臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：建構霸凌行為之需求類型研究
書刊名：青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者：邱獻輝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiou, Hsien-huei
出版日期：2014
卷期：6:1
頁次：頁1-30
主題關鍵詞：心理需求；青少年；類型論；霸凌行為；Adolescent；Bully；Psychological needs；Typology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:456
  • 點閱點閱:74
相關文獻顯示現有霸凌分類概念對諮商介入的應用有限、抑或缺乏實徵基礎，故本研究擬從霸凌行為背後的心理需求之角度切入，透過實務工作者的經驗敘說、概念抽取，以彙整出分類架構，做為霸凌者諮商的參考。為達此研究目的，本研究在方法學上以建構主義典範為基礎，邀請10位長期從事霸凌者諮商的專業人員進行訪談，並在社會建構的思惟下，以協同方式進行質性資料的樣版式分析。本研究結果共得七項霸凌行為的心理需求，包括玩樂/錯誤的探索行為、引起注意、同儕歸屬、自我認同的追尋，權力與掌控、宣洩與爆發、生理作用。研究者亦嘗試從諮商理論與技術的觀點對結果進行討論，思索其對實務工作的意涵。
Some of the existed typologies of bully are not efficient to infer counseling treatments of bullying, and the othersare not derived from evidence-base researches. It is an urgent need of a typology of bully with both counseling function and empirical base. This study, from the perspectives of psychological needs, tries to abstract the rationales from the experience of senior bullying counselors, and then build up a new set of typology of bullying which could be a sorting flame for counselors to efficaciously design strategies modifying bullying. This study bases on constructivism paradigm. Ten senior counselors are invited as interviewees for deeply semi-structure interviews during the data collection. The result defines 7 psychological needs behind the bullying. These needs and discussions related as follows: (a) Look for fun or naively explore the interactions: Describing this need comes from the viewpoints of bullies, so it may be controvertible to the perspectives which are built on the side of the bullied, (b)Attract notice from others: This need describes the rationale that individual would behave badly to acquire notice rather than follow the rules without caresfrom others, (c) Earn peer belongingness: Adolescences value the peer acceptance so much that he is pressured to do the same thing (bully) as them, which will convince him that he belongs to his peer group, (d) Pursue self-identification: When some of teenagers embody wrong belief as his practicing of self-realization, they may become the bullies, (e) Acquire power and control others: From certain perspectives, bulling could be seen as improper expectations and satisfaction of power.(f) Catharsis and flare up: For many instances of bullies, under the appearance of extreme fierceness, the psychological functions of some bullies are really vulnerable, (g) Physiology mechanism: In some cases, bullying might be part of the symptoms of psychological disorder which trigger violence if the client does not find proper ways to transport his overflowing energy.
期刊論文
1.Fey, G. P.、Nelson, R. J.、Roberts, M. L.(2000)。The perils of profiling。School Administrator，57(2)，12-16。  new window
2.McAdams, C. R. III、Schmidt, C. D.(2007)。How to help a bully: Recommendations for counseling the proactive aggressor。Professional school counseling，11(2)，121-128。  new window
3.Twemlow, F. C.、Sacco, F. C.、Williams, P.(1996)。A clinical and interactionist perspective on the bully-victim-bystander relationship。Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic，60(3)，296-313。  new window
4.Veenstra, R.、Lindenberg, S.、Munniksma, A.、Dijkstra, J. K.(2010)。The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences。Child Development，81(2)，480-486。  new window
5.魏麗敏(20030600)。校園欺凌行為、家庭環境與學校氣氛之關係。臺中師院學報，17，21-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Annells, M.(1996)。Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism。Qualitative Health Research，6(3)，379-393。  new window
7.邱獻輝(20121200)。霸凌者的心理需求與諮商介入。應用心理研究，56，165-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Mulligan, S.(2001)。Classroom strategies used by teachers of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder。Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics，20(4)，25-44。  new window
9.洪福源、黃德祥(20020100)。國中校園欺凌行為與學校氣氛及相關因素之研究。彰化師大教育學報，43(2)，37-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(1995)。Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive research。Qualitative Inquiry，1(3)，275-289。  new window
11.Polkinghorne, D. E.(2005)。Language and Meaning: Data Collection in Qualitative Research。Journal of Counseling Psychology，52(2)，137-145。  new window
12.鄔佩麗、洪儷瑜(19970900)。校園暴力行為之診斷與處理策略研究。教育心理學報，29，177-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.邱珍琬(20021100)。國小國中校園欺凌行為比較研究。彰化師大教育學報，3，99-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.邱獻輝(2011)。性霸凌個案之處理流程。防制校園霸凌個案研討會，教育部 。嘉義：國立中正大學犯罪防治系。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭如安(2007)。96年度高雄市國中國小校園霸凌現況調查之研究。美合技術學院社工系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王榮駿(2009)。以生命教育課程與協同教學改善霸凌行為之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯采伶(2010)。真的只是囝仔的打鬧嗎？--國中霸凌者校園霸凌行為之研究(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dinkmeyer, D.、McKay, G. D.(1990)。Parenting teenagers。Coral Springs, FL：STEP Publishers。  new window
2.Gordon, M.(2003)。Roots of empathy: Changing the world child by child。New York, NY：The Experiment。  new window
3.Lines, D.(2008)。The bullies: Understanding bullies and bullying。London：Jessica Kingsley。  new window
4.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2004)。國小兒童校園霸凌（bully）現象調查報告。臺北：兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Alexander, F.(1956)。Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy。New York, NY：Norton。  new window
6.Revitch, E.、Schlesinger, L. B.(1981)。Psychopathology of Homicide。Springfield, IL：Charles C. Thomas。  new window
7.Sun, K.(2008)。Correctional counseling: A cognitive growth perspective。Sudbury, Massachusetts：Jones and Bartlett Publishers。  new window
8.Rivers, I.、Duncan, N.、Besag, V. E.(2007)。Bullying: A handbook for educator and parents。Westport, CT：Praeger。  new window
9.Barkley, R. A.(2006)。Attention-deficit dyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment。New York, NY：The Guilford Press。  new window
10.Coon, D.、Mitterer, J. O.(2012)。Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behaviors。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
11.Galotti, K. M.(2011)。Cognitive development: Infancy through adolescence。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
12.Meloy, J. R.(1992)。Violent attachments。Northvale, NJ：Jason Aronson。  new window
13.Robinson-Riegler, B.、Robinson-Riegler, G.(2012)。Cognitive psychology: applying the science of the mind。Boston, MA：Pearson Allyn & Bacon。  new window
14.Cervone, D.、Pervin, L. A.(2008)。Personality: Theory and research。Singapore：New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
15.Dolgin, K. G.(2010)。The adolescent: Development, relationships, and culture。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
16.First, M. B.、Tasman, A.(2004)。DSM-IV-TR Mental Disorders: Diagnosis, Etiology, and Treatment。Chichester, West Sussex：Wiley。  new window
17.Darley, J. M.、Glucksberg, S.、Kinchla, R. A.(1991)。Psychology。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
18.O'Moore, M.、Minton, S. J.(2004)。Dealing with bullying in schools: A training manual for teachers, parents and other professionals。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
19.Rigby, K(2007)。Bullying in schools and what to do about it。Melbourne：Australian Council for Education Research。  new window
20.Stephens, T.、Hallas, J.(2006)。Bullying and sexual harassment: A practical handbook。Oxford：Chandos。  new window
21.Teyber, Edward(2000)。Interpersonal Process in Psychotherapy--A Relational Approach。Pacific Grove, CA：Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning。  new window
22.張春興(1994)。現代心理學--現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北：東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
24.陳向明(2002)。教師如何做質的研究。洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
25.Corey, G.、修慧蘭、鄭玄藏、余振民、王淳弘、楊旻鑫、彭瑞祥(2009)。諮商與心理治療：理論與實務。臺北：雙葉。  延伸查詢new window
26.Olweus, Dan(1993)。Bullying At School: What We Know and What We Can Do。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.Yorkshire Training Centre(2011)。Transactional analysis and strokes: Folks need strokes!，http://www.ta-psychotherapy.co.uk/strokes.htm。  new window
2.教育部(2012)。教育部防制校園霸凌專區：問與答，http://140.111.1.88/faq/， 2012/07/28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Mongold, J. L.、Braswell, M.(2007)。The function of correctional counseling and treating。Correctional counseling and rehabilitation。Cincinnati, OH：Anderson。  new window
2.Luborsky, E. B.、O'Reilly-Landry, M.(2011)。Psychoanalysis。Current psychotherapies。Belmont, CA：Brooks/Cole。  new window
3.Crabtree, B. J.、Miller, W. L.(1992)。A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebook。Doing Qualitative Research。Newbury, CA：Sage Publication Inc.。  new window
4.吳芝儀(2000)。建構論及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。麗文。  延伸查詢new window
5.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln. Y. S.(2005)。Paradigmatic controversies, contradiction, and emerging confluences。The sage Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1105（臺灣：1095，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67506473
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上