參考文獻
一、 中文部分
方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真（1998）。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。載於國立臺南大學教育學院舉辦之「國小教學評量的反省與前瞻」研討會論文集（頁123-127），台南。
吳明隆（2000）。SPSS 統計應用實務。台北：松崗。
官美媛（1999）。國小學生摘取文章大意策略之教學研究－以五年級說明文為例。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林建平（1994）。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版。
柯華葳、陳冠銘（2004）。文章結構標示。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報，36(2) ，185-200。
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅（2008）。台灣四年級學生閱讀素養（PIRLS 2006報告）。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
柯華葳、丘嘉慧、詹益綾、游婷雅、楊芝瑜（2012）。PIRLS 2011報告－臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養。桃園縣：國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
張莉珍（2003）。故事構圖策略與摘要策略對增進國小六年級低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張新仁（2009）。台灣閱讀摘要回顧與展望。載於國科會辦理之「台灣閱讀研究回顧與展望」座談會手冊（頁69-83）。
張新仁、傅粹馨、王瓊珠（2011）。台灣跨年級學生摘取大意能力之研究。國科會專案報告，計畫編號：NSC99-2410-H017-010。
教育部（2011）。「閱讀理解文章與試題範例」。台北：教育部。
陳文安（2006）。國小學生摘要策略之教學研究---以六年級為例。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版。
陳添球、廖慧卿（2009）。台灣三種版本國小三年級語文教科書課文篇章結構的批判與重建。論文發表於香港教育學院舉辦之「小學教育國際研討會」，香港。
陳惠瑜（2008）。圖形組體運用於國小三年級低成就學生國語大意摘取教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學語文與創作學系語文教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版。
陸怡琮 (2009)。摘要策略教學在屏東縣國小五年級的實施成效之研究。教育部閱讀教學策略開發與推廣計畫。
陸怡琮（2011）。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效。教育科學研究期刊，56（3），91-118。陸怡琮、李燕芳、馮心怡（2010）。摘要策略。載於國立中央大學學習與教學研究所（主編）：閱讀理解策略教學手冊（頁42-94）。台北：教育部。
黃玉佳（2003）。概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃蔓婷（2007）。自我解釋學習策略運用於國小四年級學童摘取大意之行動研究。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版。
黃瓊儀（2003）。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之研究。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。蔡銘津（1995）。文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。高雄師範大學教育系博士論文，未出版。謝美寶（2003）。國小學生閱讀態度、家庭閱讀環境與閱讀理解能力關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
魏靜雯（2004）。心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
二、 英文部分
Anderson, R. C. &; Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Anderson, R. C. (1994). Role of the reader’s schemata in comprehension, learning and memory. In R. B. Ruddell, M. Rapp, &; H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 469-482). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Anderson, V., &; Hidi, S. (1989). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 26-28.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., &; Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
Bean, T.W., &; Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 297-307.
Brown , A. L., Campione , J. C., Day , J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
Brown, A. L., &; Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1- 14.
Brown, A. L., &; Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts, Child Development, 49, 1076-1088.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., &; Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54(4) , 968-979.
Brown, A. L., Smiley, S. S., &; Lawton, S. C. (1978). The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying text. Child Development, 49, 829-835.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Douglas, W. C., Jerry S., &; Edward, J. K. (1997). Direct instruction reading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Duke, N. K., &; Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup &; S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242).
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., &; Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Education Research Journal, 34(1), 174-206.
Gagné, E.D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, MA：Little, Brown and Company.
Gajria, M., &; Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(6), 508-516.
Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research , 75(5), 275-279.
Garner, R. (1984). Rules for summarizing texts: Is classroom instruction being provided ? Journal of Educational Research, 77 (5), 304-308.
Garner, R. (1985). Text summarization deficiencies among older students: Awareness or production ability? American Educational Research Journal, 22, 549-560.
Garner, R., Macready, G. B., &;Wagoner, S. (1984). Readers' acquisition of the components of the text-lookback strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 300-309.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &; Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395.
Hare, V. C. (1992). Summarizing text. In J. W. Irwin &;; M. A. Doyle(Eds.) Reading/Writing connections: Learning from research. Newark, Del.: IRA
Hare, V. C., &; Bingham, A. B. (1986). Teaching students main idea comprehension: Alternatives to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp. 179-194). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hare, V. C., &; Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly , 20 (1), 62-78.
Hayes, J. R. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C. A. MacArthur, S.
Graham, &; J. Fitagerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28-40). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Head, M. H., Readence, J. E., &; Buss, R. R. (1989). An examination of summary writing as a measure of reading comprehension, Reading Research and Instruction, 28(4), 1-11.
Hidi, S. and Anderson,V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56:473–493.
Hyde, A. A., &; Bizar, M. (1984). Thinking in context: Teaching cognitive process across of dementary school curriculum. New York, NY :Longman.
Jacobowitz, T. (1990). AIM: A metacognitive strategy for constructing the main idea of text. Journal of Reading, 33(8), 620-624.
Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., &; Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14(4), 379–396.
Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., &; Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a ummarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 27-139.
Johnson, N. (1983). What do you do if you can’t tell the whole story? The development of summarization skills. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s Language , 4, 315-383. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch , W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 87-108.
Kintsch, W., &; van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Malone, L. D., &; Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
Nelson, J. R., Smith, D. J., &; Dodd, J. M. (1992). The effects of teaching a summary skills strategy to students identified as learning disabled on their comprehension of science text. Education and Treatment of Children, 15(3), 228-243.
Neufeld, P. (2005). Comprehension instruction in content area classes. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 302-312.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., &; Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vice mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625-645.
Palincsar, A. S., &; Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Pearson, P. D., &; Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-345.
Radev, D. R., Hovy, E., &; McKeown, K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 399-408,
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., &; Erickson, L.G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Rosenshine, B., &; Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching high cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26-33.
Sperling, M. &; Freeman, S. W. (2001). Research on writing. In V. Richardson (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 370-389). Washington: American Educational Research Association,.
Thistlethwaite, L. L. (1991). Summarizing: It's more than just finding the main idea. Intervention in School and Clinic, 27(1), 25-30.
Tierney, R. J., &; Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on reading-writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, &; P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol 2., pp. 246-280). New York: Longman,.
Vaughan, D. K. (1991). Abstracts and summaries: Some clarifying distinctions. Technical Writing Teacher, 18(2), 132-141.
Vaughn, S., &; Klingner, J. K. (1999). Teaching reading comprehension through collaborative strategic reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 284-292.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., &; Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66-74.
Weinstein, C. E., &; Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Weisberg, R., &; Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers’ metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(2), 117-136.
Wiggins, G. P. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment.
Phi Delta Kappa, 70(9), 703-713.
Winograd, P. N. (1983). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Technical Report , 274, 1-61.