中或以下」與「高中職」居多,職業類別以「體力工」與「技術工作員」為主。二、資優生來自「雙親家庭」的比例多於普通生,普通生來自「單父家庭」的百分比高於資優生。資優生手足人數為「0位」與「1位」的比例多於普通生,普通生手足人數為「3位」、「4位」及「5位以上」的百分比高於資優生。資優生手足排序為「獨生子女」與「排行一」的比例多於普通生,普通生手足排序為「排行三」與「排行四」的百分比高於資優生。三、家庭社經背景,及手足排序對資優生與普通生的區別預測率約68.72%。
The purpose of this study was to compare the differences between gifted and regular elementary students regarding their family backgrounds. Data were collected from self-developed questionnaires given to 676 gifted and 753 regular students, respectively, selected from October 2005 through February 2006. The major findings were as follows: First, a high percentage of the gifted students’ parents had received “associate-college degrees,”“college degrees” or “graduate degrees,” and a similar percentage of them were “assistant professionals” or “professionals.” A high percentage of the regular students’ parents had graduated from “junior high or below” or “senior/vocational high,” and a similar percentage of them were “blue-collar workers” or “mechanical workers.” Secondly, the percentage of gifted students from the two-parent families was higher than regular students, while the proportion of regular students from the single-father families was higher than gifted students. In addition, in comparison with regular students, many gifted students had no sibling or had one sibling only, and they were more likely to be the only child or the firstborn in the family. While a number of regular students, compared with gifted students, had three, four or five siblings and almost one-fifth of them was the third or fourth born child in the family. Thirdly, discriminant analysis between the gifted and regular students can be predicted at about 68.72% by the family socioeconomic backgrounds and the birth order of siblings.
期刊論文
1.江明曄、廖文靖(20040600)。從再製論的觀點探討高中數理資優教育之實施--以臺中市一所高中為例。特殊教育學報,19,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑美(19890100)。家庭因素與嬰兒智力、動作能力的發展。測驗年刊,36,165-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.簡茂發、羅芙蓉(19890100)。國小資優及普通兒童父母教導方式與學習行為之關係。測驗年刊,36,133-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Peoples, C. E.、Fagan, J. F.、Drotar, D.(1995)。The influence of race on 3-year-old children's performance on the Standford-Binet: Fourth edition。Intelligence,21,69-82。  new window
5.馬信行(1985)。家庭文化背景與學業成就的關係。政治大學學報,51,139-166。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇建文、盧欽銘、陳淑美、鍾志從、張景媛(1992)。家庭環境與嬰兒認知與動作能力發展的關係。教育心理學報,25,13-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bradley, R. H.、Caldwell, B. M.、Elardo, R.(1977)。Home environment, social status, and mental test performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,69(6),697-701。  new window
8.Groth, N. J.(1975)。Mothers of gifted。The Gifted Child Quarterly,19(3),217-222。  new window
9.Prom-Jackson, S.、Johnson, S. T.、Wallace, M. B.(1987)。Home environment, talented minority youth, and school achievement。Journal of Negro Education,56(1),111-121。  new window
10.Kohn, Melvin L.(1963)。Social Class and Parent-Child Relationships: An Interpretation。American Journal of Sociology,68(4),471-480。  new window
11.MacMillan, D. L.、Morrison, G. M.(1980)。Correlates of social status among mildly handicapped learners in self-contained special class。Journal of Educational Psychology,72(4),437-444。  new window
12.Kohn, M. L.(1959)。Social class and parental values。American Journal of Sociology,64(4),337-351。  new window
13.Lichtenwalner, J. S.、Maxwell, J. W.(1969)。The relationship of birth order and socioeconomic status to the creativity of preschool children。Child Development,40,1241-1247。  new window
14.陳榮華(19810600)。智能不足學生家庭背景之調查研究。教育心理學報,14,41-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃毅志(19960400)。臺灣地區社會學研究的職業分類與測量問題之探討。調查研究,1,123-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Albert, R. S.(1980)。Exceptionally gifted boys and their parents。Gifted Child Quarterly,24(4),174-179。  new window
17.Cohen, S.、Beckwith, L.(1976)。Maternal language in infancy。Developmental Psychology,12,371-372。  new window
18.Marjoribanks, K.、Walberg, H. J.(1975)。Ordinal position, family environment, and mental abilities。Journal of Social Psychology,95,77-84。  new window
19.謝孟穎(20030600)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊,49(2),255-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.簡茂發(19840600)。高級中學學生家庭社經背景、教師期望與學業成就之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,26,1-97。  延伸查詢new window
21.Teachman, Jay D.(1987)。Family Background, Educational Resources, and Educational Attainment。American Sociological Review,52(4),548-557。  new window
22.林俊瑩、黃毅志(20080600)。影響臺灣地區學生學業成就的可能機制:結構方程模式的探究。臺灣教育社會學研究,8(1),45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Barbe, Walter B.(1956)。A Study of the Family Background of the Gifted。Journal of Educational Psychology,47(5),302-309。  new window
24.黃毅志(19980400)。臺灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究:方法與應用,5,5-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.張建成、陳珊華(20060300)。生涯管教與行為管教的階級差異:兼論家庭與學校文化的連續性。教育研究集刊,52(1),129-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.鄭淵全(19980200)。社經地位、能力、學校教育與國小學生學業成就之關係-功能典範與衝突典範之探究。新竹師院學報,11,421-448。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.黃毅志(20080600)。如何精確測量職業地位?--「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),151-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.王振德(1981)。近三十年來我國的特殊教育。教育資料集刊,6,27-51。  延伸查詢new window
30.李明生(1973)。影響才賦優異兒童教育之家庭因素。教育研究所集刊,15,129-231。  延伸查詢new window
31.Anastasi, A.(1956)。Intelligence and family size。Psychological Bulletin,53(3),187-209。  new window
32.Belmont, L.、Marolla, F. A.(1973)。Birth order, family size, and intelligence。Science,182,1096-1101。  new window
33.Benbow, C. P.、Stanley, J. C.(1980)。Intellectually talented students: Family profiles。Gifted Child Quarterly,24(3),119-122。  new window
34.Blanchard, R. W.,、Biller, H. B.(1971)。Father availability and academic performance among third-grade boys。Developmental Psychology,4(3),301-305。  new window
35.Carlsmith, L.(1964)。Effect of early father absence on scholastic aptitude。Harvard Educational Review,34,3-21。  new window
36.Carlsmith, L.(1973)。Some personality characteristics of boys separated from their fathers during World War II。Ethos,1(4),466-477。  new window
37.Church, A. T.,、Katigbak, M. S.(1991)。Home environment, nutritional status, and maternal intelligence as determinants of intellectual development in rural Philippine preschool children。Intelligence,15,49-78。  new window
38.Hare, E. H.,、Shaw, G. K.(1965)。A study in family health: Health in relation to family size。British Journal of Psychiatry,111,461-466。  new window
39.Henrickson, H. V.(1981)。Class and gender: Role model considerations and liberations in advanced capitalism。Interchange,12,151-164。  new window
40.Jensen, A. R.,、Reynolds, C. R.(1982)。Race, social class and ability patterns on the WISC-R。Personality and Individual Differences,3,423-438。  new window
41.Kohn, M. L.(1959)。Social class and the exercise of parental authority。American Sociological Review,24(3),352-366。  new window
42.Konstantopoulos, S., Modi, M.,、Hedges, L. V.(2001)。Who are America’s gifted?。American Journal of Education,109 (3),344-382。  new window
43.Landy, F., Rosenberg, B. G.,、Sutton-Smith, B.(1969)。The effect of limited father absence on cognitive development。Child Development,40(3),941-944。  new window
44.Lessing, E. E., Zagorin, S. W.,、Nelson, D.(1970)。WISC subtest and IQ score correlates of father absence。The Journal of Genetic Psychology,117,181-195。  new window
45.McGowan, R. J.,、Johnson, D. L.(1984)。The mother-child relationship and other antecedents of childhood intelligence: A causal analysis。Child Development,55(3),810-820。  new window
46.Pfouts, J.(1980)。Birth order, age-spacing, IQ differences, and family relations。Journal of Marriage and Family,42(3),517-531。  new window
47.Reed, R. B.(1947)。Social and psychological factors affecting fertility: VII. The interrelationship of marital adjustment, fertility control, and size of family。The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,25(4),383-425。  new window
48.Santrock, J. W.(1972)。Relation of type and onset of father absence to cognitive development。Child Development,43(2),455-469。  new window
49.Santrock, J. W.(1975)。Father absence, perceived maternal behavior, and moral development in boys。Child Development,46(3),753-757。  new window
50.Schoonover, S. M.(1959)。The relationship of intelligence and achievement to birth order, sex of sibling, and age interval。Journal of Educational Psychology,50(4),143-146。  new window
51.Sheldon, P. M.(1954)。The families of highly gifted children。Marriage and Family Living,16(1),59-60。  new window
52.Silverman, L. K.,、Kearney, K.(1989)。Parents of the extraordinarily gifted。Advanced Development,1(1),41-56。  new window
53.Sutton-Smith, B., Rosenberg, B. G.,、Landy, F.(1968)。Father-absence effects in families of different sibling compositions。Child Development,39(4),1213-1221。  new window
54.Zajonc, R. B.(1976)。Family configuration and intelligence: Variations in scholastic aptitude scores parallel trends in family size and the spacing of children。Science,192,227-236。  new window
55.Zajonc, R. B.,、Markus, G. B.(1975)。Birth order and intellectual development。Psychological Review,82,74-88。  new window
學位論文
1.莊婉妮(2005)。高雄市國中資優班學生父母教養方式與成就動機關係之研究,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊惠琴(2000)。國小資優學生家長參與學校教育之研究,彰化。  延伸查詢new window
3.譚德玉(2001)。國中資優學生家長參與學校教育之研究,彰化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jersild, A. T.(1960)。Child psychology。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.Haberman, S. J.(1978)。Analysis of qualitative data。Academic Press。  new window
3.黃毅志(1999)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(1999)。中華民國特殊教育概況。臺北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
5.Nisbet, J.(1961)。Family environment and intelligence。Education, economy, and society: A reader in sociology of education。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.王振德(1994)。我國資優教育的發展與回顧。開創資優教育的新世紀。台灣師大特教系所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE