兩岸員工對主管不當督導因應行為之比較研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	兩岸員工對主管不當督導因應行為之比較研究
作者：	蔡孟穎
作者(外文)：	Tsai, Meng-Ying
校院名稱：	中國文化大學
系所名稱：	國際企業管理學系
指導教授：	謝安田
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2015
主題關鍵詞：	不當督導；員工因應行為；組織正義；文化價值；兩岸；abusive supervision；employees’ coping behavior；organizational justice；culture value；Taiwan and China
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:32

本研究問題是探討兩岸員工對主管不當督導(abusive supervision)及員工因應行為(employees’ coping behavior)之關係，經由文獻引用之及邏輯推論，發現兩者之關係有必要進一步釐清，並探討文化價值對兩者關係之影響及比較兩岸員工之差異。
本研究是透過郵寄問卷及網路問卷的方式，請受雇於組織且有其直屬主管的員工填答。本研究在台灣及大陸總共發出600份問卷，回收352份問卷(回收率為58.67%)，扣除22份明顯漏答的問卷及52份無不當督導經驗的問卷，最後有效問卷共278份(有效回收率為46.33%)。
結果本研究發現，不當督導對員工因應行為有顯著的預測能力。不當督導對員工溝通行為、忠誠行為有負向影響，對漠視行為及離職行為有正向影響。另外，本研究發現組織正義會對不當督導與員工因應行為的影響有部分中介效果。
干擾變數為文化價值，則以「權力距離」、「個人主義」、「男性傾向」、「不確定性避免」、「長期導向」五個構面為主。「權力距離」、「不確定性避免」減緩不當督導對員工因應行為的影響。「個人主義」、「男性傾向」則加強不當督導對員工因應行為的影響，「長期導向」干擾影響則不顯著。台灣員工與大陸員工相比在面對不當督導時，台灣員工比大陸員工願意進行積極的溝通行為，但台灣員工比大陸員工相對有比較低順從的忠誠行為，對於漠視行為及離職行為也相對較低。兩岸員工因應行為不同的原因可能是，一、中國大陸經濟起飛，經濟成長的力度極大，二、兩岸主管不當督導型態不同，三、台灣員工的教育較多元，四、台灣員工的溝通方式較委婉。

以文找文

This study empirically examines the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior. In addition, this doctoral dissertation speculates that organizational justice mediate the relationship and culture value moderate the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior.
The research problem of this doctoral dissertation is found in the existing literature. First, the doctoral dissertation explores the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior. Second, the research explore organization justice mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior. Third, the doctoral dissertation explores cultural value (power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation) moderate the relation between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior. Final, the doctoral dissertation explore employees in Taiwan and China has different coping behavior, when they percept abusive supervision. An analytical approach of methodology is applied to analyze the parsimonious relationship by the cross-sectional survey.
The data is composed of employees and is collected by 600 questionnaires. Employees were asked about their levels of abusive supervision, organizational justice, voice coping behavior, loyalty coping behavior, neglect coping behavior, exit coping behavior, power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation. Of all samples, 32 different firms responded by returning at least one questionnaire from an employee (a total of 352 questionnaires); of these, 22 employees were unusable because they were incomplete, 52 employees were unusable because they were without abusive supervision experience. Completed questionnaires were returned by 278 employees (46.33% response rate).
Finally, the results indicate that abusive supervision is positively related to employees’ neglect and exit coping behavior, and negatively related to employees’ voice and loyalty coping behavior. In addition, the author speculates that organizational justice partial mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior；Power distance, individualism, masculinity and uncertainty avoidance moderate the relation between abusive supervision and employees’ coping behavior. Employees in Taiwan have more voice coping behavior than China；Employees in China have more loyalty, neglect and exit coping behavior than Taiwan. However, these hypotheses were not supported by the empirical data. The contribution of this doctoral dissertation has two aspects .The theoretical: the doctoral dissertation can answer the research problem. The practical: this doctoral dissertation can offer insights into abusive supervision how to influence employees’ coping behavior.

以文找文

一、中文部分

吳宗祐(2008)，由不當督導到情緒耗竭：部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果，中華心理學刊，50(2)，201-221。 new window

胡昌亞，鄭瑩妮(2014)，不當督導研究回顧與前瞻，中華心理學刊，56(2)，191-214。 new window

許境頤，江彧慈(2013)，[罵]有用嗎？以資源保存理論看不當督導對部屬的影響，人力資源管理學報，13(1)，81-104。 new window

郭建志，蔡育菁(2012)，組織挫折與職場退縮：主管不當督導與工作內外控之研究，中華心理學刊，54(3)，293-313。 new window

陳儀蓉，余明助，王志聖(2007)，辱罵式管理對外勞組織公民行為的影響－從社會交換觀點探討領導者－部屬交換關係的中介效果，管理實務與理論研究，1(4)，186-203。 new window

彭台光，高月慈，林鉦棽(2006)，管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救，管理學報，23(1)，77-98。 new window

蔡孟穎(2013)，不當督導對員工組織承諾影響：權力距離為干擾效果，多國籍企業管理評論，7(2)，127-146。 new window

蔡孟穎(2014)，員工企業社會責任認知對組織公民行為影響：以組織承諾及組織正義為中介效果，文大商管學報，19(1)，39-62。

鄭仁偉，陳春希，袁梅玲，李姿瑩(2012)，不當督導、印象管理與退卻行為之研究－表層演出與深層演出的中介效果，輔仁管理評論，19(2)，1-27。 new window

二、英文部分

Allcorn, S. (1994). Anger in Workplace: Understanding the Cause of Aggression and Violence. Westport: Quorum books.

Andersson, L., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.

Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty Tyranny in Organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.

Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty Tyranny in Organizations: A Preliminary Examination of Antecedents and Consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 126-140.

Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress, and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 1-30.

Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among University Employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20(3), 173-184.

Boddy, C. (2011). Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace. Journal Of Business Ethics, 100(3), 367-379.

Brett, J. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Lytle, A. L. (1998). Breaking the Bonds of Reciprocity in Negotiations. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 410-424.

Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M.(2002).Emotion and Attribution of Intentionality in Leader-menber Relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 615-634.

Drogendijk, R., & Slangen, A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15(4), 361-380.

Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social Undermining in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331-351.

Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (1998). Social undermining and social support in the workplace, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. CA: San Diego.

Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., Lawrence, K. A., & Miner, R. K. (2002). Red light, green light: Making Sense of the Organizational Context for Issue Selling. Organization Science, 13(4), 355-369.

Fisher, C. D., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2000). The Emerging Role of Emotions in Work Life: An Introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 123-129.

Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When Tough Times Make Tough Bosses: Managerial Distancing as a Function of Layoff Blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1) , 79-87.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of Emotion and Coping during Three Stages of a College Examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150-170.
Harris, K., Kacmar, K., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 252-263.

Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264-280.

Hobman, E., Restubog, S., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. (2009). Abusive Supervision in Advising Relationships: Investigating the Role of Social Support. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(2), 233-256.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequence: International Differences in Work-related Values. CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85-117.

Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive Behavior in the Workplace: A Preliminary Investigation. Violence and Victims, 9(4), 341-357.

Kernan, M. C., Watson, S., Fang, F. C., & Kim, T. G. (2011). How cultural values affect the impact of abusive supervision on worker attitudes. Cross Cultural Management, 18(4), 464-484.

Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research In Personality, 44(4), 512-519.

Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of cultures consequences- A review of empirical research incorporating hofstedes cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320.

Kirkman, B. L. (2010). Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review of Hofstede’s Cultural Value Dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405-439.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1980). An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-aged Community Sample. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 21(3), 219-239.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Leck, J. D. (2003). Violence in the Canadian workplace. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(2), 308-315.

Lian, H., Lance Ferris, D. D., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse- How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 41-52.

Liu, J. (2010). Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor- directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 835-856.

Loh, J., Restubog, S., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2010). Consequences of workplace bullying on employee identification and satisfaction among Australians and Singaporeans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 36-52.

Manusov, V. (1989). How can you Resist me? Compliance Resistance among Friends. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. CA: San Francisco.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of hofstedes doctrine. Cross Cultural Management, 18(1), 10-20.

Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance and the Moderating Effects of Negative Reciprocity Beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159-1168.

Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational Silence： A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.

O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-motivated Aggression: A Research Framework. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 225-253.

Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1979). The Structure of Coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20(2), 202-205.

Powell, G. N. (1998). The Ausive Organization. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 95-96.

Schat, A. C. H., Frone, M. R., & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. workforce: Findings from a national study. In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling, & J. J. Hurrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence: 47- 89. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of cultures consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstedes cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405.

Taris, T. W., Peeters, M. C. W., LeBlanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2001). From inequity to burnout: The role of job stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 303-323.

Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.

Tepper, B., Carr, J., Breaux, D., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167.

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101-123.

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality Moderators of the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974-983.

Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of Abusive Supervision: Supervisor Perceptions of Deep-Level Dissimilarity, Relationship Conflict, and Subordinate Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279-294.

Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive Supervision, Upward Maintenance Communication, and Subordinates’ Psychological Distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169-1180.

Tepper, B. J., Schriesheim, C. A., Nehring, D., Nelson, R. J., Taylor, E. C., & Eisenbach, R. J. (1998). The Multi-dimensionality and Multi-functionality of Subordinates' Resistance to Downward Influence Attempt. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. CA: San Diego.

Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79-92.

Valle, M. (2005). A Preliminary Model of Abusive Behavior in Organization. Southern Business Review, 30, 27-35.

Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2001). Stress and justice in organizations： An exploration into justice processes with the aim to find mechanisms to reduce stress. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), From theory to practice: Vol.2. Justice in the workplace (pp. 27-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219-235.

Waldron, V. R. (1991). Achieving communication goals in superior-subordinate relationships: The multi-functionality of upward maintenance tactics. Communication Monographs, 58(3), 289-306.

Zohar, D. (1995). The justice perspective of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 487-495.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	「生命相伴」與「按表操課」間的擺盪：長照機構照顧服務員的情緒勞動初探
2.	職場情緒勒索量表之發展與驗證
3.	部屬啊！您有做自己的機會嗎？尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性：以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
4.	部屬難為：領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係：以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
5.	設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
6.	國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
7.	青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
8.	中醫診所形象對病患忠誠度的影響--知覺價值的中介作用
9.	中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
10.	轉換型領導、交易型領導、倫理氣候與情緒智力對房屋仲介經紀人員工作績效之影響--以信任管理者為中介變數
11.	居服員留任傾向之研究
12.	國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
13.	病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響：壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式
14.	重度工作投資與工作倦怠：健康促進與心理資本扮演之調節角色
15.	就事論事或將心比心？顧客不當對待與員工身心壓力的情緒歷程：壓力源評估與同理心特質的調節效果

1.	表面服從對工作家庭衝突及工作滿意度之影響：以員工情緒耗竭為中介因子之探討
2.	認定領導：理論建構、量表發展及效果驗證
3.	領導成員交換關係、工作資源、心理契約違反與離職傾向關聯之實證研究
4.	「知覺屈就」是自我膨脹：自我增強的動機及效果
5.	跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
6.	國民中學教師自我調節學習、驚輸、工作投入與組織公民行為關係之研究-以工作投入為中介變項
7.	全球化下台灣中小企業策略模式結構驗證之研究
8.	服務補救和關係銷售行為對顧客信任、滿意和忠誠度的影響
9.	主管領導方式與部屬知覺主管不當監督關係之研究
10.	品牌代理商降低拉式策略威脅之研究：三方交換關係觀點
11.	長期照顧機構照顧服務員之人力資源措施與組織公民行為之研究
12.	中高齡者參與樂齡核心課程學習與焦慮感關係之研究：以台中樂齡學習中心為例
13.	智慧資本與環境偵測對組織學習與組織控制效果之影響--以政府部門為例
14.	知覺組織支持對離職傾向之影響－工作滿足的中介效果與工作投入的調節式中介效果
15.	關係品質在企業社會責任與運動消費意圖之中介效果

1.	休閒管理與概論：休閒活動設計規劃個案
2.	校長競值領導效能研究 : 理論、指標與衡量
3.	成就動機對組織公民行為的影響--以領導者和部屬交換關係和團隊成員交換關係為調節效果
4.	國民小學校長毀壞型領導之研究
5.	臺港兩地工作者之工作壓力歷程--工作動機及因應策略之調節作用

無相關著作

1.	自私的慈善家--家族涉入與企業社會責任行為
2.	制度環境與民營企業績效--種群生態學和制度學派結合視角
3.	政府倫理
4.	社區倫理
5.	財務倫理
6.	企業倫理的重要性與發展
7.	光寶科技--企業社會責任的落實
8.	國民中小學校長不當督導影響主任對校長信任及幸福感之研究
9.	負面社會責任因子在多空市場趨勢的股價衝擊研究
10.	服務導向創新與企業社會責任：社會企業的角色
11.	企業推動志願服務模式：拓凱實業的行動分析
12.	企業倫理與企業社會責任意涵之探討
13.	企業社會責任與財務績效的關聯
14.	我國企業社會責任之實踐--《高齡社會白皮書》提供的機會
15.	全球化脈絡下中國大陸儒學傳播策略之分析：以「孔子學院」發展為觀察

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫