:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響高一學生科學創造力的因素之研究
作者:陳振明 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen-Ming Chen
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
指導教授:吳裕益
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:創造力科學創造力線性結構方程模式creativityscientific creativitystructural equation model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(10) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:65
本研究是以近年來創造力研究取向中兼顧個人、環境與文化等各種因素全方位的「匯合取向」(confluence approaches)理論為基礎建構探究模式與發展工具,以線性結構方程模式(SEM)為分析方法,深入探討在科學範疇中的創造力。本研究以影響科學創造力的環境、個人特質與知識等因素作為自變項,科學創造力測驗與科展作品成績的表現作為依變項,提出影響高一學生科學創造力線性結構方程模式並對此模式進行適合度評鑑,最後針對研究結果進行討論,提出建議。
研究結果顯示,本研究所發展的「影響科學創造力的因素之問卷」、「科學創造力測驗」兩工具有良好的信效度與適用性。不同科學創造作品表現的高一學生在影響科學創造力的因素之得分有顯著的差異,但關聯程度不大。影響高一學生科學創造力線性結構方程模式適配度評鑑結果大致尚佳,可用以說明影響高一學生科學創造力變項間的關係,其中「環境」、「科學知識」、「科學創造力測驗」對「科學創造產品表現」有較強且達顯著的直接效果存在,「科學創造力個人特質」對「科學創造產品表現」的直接效果值則較小且未達顯著。「環境」、「科學知識」、「科學創造力個人特質」對「科學創造力測驗表現」的直接效果值都不高且未達顯著水準。
根據研究結果,本研究對科學創造力資賦優異的鑑定、科學創造力的培育、與未來研究三方面提出建議。
The test instruments and a theoretical model developed in this research were in accordance with the perspective of the confluence approaches to creativity, and in particular, the systems model, which emphasizes the interaction of individuals, domain, and field as subsystems. The structural equation model (SEM) was then applied to evaluate the goodness of fit of the proposed model in relation to scientific creativity of high school freshmen, with environment, personal attributes, and scientific knowledge as independent variables, and performances in the Scientific Creativity Test and scientific exhibit competition as dependent variables.
The results demonstrated that Questionnaire on the Factors Influencing Scientific Creativity in concert with the Scientific Creativity Test were both psychometrically sound and applicable. Significant differences existed in the questionnaire scores among high school students with varying degrees of proficiency in scientific exhibit competition, although their associations were small. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis model testing the factors influencing scientific creativity of high school freshmen provided adequate fit. The environment, scientific knowledge along with scores of the Scientific Creativity Test showed stronger and significant direct effects on the performances in the scientific exhibit competition. Nevertheless, the direct effects of personal attributes on the performances in the scientific exhibit competition did not reach a significant level. As well, the environment, scientific knowledge coupled with personal attributes had no statistically significant direct effects on the Scientific Creativity Test performances.
Based on the study’s findings, suggestions were made regarding the identification of creative scientific gifted, strategies for fostering scientific creativity, in combination with directions for future research.
中文部分
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000):創造力研究。台北:心理。new window
王千倖(2000):提升教師教學創造力。中等教育,第51卷,第三期,60-71頁。
王文中、鄭英耀(2000):創造力發展量表之編製與試題反應。測驗年刊,47(1),頁153-173。new window
王文科(1988):資優課程設計。台北:心理。
王木榮(1985):威廉斯創造力測驗修訂研究。國立台灣教育學院輔導研究所碩士論文。new window
王美芬、熊召弟(1995):國民小學自然科教材教法。台北市:心理。
王溢嘉(1991):IQ與創造力。台北:自立晚報。
台北市政府(1999):台北市資優教育白皮書。台北市政府印。
行政院教育改革審議委員(1996):教育改革總諮議報告書。行政院印。
吳裕益(2004a):線性結構模式的理論與應用。高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所線性結構模式上課講義。
吳裕益(2004b):題目反應理論。高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所測驗理論與運用上課講義。
吳靜吉(2002):台灣實施創造力教育的樣貌。2004創造力教育國際學術研討會。國立台北師範學院主辦,2004年6月4日、5日。
吳靜吉(2002):創造力的研究取向之回顧與展望,創造能力課程開發學術研討會,國立台北師範學院主辦,2002年10月17日。
吳靜吉、葉玉珠、鄭英耀(2000)。影響創意發展的個人因素、家庭及學校因素量表之發展。創新與創造力―技術創造力的涵意與開發研討會。台北。
呂金燮(2003):創造力教學的本質與陷阱。資優教育,86,頁1-9。
李錫津(1986):創造思考教學對高職學生創造力發展之影響。教育研究集刊,29(33),347-356。
李錫津(1987):創造思考教學研究。台北:台灣書店。
林偉文(2002):國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係,國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。new window
林清山(1984):「線性結構關係」(LISREL)電腦程式的理論與應用。測驗年刊,31,頁149-164。new window
林靜怡(2003):創造力青少年其家庭教養環境之研究--以全國科展得獎國中生為例,國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林寶山、陳瓊森(1984):科學方法過程能力測驗,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心編印。
邱皓政(2002):結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。
金吾倫(1993):科學發現的哲學-拉瓦錫化學革命探究。台北:水牛出版社。
俞國良(1996)。創造力心理學。林崇德、沈德立主編:當代智力心理學叢書。杭州:浙江人民。
洪文東(1997):創造性思考與科學創造力的培養。國教天地,第123期,頁10-14。new window
洪文東(1999):科學的創造發明與發現。台北:台灣書店。
洪文東(2000):創造型兒童之思考特性與科學創造力的關聯性。屏東師院學報,頁355-394。new window
洪振方(1998):科學創造力之探討,高雄師大學報,9,289-302。new window
洪振方、賴羿蓉(1997):教師對邏輯實證與後邏輯實證主義科學哲學觀建構之電化電池發展史教材的認識與抉擇。科學教育學刊,第五卷第二期,1-52。new window
洪瑞雲、吳庭瑜(2002):法則發現的背後。應用心理研究-創造力的發展與實踐,十五期。台北:五南。
胡衛平、俞國良(2002):青少年的科學創造力研究,教育研究23(1),頁44-48。new window
翁秀玉、段曉林(1997):科學本質在科學教育上的啟示與做法,科學教育月刊,201,2-16。
高 健(1998):即興創意。台北,時報出版社。
國立台灣科學教育館(2001):中華民國中小學科學展覽會實施要點。
國科會(2000):中華民國人文社會科學白皮書,國科會。
國科會科教處(2003):科學教育白皮書。台北:國科會科教處
張世彗(2003):創造力-理論、技術/技法與培育。
張巨青、吳寅華(1995):邏輯與歷史-現代科學方法論的嬗變。台北:淑馨出版社。
張玉成(1997):開發腦中金礦的教學策略。台北:心理。new window
張春興(1995):教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市,東華。
張春興(1996):張氏心理學辭典。台北市,東華。
張家芬(1997):國小高年級學生依附風格、創意教養環境與創造行為之關係。國立政治大學碩士論文,未出版。
教育部(1994):國民中小學課程標準。台北,教育部。
教育部(1998):國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北,教育部。
教育部(2001):大學教育政策白皮書。教育部高教司。
教育部(2001):特殊教育法。台北:教育部。
教育部(2002):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(2002):創造力教育白皮書。台北,教育部。
梁家祺(1999):創造力在科學教育上的意涵。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。科教人,3,1-13。
郭生玉(1997):心理與教育研究。台北市:精華書局。
郭有遹(1989):創造的定義及其所衍生的問題。創造思考教育,1,10〜12。new window
郭有遹(1994):創造性的問題解決方法。台北:心理。new window
郭有遹(2001):創造心理學。台北:正中。
郭奕龍(2004):創造力理論在創造力能力資優生鑑定上之運用。資優教育季刊,9,07-14。
陳伯璋(2001):知識經濟與教育改革。中等教育,52(2),181-197。new window
陳英豪、吳鐵雄和簡真真編著(1990):創造思考與情意的教學。高雄:復文。
陳龍安(1988)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。new window
陳瓊森(1984):國民中學學生科學方法過程之研究。國立高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳耀茂(2004):共變異數構造分析的AMOS使用手冊。鼎茂。
湯誌龍(1999):高工機械科學生專業創造力及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。new window
楊智先(2000):教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
董奇(1995):兒童創造力發展心理。台北:五南。
詹志禹(2002a):「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展-兒童會創造嗎?。教育研究月刊。117-124。new window
詹志禹(2002b):科學發現與知識成長。應用心理研究-創造力的發展與實踐,十五期。台北:五南。
詹秀美(1990):國小學生創造力與問題解決能力相關變項研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。new window
賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。台北:開明。
劉世男、郭志光(2001):創造力的概念與定義。資優教育季刊,81,頁1-7。
劉世南、郭誌光(2002):創造力理論的發展:一個心理構念演進的省思。資優教育季刊,85,頁20-30。
劉世南、郭誌光(2003):創造力實踐的基本建設:評量方法的發展。資優教育季刊,86,10-20。
鄭湧涇(1987):適合高中科學才賦優異學生的教學方案。資優教育季刊,27,頁1-6。
魏美惠(1994):創造力的認識與培養。台中師範學院幼兒教育年刊,7期,頁117-192。new window
英文部分
Albert, R. S. (1983) Genius Eminence. New York: Pergamon
Albert, R. S.(1990). Identity, experience, and career choice among the exceptionally gifted and eminent. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp.13-34). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Alexander, P. A. (1992) Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychology, 27, 33—51.
Amabile, T. M. (1987) The motivation to be creative. In S. G. Isaken (ed.) Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics (Buffalo, NY: Bearly) pp. 223—254.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organization Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M.(1995). Creativity in context. CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Lazenby, J., Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anderson, D. R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Library, 27, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Baer, A. (1993). Why you shouldn’t trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 80-83.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 271-284.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Barron, F. and Harrington, D. M. (1981) Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439—476.
Bennett, W. B.(1943). The American patent system:An economic interpretation. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.)(1993). Tesing structural equations models. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Brown, K. A. (1988). Inventors at work: Interviews with 16 notable American inventors. WA: Microsoft Press.
Brown. R. T. (1989). Creativity:What are We to Measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning. & C. R. Reynolds. (Eds.). Handbook of Creativity(pp. 3-32. ). New York:Plenum Press.
Callahan, C, M. (1991). The assessment of creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis, Handbook of the gifted Education(Eds.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Carin A. A. (1993). Teaching Modern Science (6th Ed.). New York: Merrill. Press.
Cattell, R. B. (1971) Abilities: Their Structure, Growth and Action (New York: Houghton Miflin).
Collins, M. A. & Amablie, T. M. (l999). Motivation and Creativity. In R. J. Strenberg(Ed), Handbook of Creativity(pp. 297-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Conant, J. B. (1971). Science and Common Sense. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cropley, A. J.(2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23, 72-79.
Cropley, A. J. & Urban, K. K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R.F. (eds.)(2000). International handbook of giftedness and talnet. pp.485-498.NY:Elservier.
Cropley, A. J.(2001). Creativity in education and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In M. Lepper & D. Green (Eds). The hidden costs of reward(pp. 205-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Strenberg(Ed), The Nature of Creativity(pp. 325-329). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988)., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding. In F. G. Farley & N. R. W. (Eds), The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education(pp. 91-106). NY: Praeger.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Collons.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (l999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. J. Strenberg(Ed), Handbook of Creativity(pp. 313-335). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in Education. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J.,Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R. F. (eds.)(2000.) International handbook of giftedness and talent. PP.81-94. NY:Elsevier.
Dacey, J. S. (1989). Peak periods of creative growth across the lifespan. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(4), 147-224.
Dacey, J. S. (1989). Foundmentals of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.
Davis, G.. A. (1986). Creativity is forever (2nd Ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Davis, D. A. (1989). Testing for creativity potential. Contemporary Educational Psychologu, 14, 75-87.
Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
Dillashaw, F. G..&Okey, J. R. (1980). Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary science students. Science Education, 64(5), 601-608.
Easley, J. A. Jr.(1971). Scientific method as an education objective. The Encyclopedia of Education. PP.150-157. The Macmillian Company.
Einstein, A. (1952) Letter to Jacque Hadamard. In B. Ghiselin (ed.) The Creative Process (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), pp. 43—44.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evoluation of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to excellence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eysenck, H. J. (l994). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147-178.
Feldman, D. H. (1986) Nature’s Gambit (New York: Basic Books).
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J. & Colulson, R. L. (1993). Learning, teaching, and testing for complex conceptual understanding. In N. Frederikesin, R. J. Mislevy, & I. I. Bejar(Eds.). Test theory for a new generation of tests. 181-218. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Findlay, C. S. and Lumsden, C. J. (1988) The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11, 3—55.
Fox, H. H. (1963). A critique on creativity in science. In M. A. Coler(Ed.). Essays on creativity in the Sciences (pp. 123-152). New York: New York University Press.
Friedlander, M. (1983) A natural science creativity as a prediction of creative thinking in science. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 8, 211—215.
Funk, H. J., Fiel, R. L., Okey, J. R., Jaus, H. H. & Constance Stewart Sprague. (1985). Learning science process skills. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Ganagher, J. J. (1975). Teaching the gifted child (2nd Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence (NewYork: Basic Books).
Gardner, H.(1988). Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 8-26.new window
Gardner, H.(1993). Creating minds. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H.(1995). Learning minds. NY: Basics.
Getzels, J. W. & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal, 3(9), 80-84.
Getzels, J. W. & Csikszentimihalyi, M. (1972). The creative artist as an explorer. In J. McVicker Hunt, Human intelligence(pp. 182-192). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Gove, P. B. (1973). Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. (台北市,新月圖書公司)。
Guilford, J. P.(1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity(pp. 37-59). Chicago: Aldine.
Guilford, J. P.(1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. NY: Bearly limited.
Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in western civilization. American Anthropologist 68, 1384-1417.
Greenstein, G. S. (1986). Creativity in Science : A Personal Account, Essays on Creativity and Science, Proceedings of the Creativity and Science Conference.
Greenberg, E.(1992). Creativity, autonomy, and evaluation of creative work: Artistic workers in organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 75-80.
Haensly, P. A., & Reynolds, C. R.(1989). Creative potential as related to measures of IQ and verbal comprehension. Indian Journal of Psychology, 41, 7-16.
Hakstian, A. R. (2001). The measurement and prediction of managerial creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 367-384.
Hennessey, B. A. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraints on children’s creativity while using a computer. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 151-168.
Hocevar, D. (1979). A Statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the meansurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297-299.
Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity review and critique. Journal of Personality assessment, 45(5), 450-464.
Hodson, D. (1986). Philosophy of science and science education. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2), 215-225.
Howe, R. (1997). The creative environment. 創造性思考教學研討會,11.6-8, 1997,國立台灣師範大學,台北,台灣。
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The Structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Holyle(Ed), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications(pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for seconfary school students. International Journal of Science Education. 24(4),389-403
Hung, H. C. (1997). The nature of science-problems and perspectives. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 473-479..
Jöreskog, K. G.(2000). Thirty years of SEM inthirty minutes. Lecture presented at the Fifth Vonference on Logic and Methodology.
Kane, M. K., Crooks, T., & Cohen,A. (1999). Validating measures of performance. Educational Measurement, 18(2), 5-17.
Karplus, R. (1969). Introductory Physics: A Model Approach. N.Y.: W. A. Benjamin, Inc., PP461-465
Klarh, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 524-543.
Kourany, J. A. (1998). Scientific Knowledge: Basic issues in the philosophy of science. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Koulaidis, V. & Ogborn, J.(1988). Use of systemic network in development of a questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education. 10(5), 497-509.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions(2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkpw, J. M.(1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Thinking and Problem Solving (London: Academic Press), 289—332.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In S. Cpppersmith(Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology (Vol. 2, Personality Research, pp.11-39). Copenhagen: Munksgard.
Majumdar, S. K. (1975). A systems approach to identification and nurture of scientific creativity. Journal of Indian Education, 1, 17—23.new window
Maker, J.&King, M. A.(1996). Nurturing giftedness in young children. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449-460). Cambridge University Press.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
Messick, S.(1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
Milgram, R. M. (l990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert(Eds.), Theorise of creativity (pp. 215-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mulaik, S. A., & James, L. R. (1995). Objectivity and reasoning in science and structural equation modeling. In: R. H. Holyle(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R. and Doares, L. M. (1991) Process analytic of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91—122. Ochse, R. (1990) Before the Gates of Excellence: The Determinants of Creative Genius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 187.
Nichols, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait, American Psychologist, 27, PP. 717-727.
Ochse, R.(1990).Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O’ Hara &Sternberg, R. J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, Practical or analytical on essay writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking style. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 197-210.
Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Perkins, D. N. (1988). Creativeity and the quest of mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg and E. E. Smith (Eds.). The Psychology of human thought, 309-336. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.
Plucker, J. A. (1999).Is the proof in the Pudding?Reanalyses of Torrance’s(1958 to Present) Logitudinal Data. Creativity Research Journal. 12(2), 103-114.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 35-61). Cambridge Iniversity Press.
Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.
Rekdal, C. K. (1977). In search of the wild duck: Personality inventories as tests of creative potential and their use as measurements in programs for the gifted. Creative Bhavior, 18, 11-22.
Renzulli , J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R, J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson(eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli , J. S.& Reis, S.M. (1993). Developing Creative Productivity Though the Enrichment Triad Model. Nurturing and Developing Creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline. Ablex Press.
Renzulli , J. S., Leppien, J. H., & Hays, T. S.(2000). The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: After view for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300-326.
Rossiman, T. & Horn, J. (1971). Cognitive, motivational and temperamental indicants of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 265-286.
Rossman, J.(1931). The psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee. Washington: The Inventor’s Publishing Company.
Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative Performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly 31(3), 121-25.
Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S.(1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children.Educational and Psychological Measurement,45 ,483-501.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1991). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 67-68.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why?NY: Guilford.
Sinha, A. K. and Singh, C. (1987) Measurement of scientific creativity. Indian Journal of Psychometry and Education, 18, 1—13.
Stein, M. I. (1967). Creativity and culture. In R. L. Mooney & T. A. Razik (Eds.), Explorations in creativity. New York: Harper.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985):Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988):A three-face theory of intellectual giftedness. In Sternberg R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creative. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
Sternberg, R. J. and Lubart, T. I. (1991) An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1—31.
Sternberg. R.J.,&Lubart, T. I.(1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful Intelligence (New York: Basic Books).
Sternberg, R. J. (1999).Handbook of creativity, Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg. R. J. & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 251-272). Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. & Dess, N. K. (2001). Creativity for the new Millennium. American Psychologist, 56 (4), 332.
Swartz, R. (1982) Alternative learning strategies as part of the educational process. ScienceEducation,66(2), PP269-279..
Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1992). Self-evaluation and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 259-265.
Torrance, E. P. (1962) Building Creative Talent (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms Technical Manual, Research Edition personnel press, Inc., Princeton, N. J.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively?Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking, norm-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Torrance, E. P. (1987). Future career image as a predictor of creative achievement in the 22-year longitudinal study. Psychological Reports, 60, 574.
Torrance, E. P., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 136-145.
Torrance, E. P. (1990) Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services).
Trowbridge, L. & Wbyee, R. W. (1986). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. New York: Merrill. Press.
Wallach, M.,& Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Case studies of creative thinking: Reproduction versus restructuring in the real world. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke, The creative cognition approach(pp.53-72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wiggins, G. P.(1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco, LA:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1980). Teaching for creative thinking in the intermediate grades. A Journal on Gifted Education, 3(1), 4-6.new window
Yussen, S. R.(1985). The role of metacognition in contemporary theories of congnitive development. Metacognition, cognition, and human performance.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE