:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人性格與行為關連性的特殊內隱理論之探討:不同性格、性別及地位之比較
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:許功餘 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Kung-yu
出版日期:2010
卷期:52:3
頁次:頁243-264
主題關鍵詞:人際互動內隱理論地位性別華人性格Chinese personalityGenderImplicit theoryInterpersonal interactionStatus
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:308
  • 點閱點閱:82
延續許功餘(2003)已探討「性格與行為關連性的內隱理論」在工作與社交情境中對華人人際互動之影響,本研究將進一步針對在工作情境中,面對不同性別與地位的互動對象時,6種性格與行為關連性的特殊內隱理論(「精明幹練」、「愚鈍懦弱」、「外向活躍」、「內向沉靜」、「誠信仁慈」及「狡詐殘酷」)之內涵,及這些內隱理論對個人人際行為之影響加以探討。本研究以434位(女性236位)社會人士填答2種工作情境的人際互動問卷。在人際互動問卷中,研究者以4種互動雙方的性別與地位之組合以及6種互動對象的性格來設計24種故事情境。每位受測者僅填答2種故事情境,並針對故事裡互動對象的行為與自己的互動行為來進行評量。結果顯示,6種不同的「性格與行為關連性的特殊內隱理論」之內涵,大致上顯示出如理論所預期的差異,具有「精明幹練」、「外向活躍」及「誠信仁慈」等性格的互動對象在各自的主要行為向度上,均與具有「愚鈍懦弱」、「內向沉靜」及「狡詐殘酷」等性格的互動對象有顯著差異,同時,不同性格的互動對象在次要行為上的差異亦符合理論的預期。不過,互動對象的性別與地位對個人所持有的「性格與行為關連性的特殊內隱理論」之影響僅僅出現在「精明幹練」之上。另外,6種內隱理論對個人的互動行為之影響與理論預測一致。最後,針對本研究結果與假設間的關係、研究方法的限制、以及未來研究方向做進一步討論。
This study explored the content of six kinds of specific implicit theory of personality-behavior association (competent, impotent, extraverted, introverted, other-oriented, and self-centered) based on different gender and status and the impact of these implicit theories on participants' interpersonal behaviors in the working situation. Hsu (2003) presented a new theoretical construct that coined as the implicit theory of personality-behavior association and examined the relationship between this implicit theory and interpersonal interaction. The implicit theory of personality-behavior association refers to the associative schema about target with one kind of personality will perform some kinds of interpersonal behavior. Hsu (2003) considered these implicit theories could be influenced by those interacting situations and the interacting targets' characteristics (like gender and status) and these implicit theories could influence on interpersonal interaction behaviors. We would test this possibility. The study has collected 434 adult participants (236 female) to fill out two kinds of structural questionnaires that were designed two different cooperative scenarios of working tasks. These scenarios were designed according to four combinations of gender and status of interacting dyads and sex personalities of interacting targets. Results showed that, all six kinds of specific implicit theories of personality-behavior associations were supported by participants' responses. The impact of the gender and status of interacting targets on specific implicit theories of personality-behavior only was found in the competent target. And the impact of all of specific implicit theories of personality-behavior on participants' interacting behaviors supported the theoretical predictions. These results were discussed in terms of dyadic interaction in working situations
期刊論文
1.許功餘(20060900)。華人辯證思維與「性格與行為關連性內隱理論」之關係。中華心理學刊,48(3),291-313。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Eagly, A. H.,、Mladinic, A.(1989)。Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,15,543-558。  new window
3.Burgoon, M.、Dillard, J. P.、Doran, N. E.(1983)。Friendly or Unfriendly Persuasion: The Effects of Violations of Expectations by Males and Females。Human Communication Research,10(2),283-294。  new window
4.Cejka, M. A.、Eagly, A. H.(1999)。Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,25(4),413-423。  new window
5.De Bruin, E. N.、Van Lange, P. A. M.(1999)。Impression Formation and Cooperative Behavior。European Journal of Social Psychology,29,305-328。  new window
6.Wojciszke, B.、Brycz, H.、Borkenau, P.(1993)。Effects of Information Content and Evaluative Extremity on Positivity and Negativity Biases。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64,327-335。  new window
7.Creed, A. T.、Funder, D. C.(1998)。Social Anxiety: From the Inside and Outside。Personality and Individual Differences,25,19-33。  new window
8.Bond, M. H.(1983)。Linking dimensions of person perception to dimensions of behavioral intention: The Chinese connection。Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,14,41-63。  new window
9.Eagly, A. H.、Steffen, V. J.(1984)。Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46,735-754。  new window
10.Greenwald, A. G.、Banaji, M. R.(1995)。Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes。Psychological Review,102(1),4-27。  new window
11.Dockery, T. M.、Steiner, D. D.(1990)。The Role of the Initial Interaction in Leader-Member Exchange。Group & Organization Management,15(4),395-413。  new window
12.Liden, Robert C.、Graen, George B.(1980)。Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership。Academy of Management Journal,23(3),451-465。  new window
13.許功餘(20070200)。華人性格與行為之關連性的內隱理論及其對人際互動的影響。本土心理學研究,27,3-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Broverman, Inge K.、Vogel, Susan Raymond、Broverman, Donald M.、Clarkson, Frank E.、Rosenkrantz, Paul S.(1972)。Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal。Journal of Social Issues,28(2),59-78。  new window
15.何有暉(1976)。On the concept of face。American Journal of Sociology,81(4),867-884。  new window
16.胡先縉(1944)。The Chinese Concepts of 'Face'。American Anthropologist,46(1),45-64。  new window
17.Baumeister, Roy F.、Leary, Mark R.(1995)。The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation。Psychological Bulletin,117(3),497-529。  new window
18.Dienesch, Richard M.、Liden, Robert C.(1986)。Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development。Academy of Management Review,11(3),618-634。  new window
19.Bond, M. H.,、Forgas, J. P.(1984)。Linking person perception to behavior intention across cultures: The role of cultural collectivism。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,15,337-352。  new window
20.Brescoll, V. L.,、Uhlmann, E. L.(2008)。Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral,gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace。Psychological Science,19,268-275。  new window
21.Burgess, D.,、Borgida, E.(1999)。Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination。Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,5,665-692。  new window
22.Carli, L. L.(1999)。Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence。Journal of Social Issues,55,81-99。  new window
23.Carli, L. L.、LaFleur, S. J.、Loeber, C. C.(1995)。Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68(6),1030-1041。  new window
24.Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A.,、Cremer, D. D.(2006)。Effects of procedural fairness and leader support on interpersonal relationships among group members。Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,10,309-328。  new window
25.De Bruin, E. N. M.,、Van Lange, P. A. M.(2000)。What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on informational selection。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26,206-219。  new window
26.De Dreu, C. K. W.、Nauta, A.(2009)。Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior:Implications for job performance,prosocial behavior,and personal initiative。Journal of Applied Psychology,94,913-926。  new window
27.De Jong, S. B., Van der Vegt, G. S.,、Molleman, E.(2007)。The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust。Journal of Applied Psychology,92,1625-1637。  new window
28.Heilman, M. E.(2001)。Description and prescription:How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up to the organizational ladder。Journal of Social Issues,57,657-674。  new window
29.Heilman, M. E.,、Haynes, M. C.(2005)。No credit where credit is due:Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams。Journal of Applied Psychology,90,905-916。  new window
30.Holmes, J. G.(2002)。Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective。Personal Relationship,9,1-26。  new window
31.Kenny, D. A.(2004)。PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception。Personality and Social Psychology Review,8(3),265-280。  new window
32.Matschiner, M.,、Murnen, S. K.(1999)。Hyperfemininity and influence。Psychology of Women Quarterly,23,631-642。  new window
33.Ridgeway, C. L.(1981)。Nonconformity,competence and influence in groups: A test of two theories。American Sociological Review,46,333-347。  new window
34.Ruble, T. L.(1983)。Sex stereotypes: Issues of change in the 1970s。Sex Roles,9(3),397-402。  new window
35.Siderits, M. A., Johannsen, W. J.,、Fadden, T. F.(1985)。Gender, role, and power: A content analysis of speech。Psychology of Women Quarterly,9,439-450。  new window
36.Smith, E. R.、Collins, E. C.(2009)。Contextualizing person perception: Distributed social cognition。Psychological Review,116(2),343-364。  new window
37.Sommer, K. L.,、Baumeister, B. F.(2002)。Self-evaluation,persistence, and performance following implicit rejection: The role of trait self-esteem。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28,926-938。  new window
38.Spector, M. D.,、Jones, G. E.(2004)。Trust in the workplace: Factors affecting trust formation between team members。Journal of Social Psychology,144,311-321。  new window
39.Vohs, K. D.,、Heatherton, T. F.(2001)。Self-esteem and threat to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,1103-1118。  new window
40.Vonk, R.(1999)。Differential evaluations of likeable and dislikeable behaviours enacted towards superiors and subordinates。European Journal of Social Psychology,29,139-146。  new window
41.Wojciszke, B.(1994)。Multiple meanings of behavior:Construing actions in terms of competence or morality。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,222-232。  new window
學位論文
1.許功餘(2003)。華人性格與行為關連性的內隱理論(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.佐斌(1997)。中國人的臉與面子:本土社會心理學探索。Wuhan:華中師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Eagly, Alice H.(1987)。Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
3.Buss, David M.(1999)。Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.金耀基(1992)。中國社會與文化:人際關係中人情之分析。香港:牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Wegner, D. M.、Vallacher, R. R.(1977)。Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Berger, C. R.(1988)。Uncertainty and information exchange in developing relationships。Handbook of personal relationship。New York。  new window
7.Brehm, S.,、Kassin, S. M.(1993)。Social psychology (2nd ed.)。Boston。  new window
8.Graen, G.,、Cashman, J. F.(1975)。A role-making model of leadership in formal organization: A developmental approach。Kent, OH。  new window
9.Leary, M. R.(2001)。Toward a conceptualization of interpersonal rejection。Interpersonal rejection。New York。  new window
10.Leary, M. R., Bednarski, R., Hammon, D.,、Duncan, T.(1997)。Blowards, snobs, and narcissists: Interpersonal reactions to excessive egotism。Aversive interpersonal behaviors。New York。  new window
11.Lynch, J. J.(1977)。The broken heart: The medical consequences of loneliness。New York。  new window
12.Peeters, G.,、Czapinski, J.(1990)。Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects。European review ofsocial psychology。New York。  new window
13.Smith, E. R.(1998)。Mental representation and memory。The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.)。New York。  new window
14.Wyer, R. S., Jr.,、Lambert, A. J.(1994)。The role of trait constructs in perception: A historical perspective。Social cognition: Impact on social psychology。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.朱瑞玲(1991)。中國人的社會互動:論面子的問題。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cosmides, L.、Tooby, J.(1992)。Cognitive adaptations for social exchange。The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture。Oxford, England:New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理--理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Hogan, R.(1996)。A socioanalytic perspective on the five factor model。The five factor model of personality。New York:Guilford Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE