:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺中市實施扶幼計畫現況探討
書刊名:幼兒教保研究期刊
作者:張嘉芙 引用關係楊淑朱 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Chia-fuChang, Shu-chu
出版日期:2012
卷期:9
頁次:頁25-44
主題關鍵詞:扶幼計畫幼教政策大班教保服務人員Supporting children projectAged 5 children's preschool teachersEducational policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:74
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究旨在瞭解台中市大班教保服務人員對「扶幼計畫」政策之了解與看法,以進一步探究「扶幼計畫」之現況。本研究以問卷調查法為主,結論有下列七項:一、多數大班教保服務人員已瞭解「扶幼計畫」內容,也多肯定該政策立意甚佳。二、不同年齡、教育程度、任教資格之大班教保服務人員,對「扶幼計畫」實施之了解有顯著差異。三、公私立幼兒園之大班教保服務人員,在「扶幼計畫」之了解與執行面看法上有顯著差異。而不同規模之幼兒園,其對該計畫之執行面與政策面看法上亦有顯著差異。四、41-45歲之教保人員對扶幼計畫之熟稔度較高。五、「扶幼計畫」政策之宣導不足,撥款之行政效率不佳,使幼兒園行政負荷量增加,也產生許多困擾。六、多數大班教保服務人員認為「扶幼計畫」的家戶所得計算標準及請領資格不甚公平。七、「扶幼計畫」請領手續過於繁雜,撥款速度緩慢。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the understanding and views to the ”Supporting Children Project” from aged 5 children's preschool teachers in Taichung City. Further to explore the status of ”Supporting Children Project”. This study used questionnaire. Seven conclusions were as follows: 1. The majority of preschool teachers were already known the content of ”Supporting Children Project”, also affirmed the policy of good intentions. 2. There were significant differences on the perception and views of ”Supporting Children Project” in different ages, educational levels, qualifications of teaching with aged 5 children's preschool teachers. 3. There were significant differences from the aged 5 children's preschool teachers on the perception and the face of implementation of ”Supporting Children Project”. There were also significant differences from the different sizes of kindergarten on the faces of implementation and policy. 4. The preschool teachers whose ages from 41to 45 had highly degree of familiarity to the ”Supporting Children Project”. 5. The ”Supporting Children Project” lacked of policy advocacy. The appropriation procedures lacked of administrative efficiency. The ”Supporting Children Project” increased preschool teachers' administrative load, and produced many problems. 6. Most of aged 5 children's preschool teachers did believe that the calculation of household income standards and receiving eligibility of ”Supporting Children Project” were unfare. 7. Procedures for receiving payments of ”Supporting Children Project” were too complicated.
期刊論文
1.邱志鵬、巫永森(200109)。臺灣地區幼兒教育券政策之歷史研究。兒童福利期刊,1,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張翠娥、李新民(20030600)。托兒所行政管理與托育服務品質之相關研究--以高雄市為例。樹德科技大學學報,5(2),91-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Abu-Jaber, M.、Al-Shawareb, A.、Gheith, E.(2010)。Kindergarten teachers' beliefs toward developmentally appropriatepractice in Jordan。Early Childhood Education Journal,38(1),65-74。  new window
4.Braun, A.、Vincent, C.、Ball, S. J.(2008)。'I'm so much more myself now, coming back to work’--working class mothers, paid work and childcare。Journal of Education Policy,23(5),533–548。  new window
5.Waddan, A.(2003)。Redesigning the welfare contract in theory and practice: Just what is going on in USA?。Journal of Social Policy,32(1),19-35。  new window
6.陳麗珠(19980400)。國民教育經費補助公式垂直公平考量之模擬研究。高雄師大學報,9,149-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.饒欣秀(2008)。幼兒教育政策的發展與影響研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳世聰(2007)。「扶持五歲弱勢幼兒及早教育計畫」之政策分析(博士論文)。高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳奕君(2008)。扶持五歲弱勢幼兒及早教育計畫實施現況調查研究--以台東縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.魯文雯(2001)。英國女性就業問題與促進措施(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝子元(2005)。近代台灣幼教政策發展之研究--比較福利國家觀點(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.霍力岩(2002)。比較幼兒教育。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.文省部(2000)。諸外國の教育行財政制度。東京:文部省。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2006)。教育部幼托整合政策規劃專案。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.魏惠貞(2008)。各國幼兒教育。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Department for Work and Pensions(2007)。In work, better off: Next steps to full employment。Norwich:Her Majesty's Stationary Office。  new window
6.Patton, M. Q.(2002)。Qtilisation-Focaused Evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
7.簡楚瑛(20030000)。幼兒教育與保育之行政與政策‧歐美澳篇。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊思偉(2007)。比較教育。臺北市:三民:心理。  延伸查詢new window
9.李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式Amos之簡介及其在測驗編制上之應用: Graphics & Basic。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bredekamp, Sue、Copple, Carol(1997)。Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs。Washington, DC:The National Association for the Education of Young Children。  new window
11.Comrey, A. L.、Lee, Howard B.(1992)。A First Course in Factor Analysis。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
12.邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析--SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉重新(2004)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
14.梁福鎮(20040000)。改革教育學:起源、內涵與問題的探究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.教育部(2008)。扶持五歲幼兒教育計畫。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.DCSF(2008)。Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage,http://www.standards.dcsf.gov.uk, 2009/02/04。  new window
2.(2009)。建構友善托育環境--保母托育管理與托育費用補助實施計畫,http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx, 2010/09/12。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2010)。建構友善托育環境--保母托育管理與托育費用補助實施計畫(修正),http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx, 2011/03/20。  延伸查詢new window
4.台灣經濟永續發展會(2006)。「人口高齡化及少子女化的衝擊與因應」暨「國民年金」,http://theme.cepd.gov.tw/tesg/reports/950612, 2009/03/05。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2009)。97學年度各類學前幼童補助措施彙整表,http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/under5_973.html, 2009/04/12。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳思穎(20100906)。內政部全力促進生育 擬不排富補助第三胎托育費,http://www.nownews.com/2010/09/06/301-2643682.htm, 2010/09/10。  延伸查詢new window
7.Office of Head Start(2006)。About Head Start,http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb/about/index, 。  new window
8.UNESCO(2009)。Education for all,http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=43055&URL_DO= DOTOPIC& URLSECTION=201.htm, 2012/02/06。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE