臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國中小師生對「好學生」的角色期望
書刊名：教育政策論壇
作者：郭丁熒 引用關係
作者(外文)：Guo, Ding-ying
出版日期：2012
卷期：15:4=44
頁次：頁129-158
主題關鍵詞：好學生；國小；國中；學生角色；Elementary school；Good student；Junior high school；Student role
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:249
  • 點閱點閱:83
本研究探討國中小師生對「好學生」的角色期望，採文獻探討及調查法進行資料蒐集，先以根據文獻探討及前導性研究結果所編製之「好學生角色期望量表」，針對248位國中小師生進行預試，再以修訂後之量表調查876位國中小師生，調查資料以SASW Statistics 18.0套裝軟體中次數分配、二因子多變量變異數分析進行分析。研究結果發現，「國中小師生對好學生的角色期望包括品德、慣習、學習三層面，其中，對品德的期望最高」、「師生對好學生品德層面之角色期望並無顯著差異，但在慣習、學習等層面之角色期望，學生顯著高於教師」、「國小師生對好學生之期望，在品德、慣習、學習三層面，都顯著高於國中師生」、「師生身分與國中小教育階段兩背景變項存有交互作用，乃因國小學生對品德之期望較高」。據此推論，國中小師生對好學生的角色期望都存有「擬成人」的觀點，尤其是國小學生。
This study investigates the role expectations of teachers and students on "good student". Literature review and questionnaire investigation were used as methods to collect data. 248 subjects, who were teachers or students in either elementary or junior high schools, participated in a pretest to construct the questionnaire used in this study, i.e. Questionnaire of Good Student Role (QGSR). After QGSR was constructed, 876 subjects participated in the survey research using QGSR as a questionnaire. The data collected were statistically analyzed by Frequency and two-way MANOVA using SASW Statistics 18.0 as software. The findings of this study are summarized as follows: 1. Both teachers and students recognized that all of the three role contents, i.e. "morality", "habitus", and "learning", are necessary for good student role. 2. Students, rather than teachers, had a significantly higher level of role expectation for "good student" in the dimensions of "habitus" and "learning". 3. The subjects in elementary schools, rather than those in junior high schools, had a significantly higher level of role expectation for "good student" in all of the three dimensions. 4. An interaction between the two variables, subjects' status and schools' educational stage, existed in the dimension of "morality". All subjects, especially elementary school students, had the concept that a good student is a "pseudo-adult".
期刊論文
1.郭丁熒(20100500)。國中國文教科書中學生角色之分析--民國四十到九十年代的變遷。教育學誌，23，83-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Siegler, Robert S.(1988)。Individual Differences in Strategy Choices: Good Students, Not-so-good Students, and Perfectionists。Child Development，59(4)，833-851。  new window
3.林文瑛(20040600)。教師的人性觀與教育觀--以能力觀為例。教育心理學報，35(4)，355-374。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Greeno, J. G.、Magone, M. E.、Chaiklin, S.(1979)。Theory of construction and set in problem solving。Memory and Cognition，7，445-461。  new window
5.Llamas, J. M. C.(2006)。Technologies of disciplinary power in action: The norm of the 'Good student'。Higher Education，52(4)，665-686。  new window
6.Canaan, J.(2004)。New right students?: Exploring high achieving British university students' discourses of learning。International Journal of Oualitative Studies in Education，17(6)，749-767。  new window
7.Shaw, T. A.(1991)。Schooling for success in a non-Western culture: a case from Taiwan。Qualitative Studies in Education，4(2)，109-120。  new window
8.Meirovich, G.、Romar, E. J.(2006)。The difficulty in implementing TQM in higher education instruction: The duality of instructor/student roles。Quality Assurance in Education，14(4)，324-337。  new window
9.Song, H. H.(2003)。Who Is a Good Student?。Chinese Education & Society，36(3)，43-54。  new window
10.朱子君(2010)。大學資源培育與職業能力發展：大學教育目標的省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊，93，1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李威伸、何信慧(2003)。誰成為老師眼中的好學生：檢視文化資本的效果。人文及社會學科教學通訊，14(2)，66-79。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭丁熒(2011)。民國四十至九十年代國小國語教科學中書學生角色之分析。教育學誌，26，131-169。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bianchi, A. J.、Lancianese, D. A.(2005)。No child left behind: Role/identity development of the : good student。International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice，5(1)，3-29。  new window
14.Hempel-Jorgensen, A.(2009)。The construction of the ‘ideal pupil’ and pupils ‘perceptions of’ misbehaviour and discipline。British Journal of Sociology of Education，30(4)，435-448。  new window
15.McCargar, D. F.(1993)。Teacher and student role expectation: Cross-cultural differences and implications。The Modern Language Journal，77(2)，192-207。  new window
16.Parish, T. S.、Truszkowski, M.(2007)。The ABC’s of becoming a “good student.”。Education，127(3)，447。  new window
17.Taylor, Y.(2008)。Good students, bad pupils: Constructions of “aspiration,” “disadvantage” and social class in undergraduate-led widening participation work。Educational Review，60(2)，155-168。  new window
18.Read, B.(2008)。‘The world must stop when I’m talking’: Gender and power relations in primary teachers’ classroom talk。British Journal of Sociology of Education，29(6)，609-621。  new window
會議論文
1.Foucault, Michel(1988)。Technologies of the Self。Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault。Amherst, Massachusetts：The University of Massachusetts Press。16-49。  new window
學位論文
1.Finehout, P. J.(1983)。The effectiveness of "good student" skill training with underachieving high school students(博士論文)。University of Maryland。  new window
2.Wojcikiewicz, S. K.(2007)。The good students: A study of high-achiever culture in a high school history class(博士論文)。Michigan State University，East Lansing, MI。  new window
3.李莉菁(2002)。國小教師對學生的分類方式及其成因之探討(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃中興(2002)。學校中的日常生活：舞臺、劇本與角色(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Rop, C. J.(1996)。The good student what does it mean and what does is take to be successful in high school chemistry? Or, will this stuff be on the test(博士論文)。Michigan State University, East Lansing。  new window
圖書
1.Morgan, C.、Morris, G.(1999)。Good Teaching and Learning: Pupils and Teachers Speak。Buckingham：Open University Press。  new window
2.王保進(2008)。多變量分析--套裝程式與資料分析。台北市：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳映芳(2003)。圖像中的孩子--社會學的分析。濟南市：山東畫報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Straughan, R.(1988)。Can we teach children to be good? Basic issues in moral, personal and social education。Milton Keynes, Philadelphia。  new window
5.Buckingham, David、楊雅婷(2003)。童年之死--在電子媒體時代下長大的兒童。臺北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.Berger, Peter L.、Luckmann, Thomas、鄒理民(1997)。知識社會學：社會實體的建構。臺北市：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.Linton, R.(1936)。The Study of Man。New York：D. Appleton-Century。  new window
8.Coleman, J. S.(1961)。The Adolescent Society。New York, NY：The Free Press。  new window
9.王保進(2006)。英文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市：心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.林清江(1982)。教育社會學新論。臺北：五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭為藩(1972)。自我心理學。台南：開山書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bourdieu, P.、Nice, R.(2003)。Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste。London：England: Routledge。  new window
13.Hughes, E. C.(1981)。Men and their work。Glencoe, IL：Greenwood Press。  new window
14.Weikart, D. P.(1999)。What should young children learn? Teacher and parent views in 15 countries。Ypsilanti, MI：High/ Scope Press。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2012)。各級學校概況，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15423&CtNode=4610。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部中教司(2009)。擴大高中職及五專免試入學實區方案，http://www.edu.tw/HIGH-SCHOOL/content.aspx?site_conten_sn=21636。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Calderhead, J.(1996)。Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge。Handbook of educational psychology。New York, NK：Simon & Schuster Macmillan。  new window
2.Bourdieu, Pierre(1997)。The forms of capital。Education, Culture, Economy and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1438（臺灣：1437，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67327963
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上