:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:混齡教學於國中小階段之實施方式與支持措施--多重個案探究
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:林欣毅鄭章華廖素嫻
作者(外文):Lin, Hsin-yiChen, Chang-huaLiao, Su-hsien
出版日期:2016
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁1-31
主題關鍵詞:少子化合作學習協同教學差異化教學探究式教學法混齡教學Cooperative learningDifferentiated instructionInquiry-based instructionMixed-age teachingTeam teachingLow birth rate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:154
為因應少子化導致學生人數漸減的趨勢,以及有效整合、善用學校資源,提供學生適性學習的機會,實施混齡教學有其重要性。本研究進行文獻分析、課室觀察及訪談,探討現行實施混齡教學的原因、方式與支持措施,並提出具體建議。研究發現以下三點,首先,混齡教學的原因可分為:因教育理念而實施混齡教學、因現實考量而實施混齡教學;混齡教學的實施方式至少包括:探究式教學、協同教學、合作學習、差異化教學法。另外,混齡教學的支持措施則從教師專業成長、課程規畫、學校行政支持三方面進行分析與論述。整體而言,混齡教學的實施不論在師資培育、教師專業成長、課程規畫、教學實施、行政措施等方面,皆需有更多的支持與配套。關於國中小混齡教學之研究在國內仍屬於初探階段,期待未來能有更多不同面向與不同研究方法之相關研究投入,俾使教育研究社群對於混齡教學能有更多的理解與運用。
As a result of low birth rate and population decline, mixed-age teaching is critical for accommodating the needs of classes with fewer students and for effectively integrating and utilizing school resources to provide students with adaptive learning opportunities. Through literature analysis, classroom observations, and interviews, the underlying reasons for mixed age teaching, methods of implementation and support measures employed by schools are explored. The findings of this study are as follows: 1) The justifications for mixed-age teaching are based on educational philosophy and practical considerations; 2) mixed-age teaching is implemented through four approaches; namely, inquiry-based instruction, team teaching, cooperative learning, and differentiated instruction; and 3) measures for supporting mixed-age teaching can be analyzed and discussed from three aspects: teachers’ professional development, curriculum planning, and school administration support. Overall, implementing mixed-age teaching requires further support on aspects of pre-service teacher education, professional development, curriculum planning, teaching implementation, and administrative measures. Studies on mixed-age teaching in elementary and junior high schools in Taiwan are preliminary. The results of the studies may assist the educational research community in understanding and implementing mixed-age teaching.
期刊論文
1.Hanushek, Eric A.(1989)。The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance。Educational Researcher,18(4),45-51+62。  new window
2.丘愛鈴(20010700)。勇闖愛麗絲仙境--跨年級協同教學之設計與實施。師友月刊,409,54-58。  延伸查詢new window
3.林書伶、蕭夏玉、萊素珠(2010)。混齡編班幼兒教師運作課程之研究。醫護科技期刊,12(3),212-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bennett, N.、O'Hare, E.、Lee, J.(1983)。Mixed age classes in primary schools: A survey of practice。British Educational Research Journal,9(1),41-56。  new window
5.Cohen, D.、Raudenbush, S.、Ball, D.(2003)。Resource, instruction, and research。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,25(2),119-142。  new window
6.Hanushek, E. A.(1981)。Throwing money at schools。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,1(1),19-41。  new window
7.Hyry-Beihammer, E. K.、Hascher, T.(2015)。Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools。International Journal of Educational Research,74,104-113。  new window
8.Lindström, E.-A.、Lindahl, E.(2011)。The effect of mixed-age classes in Sweden。Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,55(2),121-144。  new window
9.Song, R.、Spradlin, T. E.、Plucker, J. A.(2009)。The advantages and disadvantages of multiage classrooms in the era of NCLB accountability。Center for Evaluation and Education Policy,7(1),1-8。  new window
10.Morton, C.、Harmon, H. L.(2011)。Challenges and sustainability practices of frontier schools in Montana。Rural Education,33(1),1-14。  new window
11.Stuart, S. K.、Connor, M.、Cady, K.、Zweifel, A.(2006)。Multiage instruction and inclusion: A collaborative approach。International Journal of Whole Schooling,3(1),12-26。  new window
12.Shenton, Andrew K.(2004)。Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects。Education for Information,22(2),63-75。  new window
13.蔡銘津(20120300)。少子女化的教育政策走向與應變。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(5),1-7。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪振方(20031200)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報,15(3),641-662。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Anderson, R. H.(1992)。The nongraded elementary school: Lessons from history。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2013)。教育統計指標(102年版)。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院經濟建設委員會(2012)。中華民國2012年至2060年人口推計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Gomes, M. L.(2013)。Bridging the gap of a professional learning community as a support system in South Africa for multigrade teachers and principals: Working together for collective learning and its implementation(博士論文)。Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa。  new window
圖書
1.Tomlinson, C. A.(2001)。How to differentiate Instruction in mixed-ability classrooms。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
2.簡成熙(2004)。教育哲學:理念、專題與實務。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.Stake, Robert E.(1995)。The Art of Case Study Research。Sage Publications。  new window
4.陳之華(2013)。沒有資優班。台北:木馬文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Coleman, J.、Campbell, E.、Hobsen, C.、McPartland, J.、Mood, A.、Weinfeld, F.、York, R.(1966)。Equality of educational opportunity survey。Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
6.Little, Angela W.(2006)。Education for all and multigrade teaching: Challenges and opportunities。Springer。  new window
7.Laud, L.(2011)。Using formative assessment to differentiate mathematics instruction。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
8.Small, M.(2012)。Good questions: Great way to differentiate mathematics instruction。New York, NY:Teacher College Press。  new window
9.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Yin, Robert K.(2014)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage。  new window
11.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
12.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
13.黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bogdan, R. C.、Biklen, S. K.(2007)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods。Pearson。  new window
單篇論文
1.Katz, L. G.,Chard, S.(1995)。The benefits of mixed-age grouping(ED382411)。  new window
其他
1.劉偉瑩(20150316)。混齡教學試式行為實驗校鋪路,http://www.mdnkids.com/info/news/advjistdetail.asp?serial=92380。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教肓課程綱要總綱,http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_5320_2729842_56626.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃意舒(2000)。混齡教學,http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1310511/?index=l。  new window
4.Berry, C.(2004)。Mixed age classes in urban primary schools: Perceptions of head teachers,http://multigrade.ioe.ac.uk/fulltext/fulLtextBerrymixedage.pdf。  new window
5.Fisher, R.,Lewis, M.,Davis, B.(2000)。The implementation of the literacy hour in small rural schools,http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED446879.pdf。  new window
6.Leuven, E.,Running, M.(2011)。Classroom grade composition and pupil achievement,http://ftp.iza.org/dp5922.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE