:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣第一代大學生的背景和特質:臺灣和美國的發現一樣嗎?
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:黃雅容
作者(外文):Huang, Ya-rong
出版日期:2008
卷期:53:2
頁次:頁111-130
主題關鍵詞:父母教育程度第一代大學生選系選校Parental educationFirst-generation college studentsChoosing majorsChoosing schools
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:546
  • 點閱點閱:59
第一代大學生,即父母沒有受過大學教育的大學生,獲得美國學術界和政府機構的關注,在台灣則尚未受到注意,因此,本文以台灣高等教育資料庫94 學年度大一學生問卷調查為分析資料,探討台灣第一代大學生的背景和特質。本研究主要發現如下:相較於其他學生,第一代大學生女性、低收入戶的比例較高,父親是外省人的比例較低;他們就讀技職體系和私立學校的比例較高,入學前的學業成就較低;在選校和選系時,他們比較重視經濟因素、學校地理位置因素、務實因素,對朋友同學的建議重視程度較高;他們重視的人生目標和其他學生不同,未來規劃要再念國內外研究所的比例較低。這些背景和特質基本上與美國第一代大學生相似,大部份可用文化資本和社會資本的概念去理解。
American researchers, and in particular the National Center for Educational Statistics of the U.S. Department of Education, have found first-generation college students (FGCSs)--students whose parents are not college-educated--to be dissimilar from more traditional college students, and to be at a disadvantage in several respects. To understand whether FGCSs in Taiwan face a similar situation, this study investigated the backgrounds and characteristics of FGCSs in Taiwan. Using data drawn from the 2005 Freshman Survey in the Taiwan Higher Education Database, this study compared FGCSs with non-FGCSs on five issues. The major findings were as follows: First, the FGCSs in Taiwan, as compared with the "traditional" college students in Taiwan, were more likely to be female, to come from low-income families, and to be less likely to have a father who came from mainland China. Second, FGCSs were more likely to be on the vocational and technical track rather than the general education track, and to study at private colleges and universities. Third, FGCSs on average got lower scores on the standardized college entrance tests. Fourth, in choosing schools and majors, FGCSs were concerned more about costs and scholarships, school locations and job opportunities, and less about a school's prestige or their own academic interests and abilities. Fifth, Taiwan's FGCSs placed greater importance on "being successful in one's own business" and "having a happy family," and cared less about goals associated with wealth, achievement, status, and spiritual life. They were less likely to pursue advanced study after they graduated. The backgrounds and characteristics of FGCSs in Taiwan turned out to have much in common with their American counterparts, and supported expectations based on "cultural and social capital" concepts.
期刊論文
1.林大森、陳憶芬(20061200)。臺灣高中生參加補習之效益分析。教育研究集刊,52(4),35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Astin, A. W.(1999)。Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education。Journal of College Student Development,40(5),518-529。  new window
3.Huang, T. R.、Chang, S. M.(2003)。Academic and cocurricular involvement: Their relationship and the best combinations for student growth。Journal of College Student Development,45(4),391-406。  new window
4.陳麗如(20050600)。父母對子女學習的影響--家庭資源之探討。教育與社會研究,9,121-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊,29(2),117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭燿男、陳怡靖(20000600)。臺灣地區家庭背景對就讀公/私立學校與受教育年數的影響:並檢證文化資本論財務資本論社會資本論之適用性。國民教育研究學報,6,103-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.簡茂發(19840600)。高級中學學生家庭社經背景、教師期望與學業成就之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,26,1-97。  延伸查詢new window
9.Teachman, Jay D.(1987)。Family Background, Educational Resources, and Educational Attainment。American Sociological Review,52(4),548-557。  new window
10.李文益(20040600)。文化資本、多元入學管道與學生學習表現--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許崇憲(20021000)。家庭背景因素與子女學業成就之關係--臺灣樣本的後設分析。中正教育研究,1(2),25-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳婉琪(20051200)。族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異。臺灣社會學,10,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
14.蘇健華(2002)。淺談家庭背景與教育取得。網路社會學通訊期刊,23。  延伸查詢new window
15.Rodriguez, S.(2003)。What Helps Some First-generation Students Succeed。About Campus,40796,17-22。  new window
16.Inman, W. E.、Mayes, L. D.(1999)。The Importance of Being First: Unique Characteristics of First-generation Community College Students。Community College Review,26(4),3-22。  new window
17.McConnell, Peggy J.(2000)。ERIC Review: What Community Colleges Should Do to Assist First-generation Students。Community College Review,28(3),75-87。  new window
18.Van T. Bui, K.(2002)。First-generation College Students at a Four-year University: Background Characteristics, Reasons for Pursuing Higher Education, and First-year Experience。College Student Journal,36(1),3-11。  new window
19.Terenzini, P. T.、Springer, L.、Yaeger, P. M.、Pascarella, E. T.、Nora, A.(1996)。First-college Students: Characteristics, Experiences, and Cognitive Development。Research in Higher Education,37(1),1-22。  new window
20.Riehl, R. J.(1994)。The Academic Preparation, Aspirations, and First-year Performance of First-generation Students。College and University,70(1),14-19。  new window
21.Pascarella, E. T.、Pierson, C. T.、Wolniak, G. C.、Terenzini, P. T.(2004)。First-generation College Students: Additional Evidence on College Experiences and Outcomes。The Journal of Higher Education,75(3),249-284。  new window
研究報告
1.Education Resources Institution、Institute for Higher Education Policy(1997)。Missed Opportunities: A New Look at Disadvantaged College Aspirants。Boston, MA/ Washington, DC。  new window
2.Nomi, T.(2005)。Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-generation Community College Students。0。  new window
3.Horn, L.、Nunez, A.(2000)。Mapping the Road to College: First-generation Students' Math Track, Planning Strategies, and Context of Support, U.S. Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
4.Chen, X.(2005)。First-generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at Their College Transcripts, U.S. Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
5.Nunez, A.、Cuccaro-Alamin, S.(1998)。First-generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
6.Berkner, L.、Chavez, L.(1997)。Access to Postsecondary Education for the 1992 High School Graduates, U.S. Department of Education。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Coleman, J. S.(1988)。Equality of educational opportunity。Salem, NH:Ayer Company。  new window
2.Kuh, G. D.、Schuh, J. H.、Whitt, E. J.、Andreas, R. E.、Lyons, J. W.、Strange, C. C.、Krehbiel, L. E.、Mackay, K. A.(1991)。Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.楊瑩(1995)。教育機會均等--教育社會學的探究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.戴曉霞(2000)。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊--我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實證研究。台北市:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Brooks-Terry, M.(1988)。Tracing the Disadvantages of First-generation College Students: An Application of Sussman's Option Sequence Model。Family Support Systems across the Life Span。New York, NY。  new window
8.Pace, C. R.(1990)。The Undergraduates。The Undergraduates。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.謝小芩(1995)。教育:從父權的複製到女性的解放。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Trow, Martin(1974)。Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education。Policies for Higher Education: General Report。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)。  new window
3.Bourdieu, Pierre(1977)。Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction。Power and Ideology in Education。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE