:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實效社區治理模式的重組與實踐 : 以社區大學為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:李柏諭 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Po-yu
出版日期:2010
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁33-87
主題關鍵詞:治理跨域治理社區主義實效社區治理模式社區大學GovernanceCross-boundary governanceCommunitarianismThe model of effective community governanceCommunity university
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:897
  • 點閱點閱:41
近年來,政治學界有越來越重視「跨域治理」(cross-boundary governance) 研究的趨勢。傳統跨域治理研究多半以跨越「地理區域」或跨越「轄區」議題所需要的公共管理模式為探討對象。然而,仔細檢視跨域治理所涵蓋之範圍其實不只有地理上的「超溢現象」或者是轄權上的「越權行為」;就理論層面而言,跨領域治理機制反映出主要行為者就是第一部門、第二部門與第三部門的協力機制研究。本研究從協力關係中探討「實效社區治理模式」(model of effective community governance) 的重要基礎,特別著重理論層面的設計與討論,重新詮釋跨治理領域議題的內涵與類型,並進一步說明實效社區治理模式的核心依據與制度設計的原則。在經驗層次上,本研究希望藉由對社區大學與政府間如何建立和諧協力模式的討論,重新勾勒出社區治理的新義,進一步將目前社區治理的知識累積進行重新概念化與類別化的精煉工作,並提出一套以「社區型態的治理模式」為基本框架的行動方針。藉由(1)推動公民參與、(2)落實成效評估,與(3)完成治理工作等三個不同層面的討論,試圖將過去易流於規範性論述或形式性討論的社區治理研究,導向具有實際治理技術與治理成效的研究取向,以期作為各種社區治理工作及實際參與社區治理過程的參考依據。
Recently, along with public affairs involving across boundary, a new mode of transboundary governance is emphasized. It concerns not only geographic region or jurisdiction, but trans-governance-domain partnership which reflects concretely on the cooperation of governance among public sector, private sector and the third sector. In order to respond the need of cross domain government mechanism, this paper is aimed at dealing with the theoretical basis of cross-boundary governance, and further proposes the model of effective community governance to help people and organizations find ways to become more effective at improving communities. The context of the effective community governance model involves three critical elements of governance: engaging citizens, measuring results, and getting things done. Empirically, the rapid development of the community university movement in Taiwan indicate that government and community university have formed a partnership which have successfully achieving public service delivery, the informal education of lifelong learning. Through observation and discussion of the relationship between community university and government, this research hopes outline the new righteousness of community governance. Linking the core and institutionalization of model of effective community governance, this paper will propose actual governance technique and the result of research orientation for effective governance, hoping to be the reference of future community governance.
期刊論文
1.廖坤榮(20020800)。政府與農會組織--治理典範的挑戰。空大行政學報,12,71-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.O'Toole, Kevin、Burdess, Neil(2004)。New Community Governance In Small Rural Towns: The Australian Experience。Journal of Rural Studies,20(4),433-443。  new window
3.李長晏、詹立煒(2004)。跨域治理的理論與策略途徑之初探。中國地方自治,57(3),4-31。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉阿榮、石慧瑩(20040300)。社群意識與永續發展:鄰避現象及補償金之分析。中國行政評論,13(2),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Stephenson, Max O. Jr.(1991)。Whither the Public-private Partnership: A Critical Overview。Urban Affairs Quarterly,27(1),109-127。  new window
6.Laverack, Glenn(2006)。Evaluating community capacity: Visual representation and interpretation。Community Development Journal,41(3),266-276。  new window
7.Dessler, David(1989)。What's at Stake in the Agent-structure Debate?。International Organization,43(3),441-473。  new window
8.吳英明(19940300)。公私部門協力推動都市發展--「高雄21」美國考察報告。空間,56,61-67。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hay, Colin、Wincott, Daniel(1998)。Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism。Political Studies,46(5),951-957。  new window
10.李宗勳(20090300)。公民社會與社區參與--從心態期待到空間讓渡。公共行政學報,30,131-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.趙永茂(20030600)。臺灣府際關係與跨域管理:文獻回顧與策略途徑初探。政治科學論叢,18,53-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李柏諭、楊昊、張喁(20090900)。國際非政府組織的產業化策略:以日本和平船為例。東吳政治學報,27(3),117-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.江大樹、張力亞(20080300)。社區營造中組織信任的機制建構:以桃米生態村為例。東吳政治學報,26(1),87-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李柏諭(20060300)。選舉制度對政黨體系之影響:臺灣總統、縣市長、立法委員、任務型國大選舉之實例比較。政治科學論叢,27,69-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃源協、劉素珍(20090600)。社會資本對臺灣社區發展之政策意涵。行政暨政策學報,48,155-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.廖俊松(20040900)。社區營造與社區參與:金鈴園與邵社的觀察與學習。社區發展季刊,107,133-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.江明修、鄭勝分(20040100)。從政府與第三部門互動的觀點析探臺灣社會資本之內涵及其發展策略。理論與政策,17(3)=67,37-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Mowbray, Martin(2005)。Community capacity building or state opportunism?。Community Development Journal,40(3),255-264。  new window
19.李柏諭(20050900)。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務:我國社區大學與政府經驗。公共行政學報,16,59-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Lynn, Laurence E. et al.(2004)。“Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects.”。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10, 2,233-262。  new window
21.陳定銘、江明修(2007)。〈台灣社區大學公共性之研究〉。《亞洲研究》,55,99-128。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Agrawal, Arun、Gibson, Clark C.(2001)。Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and State in Community-Based Conservation。N.J.:Rutgers University Press。  new window
2.Willmott, Michael(2003)。Citizen Brands: Putting Society at the Heart of Your Business。Chichester, UK:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
3.Kautz, Steven(1995)。Liberalism and Community。Cornell University Press。  new window
4.俞可平(1999)。社群主義。揚智文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.丘昌泰(2007)。鄰避情結與社區治理:臺灣環保抗爭的困局與出路。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Modern Governance。London:Sage。  new window
7.Bell, Daniel A.(1993)。Communitarianism and Its Critics。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Rosenblum, Nancy L.(1989)。Liberalism and the Moral Life。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
9.林鍾沂(2003)。行政學。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Wright, Deil S.(1988)。Understanding Intergovernmental Relations。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
11.Etzioni, Amitai(1998)。The Essential Communitarian Reader。Lanham, MD。  new window
12.Pierre, Jon、Peters, B. Guy(2000)。Governance, Politics and the State。London:New York:Hampshire:Macmillan Press:St. Martin's Press:Houndmills。  new window
13.黃武雄(1998)。臺灣教育的重建-我們要辦什麼樣的社區大學。臺灣教育的重建-我們要辦什麼樣的社區大學。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
14.林水波、李長晏(20050000)。跨域治理。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李宗勳(2008)。網絡社會與安全治理。台北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳敦源(20020000)。民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點。臺北:韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Waldo, Dwight(1984)。The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration。New York:Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.。  new window
18.江宜樺(19980000)。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of Social Theory。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
20.Babbie, Earl R.(2004)。The Practice of Social Research。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning。  new window
21.Etzioni, Amitai(1993)。The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda。Crown Publishers。  new window
22.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
23.Epstein, Paul、Coaters, P. M.、Wary, L. D.、Swain, D.(2006)。Results that Matter: Improving Communities by Engaging Citizens, Measuring Performance, and Getting Things Done。Jossey-Bass。  new window
24.Kymlicka, Will(1992)。Liberalism Community and Culture。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
25.Reiman, Jeffrey.(1994)。“Liberalism and Its Critics.”。The Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate: Liberty and Community Values。Maryland。  new window
26.Wilson, Woodrow(1987)。“The Study of Administration.”。Classics of Public Administration。Chicago, Ill。  new window
27.台北市士林社區大學(2006)。《台北市士林社區大學96-1校務與選課手冊》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
28.宜蘭社區大學(2006)。《九十六年上學期宜蘭校區選課手冊》。宜蘭。  延伸查詢new window
29.員林社區大學(2007)。《員林社區大學校刊》。彰化。  延伸查詢new window
30.高雄縣鳳山區社區大學(2006)。《高雄縣鳳山區社區大學95學年度第2學期選課手冊》。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.顧忠華(2004)。將夏山學校的理想融入社區大學。社大文庫003--成人的夏山。臺北:左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.江大樹(2004)。府際關係導論。府際關係。台北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.石元康(1998)。市民社會與民主。市民社會與民主的反思。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭承天(2000)。新制度論與政治經濟學。邁入二十一世紀的政治學。台北:中國政治學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE