我國技專校院學生學習成效評估機制之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	我國技專校院學生學習成效評估機制之研究
作者：	黃曙東
作者(外文)：	Shu-Tung Huang
校院名稱：	國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱：	工業教育與技術學系
指導教授：	戴文雄
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2006
主題關鍵詞：	技專校院；學生學習成效；評估；評鑑；學生學習成效評估機制；university and college of technology；Student Learning Outcomes；assessment；evaluation；the system of assessing Student Learning Outcomes
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:4 共同引用:0 點閱:101

本研究旨在探討我國技專校院學生學習成效評估機制層級結構及其相對權重，以及建置機制所需之實施策略，以作為學校、評鑑單位實施學生學習成效評鑑參考依據。
本研究方法為問卷調查法。經由自編問卷實施層級分析法及德懷術之資料蒐集與分析，獲致結論如下：
壹、一套的我國技專校院學生學習成效評估機制，包括機制目標、設計、執行及管控等四個構面、十三個準則和五十四個指標。
貳、學生學習成效評估機制功能除可作為教育目標、課程、教學、學生服務、經費分配、教師評鑑等決策依據外，亦可展現學校績效責任制、協助學生改善學習不足，以及提供業界所需質量皆優之人力資源。
參、建構學生學習成效評估機制除學校內部各層級教學、行政單位和教師等各項作為外，亦需學校外部之政府機構、評鑑單位、教育專業團體及產業界等作為。
肆、建構機制可能遭遇如：教師升等辦法不利教學與學生學習、缺乏外部標準化測驗、業界未能涉入、缺乏誘因、教育政策與學校辦學方向過度重視研究等問題。

以文找文

The main purpose of this study was to construct the system of assessing Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for Taiwan’s universities and colleges of technology. Such investigations can serve as a basis to future develop the university’s SLO evaluation system by educational authorities and follow-up research studies.
The study used the methods of Delphi technique and Analytic Hierachy Process. The conclusions are summarized as follows:
1. The system of assessing SLO includes 4 attributes, 13 criteria, and 54 indicators.
2. The functions of assessing SLO are to help institutions to assess students effectively, to facilitate students to achieve the learning, and to aid institutions to use the outcomes of assessing SLO to fulfill their purposes in effective teaching and learning, and educational effectiveness.
3. Two stratums’ involvements for constructing the educational quality assurance system of assessing SLO are university’s internal quality control mechanisms and external quality assurance systems, which include governmental authorities, accrediting bodies, educational professional associations, and employee institutions.

以文找文

中文部分
王文科(2002)。教育研究法。台北市：五南。 new window

王保進(2003)。主要國家高等教育評鑑實務暨我國資訊學門評鑑制度之規劃。台北市：高等教育。
王素芸(1993)。適性評量的理論與實施。教育研究雙月刊，30，9-69。
何英奇(1992)。教學評量的基本原則。國立臺灣師範大學學術研究委員會 (主編)，教學評量研究。台北市：五南。
吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。台北市：高等教育。 new window

李隆盛、賴春金(2004)。技職教育評鑑的展望。教育資料集刊，29，327-340。 new window

林聰明、王國隆(1990)。專科學校評鑑作業改進調查研究。台北市：教育部。
柳玉清、王淑敏、邱美秀、陳李綢 (譯) (2000)。T. Kubiszyn, & G. Borich 著。教育測驗與評量(Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice)。台北市：五南。
郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。台北市：五南。 new window

張文華、郭重吉(1995)。科教革新中評量理念的重建。教育研究雙月刊，45，23-30。 new window

陳正昌(1993)。正確的教學評量觀念-專訪臺中師院簡院長茂發。教育研究雙月刊，30，4-7。 new window

游家政(1996)。得懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。花蓮師院學報，6，1-24。 new window

黃政傑(2002)。課程評鑑。台北市：師大書苑。
黃曙東 (譯) (2005)。D. L. Stufflebeam 著。CIPP 評鑑模式。載於蘇錦麗 (審訂)，評鑑模式：教育及人力服務的評鑑觀點 (Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation) (頁333-383)。台北市：高等教育。
黃曙東、蘇錦麗(2005)。後設評鑑研究：以2001年大學校院實施自我評鑑計畫成果報告書為例。教育研究集刊，51(2)，31-65。 new window

曾淑惠(1996)。我國專科學校後設評鑑之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
楊瑩(2006，6月)。歐盟高等教育評鑑機制之形成與建置。載於財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會舉辦之「2006年邁向卓越高等教育評鑑」國際學術研討會論文集(頁81-117)，台北市。
趙志揚(1998)。技職教育教學品質系統之建構與驗證---以高職數控機械課程為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(成果報告編號：NSC87-2516-S018-002)。
蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑：理論與實際。台北市：五南。 new window

蘇錦麗、黃曙東(2006，6月)。世界重要國家評鑑專業標準與指導原則之發展對我國教育評鑑的啟示。載於財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會舉辦之「2006年邁向卓越高等教育評鑑」國際學術研討會論文集(單行本，頁1-27)，台北市。 new window

英文部分
Alfred, R., Ewell, P., Hudgins, J., & McClenney, K. (1999). Core indicators of effectiveness for community college (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Community College Press.
Airasian, P. W., & Abrams, L. M. (2003). Classroom student evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation, 533-548. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA) (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) (2004). Assessment. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2004, from http://www.aacu.org/issues/assessment/index.cfm.
Astin, A. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) (2002). Audit manual. Retrieved April 2, 2004, from http://www.auqa.edu.au/qualityaudit/auditmanuals/auditmanual_v1 /auqa_auditmanualv1c.pdf.
Banta, T. W. (1985). Use of outcomes information at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. In P. T. Ewell (eds.). Assessing educational outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Banta, T. W., & Moffett, M. S. (1987). Performance funding in Tennessee: Stimulus for program improvement. In D. F. Halpen. Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain. New Directions for Higher Education, 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 12-15.
Borden, V. M. H., & Bottrill, K. V. (1994). Performance indicators: History, definitions, and methods. In V. M. H. Borden, & T. W. Banta (eds.). Using performance indicators to guide strategic decision making. New Directions for Institutional Research, 82. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Candy, P. C., & Maconachie, D. (n.d.). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: A recent history and commentary. Retrieved June 25, 2004, from http://www.avcc.edu.au/policies_activities/quality_assurance/policy/quality_assurance_in_austra.doc.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979).Toward a differential testing approach: Testing the limits employing the Raven Matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
Clarke, M., & Masaus, G. (2003). New and old in student evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 485-487). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2003). Statement of mutual responsibilities for student learning outcomes: Accreditation, institutions, and programs. Washington DC: CHEA.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2004). Accreditation and the provision of additional information to the public about institution and program performance. Washington: CHEA.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2005). CHEA recognition --Recognition of accrediting organizations: Policy and procedures. Retrieved April 29, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/recognition/recognition.asp.
Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions (2003). Regional accreditation and student learning :A guide for institutions and evaluators. Philadelphia: Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Curvale, B. (2003). France-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 93-102, 159-162). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2004). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund: Issue paper. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/8F857836-F4AE-4D74-952E-3906FF5807B4/894/ltp_issues_paper.pdf.
Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2005). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund 2006: Administrative information for providers. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/018DB581-375F-4BDF-ABD8-1F5E608A4382/7637/FINALAIP2August2005.pdf.
Department of Education and Skills (DfES) (2003). The future of higher education. Retrieved Nov. 29, 2005, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/strategy/hestrategy/pdfs/DfES-HigherEducation.pdf.
Diamond, R. M. (1998). Designing and assessing courses and curricula: A practical guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dittrich, K. (2003). Ambition of the Netherlands Accreditation Organisation. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.nvao.net/content.php?a=s&t=per&id=95.
Eaton, J. S. (1991). The unfinished agenda: Higher education and the 1980s. New York: American Council on Education and the Macmillan Publishing Co.
Eaton, J. S. (2003a). An overview of U.S. accreditation. Retrieved April 17, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/pdf/overview_US_accred_8-03.pdf.
Eaton, J. S. (2003b). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/international/OECD_JEPaper_0803.pdf.
Eaton, J. S. (2003c). Is accreditation accountable? The continuing conversation between accreditation and the federal government. Washington DC: CHEA monograph series 1.
Eckstein, M. A., & Noah, H. J. (1993). Secondary school examinations. International perspectives on policies and practice. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ewell, P. T. (1983). Information on student outcomes: How to get it and how to use it. Boulder, Colo.: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Ewell, P. T., & Ries, P. (2000). Measuring up 2000: The state-by-state report for higher education . National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education: National Center Report #00-5. Retrieved Nov. 26, 2005, from http://measuringup.highereducation.org/2000/assessA.htm.
Ewell, P. T. (2001). Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of departure. Washington DC: CHEA Occasional Paper.
Filipp L. (2004). 2004 Student learning outcomes assessment reports. Retrieved Sep. 26, 2005, from
http://www.umbc.edu/selfstudy/Documents/2004%20SLOAR%20-%20Report.pdf#search='2004%20student%20learning%20outcomes.
Frye, R. (1999). Assessment, accountability, and student learning outcomes. Dialogue, 2. Retrieved Sep. 11, 2005, from http://www.ac.wwu.edu/%7Edialogue/issue2.pdf.
Frye, R. (2004). Assessment & outcomes. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2004, from http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/cii/resources/outcomes/default.asp.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principle of instructional design (4th ed). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Gipps, C. & Stobart, G. (2003). Alternative assessment. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 549-575). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Glazer, S. M., & Ogle, D. (1994). Helping our students see their learning. Teaching, 25(2), 100-102.
Guerrero, F., & Swan, K. (1988). Computer pilot program, 1986-87. New York: New York City Board of Education. (ERIC ED 301-155).
Hackman, M. Z., & Johnson, C. E. (2000). Leadership: A communication perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Higher Education Funding Council (HEFC) (2003). Information on quality and standards in higher education: Final guidance. Retrieved Dec. 26, 2005, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2003/03_51/.
Huang, S. T., & Su, J. L. (2005, May). Establishment of an integrated evaluation system for Taiwan's universities: Integrating internal evaluation and external meta-evaluation. Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice; Singapore.
Huba, M. E., & Freed J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses-shifting the focus from teaching to leaning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Jennings, J. M. (2003). New Zealand-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 127-136, 171-173). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Jones, L. V. (2003). National assessment in the United States: The evolution of a nation’s report card. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 883-904). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (Joint Committee) (2000). The need for student evaluation standards. Retrieved Oct. 26, 2005, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (Joint Committee) (2003). The student evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Joint Committee on Testing Practice (JCTP) (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practice.
Joint Quality Initiative (JQI) (2004). Shared ‘Dublin’ descriptors for short cycle, first cycle, second cycle and third cycle awards. Retrieved Oct. 16, 2004, from http://www.jointquality.org/content/descriptors/CompletesetDublinDescriptors.doc.
Keeves, J. P. (1994). National examinations: Design, procedures and reporting. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Kellaghan, T. & Madaus, G. F. (2003). External (public) examinations. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 577-600). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Kemp, D. A. (1999). Quality Assured: A new Australian quality assurance framework for university education. Retrieved Sep. 16, 2004, from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/ministers/kemp/dec99/ks101299.htm.
Knight, J., & De Wit, H. (eds.) (1999). Quality and internationalization in higher education. Paris: OECD-IMHE.
Kristoffersen, D. (2003). Denmark. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 25-34, 139-140). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
L’Ecuyer, J. (2003). Canada-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 85-92, 155-158). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Leegwater, W., & Vercruysse, N. (2003). Working on the European dimension of quality. In D. F. Westerheijden & M. Leegwater (Eds.), Working on the European dimension of quality : Report of the conference on quality assurance in higher education as part of the Bologna process, Amsterdam, 12-13 March 2002 (pp.9-11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
Lubinescu, E. S., Ratcliff, J. L., & Gaffney, M. A. (2001). Two continuums collide: Accreditation and assessment. New Directions for Higher Education, 113. 5-21.
Madaus, G. F., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 80, 688-695.
Mannat, R.P. (1992). The changing paradigm of outcomes and assessment. International Journal of Educational Reform 1.
Marchese, T. J. (1997). "The new conversations about learning." In Assessing Impact: Evidence and Action. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Miller, M. A., & Ewell, P. T. (2005). Measuring up on college-level learning. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education: National Center Report #05-8. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/mu_learning/Learning.pdf.
Mislevy, R., Wilson, M., Ercikan, K. & Chudowsky, N. (2003). Psychometric principles in student assessment. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation, 489-531. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group (NPEC) (2005). NPEC sourcebook on assessment: Definitions and assessment methods for communication, leadership, information literacy, quantitative, reasoning, and quantitative skills. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.uccs.edu/~irpage/IRPAGE/Assessment_Index/NPECsourcebook.pdf#search='npec%20sourcebook%20on%20assessment'.
New England Association of School and Colleges －Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (2000). Summary of survey of enhancing institutional effectiveness through student outcomes assessment at the undergraduate level. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2004, from http://www.neasc.org/cihe/results.htm.
New Zealand Universities Academic Unit (NEUAAU) (2002). Academic Audit Manual. Retrieved July 25, 2004, from http://www.aau.ac.nz/nzuaau/publications/reports/AuditManual2003-2006.pdf.
Oakland, T. (1995). Test use with children and youth internationally: Current status and future directions. In T. Oakland, & R. K. Hambleton. International perspectives on academic assessment. Boston: Kluwer.
Pack, D. H. (1998). WINGS: The Winona State University electronic portfolio project. Aboout Campus, 24. 26.
Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ross, J. E., & El-Khaws, E. (1987). Thinking about assessment: Perspectives for presidents and chief academic officers. Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education and American Association for Higher Education.
Sadri, G. (2002). Identifying core business school competencies. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.exchangesjournal.org/research/1044_Business_1.html.
Satty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Seybert, J. A. (1994). Assessing student learning. Assessment Update. Copenhagen, Demark: Author.
The Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA) (2003). Quality procedures in European higher education: An ENQA survey. Helsinki, Finland: European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
The Oxford English Dictionary (1989) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2003a). The quality assurance agency for higher education 2003. Gloucester, UK: Author.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2003b). Learning from subject review1993-2001. Retrieved Sep. 23, 2005, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews/subjectReview/learningfromSubjectReview/learningFromSubjectReview.pdf.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2005). Quality assurance in higher education: A guide fro international readers. Retrieved Nov. 29, 2005,from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/international/studentGuide/English_readers.pdf.
Tyler, R. W. (1934). Constructing achievement tests. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Bureau of Educational Research.
Tyler, R. W. (1942). Eight-year study. In E. R. Smith & R. Tyler (Eds.), Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper.
University of Hertfordshire (2004). Guidelines on learning outcomes. Retrieved Sep. 23, 2004, from http://www.herts.ac.uk/tli/guidelines/guidelines_contents_main.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2004). Accreditation and quality assurance. Retrieved August 4, 2004, from http://www.edu.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/edlite-accreditation.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005a). National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity: Mission. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/naciqi.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005b). Accreditation in the United States: The recognition process. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg14.html#RecognitionProcess.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005c). Accreditation in the United States: The criteria for recognition. Retrieved Sep. 29, 2005, from
http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg13.html#RecognitionCriteria_.
Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (2003). The Netherlands-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 119-126, 167-170). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Wang, Z. M. (1993). Psychology in China: A review. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 87-116.
Waterhouse, S. (2005). The power of E-learning: The essential guide for teaching in the digital age. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Westerheijden, D. F. (2003). Movements towards a European dimension in quality assurance and accreditation. In D. F. Westerheijden & M. Leegwater (Eds.), Working on the European dimension of quality : Report of the conference on quality assurance in higher education as part of the Bologna process, Amsterdam, 12-13 March 2002 (pp.16-41). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
Wiggins, G. (1991). A brief argument for “authentic” assessment. Snow mass, Co. (A reversion of an ERIC Digest).

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	步行促進因素對兒童身體活動量和生活品質影響之研究
2.	城市歷史空間文化資產價值之研究：以彰化縣定古蹟「彰化振豐源商行」為例
3.	國際教學實習對國際素養與教學專業的影響與啟發：以X大學為例
4.	原住民族的轉型正義--社會領域課程綱要與教科書中的原住民族書寫
5.	運用「整合性音樂素養」畫出國中音樂課程的實踐藍圖
6.	臺灣公共圖書館政策發展：圖書館實務者與專家學者之觀點
7.	體育課學生在排球比賽規則及對空低手擊球之學習成效--以運動教育模式為例
8.	臺灣差異化教學研究之文獻分析
9.	全球化時代南韓文化戰略--以韓劇風潮及文化產業為例
10.	技術型高中學生自主學習指標建構之研究
11.	行動美術館概念運用於幼兒園美感教育之實證研究：以水墨藝術為例
12.	生態學模式介入社區關懷據點對高齡者健康體適能之影響
13.	華語教學師資培育中的「華人社會與文化」課程大綱分析
14.	臺灣與廣東職前教師實踐性知識生成與發展--以二地師培大學師資生為例
15.	中小學視覺藝術教師專業發展因子之研究

1.	受觀察勒戒人中止與持續施用毒品之比較
2.	以方案改變理論探究中小學教師專業發展評鑑政策之執行成效
3.	英文故事閱讀與繪畫之教學策略對高職學生英語文學習興趣及學習成效影響之研究
4.	國民小學資優班教師專業合作及相關因素之研究
5.	專職原住民族語老師專業發展指標建構之研究
6.	毒品走私犯罪與偵查模式之實證研究
7.	高齡學習者社會資本、自我效能與幸福感關係之研究—以南部地區樂齡學習中心學員為例
8.	新北市毒品犯罪區位特性與防制對策之研究
9.	我國公立大學整併關鍵成功因素及其成效之研究：以臺北市立大學為例
10.	國際化與在地國際化-奧地利與臺灣之大學比較研究
11.	臺灣地區科技大學系所評鑑影響因素之分析
12.	護理資訊素養課程設計與實施之行動研究
13.	幼兒園園長正念領導、教師學習文化與專業承諾關係之研究
14.	羽球教練湯仙虎運動知識螺旋之個案研究
15.	以治理機制與權力關係觀點論主管機關與民間體育組織之治理關係

1.	教育論文寫作與實用技巧
2.	戰後臺灣觀光事業的發展史. (1945-1987)
3.	體育教師角色之輪廓
4.	教育法規：大意與政策
5.	教育評鑑：創意取向
6.	教育史學研究
7.	課程發展與教學設計論
8.	多元文化視野下的音樂通識教育
9.	探討新狂笑曲線理論與實證之研究：以蘋果公司為例
10.	祖先崇拜與紀念祖先：客家祖牌文化的延續與轉化
11.	臺灣入出國及移民法有關驅逐出國機制之現況、問題與未來可行之發展方向
12.	李白散文研究
13.	課程行動研究
14.	彰化縣偏遠地區國小導師領導風格對外籍配偶子女學習動機影響之探討
15.	資訊教師領導風格與學生之資訊教育課程學習動機

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫