刁筱華(譯)(1996)。R. Tong著。女性主義思潮(Feminist Thought : A More Comprehensive Introduction)。台北市：時報文化。
王恭志、黃月美、楊俊鴻(譯)，莊明貞審訂 (2006)。W.E.Doll與 N.Gough編。課程願景(Curriculum visions)。台北市：高等教育。
石計生(2001)。資訊社會與社會學理論— 一個馬克思主義的論述傳統與批判，當代，171：10-33。
叶瀾（1999）。教育研究方法論初探。上海市：上海教育出版社。
卯靜儒 (2004)。從新馬克思主義到後結構主義---課程社會學研究的再概念化，教育研究集刊，50 (1)：119-142。
林長杰(譯) (2004)。Gilles Deleuze與Felix Guattari著。何謂哲學？(Qu’est-ce que la philosophie)。台北市：台灣商務印書館。
朱耀偉(1996)。當代西方批評論述的中國圖像。台北市：駱駝出版社。
李子建(2008，5月)。環境教育與課程改革。載於國立花蓮教育大學舉辦之「課程與教學改革的理論與實務國際學術研討會暨第十八屆課程與教學論壇」會議手冊(頁49-60)，花蓮縣。
沈慧萍（2003）。過去/　現在 / 未來的交會─ 一位國中特殊班老師生命史研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
周怡君(2008) 。教師即陌生人---一位教師探索課程第三空間的生命敘說。國立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
周佩儀(2006)。從父權荒野的放逐到親密母土的回歸---女性主義課程理論的奧狄賽之旅，課程與教學季刊，9 (4)：1-18。
周淑卿 (2005)。課程解構或理論建構？---後現代課程論之再思。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會舉辦之「後現代課程~實踐與評鑑」會議手冊(頁71-82)，台北市。
吳臻幸（2001）。我的班、我的故事-國小導師形塑班風歷程的敘說性研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林玉体(1995)。西洋教育思想史。台北：三民書局。
洪蘭 (2008)。不會背論語不是錯。天下，389，168。
高宣揚 (1999)。後現代論。台北：五南。
高新建、魏柔宜 (2007)。杏壇老頑童：黃炳煌的真與諍。台北：頂點文化事業。
莊明貞（2002）。後現代思潮的課程研究及其本土實踐評析。教育研究月刊，102，27-39 。
釭硠t（2004）。William Pinar 課程理解典範之探究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
釭硠t (2006)。課程概念重建的發展與爭議---兼論其在課程理解典範之重要性，師大學報：教育類，51 (2)，195-217。
張宏育 (2008，5月)。William Pinar 自傳式課程探究及其在台灣課程研究應用的可能性，發表於國立花蓮教育大學舉辦之「課程與教學改革的理論與實務國際學術研討會暨第十八屆課程與教學論壇」，花蓮縣。
張定綺 (譯) (2005)。Bill Watterson著。凱文的幻虎世界─到處都挖得到寶! (There is Treasure Everywhere)。台北市：貝塔語言出版。
張寧 (譯) (2004)。Jacques Derrida著。書寫與差異 (L’ écriture et la différence )。台北市：麥田出版。
張華（2001）。走向課程理解：西方課程理論新進展。全球教育展望，7，40-49。
陳伯璋（1983）。課程研究的第三勢力---美國再概念化學派課程理論之評介。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，25，129-226。
黃永和 (2001)。後現代課程理論之研究：一種有機典範的課程觀。台北市：師大書苑。
黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計---理論與實際。台北市：五南。
黃書祥 (2007)。國小社會教科書家庭概念之批判論述分析－以K版第一冊第一單元為例。國立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
黃瑞祺（1996）。批判社會學---批判理論與現代社會學。台北：三民書局。
黃瑞祺（2000）。現代與後現代。台北：巨流圖書公司。
黃瑞祺（2003）。編者序。載於黃瑞祺（主編），後學新論：後現代/後結構/後殖民，頁6-9。台北市：左岸。
黃新成等主編（2002）。法漢大辭典。上海市：上海譯文出版社。
路況(2000)。解構死刑---德希達的最後一堂課，當代，153：4-9。
楊大春 (1994)。解構理論。台北市：揚智。
楊大春（1996）。後結構主義。台北市：揚智。
楊俊鴻（2002a）。Stuart Hall文化研究中的「認同」與「再現」及其在課程研究上的蘊義。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
楊俊鴻（2002b）。從後現代的再現觀談課程研究的新趨勢。教育研究月刊，102，67-75。
楊俊鴻、蔡清田(2007)。課程研究方法論的轉向---從結構到後結構，國教學報，19，313-338。
楊深坑（2002）。科學理論與教育學發展。台北市：心理。
楊凱麟 (2003，12月)。德勒茲哲學中的思想與特異性，發表於台灣哲學學會舉辦之「2003年度學術研討會暨年會」，台北市。
曹爾東、傅德根譯（1992/2001）。Habermas,J.原著。後形而上學思想。南京：譯林出版社。
歐用生（1984）。課程研究方法論：課程研究的社會學分析。高雄市：復文。
歐用生（1999）。新法令需有新土壤---評九年一貫課程的配套措施，國民教育，39（6）2-9。
歐用生 (2005a )。幼兒園課程是自傳文本，吳鳳技術學院學報，13，365-378。
歐用生 (2005b)。課程再概念化---系譜和風貌，載於游家政、莊梅枝(主編)，後現代課程~實踐與評鑑(頁17-40)。台北縣：中華民國教材研究發展學會。
歐用生 (2006)。課程理論與實踐。台北市：學富文化。
歐用生（2007）。詩性智慧及其對課程研究的啟示，課程與教學季刊，10 (3) ，1-16。
歐用生（2008）。我的課程旅程－台灣課程研究的典範轉移。未出版手稿。
蔡清田(2008)。課程學。台北市：五南。
蔡清田、楊俊鴻 (2008)。再概念化之後的課程發展，當代教育研究季刊，16 (2)，133-142。
鍾鴻銘（1994）。派納課程研究方法論之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
鍾鴻銘（2008）。William Pinar 自傳式課程研究法之探析，課程與教學季刊，11 (1) ，223-244。
Alvesson,M. & Sköldberg,K.（2000）. Reflexive methodology：New vistas for qualitative research .London：Sage .
Appel , S.（1998）. Jacques Lancan：Ideal-I and image , subject, and signification .In M. Peters（Ed.）,Naming the multiple：Postructuralism and education（pp.25-47） . Westport ,Connecticut：Bergin & Garvey .
Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Aoki,T.(1988). Toward a dialectic between the conceptual world and the lived world. In W. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.402-416). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scayisbrick .
Aoki, T.T.(2003) . Locating living pedagogy in teacher “research”: Five metonymic moments .In E. Hasebe-Ludt & W. Hurren (Eds.), Curriculum intertext: Place, language, pedagogy (pp.1-10). New York：Peter Lang .
Aoki, Ted T.,& Aoki, D (December 2003). Interview . Educational Insights, 8 (2). [Available:http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v08n02/celebrate/interview.html]
Bhabha, H., & Rutherford, J. (1990). The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 207-221). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London & New York: Routledge.
Biesta , G. J.J & Egea-Kuehne , D.（2001）（Eds.）. Derrida and education . London ：Routledge .
Black, N.、 Smeyers , P.、Smith, R.& Standish ,P.（1998）. Thinking Again：Education After Postmodernism .Westport：Bergin & Garvey .
Blackburn, S.（1994）. The oxford dictionary of philosophy . Oxford：Oxford University Press .
Block, A.A.（1998）. Curriculum as affichiste：Popular culture and identity，In W. Pinar, （Ed.）, Curriculum : Toward new identities(pp.325-341). New York: Garland Publishing.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
Bobbitt, F.（1918）. Scientific method in curriculum-making , in Flinders , D.J. & Thorton , S.J.（1997）（eds.）. The curriculum studies reader . New York：Routledge .
Britzman, D. P. (1998) . Lost Subjects, Contested Objects: Toward a Psychoanalytic Inquiry of Learning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Britzman,D.P.（2000）. “The question of belief”：Writing poststructural ethnography，In E .SA .Pierre & W. S. Pillow（Eds.）, Working the ruins :Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education（pp.27-40） . New York : Routledge .
Britzman,D.P.(2003). After-Education:Anna Freud, Melanie Klein, and Psychoanalytic Histories of Learning. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Brown, J. R.（2001）. Who rules in science . Cambridge,MA.：Harvard University Press .
Brown , T. & Jones, L.（2001）. Action research and postmodernism : Congruence and critique. Buckingham：Open University Press .
Burbules,N. C.（1995）. Forms of Ideology-Critique：A Pedagogy Perspective，in McLaren, P.L.& Giarelli, J.M.（eds.）. Critical theory and educational research （pp.53-69）.New York：State University of NewYork Press.
Cary, L. J. (2006). Curriculum Spaces: Discourse, Postmodern Theory and Educational Research . New York :Peter Lang .
Castells, M.& Ince, M. (2003). Conversations with Manuel Castells . Cambridge: Polity Press .
Charters, W. W.(1923). Curriculum construction. New York: Macmillan.
Cherryholmes, C. H.(1988). Power and criticism：Poststructural investigations in education . New York：Teachers College Press .
Cherryholmes, C. H.(1999). Reading pragmatism . New York :Teachers College Press .
Cherryhomes, C.H.（2002）. Curriculum ghost and visions-and what to do？. In W.E. Doll & N. Gough,（Eds.）,Curriculum visions (pp.116-126). New York：Peter Lang .
Cole,P. & O’Riley ,P. (2002) . Much Rezadieux about(Dewey’s) Goats in the Curriculum : Looking Back on Tomorrow Yesterday . In W.E. Doll & N. Gough（Eds.）,Curriculum visions(pp.132-148) . New York：Peter Lang .
Crotty ,M.（1998）. The foundations of social research ：Meaning and perspective in the research process. London ：Sage Publications .
Daignault,J.(1992). Traces at Work from Different Place. In W. F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds(Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp.195-215). New York :Teachers College Press .
Deleuze, G. (1990) .Logic of Sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.) . New York：Columbia University Press . (Original work published 1969 )
Deleuze, G.(1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton Trans.). New York：Columbia University Press .
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972–1990 ( M. Joughin, Trans.) . New York：Columbia University Press .(Original work published 1990 )
Deleuze,G.& Guattari,F.(1983). Anti-Oedipus : Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F.（1987）. A thousand Plateaus：Capitalism and schizophrenia (B.Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis：The University of Minnesota Press . (Original work published 1980 )
Deleuze, G. & Parnet,C.(1987) . Dialogues (H.Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press . (Original work published 1977 )
Derrida,J.（1981）. Positions (A. Bass, Trans.) . Chicago：University of Chicago Press .
Derrida,J.（1985）. The ear of the other . London：University of Nebraska Press .
Derrida,J.（1991）. A Derrida Reader: Between the blinds (P. Kamuf , Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press .
Doll,M. A.(2005). Capacity and Currere . Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 21 (3) , 21-28 .
Doll,W.E.（2004）. Preface，in Hongyu Wang . The Call from the Stranger on a Journey Home: Curriculum in a Third Space (pp.ix-xi) . New York：Peter Lang .
Doll,W.E. & Gough, N.（2002）（Eds.）. Curriculum visions . New York：Peter Lang .
Dupré ,J.（2001）. Human nature and the limits of science .Oxford：Oxford University Press .
Eagleton, T. (1983) . Literary Theory: An introduction. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Eisner, E.（1979）. The educational imagination：On the design and evaluation of school programs . New York：Macmillan .
Ellsworth, E.（1989）. “Why Doesn’t this Feel Impowering？ Working Thought the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy，in C. Luke & J. Gore（1992）（Eds.）Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy（pp.90-119）. New York and London：Routledge .
Eppert,C.& Wang,Hongyu（2008） (Eds.) .Cross-Cultural Studies in Curriculum :Eastern Thought, Educational Insights. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Evers,C.W.（1999）. From Foundations to Coherence in Educational Research，in Keeves, J.P. & Lakomski, G.（eds.）. Issues in Educational Research （pp.264-279）. Oxford：Pergamon .
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York,NY: Longman .
Fendler , L.（1998）. What is it impossible to think？A genealogy of the educated subject . In T.S.Popkewitz & M.Brennan（Eds.）,Foucault’s challenge： Discourse, knowledge, and power in education （pp.39-63）. New York：Teachers College Press .
Fetzer , J. H.（2001）. Computers and cognition ：Why minds are not machines. Dordrecht ：Kluwer Academic Publishers .
Feyerabend , P.（1993）. Against method（3th ed.）. London：Verso .
Fink-Eitel,H.（1992）. Foucault：A introduction . Philadelphia：Pennbridge Books .
Fleener, M .J .（2002）.Curriculum dynamics：Recreating heart . New York：Peter Lang .
Foucault, M.（1972）.The archaeology of knowledge . London：Tavistock .
Foucault, M.（1977a）.Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison ( A.Sheridan Trans.) . New York: Vintage .
Foucault,M.(1977b). Nietzche, Geneaology, History. In D.Bouchard (Ed.) ,Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: selected essaysand interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 139-164). New York: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self: The history of sexuality, Vol. 3. (Trans. Robert Hurley). New York: Pantheon . (Original works published 1984)
Foucault, M. (1988) .Technologies of the Self. In Martin. L, H. & Gutman, H. et al (eds). Technologies of the Self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M.（1991）. Governmentality. In Burchell、Gordon & Miller（eds.）. The Foucault effect：Studies in governmentality（pp.87-104）. Chicago： University of Chicago Press .
Foucault, M. (1997) .Ethics：Subjectivity and Truth. In Rabinow, P. (ed.) Michel Foucault: Ethics ''The Essential Works 1''. London: Allen Lane.
Foucault, M. (1999) .Michel Foucault and Zen . In J. Carrette (Ed.), Religion and Culture (pp.110-114). Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1969 )
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
Gavey, N. (1997). Feminist Poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In M.M. Gergen & S.N. Davis (eds.), Toward a New Psychology of Gender :A Reader (pp.49-64) . New York: Rutledge .
Giddens, A.（1990）. The consequences of modernity . London：Polity Press .
Giroux , H.（1997）. Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope：Theory , Cultural and Schooling. Oxford：Westview Press .
Goodson, I. F.& Sikes, P.（2001）. Life history research in educational settings：Learning from lives . Buckingham ：Open University .
Griffin , D. R.（1988）（Ed.）. The Reenchantment of science ：Postmodern proposals . Albany, N.Y.：State University of New York Press .
Grumet,M.(1992) . Existential and Phenomenological Foundations of Autobiographical Methods . In W.F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp.28-43). New York :Teachers College Press .
Grundy, S.（1987）. Curriculum：Product or Praxis？New York：The Falmer Press .
Haggerson ,N.L.（2000）.Expanding curriculum research and understanding：A mytho-poetic perspective . New York：Peter Lang .
Hall, J.（1999）. Cultures of inquiry：From epistemology to discourse in sociohistorical research . Camberidge：Camberidge University Press .
Hall, S.（1992）. The question of cultural identity，in Hall, S., Held, D. & McGrew,T.（eds .）, Modernity and its futures (pp. 273-325) . Cambridge : Polity Press.
Hall, S.（1997）. The work of representation . In Hall, S.（Ed.）, Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. (pp. 13-64). London : Sage.
Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Mastering the infinite game: How Asian values are transforming business practice. Oxford: Capstone Press.
Harding , S.（1986）.The science question in feminism . Ithaca :Cornell University Press .
Harding , S.（1991）. Whose science? Whose knowledge? :thinking from women''s lives . Milton Keynes ：Open University Press .
Harding , S.（1998）. Is science multicultural ？Postcolonialism, Feminism & Epistemologies . Bloomington & Indianapolis：Indiana University Press .
Harding , S. & Hintikka , M.（1983）（Eds.）. Discovering reality :Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science . Dordrecht： Reidel .
Hasebe-Ludt, E. & Hurren , W. （2003）(Eds.). Curriculum intertext: Place, language, pedagogy. New York：Peter Lang .
Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and curriculum. London: R.K.P.
Hlebowitsh,P.S. (1993) . Radical Curriculum Theory Revisited . New York:. Teachers College Press.
Hlebowitsh,P.S.(1999) . The Burdens of the New Curricularist , Curriculum Inquiry, 29 (3) , 343-354 .
Holmes , L.（1998）. Julia Kristeva：Intertextuality and education . In M. Peters（Ed.）,Naming the multiple：Postructuralism and education（pp.85-102） . Westport, Connecticut：Bergin & Garvey .
Hwu ,Wen-Song. (1998) . Curriculum, Transcendence, and Zen/Taoism: Critical Ontology of the Self. In W. Pinar（Ed.）, Curriculum:toward new identities（pp.21-40）. New York: Garland Publ.
Jardine,D. W. (2008). Foreword : “The Sickness of the West” . In Eppert,C.& Wang,Hongyu (Eds.) .Cross-Cultural Studies in Curriculum :Eastern Thought, Educational Insights(ix-xv). New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Kennedy, K. & Lee, J.C.K. (2008). The changing role of schools in Asian societies: Schools for the knowledge society. New York/London: Routledge.
Kincheloe, J. L.(1998) . Pinar’s Currere and Identity in Hyperreality: Grounding the Post-Formal Notion of Intrapersonal Intelligence. In W.F. Pinar, (Ed.).Curriculum: Toward new identities（pp.129-142）. New York: Garland
Kohli, W.（1998）. Critical education and embodied subjects：Making the poststructural turn，Education theory,48（4）,511-519 .
Kristeva, P.（1984）. Revolution in poetic language . New York：Columbia University Press .
Lather,P. (1991) . Feminist research in education: Within/against. Geelong: Deakin University Press .
Lather, P. (1995). Post-critical pedagogies：A feminist reading , in McLaren, P.（ed.）Postmodernism , Post-colonialism and Pedagogy（pp.167-186） .Albert Park： James Nicholas Publishers .
Lather,P. (1996) . Troubling Clarity: The Politics of Accessible Language . Harvard Educational Review ,66 (3) , 525-545 .
Lawton, D. (1989). Education, culture and the national curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Lincoln, Y. (1998) . From Understanding to Action: New Imperatives, New Criteria, New Methods for Interpretive Researchers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26 (1 ) , 12-29 .
Longino, H.E.（2002）. The Fate of Knowledge . New Jersey：Princeton University .
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (B. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979 )
Marshall, J.（1996）. Michel Foucault : Personal autonomy and education . Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers .
Marshall, J.（1998）. Michel Foucault：Philosophy，education ，and freedom as an exercise upon the self，In M. Peters（Ed.）,Naming the multiple：Postructuralism and education （pp.65-83）. Westport,Connecticut：Bergin & Garvey .
Marshall , J. D.（1999）. The mode of information and education：Insights on critical theory from Michael Foucault. in Popkewitz & Fendler（eds.）. Critical theories in education ：Changing terrains of knowledge and politics（pp.145-167） . New York & London：Routledge .
Martin,J. R. (1994). Changing the Educational Landscape: Philosophy, women, and curriculum . New York: Routledge .
Martusewicz, R.A.（2001）. Seeking passage：Post-structuralism, pedagogy, ethics . New York: Teachers College Press .
Matheur,A. (2003). What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? In Trueit, D . , Doll, W. , Wang, H. & Pinar, W. (Eds.) . Internationalization of Curriculum Studies: Selected Proceedings from the LSU Conference 2000 (pp.137-177). New York：Peter Lang .
Mayo, C.（2000）. The use of Foucault . Educational theory,50（1）,103-116 .
Miller,J. L.(2005). The Sounds of Silence Breaking: Women, Autobiography, Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang .
Moore, R. & Young,M.F.D.(2001) . Knowledge and the Curriculum in the Sociology of Education: towards a reconceptualisation, British Journal of Sociology of Education,22 (4) ,445-461 .
Morley,D.＆ Chen, K.H..（1996）.Stuart Hall：Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London：Routledge.
Morris,M. (2004). Stumbling inside dis/position: The un(home) of ecucation. In W. M. Reynolds & J. A.Webber (Eds). Expanding Curriculum Theory: Dis/positions and Lines of Flight (pp.83-104). New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morrow, R.A. ＆ Brown , D.D.（1994）. Critical theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks.：Sage .
Mukherji, P.N.（2000 ）.Introduction：Methodology in social research：Dilemmas and perspectives . In P.N . Mukherji（Ed.）, Methodology in social research ：Dilemmas and perspectives : essays in honour of Ramkrishna Mukherjee （pp.13-84）. New Delhi ：Sage Publications .
Mumby , D. & Putnam, L.（1992）. The politics of emotion：A feminist reading of bounded rationality . Academy of Management Review,17, 465-486 .
Newman,S. (2004). Interrogating the master: Lacan and radical politics . Psychoanaysis, Culture & Society, 9 ,298-341 .
Olssen, M. (1999). Michel Foucault: Materialism and Education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
Ong,A. (1995). Women out of China: Traveling Tales and Traveling Theories in Postcolonial Feminism. In R. Behar & D. Gordon （Eds.）, Women Writing Culture(pp.350-372). Berkeley: University of California Press .
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York:
Methuen.
Palermo , J.（2002）. Poststructuralist readings of the pedagogical encounter . New York :Peter Lang .
Peters, M.（1998）. Introduction-Naming the mulitiple：Poststructuralism and education，In M.Peters,（Ed.）,Naming the multiple：Postructuralism and education （pp.1-24）. Westport ,Connecticut：Bergin & Garvey .
Peters, M.（2003）.Derrida, pedagogy and the calculation of the subject . Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35 (3), 313-332 .
Phenix,P. H.(1964). Realms of Meaning: A Philosophy of the Curriculum for General Education. New York: McGraw.
Phillips, D.C. & Burbules, N. C.（2000）. Postpositivism and Educational Research . Oxford：Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Pierre, E , S A. & Pillow, W. S.(2000)（Eds.）. Working the ruins :Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education . New York : Routledge .
Pinar,W.F.（1975）（Ed.）. Curriculum Theorizing：The Reconceptualists . Barkeley , California：McCutchan Publishing Corporation .
Pinar , W.F.（1978）. The reconceptualization of curriculum studies . In D.J. Flinders , & S.J. Thorton （1997）（Eds.）. The curriculum studies reader (pp. 121-129). New York：Routledge .
Pinar,W.F.（1988）（Ed.）.Contemporary curriculum discourses . Scottsdale, AZ：Gorsuch,Scarisbrick .
Pinar,W.F.（1998）（ed.）. Curriculum:toward new identities. New York: Garland Publ.
Pinar,W.F.（1999）（ed.）.Contemporary curriculum discourses:twenty years of JCT. New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar,W.F. (2001) . The gender of racial politics and violence in America: Lynching,. prison rape and the crisis of masculinity. New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar,W. F.(2003). Foreword. In William M. Reynolds, Curriculum: A River Runs Through It (pp.ix-xvii). New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar , W.F.（2004）. What is curriculum theory? . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Pinar, W. F. (2005a). A bridge between Chinese and North American curriculum studies.Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 2 (1). Retrieved January 12,2008,from http: //nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/ index.php/tci
Pinar, W. F.（2005b）.A lingering note-An introduction to the collected works of Ted T.
Aoki. In Pinar, W. F., R. L. Irwin（Eds.）.Curriculum in a new key-The collected works of Ted T. Aoki(pp.1-85). N.J.：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pinar,W.F.（2006）. The Synoptic Text Today and Other Essays: Curriculum Development After the Reconceptualization . New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. & Grumet, M. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Pinar,W.F.& Irwin,R. L. （2005）（Eds.）. Curriculum in a new key: The collected work of Ted. T. Aoki . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Pinar,W.F.& Reynolds,W. M.（1992）（Eds.）.Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text . New York :Teachers College Press .
Pinar, W. , Reynolds , M. , Slattery , P. & Taubman , P.（1995）（Eds.）. Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Pitt,A.J.(1998).Qualifying Resistance: Some Comments on Methodological Dilemmas, International journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,11 (4), 535-553 .
Popkewitz,T.S（1991）. A political sociology of educational reform ：Power / knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research . New York ：Teachers College Press .
Popkewitz,T.S.（1998）. The sociology of knowledge and the sociology of education：Michael Foucault and critical tradition，in Torres ＆ Mitchell（eds.）. Sociology of education-Emerging perspectives（pp.47-89） . Albany , NY：SUNY Press.
Popkewitz,T.S. & Brennan,M.（1998）（Eds.）. Foucault’s challenge： Discourse, knowledge, and power in education . New York：Teachers College Press .
Popkewitz,T.S. & Brennan,M.（1998）. Restructuring of social and political theory in education ： Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices , in Popkewitz & Brennan（eds.） . Foucault’s Challenge：Discourse , knowledge , and power in education （pp.3-35）. New York：Teachers Colledge Press .
Poster,M. (2001) . The Information Subject : Essays . Amsterdam: G & B Arts .
Nash, K.（2000）. Contemporary political sociology：Globalization , politics , and power . Oxford：Balackwell .
Olssen ,M.（1999）. Materialism and Education . Westport： Bergin & Garvey.
Rajan , T.（2002）. Deconstruction and the remainders of phenomenology：Sartre , Derrida , Foucault , Baudrillard . California：Stanford University Press .
Reynolds,W M. (2003). Curriculum: A River Runs Through It . New York :Peter Lang .
Reynolds,W M. (2004). To Touch the Clouds Standing on Top of a Maytag Refrigeration : Brand-Name Postmodernity and a Deleuzian “In-Between” In Reynolds, W. M., J. A. Webber（Eds.）Expanding curriculum theory －Dis/position and lines of flight（pp.19-33）.New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Reynolds,W M. & Webber,J A. (2004) (Eds). Expanding Curriculum Theory: Dis/positions and Lines of Flight. New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reynolds, W. M., J. A. Webber（2004）. Introduction：Curriculum theory－dis/position. In Reynolds, W. M., J. A. Webber（Eds.）Expending curriculum theory－Dis/position and lines of flight（pp.1-18）.New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Richardson, G.（2006）. Singular nation, plural possobilities-Reimagining curriculum as third space. In Kanu, Y. (Ed.) Curriculum as cultural practice: Postcolonial imaginations.（pp.283-301）. Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge & New York : Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau , P. M.（1992）. Post-modernism and the social sciences ： Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press.
Roy,K. ( 2003 ) . Teachers in nomadic spaces : Deleuze and curriculum . New York :Peter Lang .
Sandoval,C.（2000）. Methodology of the oppressed . Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press .
Saussure, F. de.（1960）. A course in general linguistics (W. Baskin trans.). London：Peter Owen .
Scholes,R,（1985）. Textual power. New Haven：Yale University Press .
Schubert ,W.H.（1986）. Curriculum：Perspective, paradigm , possibility . New York：Macmillan .
Schwab, J.J.（1969）. The practical：A language for curriculum , in Flinders , D.J. & Thorton , S.J.（1997）（eds.）. The curriculum studies reader (pp.101-119). New York：Routledge .
Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4 : Something for curriculum professors to do . Curriculum Inquiry, 13 ,239-66 .
Scott, D. (2006) . Six Curriculum Discourse : Contestation and Edification , in Moore,A.(ed.). Schooling , Society and Curriculum (pp.31-42). London & New York：Routledge .
Slattery,P.（1995）. Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era . New York: Garland .
Smith, D. G.（2008）. The farthest west is but the farthest east－The long way of oriental/occidental engagement. In Eppert, C., H. Wang（Eds.）. Cross-cultural studies in curriculum : Eastern thought, educational insights （pp. 1-33） New York: Routledge
Smith, L. T.（1999）. Decolonizing methodologies：Research and indigenous peoples .London & New York：Zed Books Ltd .
Spencer, H. (1911). What knowledge is of most worth? . In Ernest Rhys. (Ed.), Herbert Spencer: Essays on Education (pp.21-96) . London. J. M. Dent & Sons. Ltds. (Original work published 1859 )
Spivak, G. C. (1995) . Can The Subaltern Speak? , in Ashcroft, Bill, Griffiths, Gareth and Tiffin, Helen (eds.) ,The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (pp.4-28). London: Routledge .
Sturrock, J.（1986）. Structuralism . London：Paladin .
Trueit,D.(2002).Speaking of Ghost…Problematic:Decentering the Eye/I .In Doll,W.E. & Gough, N.（2002）（Eds.）. Curriculum visions (pp.267-280) . New York：Peter Lang .
Trueit, D . , Doll, W. , Wang, H. & Pinar, W. (2003 )(Eds.) . Internationalization of Curriculum Studies: Selected Proceedings from the LSU Conference 2000 . New York：Peter Lang .
Tyler, R.（1949）. Basic priciples of curriculum and instruction . Chicago：The University of Chicago Press .
Tyler, R. (1984) . Personal reflections on the practical 4 . Curriculum Inquiry, 14 ,97-102.
Usher, R. and Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education. London: Routledge.
Wang, Hongyu (2004) . The Call from the Stranger on a Journey Home: Curriculum in a Third Space. New York：Peter Lang .
Wang, Hongyu.（2005）. Chinese aesthetics, fractals, and the Tao of curriculum. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, J. S. Julien.（Eds.）. Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation（pp. 299- 314）. New York: Peter Lang.
Wang, Hongyu (2007) . Theory/Practice as Self-self Relationships . Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, (4) 1, 75-80 .
Wang, Hongyu (2008) .The Strength of the Feminine, the Lyrics of the Power of Education. In Eppert,C.& Wang,Hongyu (Eds.) .Cross-Cultural Studies in Curriculum :Eastern Thought, Educational Insights(pp.313-333). New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Webber, J. A.(2004). Beyond God the Unconscious : The Libidinal Politics of Spiritual Youth Movement in Schools. In Reynolds, W. M., J. A. Webber（Eds.）Expanding curriculum theory－Dis/position and lines of flight（pp.65-81）.New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Willis,P.（2000）. The ethnographic imagination . Cambridge, UK.：Polity Press .