:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學教師所為何事:提高研究產出政策下的大學教師工作特質探討
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:吳明鋗李隆盛 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Ming-jiuanLee, Lung-sheng
出版日期:2009
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁45-81
主題關鍵詞:大學教師工作職責研究時間高等教育機構類型差異FacultyHigher educationInstitutional diversityJob characteristicsResearch time
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:261
  • 點閱點閱:88
摘 要 大學教師的教學、研究與服務產出,攸關學生學習成效與國家整體競爭力。晚 近,在政府與各校院普遍要求教師提高研究產出的政策下,探討大學教師的工作特 質,特別具有新時代的意義。本研究利用高等教育教師普查結果,分析大學教師面 對高研究期待下,在教學、研究和服務三大職責上的時間運用情形,研究結果發 現,研究與授課的投入時間,兩者為負相關,意即授課較多的教師,花在研究的時 間相對較少,而約30%的大學教師,兼負行政服務職。提高研究產出的政策並未使 得不同類型大學校院的教師,職責投入狀況趨於一致,而大學校院類型的不同,高 度關係著大學教師職責投入的變異。公立一般大學校院的教師,對研究的投入最 高;私立技職大學校院的教師,研究時間投入最低,但在其他職責上的壓力最重。 因此,本研究建議,大學校院的評鑑政策,應更著重校院類型的差異,因為更務實 的政策,才能讓不同校院類型的教師,在不同工作職責的能量激發上,更有所聚 焦、各展其才,高等教育整體的知識產出,也才能更豐富與多元。
Abstract Under the current progress of knowledge-based economy, the function of higher education impacts the long-term social and economic achievement of a nation more than ever. How college faculty members use their time does link to the final output of their institutions. How does most of faculty spend their time at their workplace? This research used empirical data from Taiwan Higher Education Database to uncover the insight of faculty’s working hours and how institutional diversity of university/college affects the weight of faculty’s job structure. The results find time allocation of faculty showing significant deviation due to institutional type. In spite of facing a same high research stress placed by government in current years, faculty members in different types of university/college are still unable to respond to the research demand in the same way. Accepting institutional diversity in policy-making and encouraging more focused job effort of faculty are recommended.
期刊論文
1.Porter, S. R.(2007)。A Closer Look at Faculty Service: What Affects Participation on Committees?。The Journal of Higher Education,78(5),523-541。  new window
2.林玉珮(20061122)。新挑戰 大學競爭力總體檢--大學生應有的素養與能力。天下雜誌,360,84-86+88。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fwu, B.-J.、Wang, H.-H.(2002)。The Social Status of Teachers in Taiwan。Comparative Education,38(2),211-224。  new window
4.陳素秋(20060800)。臺灣近三十年來教育評鑑研究生論文分析。教育政策論壇,9(3),47-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.薛梨真(20080100)。私立科技大學教師有效教學之行動研究。課程與教學,11(1),265-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Linsky, A. S.、Straus, M. A.(1975)。Student evaluations, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty。Journal of Higher Education,46,89-102。  new window
7.Feldman, Kenneth A.(1987)。Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration。Research in Higher Education,26(3),227-298。  new window
8.Fox, M. F.(1992)。Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality versus Competition in Academia。Sociology of Education,65,293-305。  new window
9.劉維琪(20080700)。管制干預或市場機制?從認可評鑑談大學招生政策。評鑑雙月刊,14,4-5。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬信行(19860500)。影響我國高等教育機構研究出產力之因素。國立政治大學學報,53,左85-117。  延伸查詢new window
11.Drucker, Peter F.(1999)。Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge。California Management Review,41(2),79-94。  new window
12.吳清山、王湘栗(20041200)。教育評鑑的概念與發展。教育資料集刊,29,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.杜娟娟(20020900)。教學與研究--大學教師的工作投入時間。屏東師院學報,17,135-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.司徒達賢(2006)。集中資源興辦世界頂尖研究型大學。天下雜誌,360,28-30。  延伸查詢new window
15.宋東(2006)。跨國、跨校經營的未來:美國大學全球結盟,勢力難擋。天下雜誌,360,118-121。  延伸查詢new window
16.柏海德(2006)。國際人才養成刻不容緩:當高等教育變成全球企業。遠見雜誌,240,299-301。  延伸查詢new window
17.湯堯(2007)。臺灣高等教育評鑑制度的實務探討。教育政策論壇,10(4),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.辜樹仁(2006)。全球大學,關鍵數字。天下雜誌,360,94-97。  延伸查詢new window
19.賓靜蓀(2006)。德國大學改革:向哈佛、劍橋下戰書。天下雜誌,360,112-114。  延伸查詢new window
20.蕭富元(2006)。全球化下,大學的機遇和挑戰。天下雜誌,360,38-44。  延伸查詢new window
21.Braxton, J. M.(1996)。Contrasting Perspectives on the Relationship between Teaching and Research。New Directions for Institutional Research,90,5-14。  new window
22.Faia, M. A.(1976)。Teaching and Research: Rapport or Mesalliance。Research in Higher Education,4,235-246。  new window
23.Glass, J. C.、McCallion, G.、McKillop, D. G.、Rasaratnam, S.、Stringer, K. S.(2005)。Implications of Variant Efficiency Measure for Policy Evaluations in UK Higher Education。Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,40,119-142。  new window
24.Guile, D.(2001)。Education and the Economy: Rethinking the Question of Learning for the "Knowledge" Era。Futures,33,469-482。  new window
25.Harvey, M. G.、Ready, K. J.、Kuffel, T.、Duke, A.(2006)。Viewpoint: Managing Change in Business Schools: Focus on Faculty Responses。Journal of Education for Business,81(3),160-164。  new window
26.Houston, D.、Meyer, L. H.、Paewai, S.(2006)。Academic Staff Workloads and Job Satisfaction: Expectation and Values in Academe。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,28(1),17-30。  new window
27.MacGregor, R.、Rix, M.、Aylward, S.、Glynn, J.(2006)。Factors Associated with Research Management in Australian Commerce and Business Faculties。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,28(1),59-70。  new window
28.O'Meara, K. A.(2005)。Encouraging Multiple Forms of Scholarship in Faculty Reward Systems: Does It Make a Difference?。Research in Higher Education,46(5),479-510。  new window
29.Sullivan, A. S.(1996)。Teaching Norms and Publication Productivity。New Directions for Institutional Research,90,15-21。  new window
會議論文
1.潘慧玲(2004)。邁向下一代的教育機構評鑑:回顧與前瞻。「教育機構評鑑回顧與展望」學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心 。臺北市:臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。11-23。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.彭森明、施俊名(2006)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究 (計畫編號:94A1004EI)。新竹市:國立清華大學高等教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.施明妮(2006)。教育大學教師工作壓力與組織承諾之研究--以屏東教育大學為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林政彰(2005)。我國高等教育機構與民間對大學排名態度之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學,台北縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱美靜(2001)。圖書資訊學系所教師工作滿意度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.張維容(2004)。激勵大學教師研究之機制探討:以國科會專題研究計劃為例。  延伸查詢new window
5.許麗萍(2007)。大學教師工作滿意度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.Chang, C. P.(1999)。Sources of Job Satisfaction of Full-time Faculty in University in Taiwan,Vermillion。  new window
圖書
1.Blackburn, Robert T.、Lawrence, Janet H.(1995)。Faculty at work, motivation, expectation, satisfaction。Baltimore, MD:John Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.Finkelstein, M. J.(1984)。The American academic profession: A Synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II。Columbus:Ohio State University Press。  new window
3.Huck, S. W.(2008)。Reading statistics and research。Boston, MA:Pearson/Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.湯堯、成群豪(2003)。高等教育經營。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
5.Clark, B. R.(1987)。Academic life: Small worlds, different worlds。Princeton, NJ:Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching。  new window
6.Blau, P. M.(1994)。The organization of academic work。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction。  new window
7.淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心(2005)。21世紀高等教育的挑戰與回應:趨勢、課程、治理。臺北:淡江大學高等教育研究與評鑑中心。  延伸查詢new window
8.Boyer, Ernest L.(1990)。Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate。Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching。  new window
9.邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。臺北市:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
10.戴曉霞(2000)。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
13.黃政傑、李隆盛、游家政(1998)。國民中小學教育評鑑之研究。國民中小學教育評鑑之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Finkelstein, M. J.、Seal, R. K.、Schuster, J. H.(1998)。The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation。The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation。Baltimore。  new window
15.(2005)。Higher Education for the Public Good: Emerging Voices from a National Movement。Higher Education for the Public Good: Emerging Voices from a National Movement。San Francisco。  new window
16.Nicol, A. A. M.、Pexman, P. M.(1999)。Presenting Your Findings: A Practical Guide for Creating Tables。Presenting Your Findings: A Practical Guide for Creating Tables。Washington, DC。  new window
17.O'Meara, K. A.(2005)。Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship。Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship。San Francisco。  new window
18.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。Economic Policy Reforms: Going for Growth。Economic Policy Reforms: Going for Growth。Paris, France。  new window
19.Tierney, W. G.(1999)。Faculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions, and Issues。Faculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions, and Issues。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心(2008)。臺灣高等教育資料庫整合計畫資料庫簡介。  延伸查詢new window
2.李采洪,王志鈞(2002)。成功不必過勞死。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2008)。中華民國教育統計,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部統計處(2008)。大專校院校別專任教師資料數。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部統計處(2008)。大專校院概況。  延伸查詢new window
6.Garson, D.(2008)。PA 765: Factor Analysis。  new window
7.Gurria, A.(2007)。Human Capital: Europe's Next Frontier。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2005)。A Policy Framework for Investment: Human Resource Development Policy。  new window
9.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006)。OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006。  new window
圖書論文
1.林清江(1992)。我國教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。兩岸教育發展之比較。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE