:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中學生偏差行為之研究:社會資本的觀點
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:謝志龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Chih-lung
出版日期:2011
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁129-165
主題關鍵詞:國中學生偏差行為社會資本父母網絡同儕網絡Junior high school studentsDelinquencySocial capitalParental networkPeer network
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:657
  • 點閱點閱:152
本文使用封閉性網絡與擴展性網絡兩種不同的社會資本型式,探討親代與子代的社會網絡對國中學生偏差行為的影響。前者指父母網絡,是由父母、子女同學以及子女同學的父母共同形塑出有效規範與訊息傳遞的封閉性網絡,它隱含父母主導子女行動模式的權力與態度。後者指同儕網絡,是青少年所擁有的朋友之數量與品質而開展出向外聯繫的擴展性網絡,具有多元、複雜與異質的特色。研究結果如下:第一,父母網絡對於國中學生的偏差行為不具影響力,代間封閉性網絡並非是有效理解國中青少年偏差行為的機制。第二,國中學生所結交的朋友相當重要,擴展性的「負向」同儕網絡會加劇青少年的偏差行為,但擴展性的「正向」同儕網絡則會減緩青少年的偏差行為。
This paper was aimed to explore the impact that social capital had on the delinquency of junior high school students. It was expected that both closure and expansion of social networks would play active roles in the formation of children's behaviors. The former referred to parental networks that seemed to have the authority to control children's behaviors in schools, and the later referred to adolescents' ego-networks. When adolescents' friends were more diverse and from mixed backgrounds, peer networks might affect their behaviors. The results showed that peer networks had a significant effect on adolescent delinquency. While “negative” peers could worsen the degree of delinquency, “positive” peers appeared to exert positive influence on their deviated behaviors. Parental networks, on the other hand, had no significant connection with junior high school students' delinquency.
期刊論文
1.何友暉(1981)。中國社會社教化的傳統模式。中華心理學刊,23(2),81-95。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sandefur, Rebecca L.、Laumann, Edward O.(1998)。A paradigm for social capital。Rationality and Society,10(4),481-501。  new window
3.Teachman, J. D.、Paasch, K.、Carver, K.(1997)。Social Capital and the Generation of Human Capital。Social Forces,75(4),1343-1359。  new window
4.周玉慧、吳齊殷(20011200)。教養方式、親子互動與青少年行為:親子知覺的相對重要性。人文及社會科學集刊,13(4),439-476。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.葉光輝(2004)。現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究,22,81-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇郁嵐、陳李綢(20070900)。國中生社會地位、合作與競爭對其英語科學業成就、社會焦慮、成就動機及歸因風格之影響。教育心理學報,39(1),111-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Baumrind, Diana Blumberg(1967)。Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior。Genetic Psychology Monographs,75(1),43-88。  new window
8.Lareau, Annette(1987)。Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital。Sociology of Education,60(2),73-85。  new window
9.李美枝(19980600)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能:以大學生為例。本土心理學研究,9,3-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.高淑芳、陸洛(20010600)。父母管教態度與國中生升學考試壓力感受之關係。應用心理研究,10,221-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Morgan, Stephen L.、Sorensen, Aage B.(1999)。Parental Networks, Social Closure, and Mathematics Learning: A Test of Coleman's Social Capital Explanation of School Effects。American Sociological Review,64(5),661-681。  new window
12.李文益、黃毅志(20041200)。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報,15(2),23-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李文傑、吳齊殷(20040600)。棒打出壞子?:青少年暴力行為的連結機制。臺灣社會學,7,1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.侯崇文、黃啟賓(20020300)。由校園環境探討學生偏差行為之發生與被害經驗。警學叢刊,32(5)=141,145-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.葉光輝(20091200)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林文瑛、王震武(19950200)。中國父母的教養觀:嚴教觀或打罵觀?。本土心理學研究,3,2-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.黃毅志(19980400)。臺灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究:方法與應用,5,5-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(20060400)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵:以臺灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究,25,141-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑(20060600)。青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態。臺灣社會學,11,175-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
22.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
23.吳齊殷、陳易甫(2001)。家庭暴力的成因與後果--以母親為例。應用心理研究,11,69-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Lareau, A.(1989)。Family-school relationships: A view from the classroom。Education Policy,3(3),245-259。  new window
會議論文
1.Tsay, R.-M.、Hsieli C.-L.(2010)。Cultural capital and educational attainment: Effects of parental involvement in children schooling。  new window
學位論文
1.葉川榮(2009)。國中階段的學業競爭現象。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許春金(2010)。犯罪學。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄(2003)。心理計量報告:TEPS 2001分析能力測驗。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.Coleman, J. S.、Hoffer, T.(1987)。Public and private schools: The impact of communities。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
4.Burt, Ronald S.(1992)。Structural Holes. Cambridge。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Comrey, Andrew L.(1973)。A first course in factor analysis。Academic Press。  new window
7.Gottfredson, Michael R.、Hirschi, Travis(1990)。A General Theory of Crime。Stanford University Press。  new window
8.Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of social Theory。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
9.張欣戎(1995)。從青少年發展看校園暴力。教改專題論壇--專題一校園暴力無法避免嗎?。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Burt, Ronald S.(2001)。Structural Holes Versus Network Closure as Social Capital。Social Capital: Theory and Research。New Jersey:Transaction Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE