:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用AHP探討技專校院經營績效指標
書刊名:商管科技季刊
作者:林如貞田效文 引用關係張婷婷 引用關係陳元和
作者(外文):Lin, Ru-jenTien, Shiaw-wenChang, Ting-tingChen, Yuan-ho
出版日期:2005
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁93-113
主題關鍵詞:技專校院指標建構層級分析法Technological and vocational collegeTVCIndex constructionAnalytic hierarchy processAHP
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:1195
  • 點閱點閱:60
本研究旨在建立一套客觀且適合技專校院的經營績效指標,提供學校相關經營資訊,以達學校永續經營之目的。研究採用層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process;AHP),以效能(effectiveness)與效率(efficiency)之概念,建構以輸入、過程及成果等三構面之層級模式,意即將學校經營績效指標層級化、結構化,並加以數量化,透過調查32位技專校院一級行政主管(校長、教務長、學務長與總務長),藉以建構技專院校經營績效指標與權重體系,研究結果在構面、指標、副指標三階層,共84項副指標中顯示:(1) 教育成果(輸出面)較輸入面與過程面更為重要;(2) 就輸出面而言,教學與研究仍然較受到重視,但因終身學習之推動,因此學校也逐漸加強重視推廣及社會服務;(3) 在輸入面中,以教師品質的權重最高;而在過程面中,課程品質與教學品質二項其權重最大;上述三項績效指標皆與教師有關,此點說明教師是影響學校績效之重要關鍵因素。
The purpose of this research is trying to construct an unbiased and appropriate index of management performance for technological and vocational college (TVC) in order to provide the school related operation and management information and reach the goal of forever continuous running. It applies Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the concept of effectiveness and efficiency to build up the three layer model including input, process and output. In other words, the model is layerized, structurized and quantitized the index of school management performance through an investigation of 32 chief administration officer (President, Dean of Academic Affair, Dean of Student Affair, and Dean of General Affair) in major TVC in Taiwan. It attempts to build the index of management performance and the weighted system for TVC. The results show at three layer including structure, index and vice-index. Three are total 84 vice-indexes shown (1). Educational results (output layer) are more important than input layer and process layer; (2). From output layer, teaching and research still attracted more attention. However, the school stresses increasingly on extension education and social service due to the introduction and promotion of life-time learning; (3). In input layer, the quality of teacher has the highest weight; in process layer, the quality of course and the quality of teaching have the highest weighted. The above three indexes of management performance are all related to teacher, so it can explain that teacher is the most crucial factor in the effect of school management performance.
期刊論文
1.莊謙本(1999)。教育評鑑指標的建構。技術及職業教育,52,7-9。  延伸查詢new window
2.林如貞、賀力行、楊振隆(20000600)。高等技職教育環境分析與因應策略。技術學刊,15(2),349-356。  延伸查詢new window
3.Johnson, N. A.(1989)。Criteria for assessing the effectiveness of schools and principals。Education Canada,29(2),14-19。  new window
4.Khaksari, Shahriar、Kamath, Ravindra、Grieves, Robin(1989)。A new approach to determining optimum portfolio mix。Journal of the Portfolio Management,15,43-49。  new window
5.孫志麟(20000200)。教育指標的概念模式。教育政策論壇,3(1),117-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝金青(19980200)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。新竹師院學報,11,449-486。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郭昭佑(20011100)。教育評鑑指標建構方法探究。國教學報,13,251-278。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Saaty, Thomas L.(1990)。How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process。European Journal of Operational Research,48(1),9-26。  new window
10.Barbarosoglu, Gulay、Yazgac, Tulin(1997)。An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Supplier Selection Problem。Production and Inventory Management Journal First Quarter,38(1),14-21。  new window
學位論文
1.張美蓮(1996)。我國大學教育指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王保進(1993)。高等教育表現指標之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stufflebeam, D. L.、Foley, W. J.、Guba, E. G.、Hammond, R. L.、Merriman, H. O.、Provus, M. M.、Gephart, W. J.(1971)。Educational evaluation and decision making。Illinois:P.E., peacock Publishing。  new window
2.蓋浙生(1985)。教育經濟學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡進雄(20000000)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.田振榮(2002)。建立技專校院提升教學品質指標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.張力允(1999)。我國公私立大學績效之比較研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.康龍魁、許順發(2004)。技專院校經營效率評鑑指標建構之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃政傑、李隆盛、黃坤錦、張善楠、蘇錦麗、顧志遠、張美連、詹惠雪、林青青(1998)。大學校務綜合評鑑指標建構研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.勤業管理顧問公司譯(1998)。非常訊號--如何做好企業績效評估。  延伸查詢new window
6.饒達欽、李國義(1998)。改善專科學校評鑑提高辦學績效。  延伸查詢new window
7.Boatright, K. J.(1995)。University of Wisconsin's system accountability。  new window
8.Goh, C. H.(1997)。A hierarchy process for robot selection。  new window
9.Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., & Harker, P. T.(1989)。The analytic Hierarchy process- applications and studies。  new window
10.Nuttall, D.(1992)。The functions and limitations of international education indicators。  new window
11.Saaty, T. L.(198)。The analytic hierarchy process。  new window
圖書論文
1.馬信行(1997)。大學評鑑指標適性性之評析。大學評鑑。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE