本研究以國小五年級三個班級共 129 名學生為研究對象，進行 24 節寫作教學， 探討過程取向的電腦文書寫作組，紙筆寫作組及結果取向的紙筆寫作組之間，在寫作態度， 寫作歷程， 文章品質，社交計量結果上有何差異，其主要結論如下：1. 三組之間的寫作態 度、寫作歷程沒有差異。 2. 三組之間的文章長度、字彙數，及第一、二、五、七年級的常 用字上有差異存在，而且過程取向的紙筆寫作組優於結果取向的紙筆寫作組。 3. 三組之間 的修改類型，在字和篇的修改上，以過程取向電腦文書處理組出現次數比例最多，而詞語的 修改出現次數及比例卻以過程取向電腦文書處理組最少，充份發揮了電腦文書處理的特色。 在句子的修改次數比例上，三組均排名第一，在段的修改次數及比例上，以兩組紙筆寫作組 較多。整體而言，三組在句、段、篇的修改上，出現 60% 技巧熟練的寫作專家修改特徵 4. 三組在社會喜好及 Coie 型改變情形上沒有差異。

　　　　　The researched were practiced twenty foure session for writing project, the subjectes wer 129 childrens On the fifth grade of three class of elementary school. The purpose are exprolation difference on writing attitute' writing process, the quality of compose' sociometry' within the word processing writing and the pencil paper writing of proceess approach writing teaching' and the pencil paper writing of content approach writing. The resulted were: 1. The writing attitude and writing process were no significance. Within the three groupes. 2. the length' wordes' and user wordes of first secand fifth seventh grade of compose had significance within the three groups' and the pencil paper writing of proceess approach better then the pencil paper writing of content approach writing. 3. The types of revision within the groupes, on the revisive of the word and canto' the wrod processing writing of procee approach much more then another groupes' and revisive of phrasal were little more then ano ther groupes. On the sentence revisive, the three group were first on them revisive numer' on the paragraph revisive the two pencil paper writing groupes mmuch more then word proceessing writing. Overall, on the revisive of sentence' paragraph and conto, the three groupes had sixty percent charecter of writ skilled. 4. The social like and change of the coie type had no significance within the three groupes.