:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧資本交互作用與組織績效關係之研究
書刊名:中原企管評論
作者:凌雅慧 引用關係李承潔
作者(外文):Ling, Ya-huiLi, Cheng-chieh
出版日期:2014
卷期:12:1
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:智慧資本組織績效交互作用Intellectual capitalOrganizational performanceInteractive effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:579
  • 點閱點閱:72
本研究透過訪談與問卷發放等實證方式,探討智慧資本各構面(人力資本、結構資本、關係資本)間之交互作用對組織績效之影響。問卷發放對象為台灣地區1000大製造業與500大服務業的總經理,初步篩選確認地址後共發放後1322份問卷,總共回收124份問卷。除以層級迴歸驗證本研究之假設外,亦以兩階段訪談輔助假設推演以及研究結果之解釋。研究結果再次證實智慧資本的重要。整體而言,智慧資本對組織的財務績效及創新績效皆有正向影響;智慧資本各別構面亦對組織績效有影響。所有樣本一起分析的情況下,人力資本與關係資本對財務績效有正向影響,關係資本並且對創新績效有正向影響。若將製造業與服務業樣本單獨抽出來作分析,則關係資本對製造業的財務績效有正向影響。交互作用部分亦發現一些有趣的現象。所有樣本一起分析的情況下,人力資本與結構資本的交互作用對財務績效有顯著負向影響;若將製造業與服務業樣本抽出來分開作分析,則發現:對於製造業廠商,人力資本與結構資本的交互作用對創新績效有顯著負向影響;對於服務業廠商,人力資本與關係資本的交互作用則對財務績效有顯著正向影響。由問卷與訪談結果推論,產業別可能影響智慧資本交互作用對於組織績效的影響。
The research aims to investigate the influence of the interactive effect between or among the three intellectual capital components (human capital, relational capital, and structural capital) on organizational performance. Sample was selected from the managers of the top 1000 manufacturing and top 500 service companies in Taiwan. Totally 1324 questionnaires were distributed and 124 valid questionnaires were returned. Hierarchical regression analyses were then used to analyze the data. In-depth interviews were also conducted to help develop the hypotheses and explain the analysis results. The results confirm prior studies that intellectual capital has positive influence on organizational performance. In terms of the influence of individual intellectual capital component, human capital and relational capital has positive effects on financial performance; relational capital has a positive effect on innovation performance. In terms of the interaction effect, the results indicate that the interaction between human capital and structural capital has a negative effect on a firm's financial performance. When the sample are further divided into manufacturing and service firms, the results are somewhat different: the interaction between human capital and structural capital has a negative effect on manufacturing companies' innovation performance; the interaction between human capital and relational capital, however, has a positive effect on service companies' financial performance. Based on the results of interviews and questionnaire surveys, industry may play a key role in determining the influence of intellectual capital interaction on firm performance.
期刊論文
1.Wu, Se-Hwa、Lin, Liang-Yang、Hsu, Mu-Yen(2007)。Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organizations。International Journal of Technology Management,39(3/4),279-296。  new window
2.郭翠菱(20090700)。母公司人力資本與創新資本移轉對子公司經營績效之影響:以大陸臺商為例。會計評論,49,95-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Lynn, Bernadette E.(1999)。Culture and Intellectual Capital Management: A Key Factor in Successful ICM Implementation。International Journal of Technology Management,18(5-8),590-603。  new window
4.Hsu, L. C.、Wang, C. H.(2012)。Clarifying the Effect of Intellectual Capital on Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability。British Journal of Management,23(2),179-205。  new window
5.Ling, Y. H.(2012)。A Study on the Influence of Intellectual Capital and Intellectual Capital Complementarity on Global Initiatives。Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management,10(2),154-162。  new window
6.Ling, Y. H.(2012)。The Influence of Intellectual Capital on Global Initiatives。VINE: Very Informal Newsletter on Library Automation,42(1),129-144。  new window
7.Ling, Y. H.(2013)。The influence of intellectual capital on organizational performance--Knowledge management as moderator。Asia Pacific Journal of Management,30(3),937-964。  new window
8.黃同圳(1996)。員工訓練與管理發展。工業雜誌人力培訓專刊,1996(11月號),60-64。  延伸查詢new window
9.Riahi-Belkaoui, Ahmed(2003)。Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance of US Multinational Firms: A Study of the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Views。Journal of Intellectual Capital,4(2),215-226。  new window
10.Schmidt, F. L.、Hunter, J. E.、McKenzie, R. C.、Muldrow, T. W.(1979)。Impact of Valid Selection Procedures on Work-Force Productivity。Journal of Applied Psychology,64(6),609-626。  new window
11.Bontis, Nick(1999)。Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital : Framing and Advancing the State of the Fields。International Journal of Technology Management,18(5),433-462。  new window
12.凌雅慧、洪菱(20100300)。智慧資本管理如何影響組織績效:以智慧資本為中介變數。人力資源管理學報,10(1),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Ling, Y. H.、Jaw, B. S.(2006)。The Influence of International Human Capital on Global Initiatives and Financial Performance。International Journal of Human Resource Management,17(3),379-398。  new window
14.Subramaniam, Mohan、Youndt, Mark A.(2005)。The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities。Academy of Management Journal,48(3),450-463。  new window
15.Saint‐Onge, Hubert(1996)。Tacit knowledge: the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital。Strategy & Leadership,24(2),10-14。  new window
16.Roos, Göran、Bainbridge, Alan、Jacobsen, Kristine(2001)。Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool。Strategy and Leadership,29(4),21-26。  new window
17.Quinn, J. B.、Anderson, P.、Finkelstein, S.(1996)。Leveraging Intellect。Academy of Management Executive,10(3),7-27。  new window
18.Edvinsson, Leif、Sullivan, Patrick H.(1996)。Developing a model for managing intellectual capital。European Management Journal,14(4),356-364。  new window
19.Youndt, M. A.、Subramaniam, M.、Snell, S. A.(2004)。Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns。Journal of Management Studies,41(2),335-362。  new window
20.王文英、李佳玲、邱紫芸(20120200)。智慧資本與組織學習方式對學習能力與組織績效影響之實證研究。管理學報,29(1),17-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.莊智薰、林福來、沈明鑑、李岳蓉(20110400)。員工分紅入股與組織績效:智慧資本觀點。管理與系統,18(2),207-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Ulrich, D.(1998)。Intellectual capital = Competence × Commitment。Sloan Management Review,39(2),15-26。  new window
23.Bonits, Nick、Keow, William C. C.、Richardson, Stanley(2000)。Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries。Journal of Intellectual Capital,1(1),85-100。  new window
24.Nerdrum, L.、Erikson, T.(2001)。Intellectual Capital: A Human Capital Perspective。Journal of Intellectual Capital,2(2),127-135。  new window
25.Song, M.、Droge, C.、Hanvanich, S.、Calantone, R.(2005)。Marketing and Technology Resource Complementarily: An Analysis of Their Interaction Effect in two Environmental Contexts。Strategic Management Journal,26(3),259-276。  new window
26.Bontis, Nick(1998)。Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models。Management Decision,36(2),63-76。  new window
27.Delaney, J. T.、Huselid, M. A.(1996)。The impact of human resource management practices on perception of organization performance。Academy of Management Journal,39(4),949-969。  new window
28.Nonaka, Ikujiro(1991)。The Knowledge-Creating Company。Harvard Business Review,69(6),96-104。  new window
29.Molyneux, A.(1998)。IC and the ASCPA: Seeking Competitive Advantage。Australian CAP,68(5),27-28。  new window
30.王文英、張清福(20040700)。智慧資本影響績效模式之探討:我國半導體業之實證研究。會計評論,39,89-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Hurley, R. F.、Hult, G. T. M.(1998)。Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination。Journal of Marketing,62(3),42-54。  new window
32.Harrison, Suzanne、Sullivan, Patrick H. Sr.(2000)。Profiting from intellectual capital: Learning from leading companies。Journal of Intellectual Capital,1(1),33-46。  new window
33.楊朝旭(20060300)。智慧資本、價值創造與企業績效關聯性之研究。中山管理評論,14(1),43-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(20060200)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review,70(1),71-79。  new window
會議論文
1.吳安妮(2003)。智慧資本的類別與評價機制之探討。2003年智慧資本的創造與管理研討會,行政院研究發展考核委員會 。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳泓怡、黃文鈴、趙佩玲(2004)。組織文化、知識分享與智慧資本之關係研究--以高科技製造業為例。桃園:銘傳大學。555-575。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳思華(1998)。知識流通對產業創新的影響。第七屆產業管理研討會,政治大學科技管理研究所、豐群基金會 。政治大學科技管理研究所。2-42。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉權瑩(1999)。資訊服務業知識管理之研究--以臺灣HP與台灣IBM為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪俊龍(2003)。人力資源管理系統、智慧資本與組織績效關聯性之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Drucker, Peter Ferdinand(1969)。The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
2.Stewart, Thomas A.(1997)。Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations。New York:Bantam DoubIeday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.。  new window
3.Drucker, P. F.(1993)。Post-Capitalist Society。Butterworth Heinemann。  new window
4.Edvinsson, Leif、Malone, Michael S.(1997)。Intellectual capital: realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower。New York, NY:HarperCollins Publishers Inc.。  new window
5.Sveiby, Karl Erik(1997)。The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets。San Francisco, California:Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.。  new window
6.Argyris, Chris、Schon, Donald A.(1978)。Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
7.Roos, J.、Roos, G.、Dragonetti, N. C.、Edvinsson, L.(1997)。Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape。London, UK。  new window
8.Galbraith, Jay R.(1973)。Designing complex organizations。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
9.Senge, Peter、郭進隆、齊若蘭(1990)。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為:領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係:以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
5. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
6. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
7. 公司治理是否影響企業的經營績效?--家族與非家族企業的比較
8. 居服員留任傾向之研究
9. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
10. 病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響:壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式
11. 重度工作投資與工作倦怠:健康促進與心理資本扮演之調節角色
12. 就事論事或將心比心?顧客不當對待與員工身心壓力的情緒歷程:壓力源評估與同理心特質的調節效果
13. 越南臺商外派人員之領導部屬交換對職場偏差行為之影響--以外在工作價值與工作不安全感為調節變項
14. 學校運動教練工作不安全感、組織認同、工作倦怠與工作退縮行為:工作要求-資源模式之觀點
15. 景觀餐廳顧客認知價值對行為意圖與額外願付價格之影響
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE