:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣原住民地區國民小學校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能關係之研究
作者:洪英雄
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:鄭彩鳳
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:原住民地區校長真誠領導教師幸福感組織健康學校效能Aboriginal AreasPrincipal's Authentic LeadershipTeacher’s Well-beingOrganizational HealthSchool's Efficacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究乃是以全國原住民地區國民小學教師為研究對象,探討校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能知覺之關係,研究目的為瞭解台灣原住民地區國民小學校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能關係的實際情況,並分析不同背景的原住民地區國民小學教師在知覺上述變項間有無顯著的差異情形,進一步則探討變項間關係的關聯情形。
本研究以相關文獻探討建立理論、研究架構,並作為設計研究工具之依據,以調查研究法,針對全國台灣原住民地區820所的國小教師作為施測對象,本調查問卷共寄出820份,回收748份,回收率為91.22% ;扣除填答不全22份,共得有效問卷726份,可用率88.54%。施測工具為「校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能問卷」,有效樣本資料以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析,Pearson積差相關及AMOS結構方程式等加以分析。
本研究獲得以下結論:
一、台灣原住民地區國民小學校長真誠領導之表現屬中上程度,其
中「內在道德觀」之感受最高,而以「客觀訊息處理」為最低
二、台灣原住民地區國小教師幸福感之表現屬中上程度。其中以「身
心健康」之感受最高,而以「生活滿意」為最低
三、台灣原住民地區國小組織健康之表現屬中上程度。其中以「資源
影響」之感受最高,而以「重視學業成就」為最低
四、台灣原住民地區國小學校效能之表現屬中上程度。其中以「行政
服務績效」之感受最高,而以「社區家長支持」為最低
五、男性、51歲以上、科任的教師、原住民籍、中區(苗栗、台中、
南投)之學校教師,在校長真誠領導上普遍有較高的知覺
六、男性、服務15年以上、科任的教師、碩士含40學分班以上、中
區(苗栗、台中、南投)之學校教師,在教師幸福感上普遍有較高
的知覺
七、男性、30歲以下、科任的教師、服務1-5年之學校教師,在組
織健康上普遍有較高的知覺
八、男性、服務1-5年、科任的教師、原住民籍之學校教師,在學校
效能上普遍有較高的知覺
九、台灣原住民地區國小校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學
校效能彼此呈現正相關
十、組織健康是影響學校效能的重要因素
十一、台灣原住民地區國小校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康
與學校效能整體結構關係模式具有良好的適配度
十二、組織健康與教師幸福感在校長真誠領導與學校效能之間具有部
分中介效果
最後根據研究結果提供具體建議,供教育行政機關、國民小學校長與後續相關研究參考。
關鍵字:原住民地區、校長真誠領導、教師正幸福感、組織健康、
學校效能
Abstract
This study was to search for the relationships among the principal’s authentic leadership, teacher’s well-being, organizational health, and school's efficacy perception from the elementary school teachers in Taiwan's aboriginal areas. The purpose of this study was not only to understand the real situations among the principal’s authentic leadership, teacher's well-being, organizational health, and school's efficacy perception in Taiwan's aboriginal areas but also to analyze the differences and mutual influences of various backgrounds. Furthermore, this study was to be in search of the correlations with the variables mentioned above.
On the basis of relevant documents, this study was to set up the theories, the research framework, and the research tool. With the questionnaire of "Principal's Authentic Leadership, Teacher's Well-being, Organizational Health, and School's Efficacy", the study was made in the questionnaire survey with the target of 820 teachers from elementary schools in Taiwan's aboriginal areas. A total of 820 questionnaires were issued with 748 valid questionnaires received. Survey availability was 88.54%. The survey data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and AMOS structural equation.
The major findings were as follows:
1. The result of the elementary school principal's authentic leadership in Taiwan's aboriginal areas was above average. The degree in "the perception of internal morality” was the highest, and “the handling of objective messages” was the lowest.
2. The result of well-being from the elementary school teachers in Taiwan’s aboriginal areas was above average. Of all the factors, the perception of "physical and mental health" had the highest degree, and "life satisfaction" had the lowest.
3. The result from the organizational health of the elementary schools in Taiwan's aboriginal areas was above average. Of all the factors, the “resource impact” had the highest degree, and the “emphasis on academic achievement” had the lowest.
4. The result of the elementary school's efficacy in Taiwan’s aboriginal areas was above average. Of all the factors, “administrative service” had the highest level, and “community parents' support” had the lowest.
5. The male subject teacher, over 51 years of age, aboriginal and teaching in Central Taiwan (Miaoli, Taichung, and Nantou) had higher awareness of the principal's authentic leadership.
6. The male subject teacher with the master's degree ( including the graduate class of 40 credits), teaching in Central Taiwan (Miaoli, Taichung, Nantou) for over 15 years, had higher perception on the well-being of teachers.
7. The male subject teacher, under 30, teaching for 1-5 years, had higher awareness of organizational health.
8. The male indigenous subject teacher, teaching for 1-5 years, had higher perception of school's efficacy.
9. The overall reception among elementary school principal's authentic leadership, teacher's well-being, organizational health, and school's efficacy in Taiwan's aboriginal areas was positively related.
10. Organizational health was an important factor to affect school's efficacy.
11. A good adjustment was suited for the elementary school principal's authentic leadership, the sense of teacher's well-being, organizational health, and the whole structure of school's efficacy in Taiwan's aboriginal areas.
12. Organizational health and teacher's well-being had partial mediating effects on the principal’s authentic leadership and school's efficacy.
Finally, some suggestions were provided for the educational dministration, the elementary school principal, and the references for the subsequent relevant research according to the results of this study.
Keywords: Aboriginal Areas, Principal's Authentic Leadership, Teacher’s
Well-being, Organizational Health, School's Efficacy
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
王孟如(2007)。高級中學學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
王淑女(2011)。國中教師自我復原力、教師效能感與幸福感關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
王建迪(2015)。主管真誠領導輿團隊正向情感氛圍對員工敬業與問題解決態度之影響研究。亞洲大學碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
王琮閔(2009)。真誠領導、工作社會特性與工作結果之關聯性和調節效果分析。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
玉銘聖(2016)。中部地區國民小學校長真誠領導與教師幸福感之研究。國立暨南國際大學碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
江滿堂(2008)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東。
余民寧、許嘉家、陳柏霖(2010)。中小學教師工作時數與憂鬱間的關係-主觀幸福感的觀點。教育心理學報,42(2),229-252。
吳明隆(2008)。多變量分析實務。台北市:五南圖書。
吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務(二版)。台北市:五鳴。
吳和堂(2010) 。教育論文寫作與實用技巧。臺北市:高等教育。
吳明雄(2009)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究。國立台中教育大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,台中。
吳玲瑤(2011)。國民小學校長道德領導與學校組織健康關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。
吳清山(2002)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
吳勁甫(2015)。國小校長正向領導對學校效能影響之研究:教師心理資本的多層次中介效果。教育與心理研究,38(3), 1-36。
呂政達(1995)。還幸福一個本來面目。載於王桂花(主編),中國人的幸福觀-命運與幸福(頁158-167)。臺北市:張老師文化。
呂靜昀(2010)。國民小學校長真誠領導、組織公平與集體教師效能感關係之研究:以桃園縣為例。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
李健慧(2010)。學校組織創新管理、組織文化與學校效能關係之研究-以南投縣國小為例。國立暨南大學終身學習與人力資源發展碩士論文,未出版,南投。
李新民、朱芷萱(2012)。真誠領導的測量與相關後果變項初探。樹德科技大學學報,14 (1), 341-366。
邢占軍(2005)。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究,24,301-323。
林明地等(譯)(2003)。教育行政學:理論、研究與實際。高雄市:麗文。
林衍伸(2009)。屏東縣國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,未出版,屏東縣。
邱惠娟、童心怡(2010)。教師幸福感內涵之探究。學校行政雙月刊,67,168-180。
施建彬、陸洛(譯)(1997)。幸福心理學。臺北市:巨流圖書。
施翔云(2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導、學校組織文化與學校效能之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
柯嚴賀(2007)。國民小學團體動力、組織價值、組織創新與學校效能關係之研究-以高雄市為例。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
洪瑞斌、李志鴻、劉兆明、周志明(2006)。從組織文化角度探究「健康組織」之意涵。第五屆工商心理學學術與實務研討會論文集,119-142,台北市。
洪蘭(譯)(2012b)。邁向圓滿:掌握幸福的科學方法&練習計畫(Seligman, M. E. P.著)。臺北市:遠流出版。
范慶鐘(2010)。國民小學校長多元架構領導、學校組織健康、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
徐宗盛(2010)。校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,未出版,臺北市。
秦夢群、吳勁甫(2006)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育研究集刊,52(3),141-172。
秦夢群、吳勁甫、鄧鈞文(2007)。國民中學學校組織健康層面之建構與衡量。教育357政策論壇,10(3),75-102。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。台北市:五南。
郝靜宜(2008)。國立高中職校長轉型領導、學校組織變革與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
康馨尹(2010)。桃園縣國民小學教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論輿實踐。台北市:東華。
張家婕(2012)。幼兒園教師幸福感與教學效能之關係—以新竹市為例。東海大學碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
張菁媛(2009)。屏東縣國小校長授能行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
張嘉原(2008)。國民小學學校組織健康、組織學習與教師效能感關係之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
張慶勳(2000)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。高雄市:復文。
張慶勳(2010)。教育學研究方法的哲思與知能。教育研究月刊,200, 36-45。
張慶勳(1996)。學校組織行為。臺北市:五南。
陳幸仁(1997)。追求卓越提昇品質-學校效能因素之淺析。國教之友,49(2),39-42。
陳宣妏(2007)。臺北縣市國民中學學校組織健康與教師組織信任關係之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。結構方程模型分析實務AMOS的運用。台北:五南。
馮丰儀、楊宜婷(2012)。校長真誠領導實踐之探究。學校行政(80), 17-32。
黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式一理論與應用(四版)。台北市:五南。
陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。
傅如瑛(2009)。桃園縣國民小學組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
曾介妤(2011)。國民中學學校組織健康、教師專業承諾與資源班教師自我效能關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士學位論文,未出版,臺中市。
黃怡雯(2005)。客籍國中小校長的領導風格、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
劉宜政(2008)。屏東縣國民小學校長多元架構領導策略與學校組織效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
劉敏雯 (2008)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師專業發展動機與學校組織健康關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊,43,77-97。
蔡文杰(2007)。國民小學校長領導行為、組織特性發展與學校效能展現關係之研究-以有機化組織觀點為例。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
蔡政良(2008)。學校組織健康與教師專業發展評鑑變革關注關係之研究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。
蔡培村、武文瑛(2013)。領導學:理論與實務。高雄市:麗文。
蔡進雄(2000)。轉型領導輿學校效能。台北市:師大書苑。
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
鄭彩鳯(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
鄭彩鳳(2007)。校長競值領導效能研究:理論、指標與衡量。台北市:高等教育。
鄭新輝(2010)。卓越校長領導的政治智慧與策略:紛擾時代應備能力。教育研究月刊,194, 10-23。
鄭晶文(2008)。國中學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之探究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中。
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。臺北市:心理。
謝傳崇(2016)。國民小學校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究。臺灣教育發展論,11 (3),49-66。
謝季宏(2005)。高級統計學(未出版的講義)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
盧彥賓(2005)。台南縣國民小學學校效能之研究。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士,未出版,台南。
顏童文(2007)。國民小學組織動態能耐、組織健康氣候與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系行政組博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
魏美惠(2011)。幼兒教師幸福感研究。教育科學期刊,10(2),173-194。
鐘秀雪(2008)。校長道德領導與教師專業倫理之相關研究--以臺中縣國小為例。東海大學教育研究所,未出版,臺中市。

壹、英文文獻
Adam, N. (2002). School health and its relation to teacher commitment.Planning andChanging, 33(1-2), 106-126.
Albuquerque, I., de Lima, M. P., Figueiredo, C., & Matos, M. (2012). Subjective well-being structure: Confirmatory factor analysis in a teachers' Portuguese sample. SocialIndicators Research. 105(3), 569-580. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9789-6
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error onconvergence, improper solutions and goodness_Of-At indices for maximumlikelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
Argyle, M. (1987).The psychology of happiness. London, England: Routledge.
Argyle, M. (2001).Thepsychology of happiness(2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Avolio, B., & Gardner, W. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive form of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journalof the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Berrocoso, J. V., Sanchez, M. R. F., & Dominguez, F. I. R. (2013).Best educational practices with ICT and subjective well-being in innovative teachers.Educación XX1, 16(1), 255-279. DOI 10.5944/educxx1.16.1.726
Boston. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizationalhealth of schools.The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). FinewⅢcremental fit index for general structural equation models.Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
Buss, D. M. (2000). The evolution of happiness.American Psychologist, 55(1), 15-23.
Brent, J. G., & Brett,L. W. (2015).Development of psychological capital in an academic-based leadership education program.Journal of Management Development, 34(7), 773-786. DOI 10.1108/JMD-2013-07-0100
Cornelisz, I. (2013). Relative private school effectiveness in the Netherlands: A reexamination of PISA 2006 and 2009 data.Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 192-201.
Camerson, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of highereducation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604-634.
Carruthers, C., & Hood, C. (2004). The power of the positive: Leisure & well-being.Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 38(2), 225-245.
Cenkseven-Onder, F., & Sari, M. (2009).The quality of school life and burnout as predictors of subjective well-being among teachers.Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 9(3), 1223-1235. WOS: 000270239900006
Chan,A.(2005).Measureand development: Challenges andsuggestions.Authentic leadership.In W. L. Gardner, B. J. Avolio, & F. O. Walumbwa (Eds).
Chan, D. W. (2009a). The hierarchy of strengths: Their relationships with subjectivewell-being among Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education,25(6), 867-875. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.010
Chan, D. W. (2009b). Orientations to happiness and subjective well-being among Chinese prospective and in-service teachers in Hong Kong.Educational Psychology, 29(2), 139-151. DOI: 10.1080/01443410802570907
Chan, D. W. (2013). Subjective well-being of Hong Kong Chinese teachers: The contribution of gratitude, forgiveness, and the orientations to happiness. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 32, 22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.12.005
Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school based management: A mechanism fordevelopment . Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Childers, J. H. (1983). Organizational health: How to measure a school’s level of health and take remedial action. Journal of Educational Public Relations, 8(2), 4-7.
Coleman, P.,& Collinge, J. (1991). In the web: Internal and external influence affecting school improvement. School Effective and School Improvement, 2(4), 262-285.
Cooper, C. D., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward butlearning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authenticleadership theory and authentic leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 475-493.
Creemers, B. P. M.,& Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice,17(3), 347-366.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom.London : Cassell.
Devin, H. F., Ghahramanlou, F., Fooladian, A., & Zohoorian, Z. (2012).The relationship between locus of control (internal-external) and happiness in pre-elementary teachers in Iran.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4169-4173. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.220
Deeboonmee, W., &Ariratana, W. (2014). Relationship between Strategic Leadership and School Effectiveness.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 982-985.
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., Liu, J., & Li, L. (2010).Pursuit of whose happiness?Executive leaders' transformational behaviors and personal values.Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 222-254. WOS: 000280817900002
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). "Canyou see the real me?" A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development.The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lastingvalue. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Grift, W. J. C. & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006).Underperformance in primary school.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 255-273.
Goertzen, B. J., & Whitaker, B. L. (2015).Development of psychological capital in an academic-based leadership education program. Journal of Management DeveloPment, 34(7), 773-786.
Habibzadeh, S., & Allahvirdiyani, K. (2011).Effects of economic and non economic factors on happiness on primary school teachers and Urmia University professors.ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2050-2051. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.397
Hallinger, P., & Kantamra, P. (2000). Educational change in Thailand: Opening a window 371 onto leadership as a cultural process. School leadership & Management,20(2), 189-205.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In: Snyder, C.R. & Lopez, S.J., (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 382-394).New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Herrera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives fromprincipals and teachers(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).WesternMichigan University.Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Hoy, W. K. & Hannum, J. W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly,33(3), 290-311.
Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. J. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoy, W. K., & Feldman, J. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 30-38.
Hoy, W. K., & Ferguson, J. (1989). A theoretical framework and exploration oforganizational effectiveness of schools.In J. L. Burdin (Ed.), School Leadership (pp. 259-274).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hoy, W. K., & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1990). Organizational climate, school health,and studentachievement: A comparative analysis.Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools.The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 3)55-372.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools:Measuringorganizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Huxhold, O., Fiori, K. L., & Windsor, T. D. (2013). The dynamic interplay of social network characteristics, subjective well-being, and health: The costs and benefits ofsocio-emotional selectivity. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 3-16. DOI: 10.1037/a0030170
Ilies, R. Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
Kalshoven, K., & Boon, C. T. (2012).Ethical leadership, employee well-being, and helping the moderating role of human resource management.Journal of Personnel Psychology,11(1), 60-68. DOI: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000056
Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003).The measurement and utility of adultsubjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyder(Eds.), Positive psychologicalassessment: A handbook of models and measures(pp. 411-425). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NewYork: Guilford Press.
Koo, M., & Oishi, S. (2009).False memory and the associative network of happiness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(2), 212-220. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208327191
Litwin, H., & Shiovitz-Ezra, S. (2011). Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans.Gerontologist. 51(3), 379-388. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnq094 162London: Elsevier.
Liu, J. Y., Siu, O. L., & Shi, K. (2010). Transformational leadership and employeewell-being: The mediating role of trust in the leader and self-efficacy.AppliedPsychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale,59(3), 454-479.
Lovell, C. W. (2009).Principal efficacy: An investigation of school principals' sense of efficacy and indicators of school effectiveness(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.
Lu, L. (1999). Personal or environmental causes of happiness: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Social Psychology, 139(1), 79-90. WOS: 000078645300007
Lu, L., Shih, J. B., Lin, Y. Y., & Ju, L. S. (1997). Personal and environmental correlates ofhappiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(3), 453-462.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmentapproach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. (Eds.), Positive organizationalscholarship (pp. 241- 261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
Martin V. M. (2009). The role of Early College High School in P-16 success: A case study of students' perceptions of mission Early College High School effectiveness(Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.
May, D. R. Chan, A. L., Hodges, T. D. Avolio, B. J. (2003).Developing the moralcomponent of authentic leadership.Organizational Dynamics,32(3), 247-260.
Mcvey, D. (2009).Parsonian influence and the effect of school climate and bureaucracy on the perceived effectiveness in schools(Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of John's (New York), School of Education and Human Services, N. J.
Mehmet K. (2006). The relationship between organizational health and robust school visionin elementary schools.Educational Research Quarterly, 30(1), 14-36.
Mehmet K. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organizational health.EducationaResearchQuarterly, 30(3), 22-54.
Miles, M. B. (1969). Planned change and organizational health: Figure and ground.In F. D.Carver and T. J. Sergiovanni (Ed.), Organizations and Human Behavior(pp.375-391).New York: McGraw-Hill.
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Mesa, R. R. (1985). School effectiveness: Checking process andassumption and developing a role for state and federal government. Teachers CollegeRecord, 86(4), 606-641.
Northouse, P. G. (2013).Leadershp: Theory and Practice, (6th ed). Sage Publications, lnc.
Omolade, R. A. (2007). A systems test of effectiveness of elementary schools in Nigeria(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of John's (New York), School ofEducation and Human Services, N. J.
Parker, P. D., & Martin, A. J. (2009). Coping and buoyancy in the workplace: Understanding their effects on teachers' work-related well-being and engagement. Teaching and TeacherEducation, 25(1), 68-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.009
Parsons, T. (1967).Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In A.W.Gakoub(Ed.), Administrative theory in education(pp.40-72). New York: Macmillian.
Peus,C.,Wesche,J.,Streicher,B.,Braun,S.,&Frey,D.(2012).Authentic leadership:An empirical test of its antecedents,consequences,and mediating mechanisms.Journal of Business ethics,107(3), 331-348.
Robert T. Y. (2005). Relationship between teachers’ teaching effectiveness and school effectiveness in comprehensive high schools in Taiwan, Republic of China.A PaperPresented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and ImprovementConference, (March, 21). Barcelona, Spain.
Rogers, O. H. (1994). Perceived transformational leadership of elementary principals ineffective school. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2820-2834.
Rowan, B. (1985).The assessment of school effectiveness.In Reginal, M. J.(Ed.),Researching for excellence an effective schools sourcebook(pp.99-116). Washington:U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & e Cuohq M. P. (2012).Authentic leadershippromoting employees, psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437.
Setwong, R., &Prasertcharoensuk, T.(2013).The influence of instructional leadershipofschool administrators on school effectiveness.Procedia-Social and BehavioralSciences, 106, 2859-2865.
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of processindicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1),72-80.
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What's your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395-417.
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self.The LeadershipQuarterly, 16(3), 419-439
Stoll, L.& Fink, D. (1993).Effecting school change, The Halton approach. SchoolEffectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19-41.
Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes:Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 36(5), 703-729.
Tsui, T. K. & Cheng, Y. C. (1999).School organizational health and teacher commitment: Acontingency study with muti-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3),249-268.
Tatlah, I.A.,&Iqbal,M.Z.(2012).Leadership styles and school effectiveness: empiricalevidence from secondary level.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,69,790-797.
Veenhoven, R. (1994). Is happiness a trait? Test of the theory that a better society does not makepeople any happier. Social Indicators Research, 32, 101-160.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008).Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly,21(5), 901-914.
Williams, B. W. (2010). Organizational health and mindfulness as predictors of schooleffectiveness: Using the Balanced Scorecard. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Alabama.
Wood, G. M. (2007). Authentic leadership: Do we really need another leadership theory?(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE