:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國師資培育革新的憲法基礎探究:教育基本權保障觀點
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:王等元 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Teng-yuan
出版日期:2016
卷期:19:4=60
頁次:頁65-92
主題關鍵詞:師資培育法教育基本權標準本位師資培育憲法釋義學Teacher Education ActEducation basic rightsStandards-based teacher educationInterpretative epistemology of the constitution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:619
  • 點閱點閱:75
我國推動教育改革已逾20年,惟其依據之法律的正當性基礎如何?殊值探究。職是,本文旨從教育基本權保障觀點,以憲法釋義學方法,探究我國師資培育革新之法的正當性基礎。本文之結論與建議:一、我國《師資培育法》所建構之師資培育體系似欠缺完整性,在職教師專業發展亟待法制化;二、國民教育基本權與師資培育法制二者間具有相當關聯性,師資培育革新可做為教育基本權之國家保護義務之一;三、標準本位師資培育可做為我國未來10年師資培育革新之組織與程序保障機制;四、憲法法治國原則可導出我國《憲法》第162條「全國公私立之教育文化機關,依法律受國家之監督」,以之做為師資培育革新之正當性基礎。
We have carried out educational reforms for more than twenty years in Taiwan, and have launched the 12-Year Basic Education since 2014. The experiences we have had indicate that teacher education reforms have always been the key issue to education reforms in Taiwan. This study aims to discuss the constitutional rationale of teacher education reforms by interpretative epistemology of the Constitution from an education basic rights perspective. Research findings are as follows: 1. The Teacher Education System built on Teacher Education Act does not seem to be sound enough; 2. The teacher education is related to education basic rights; 3. The Standards-based Teacher Education is viewed as the protection mechanism of organization and process for teacher education reforms in the coming decade; and 4. The Article 162 induced by the Constitutional Rule-by-law Rules is viewed as the constitutional rationale of teacher education reforms.
期刊論文
1.曾大千(20030200)。論教育基本權的內涵與功能。教育政策論壇,6(1),63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭淑芳(20130600)。我國師資培育數量規劃政策實施之效能分析。測驗統計年刊,21(上),61-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李奉儒(20110300)。英國師資培育認證制度之探究。教育研究與發展期刊,7(1),53-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃嘉莉(20081200)。英國教師素質管理政治理性的轉變:治理性的分析。中正教育研究,7(2),129-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Darling-Hammond, L.(1999)。Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report。Educational Research,27(1),3-15。  new window
6.Valli, L.、Rennert-Ariev, P.(2002)。New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education。Journal of Curriculum Studies,34(2),201-225。  new window
7.McMahon, A.(1992)。Teacher appraisal: Development and accountability。Journal of Teacher Development,1(1),19-28。  new window
8.許宗力(2002)。基本權利:第二講--基本權的功能。月旦法學教室,2,72-80。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭淑芳、張明文(20140900)。師資培育制度改革回顧與展望。教育研究月刊,245,41-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Buday, M. C.、Kelly, J. A.(1993)。National board certification and the teaching profession's commitment to quality assurance。Phi Delta Kappan,78(3),215-219。  new window
11.Rose, Nikolas、Miller, Peter(1992)。Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government。The British Journal of Sociology,43(2),173-205。  new window
12.周志宏(19990500)。社會權--總論、教育權。月旦法學,48,127-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Cochran-Smith, M.(2001)。Higher standards for prospective teachers: What's missing from the discourse?。Journal of Teacher Education,52(3),179-181。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2010)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(99年版)。臺北市:教育部中等教育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2008)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(九十六年版)。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2010)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(98年)。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2009)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(97年)。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2013)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(102年)。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳佩琪(1995)。父母在學校教育上之權利(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Darling-Hammond, L.(2000)。Solving dilemmas of teacher supply, demand and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child。New York, NY:National Commission on Teaching & America's Future。  new window
2.韓忠謨(2002)。法學緒論。臺北市:韓忠謨。  延伸查詢new window
3.Office for Standards in Education & Teacher Training Agency(1996)。Framework for the assessment of quality and standards in initial teacher training 1996/97。London, UK:Office for Standards in Education & Teacher Training Agency。  new window
4.法治斌、董保城(2014)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
5.National Commission on Teaching and America's Future(1996)。What matters most: Teaching for America's Future。New York, NY:National Commission on Teaching and America's Future。  new window
6.Department for Education and Employment(1998)。Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998。London:Department for Education and Employment。  new window
7.Department for Education and Employment(1998)。Teachers: Meeting the challenge of change。Department for Education and Employment。  new window
8.周志宏(19970000)。教育法與教育改革。新北市板橋:稻鄉出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.許慶雄(1992)。社會權論。臺北:月旦法學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.許慶雄(2000)。憲法入門。臺北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.李建良(1999)。憲法理論與實踐。臺北:新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.David, C.、Philip, T.(2001)。Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning。Aldershot:Ashgate。  new window
13.教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書:發揚師道、百年樹人。教育部師資培育與藝術教育司。  延伸查詢new window
14.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.許育典(20050000)。教育憲法與教育改革。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.許育典(20020000)。法治國與教育行政:以人的自我實現為核心的教育法。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.許育典(2007)。教育法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳新民(19990000)。憲法基本權利之基本理論。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃武雄(1995)。臺灣教育的重建。臺北:遠流出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳鏗任(2012)。教師需求量估得準嗎?美國百年經驗與問題,https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=496。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2006)。師資培育素質提升方案,http://www.edu.tw/files/regulation/B0037/5668950307.doc, 。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊深坑、黃嘉莉(2011)。各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況之比較分析。各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況。臺北:教育部。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭崇趁(2001)。探尋教育改革的發展脈絡。教育改革與教育發展。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃嘉莉(2012)。美國師資培育認證制度之研究。各國師資培育認證制度之比較。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sykes, G.(1992)。Teacher licensure and certification。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York, NY:American Educational Research Association。  new window
5.Yinger, R.(1999)。The role of standards in teaching and teacher education。The education of teachers: Ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the study of education。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文(2012)。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。我國百年教育回顧與展望。臺北:國家教育研究院。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林志成、張淑玲(2010)。師資培育的回顧省思與前瞻展望。師資培育的危機與轉機。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.覃壯才(2002)。國家教育櫂與社會教育櫂的權力行使模式探析。中國教育法制評論。北京:教育科學。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇進棻(2014)。師資培育教育改革20年的回顧與前瞻。教改20年:回顧與前瞻。臺北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.伍振鷟、黃士嘉(2002)。台灣地區師範教育政策之發展( 1945 - 2001 )。師資培育的政策與檢討。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE