:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:忠於自我或見機行事?--華人關鍵情境下的行為差異
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:高旭繁 引用關係
作者(外文):Kao, Shu-fang
出版日期:2013
卷期:40
頁次:頁3-44
主題關鍵詞:見機行事忠於自我情境取向SelfSituation-orientation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:1248
  • 點閱點閱:485
本研究旨在探討華人在情境取向及自我能動性的雙重影響之下,面對不同情境之行為傾向的個別差異。本研究以情境模擬法利用問卷進行大樣本施測,探究華人在「角色義務」及「獨立自主」兩類情境下,順勢而為的傾向(即見機行事),以及不同威權取向或平權取向程度者行為傾向的差異(即忠於自我)。有效樣本為701位,包含大學生(354位)及成人(347位),男女各半。研究結果顯示:(1)華人在面對兩類情境時,皆傾向順勢而為;(2)威權取向會強化「角色義務」下順勢而為的傾向,弱化「獨立自主」情境下順勢而為的傾向;(3)平權取向會強化「獨立自主」情境下順勢而為的傾向;(4)相較而言,華人順應情境的效應高於忠於自我。本研究就上述結果推論情境對理解華人行為的重要性,並加以討論。
The study explored individual differences in behavioral tendencies among Taiwanese taking into account the dual influences of situation and self. Using structured questionnaires, ”role obligation” and ”autonomous independence” scenarios were presented to solicit situation-oriented behavioral tendencies in participants. Participants were 354 university students and 347 adults (mean age = 34.73), with an equal gender ratio. Results showed that (1) participants manifested situation-orientation in both types of scenarios; (2) an authoritarian personality intensified the situation-orientation in role obligation scenarios, whereas it ameliorated the situation-orientation in the autonomous independence scenarios; (3) egalitarian personality intensified the situation-orientation in autonomous independence scenarios; and finally (4) participants generally had a stronger situation-orientation tendency than a be-true-to-the-self tendency. The situation is vitally important for understanding Taiwanese people’s behavior.
期刊論文
1.Mischel, W.、Ayduk, O.(2002)。Self-Regulation in a Cognitive-affective Personality System: Attentional Control in the Service of the Self。Self and Identify,1(2),113-120。  new window
2.陸洛(20111200)。現代華人的雙文化自我與雙重陷落。本土心理學研究,36,155-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.高旭繁、楊國樞(20110600)。華人心理傳統性與心理現代性研究之回顧與前瞻。彰化師大教育學報,19,1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃光國(20120600)。跳脫「二元對立」的思維框架。本土心理學研究,37,191-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cervone, D.、Shoda, Y.(1999)。Beyond traits in the study of personality coherence。Current Directions in Psychological Science,8(1),27-32。  new window
6.Chuan, Y. C.(1998)。The cognitive structures of role norms in Taiwan。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1,239-251。  new window
7.Conway, L. G. III、Schaller, M.、Tweed, R. G.、Hallett, D.(2001)。The complexity of thinking across cultures: Interactions between culture and situational context。Social Cognition,19(3),228-250。  new window
8.Knowle, E. D.、Morris, M. W.、Chiu, C.-Y.、Hong, Y.-Y.(2001)。Culture and the process of person perception: Evidence for automaticity among East Asians in correcting for situational influences on behavior。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27(10),1344-1356。  new window
9.Mischel, W.、Shoda, Y.(1995)。A cognitive-affective personality system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure。Psychological Review,102,246-268。  new window
10.Moos, R. H.(1996)。Understanding environments: The key to improving social processes and program outcomes。American Journal of Community Psychology,24(1),193-201。  new window
11.Nisbett, R. E.、Peng, K.、Choi, I.、Norenzayan, A.(2001)。Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition。Psychological Review,108,291-310。  new window
12.Pargament, K. I.(1986)。Refining fit: Conceptual and methodological challenges。American Journal of Community Psychology,14(6),677-684。  new window
13.Sarbin, T. R.(1995)。Emotional life, rhetoric, and roles。Journal of Narrative and Life History,5(3),213-220。  new window
14.Shoda, Y.(1999)。A unified framework for the study of behavioral consistency: Bridging person×situation interaction and the consistency paradox。European Journal of Personality,13(5),361-387。  new window
15.Zayas, V.、Shoda, Y.、Ayduk, O. N.(2002)。Personality in context: An interpersonal systems perspective。Journal of Personality,70(6),851-900。  new window
16.Hwang, K. K.(2003)。Critique of the methodology of empirical research on individual modernity in Taiwan。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,6,241-262。  new window
17.Triandis, H. C.、Chen, X. P.、Chan, D. K. S.(1998)。Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,29(2),275-289。  new window
18.Brindley, T. A.(1989)。Socio-psychological Values in the Republic of China。Asian Thought and Society,14(41/42),98-115。  new window
19.Brindley, T. A.(1990)。Socio-psychological Values in the Republic of China。Asian Thought and Society,15(43),1-16。  new window
20.黃光國(2011)。The Mandala Model of Self。Psychological Studies,56(4),329-334。  new window
21.Schneider, B.(1990)。Organizational Climate Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance。Academy of Management Journal,52(3),489-505。  new window
22.Markus, Hazel Rose、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Cultural and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation。Psychological Review,98(2),224-253。  new window
23.Liden, R. C.、Maslyn, J. M.(1998)。Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessmemt Through Scale Development。Journal of Management,24(1),43-72。  new window
24.Fiske, Alan P.(1992)。The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations。Psychological review,99(4),689-723。  new window
25.黃光國(20111200)。論「含攝文化的心理學」。本土心理學研究,36,79-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Spreitzer, G. M.、Perttula, K. H.、Xin, K.(2005)。Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan。Journal of Organizational Behavior,26(3),205-227。  new window
27.Harris, G. G.(1989)。Concepts of individual, self, and person in description and analysis。American Anthropologist,91(3),599-612。  new window
28.Morris, M. W.、彭凱平(1994)。Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(6),949-971。  new window
29.Farh, Jiing-Lih、Hackett, Rick D.、Liang, Jian(2007)。Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality。Academy of Management Journal,50(3),715-729。  new window
30.Endler, Norman S.、Magnusson, David(1976)。Toward an interactional psychology of personality。Psychological Bulletin,83(5),956-974。  new window
31.楊國樞、陸洛(20050600)。社會取向自我實現者與個人取向自我實現者的心理特徵:概念分析與實徵衡鑑。本土心理學研究,23,71-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Lu, Luo、Yang, Kuo-Shu(2006)。Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,9(3),167-175。  new window
33.陸洛(20031200)。人我關係之界定--「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究,20,139-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.陸洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶(20060400)。傳統性、現代性、及孝道觀念對幸福感的影響:一項親子對偶設計。本土心理學研究,25,243-278。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Chiu, C. Y.、Dweck, C. S.、Tong, J. Y. Y.、Fu, J. H. Y.(1997)。Implicit theories and conceptions of morality。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(5),923-940。  new window
36.陸洛(2007)。個人取向與社會取向的自我觀:概念分析與實徵測量。美中教育評論,4(2),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.楊國樞(20041200)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.高旭繁、陸洛(20060400)。夫妻傳統性/現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究,25,47-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Hong, Ying Yi、Morris, Michael W.、Chiu, Chi Yue、Benet-Martínez, Verónica(2000)。Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition。American Psychologist,55(7),709-720。  new window
40.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(20060200)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.康瑩儀、Benet-Martinez, V.、趙志裕、Morris, M. W.(2003)。Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,34,453-464。  new window
42.Choi, I.、Nisbett, R. E.、Norenzayan, A.(1999)。Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality。Psychological Bulletin,125(1),47-63。  new window
43.Chiu, C. Y.、Hong, Y. Y.、Mischel, W.、Shoda, Y.(1995)。Discriminative Facility in Social Competence: Conditional Versus Dispositional Encoding and Monitoring-blunting of Information。Social Cognition,13,49-70。  new window
研究報告
1.鄭伯壎、黃敏萍、周麗芳(2002)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸組織的證據。臺北:國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.翁克成(2004)。研究生之個人傳統性/現代性與師生關係品質及身心適應之關聯(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張嘉莉(2005)。心理傳統性與現代性的融合類型與跨範疇模式(碩士論文)。佛光人文社會學院,宜蘭。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖玲燕(2000)。台灣本土社會讚許量表之編製及其心理歷程分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.高旭繁(2008)。華人在傳統與現代生活情境中的傳統與現代行為:人境互動論的觀點(博士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Argyle, M.、Furnham, A.、Graham, J. A.(1981)。Social situation。University of Cambridge: Press Syndicate。  new window
2.Freud, S.(1924)。The loss of reality in neurosis and psychosis。The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19: The ego and the id and other works。London:Hogarth Press。  new window
3.Goldstein, K.(1939)。The organism。New York:American Book。  new window
4.Mischel, W.(1999)。Personality coherence and dispositions in a cognitiveaffective personality (CAPS) approach。The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization。New York:Guilford Press。  new window
5.Hsu, F. L. K.(1981)。Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences。Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
6.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃光國(20090000)。儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃光國(20110000)。心理學的科學革命方案。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Mischel, W.、Shoda, Y.(1999)。Integrating Dispositions and Processing Dynamics within a Unified Theory of Personality: The Cognitive-affective Personality System。Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shoda, Y.、Mischel, W.(1998)。Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: Characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure。Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers。  new window
2.Triandis, H. C.(1990)。Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism。Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989。Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press。  new window
3.楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性:概念與測量。中國人的心理與行為。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊國樞(19940000)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存?。中國人的價值觀:社會科學觀點。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊傑(2002)。傳統中國的思維方式及其價值觀:歷史回顧與現代啟示。傳統中華文化與現代價值的激盪。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
1. 主題樂園產業企業社會責任、企業形象與組織認同關係之研究--以E主題樂園為例
2. 內外控特質透過組織承諾對公共部門組織公民行為影響之跨層次研究:以轉換型領導風格為調節變數
3. 外派職涯承諾、文化智商與自願外派中國意願之關聯:家庭及組織支持的調節效果
4. 第三屆世界棒球經典賽觀眾觀賞行為模式之研究:以臺灣臺中洲際棒球場賽事為例
5. 企業組織能力對員工工作績效與留職意願之影響--以員工滿意度為中介變數
6. 探討產品模組化對供應鏈關係品質、知識分享及新產品開發績效間關係之調節作用
7. 工作狂與情緒耗竭、工作-家庭衝突之關係:個體間差異的調節效果
8. 情緒勞動對服務品質之影響:團隊服務氣候及情緒能力之調節角色
9. 臺灣國中生班級社會網絡指標及位置與被霸凌經驗之關係
10. 高階經營團隊之環境倫理價值觀與企業智慧資本:環境管理的中介效果
11. 如何留住顧客?探討關係品質在服務品質、服務補救與顧客再購意圖關係上之中介效果
12. 家長式領導與信任對領導效能之影響--以臺灣營造業為例
13. 領導者定位、領導行為與部屬對主管滿意度關係之研究--華人對偶關係之情境觀點
14. 比較廣告資訊內容與法律效果關聯之驗證:市場競爭秩序的角色
15. 智慧資本交互作用與組織績效關係之研究
 
QR Code
QRCODE