臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣國中生班級社會網絡指標及位置與被霸凌經驗之關係
書刊名：臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者：林妤容／吳文琪 引用關係／李均揚／林岱嬋／江宜珍 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Yu-jung／Wu, Wen-chi／Lee, Chun-yang／Lin, Dai-chan／Chiang, Yi-chen
出版日期：2014
卷期：33:4
頁次：頁397-409
主題關鍵詞：中心性；社會網絡位置；被凌者；被凌經驗；Centrality；Social network position；Victimization；Bullied experience
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:517
  • 點閱點閱:114
目標：了解台灣國中生被凌經驗之分佈，並探討其於班級內的社會網絡指標及位置與被凌經驗之關係。方法：使用國科會計畫「台灣國中生欺凌行為的類型與角色及其與健康的關係」之部分資料進行分析。樣本自北中南東各隨機抽出五所國中，於7~9年級各隨機抽出兩班，有效樣本共2,474人。社會網絡位置採提名法，每人提名至多3位同學，以UCINET軟體進行社會網絡分析，依據被提名總數（向內中心性）及提名他人總數（向外中心性），將研究樣本分類於身處班級內不同之社會網絡位置，共分為孤鳥型、一廂情願型、自我孤立者、小團體成員、大團體成員等四類。被凌經驗分為肢體式、口語式及關係式被凌，應用SAS軟體進行邏輯斯迴歸分析，探討班級社會網絡指標及位置與被凌經驗的關係。結果：男生、向內中心性較低者及一廂情願型的學生較常肢體／口語式被凌；女生較易關係式被凌；孤鳥型易肢體／關係式被凌；小團體成員則較少關係式被凌。結論：不同社會網絡位置與學生被凌經驗有關，建議可觀察其所屬社會網絡位置，及早偵測學生被凌情形以預防被凌後產生之負向影響。
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to realize the rate of being bullied among junior high school students in Taiwan and to investigate the effect of social network indicators and positions on bullied experiences. Methods: Part of the data from the National Science Council research project ＂The relationship of health and characters of Taiwan junior high school students in School violence＂ was obtained in this study for analysis purpose. The sample involved 2,474 seventh to ninth graders in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan via stratified, multistage, random cluster sampling. UCINET software was utilized to generate the social network indicators. Social network positions were obtained using peer nomination (nominated up to three classmates). The sample was classified into the isolates, sources, sinks, clique members and liaisons based on the numbers of indegree and outdegree. Bullied behaviors could be classified into three types as the physical, verbal and relational. Logistic regression models were analyzed by SAS software. Results: Boys of lower indegree and source were more likely to be physical/verbal bullied (compared to girls of outdegree and clique members, respectively); girls were more likely to be relationally bullied than boys; isolated students was associated with the experience of physical/relational bullied; and liaisons were more likely to be relationally bullied. Conclusions: Social network positions were significantly associated with bullied experiences. Teachers and school facilitators should recognize the association in advance for school bullying prevention.
期刊論文
1.Haynie, D. L.(2001)。Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?。American Journal of Sociology，104，1013-1057。  new window
2.Seals, D.、Young, J.(2003)。Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression。Adolescences，38(152)，735-747。  new window
3.Veenstra, R.、Lindenberg, S.、Oldehinkel, A. J.、De Winter, A. F.、Verhulst, F. C.、Ormel, J.(2005)。Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents。Developmental Psychology，41(4)，672-682。  new window
4.Arseneault, L.、Bowes, L.、Shakoor, S.(2010)。Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'Much ado about nothing'?。Psychological Medicine，40(5)，717-729。  new window
5.Vaillancourt, T.、Hymel, S.、McDougall, P.(2003)。Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies。Journal of Applied School Psychology，19(2)，157-176。  new window
6.Salmivalli, Christina(2010)。Bullying and the peer group: A review。Aggression and Violent Behavior，15(2)，112-120。  new window
7.Hanish, L. D.、Guerra, N. G.(2000)。The roles of ethnicity and school context in predicting children’s victimization by peers。Am J Community Psychol，28，201-223。  new window
8.Kessler, R. C.、Molnar, B. E.、Feurer, I. D.、Appelbaum, M.(2001)。Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey。Int J Law Psychiatry，24，487-508。  new window
9.Baldry, A. C.(2004)。The impact of direct and indirect bullying on the mental and physical health of Italian youngsters。Aggress Behav，30，343-355。  new window
10.吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(20130800)。臺灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，32(4)，372-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hawley, P. H.(1999)。The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective。Journal of Developmental Review，19，97-132。  new window
12.Neal, J. W.、Cappella, E.(2012)。An examination of network position and childhood relational aggression: integrating resource control and social exchange theories。Aggressive Behavior，38(2)，126-140。  new window
13.Sijtsema, J. J.、Veenstra, R.、Lindenberg, S.(2009)。Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige。Aggress Behav，35，57-67。  new window
14.Modin, B.、Ostberg, V.、Almquist, Y.(2011)。Childhood peer status and adult susceptibility to anxiety and depression. A 30-year hospital follow-up。J Abnorm Child Psychol，39，187-199。  new window
15.Almquist, Y. B.、Ostberg, V.(2013)。Social relationships and subsequent health-related behaviours: linkages between adolescent peer status and levels of adult smoking in a Stockholm cohort。Addiction，108，629-637。  new window
16.Hunter, S. C.、Boyle, J. M.(2002)。Perceptions of control in the victims of school bullying: the importance of early intervention。Educ Res，44，323-336。  new window
17.Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J.、Nesdale, D.、McGregor, L.、Mastro, S.、Goodwin, B.、Downey, G.(2013)。Comparing reports of peer rejection: associations with rejection sensitivity, victimization, aggression, and friendship。Journal of Adolescence，36(6)，1237-1246。  new window
18.Jones, D. C.、Newman, J. B.、Bautista, S.(2005)。A three-factor model of teasing: the influence of friendship, gender, and topic on expected emotional reactions to teasing during early adolescence。Soc Dev，14，421-439。  new window
19.Bjorkqvis, K.、Lagerspetz, K. M.、Kaukiainen, A.(1992)。Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression。Aggress Behav，18，117-127。  new window
20.Knack, J. M.、Tsar, V.、Vaillancourt, T.、Hymel, S.、McDougall, P.(2012)。What protects rejected adolescents from also being bullied by their peers? The moderating role of peer-valued characteristics。Journal of Research on Adolescence，22(3)，467-479。  new window
21.Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J.、Pronk, R. E.、Goodwin, B.(2013)。Connected and isolated victims of relational aggression: associations with peer group status and differences between girls and boys。Sex Roles，68，363-377。  new window
22.Olweus, D.(1997)。Bully/victim problems in school: facts and intervention。European Journal of Psychology of Education，12(4)，495-510。  new window
23.Wang, J.、Iannotti, R. J.、Nansel, T. R.(2009)。School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber。The Journal of Adolescent Health，45(4)，368-375。  new window
24.Olweus, D.(1994)。Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program。Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry，35(7)，1171-1190。  new window
25.Pellegrini, A. D.、Long, J. D.(2002)。A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition form primary to secondaiy school。British Journal of Developmental Psychology，20，259-280。  new window
26.楊雪華、陳端容、李蘭、柯姍如(20020600)。臺北市某高中一年級學生的班級人際網絡位置與吸菸行為的關係。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，21(3)，164-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Magee, J. C.、Galinsky, A. D.(2008)。Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status。The Academy of Management Annals，2(1)，351-398。  new window
28.Nansel, T. R.、Overpeck, M. D.、Pilla, R. S.、Ruan, W. J.、Simons-Morton, B.、Scheidt, P.(2001)。Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment。Journal of the American Medical Association，285(16)，2094-2100。  new window
29.Emerson, Richard M.(1962)。Power-dependence relations。American Sociological Review，27(1)，31-41。  new window
30.Kupersmidt, J. B.、Coie, J. D.(1990)。Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence。Child Development，61(5)，1350-1362。  new window
31.Baumeister, Roy F.、Leary, Mark R.(1995)。The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation。Psychological Bulletin，117(3)，497-529。  new window
32.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(20060200)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Crick, N. R.、Ku, H. C.、Casas, J. F.(1999)。Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool。Developmental Psychology，35，376-385。  new window
34.Wang, J.、Iannotti, R. J.、Nansel, T. R.(2009)。School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, social, and cyber。Journal of Adolescent Health，45，368-375。  new window
35.Scheithauer, H.、Hayer, T.、Petermann, F.、Jugert, G.(2006)。Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates。Aggressive Behavior，32，261-275。  new window
會議論文
1.吳齊殷、李文傑(2001)。青少年友誼網絡的特質與變遷：長期追蹤研究。「青少年生命歷程與生活調適」研討會，中央研究院社會學研究所 (會議日期: 2001年6月28-29日)。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。1-31。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2007)。兒童校園霸凌者現況調查報告。臺北市：兒童福利聯盟。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cotterell, J.(1996)。Social Networks and Social Influences in Adolescence。New York：Taylor & Francis。  new window
3.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2004)。國小兒童校圔霸凌 (bully)現象調查報告。台北：兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lance, C. E.、Vandenberg, R. J.(2009)。Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences。New York：Taylor & Francis Group。  new window
5.Rosner, B.(2010)。Fundamentals of Biostatistics。Boston, Massachusetts：Cengage Learning。  new window
6.Jimerson, S. R.、Swearer, S. M.、Espelage, D. L..(2010)。Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective。New York：Taylor & Francis。  new window
7.Branch, S.(2005)。Exploration of upwards bullying: an interview study。Griffith, Australia：Griffith University。  new window
8.Olweus, D.(1993)。Bullying at school: What we know and what can we do。Blackewll。  new window
9.Knoke, David、Yang, Song(2008)。Social Network Analysis。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.江宜珍、李蘭(2010)。社會網絡與社會支持。健康行為與健康教育。台北：巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Popper, C. W.(1988)。Disorders usually first evident in infancy, childhood, or adolescence。Textbook of Psychiatry。Washington, DC：American Psychiatric Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊！您有做自己的機會嗎？尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性：以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為：領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係：以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
5. 多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學習障礙學生校園霸凌覺知成效之研究
6. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
7. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
8. Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of the Bullying Prevention Policies in Taiwan
9. 居服員留任傾向之研究
10. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
11. 病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響：壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式
12. 重度工作投資與工作倦怠：健康促進與心理資本扮演之調節角色
13. 就事論事或將心比心？顧客不當對待與員工身心壓力的情緒歷程：壓力源評估與同理心特質的調節效果
14. 越南臺商外派人員之領導部屬交換對職場偏差行為之影響--以外在工作價值與工作不安全感為調節變項
15. 學校運動教練工作不安全感、組織認同、工作倦怠與工作退縮行為：工作要求-資源模式之觀點
 
無相關著作
 
1. 主題樂園產業企業社會責任、企業形象與組織認同關係之研究--以E主題樂園為例
2. 內外控特質透過組織承諾對公共部門組織公民行為影響之跨層次研究：以轉換型領導風格為調節變數
3. 外派職涯承諾、文化智商與自願外派中國意願之關聯：家庭及組織支持的調節效果
4. 第三屆世界棒球經典賽觀眾觀賞行為模式之研究：以臺灣臺中洲際棒球場賽事為例
5. 企業組織能力對員工工作績效與留職意願之影響--以員工滿意度為中介變數
6. 探討產品模組化對供應鏈關係品質、知識分享及新產品開發績效間關係之調節作用
7. 工作狂與情緒耗竭、工作-家庭衝突之關係：個體間差異的調節效果
8. 情緒勞動對服務品質之影響：團隊服務氣候及情緒能力之調節角色
9. 高階經營團隊之環境倫理價值觀與企業智慧資本：環境管理的中介效果
10. 如何留住顧客？探討關係品質在服務品質、服務補救與顧客再購意圖關係上之中介效果
11. 家長式領導與信任對領導效能之影響--以臺灣營造業為例
12. 領導者定位、領導行為與部屬對主管滿意度關係之研究--華人對偶關係之情境觀點
13. 國小高年級學童人格特質、父母教養方式與校園霸凌之關係研究
14. 比較廣告資訊內容與法律效果關聯之驗證：市場競爭秩序的角色
15. 智慧資本交互作用與組織績效關係之研究
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：428（臺灣：423，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67414015
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上